Christianity is not based upon historical documentation. Christianity is
not a religion as you like to define religion. The foundation of
Christianity is a relationship with a living God.

The very foundation of Christian and Hebrew religions is the Bibles. They
totally base their faith on the Bibles.

Christianity is not based upon historical documentation.

Christianity is
not a religion as you like to define religion. The foundation of
Christianity is a relationship with a living God. A God who communed
with living men in the past. These, those God communed with, left
historical evidence of their existence, they provided nothing to give
evidence of God's existence. To do so would be as absurd as saying, "I
think therefore you exist." The historical documentation which they left
provides confirmation of a common experience for those with whom God,
through Christ, communes today.
There is a difference between the living and the dead. The living have
the ability to respond to what they hear, see, smell, taste and
tactually sense. The dead are so named because they can neither sense
nor respond. A man who cannot commune with God is like a dead man.

Christianity is not based upon historical documentation. Christianity is
not a religion as you like to define religion.

The foundation of
Christianity is a relationship with a living God.

A God who communed
with living men in the past.

These, those God communed with, left

historical evidence of their existence, they provided nothing to give
evidence of God's existence.

To do so would be as absurd as saying, "I
think therefore you exist." The historical documentation which they left

provides confirmation of a common experience for those with whom God,
through Christ, communes today.

There is a difference between the living and the dead. The living have
the ability to respond to what they hear, see, smell, taste and
tactually sense. The dead are so named because they can neither sense
nor respond.

A man who cannot commune with God is like a dead man.

Bill M wrote:

"Codebreaker" <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:e222ca0f-b4cb-4962-9641-b4e1a6149461@g30g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

But the Gospel belongs to nobody. It is the divine message
from God to mankind through Christ.

\

The very foundation of Christian and Hebrew religions is the Bibles. They
totally base their faith on the Bibles.

The Bibles are nothing more than books of myths, fables, contradictions,
human and animal sacrifices, genocide, slaveholding, misogyny, destruction,
barbarisms, and impossible tales. They are not accurate history and
certainly are not the words of any god unless he is an insane and totally
untrustworthy monster. They are not even good fiction.

The average person today does not appreciate the difficulty and unlikelihood

of producing accurate transmissions of the original Bibles. Firstly there
are NO ORIGINALS in existence. They are all copies of copies of unknown
accuracy.

One of the problems with the accuracy of the Bibles is that when they were
first copied, no marks of punctuation were used, no distinction was made
between lower case and upper case letters and more bizarre to modern script,
no spaces were used to separate words.

This kind of continuous writing was called "scriptuo continua".

'godisnowhere' could mean 'god is now here' or quit the opposite, 'god is no
where' depending on the spacing which was not used at the time. This left
accurate interpretation very unlikely if not impossible.

Add to this the natural occurrence of errors of transmission and the
intentional modification to suite the transcribers wishes and beliefs and
you have documents of highly questionable meaning and very atrocious
accuracy.

Further compounding the problem was the size and accuracy of the
vocabularies were much more limited than today. And they were written before
the modern dictionaries so there was room for much conflict between the
meaning of words.

The Bibles are a foundation of quicksand. There are NO ORIGINALS in
existence. Why would not any 'real' God protect the originals??? What are
available are altered copies of copies by unknown men of questionable
veracity. The books of the Bibles were written over 1,000 years before the
invention of the printing press. Even the so called originals were
supposedly written by 50 or more different authors of unknown veracity. They
are biased by, and dependent on the writings and opinions of the clergy. And
the status and survival of the clergy is totally dependent on their follower's
belief in their Bible stories. There are 18 different English versions alone
and there is no way of knowing how far they have wondered from the
originals.

And there is no evidence that even the originals are anything more than
inaccurate fiction.

Basing ones life and faith on these documents is basing ones life on trash.
It is the equivalent of depending on the good luck of a rabbit's foot.

Christianity is not based upon historical documentation. Christianity is
not a religion as you like to define religion. The foundation of

Christianity is a relationship with a living God. A God who communed
with living men in the past. These, those God communed with, left
historical evidence of their existence, they provided nothing to give
evidence of God's existence. To do so would be as absurd as saying, "I
think therefore you exist." The historical documentation which they left
provides confirmation of a common experience for those with whom God,
through Christ, communes today.

There is a difference between the living and the dead. The living have
the ability to respond to what they hear, see, smell, taste and
tactually sense. The dead are so named because they can neither sense
nor respond. A man who cannot commune with God is like a dead man.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Christianity is not based upon historical documentation. Christianity
is
not a religion as you like to define religion. The foundation of
Christianity is a relationship with a living God. A God who communed
with living men in the past. These, those God communed with, left
historical evidence of their existence, they provided nothing to give
evidence of God's existence. To do so would be as absurd as saying, "I
think therefore you exist." The historical documentation which they
left provides confirmation of a common experience for those with whom
God, through Christ, communes today.

There is a difference between the living and the dead. The living have
the ability to respond to what they hear, see, smell, taste and
tactually sense. The dead are so named because they can neither sense
nor respond. A man who cannot commune with God is like a dead man.