| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Bitchin Bonney" |
| Date: |
23 Apr 2006 11:44:50 PM |
| Object: |
The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right — that of "expressive association" — which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won — in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not
to lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a
quasi-custodial role over young people, it has to take into account
the views and concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift
in public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their
non-discrimination statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or
apply pressure on the group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open
to other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
.
|
|
| User: "2face" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 AM |
|
|
"Bitchin' Bonney" <bibon@râlant.org> wrote in message
news:pflo42tiv0u9bqb1ef0qtmggmegeu7kau8@4ax.com...
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right - that of "expressive association" - which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won - in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not
to lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a
quasi-custodial role over young people, it has to take into account
the views and concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift
in public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their
non-discrimination statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or
apply pressure on the group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open
to other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
****************************************************************************
*******
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout?
In the meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or
how to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****?
Gays just don't want to accept the fact that normal people don't trust them
pervs with their kids. I don't, and I don't have to neither.
Kids don't need the Gay agenda in their face.
If you wanna be Gay, then hang out with like-minded people, and quit waving
your flags.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 10:43:15 AM |
|
|
"2face" <2face@batman.com> writes:
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout?
In the meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or
how to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****?
What the issue was about was the exlusion of boys who happen to be gay
and who are at an age where boys like to learn how to make a fire out
of two sticks (being rejected for reasons they can't understand is
kind of hard on these kids), and the exclusion of gay adults such as
as parents who might want to help supervise their children.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 11:09:30 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 -0500, "2face" <2face@batman.com> wrote
in message <20c94$444ce33d$4088ca67$15813@EVERESTKC.NET>
"Bitchin' Bonney" <bibon@râlant.org> wrote in message
news:pflo42tiv0u9bqb1ef0qtmggmegeu7kau8@4ax.com...
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right - that of "expressive association" - which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won - in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not
to lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a
quasi-custodial role over young people, it has to take into account
the views and concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift
in public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their
non-discrimination statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or
apply pressure on the group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open
to other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
****************************************************************************
*******
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout?
In the meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or
how to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****?
Gays just don't want to accept the fact that normal people don't trust them
pervs with their kids. I don't, and I don't have to neither.
Kids don't need the Gay agenda in their face.
If you wanna be Gay, then hang out with like-minded people, and quit waving
your flags.
Yeah. Next thing you know the damn niggers will want in too!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 02:26:32 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:09:30 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 -0500, "2face" <2face@batman.com> wrote
in message <20c94$444ce33d$4088ca67$15813@EVERESTKC.NET>
"Bitchin' Bonney" <bibon@râlant.org> wrote in message
news:pflo42tiv0u9bqb1ef0qtmggmegeu7kau8@4ax.com...
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right - that of "expressive association" - which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won - in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not
to lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a
quasi-custodial role over young people, it has to take into account
the views and concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift
in public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their
non-discrimination statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or
apply pressure on the group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open
to other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
****************************************************************************
*******
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
Yeah. Next thing you know the damn niggers will want in too!
They already are except for homosexual blacks. Does that ***** you off
no body?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 04:10:20 PM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, Boy Toy in episode
<81up42p978t48uasthm0ipslrvc4s2cgk1@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 -0500, "2face" <2face@batman.com> wrote in
message <20c94$444ce33d$4088ca67$15813@EVERESTKC.NET>
"Bitchin' Bonney" <bibon@râlant.org> wrote in message
news:pflo42tiv0u9bqb1ef0qtmggmegeu7kau8@4ax.com...
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right - that of "expressive association" - which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won - in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not to
lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a quasi-custodial
role over young people, it has to take into account the views and
concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to take
that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift in
public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their non-discrimination
statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or apply pressure on the
group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open to
other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
****************************************************************************
*******
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout? In the
meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or how
to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****? Gays just don't
want to accept the fact that normal people don't trust them pervs with
their kids. I don't, and I don't have to neither. Kids don't need the Gay
agenda in their face.
If you wanna be Gay, then hang out with like-minded people, and quit
waving your flags.
Yeah. Next thing you know the damn niggers will want in too!
Not to mention the Joos and the Spiks and the...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 09:44:20 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> posting the following on Mon, 24 Apr 2006
16:10:20 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Previously, on alt.atheism, Boy Toy in episode
<81up42p978t48uasthm0ipslrvc4s2cgk1@4ax.com>...
Yeah. Next thing you know the damn niggers will want in too!
Not to mention the Joos and the Spiks and the...
Don't forget us bloody Micks! We're a Jeen-U-Ine Threat to America!
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "leo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 12:12:40 PM |
|
|
Yeah. Next time Xians would be protesting of niggers camping with
white boys. There could be many reasons involved. They would learn a
lot of foul language.
Leopoldo
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 10:09:30 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 -0500, "2face" <2face@batman.com> wrote:
"Bitchin' Bonney" <bibon@râlant.org> wrote in message
news:pflo42tiv0u9bqb1ef0qtmggmegeu7kau8@4ax.com...
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts of
America's right to exclude gays, but in so doing it strengthened a
right - that of "expressive association" - which benefits us all. And
gays are well situated to win the forthcoming Scouts battle where it
should be won - in the court of public opinion, rather than the courts
of law. What positive actions can gays take?
(...)
The Boy Scouts, after all, has a strong organizational incentive not
to lead social change on the issue. So long as it has a
quasi-custodial role over young people, it has to take into account
the views and concerns of parents.
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
We can encourage gay scouts and former scouts to come out and put a
wholesome public face on gays in scouting in order to hasten a shift
in public opinion.
Gay adults, especially former Boy Scouts, could help form scout-like
boys clubs to give young gays-and any other interested youths-some of
the same experiences the Boy Scouts offers exclusively by and for
heterosexuals. The troops could explore affiliating with the Canadian
Scouts, which now accepts gays.
We can begin a concentrated effort to persuade United Way campaigns to
exclude local Boy Scout troops as funding recipients.
We can lobby corporations that include gays in their
non-discrimination statements to stop supporting the Boy Scouts or
apply pressure on the group to change its policy.
We can try to persuade churches that sponsor Boy Scout troops to
protest the exclusion of gays and re-evaluate whether to continue
sponsoring troops. Gay-supportive troops could march in the gay Pride
parades.
We can sue to prevent governmental entities (cities, park districts,
schools, police and fire departments) from sponsoring or subsiding Boy
Scout troops or permitting the use of government facilities not open
to other religious groups.
Change will come when the Boy Scouts sees it as necessary.
****************************************************************************
*******
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
In that case I have good news for you. There is no such thing.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout?
I agree. It shouldn't make any difference.
In the meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or
how to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****?
Yes, as everyone knows, heterosexuals never ever talk about sex and
never ever use dildos or any other kind of erotic toy.
Gays just don't want to accept the fact that normal people don't trust them
pervs with their kids.
I wouldn't trust my children with perverts either. What does that
have to do with homosexuals?
I don't, and I don't have to neither.
Kids don't need the Gay agenda in their face.
Are you still obsessed with that fantasy?
If you wanna be Gay, then hang out with like-minded people, and quit waving
your flags.
People who like to play football hang out with others that like the
game. Some of those people are gay. Being gay or straight does not
define everything about a person. I am not really interested in
another guy's private sex life. Why are you worried about it?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 09:40:11 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "2face" <2face@batman.com>
posting the following on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:39:29 -0500 iin
alt.atheism?
God I am so sick of the Gay agenda.
What the HELL does being Gay have to do with being a BoyScout?
In the meetings do they talk about how to make a fire out of two sticks, or
how to take a stick of wood and carve it down into a *****?
Gays just don't want to accept the fact that normal people don't trust them
pervs with their kids. I don't, and I don't have to neither.
Kids don't need the Gay agenda in their face.
If you wanna be Gay, then hang out with like-minded people, and quit waving
your flags.
My Great-Grandfather heard the same rant in the 1870s, but replace the
word "gay" with "Irish."
Bigotry never changes.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 12:49:39 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 01:00:30 AM |
|
|
Funny, how the BSA like(d) to use the "private organization" argument,
then turn around and collect federal and state money. If you're going
to discriminate and be a private organization, then do it, but don't
complain about your right of association and then complain when the
government stops funding and people use their right of association to
stop makiing contributions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 10:06:43 AM |
|
|
Previously, on alt.atheism, sjmcarter in episode
<1145858430.670026.40450@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...
Funny, how the BSA like(d) to use the "private organization" argument,
then turn around and collect federal and state money. If you're going to
discriminate and be a private organization, then do it, but don't complain
about your right of association and then complain when the government
stops funding and people use their right of association to stop makiing
contributions.
Yeah, funny how they're a public organization when it comes to sucking
down tax dollars but a private organization when tax payers expect to have
some say in how they use those dollars...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"Corps chief admits to 'design failure'"
(Took them long enough)
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J3EF62DEC
"As hip as it is for outsiders to blame New Orleans
for everything bad that happened during and after
Hurricane Katrina, the truth is that the people
who lived here were much more prepared for a big
storm than the federal government that promised
us flood protection."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?V180525DC
"Everything New Orleans"
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 12:55:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote in message <124opnjoht0blcb@corp.supernews.com>
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
It's funny that non-discrimination against homosexual members has not
destroyed the Girl Scouts or the Boy Scouts in other countries
(including Britain, where scouting was founded.) America, the land of
the free! Protector of liberty and freedom! lol. What a joke.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 02:30:14 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:29 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote in message <124opnjoht0blcb@corp.supernews.com>
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
It's funny that non-discrimination against homosexual members has not
destroyed the Girl Scouts or the Boy Scouts in other countries
(including Britain, where scouting was founded.) America, the land of
the free! Protector of liberty and freedom! lol. What a joke.
Do you have a passport, lamb chops? Or you could always sneak across
the border. Don't let the crowd cheering your departure discourage
you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 10:09:29 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:30:14 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:29 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote in message <124opnjoht0blcb@corp.supernews.com>
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
It's funny that non-discrimination against homosexual members has not
destroyed the Girl Scouts or the Boy Scouts in other countries
(including Britain, where scouting was founded.) America, the land of
the free! Protector of liberty and freedom! lol. What a joke.
Do you have a passport, lamb chops? Or you could always sneak across
the border. Don't let the crowd cheering your departure discourage
you.
Couldn't respond to the point being made?
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 01:40:56 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:09:29 +0200, thomas p
<tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
<08t6521lrftqhfh9fn5us0ivt5smil2k5l@4ax.com>
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:30:14 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:29 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote in message <124opnjoht0blcb@corp.supernews.com>
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
It's funny that non-discrimination against homosexual members has not
destroyed the Girl Scouts or the Boy Scouts in other countries
(including Britain, where scouting was founded.) America, the land of
the free! Protector of liberty and freedom! lol. What a joke.
Do you have a passport, lamb chops? Or you could always sneak across
the border. Don't let the crowd cheering your departure discourage
you.
Couldn't respond to the point being made?
What else is new? Besides, as a Canuck, I don't have to move anywhere
to enjoy my equal rights.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 04:37:56 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 12:40:56 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:09:29 +0200, thomas p
<tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
<08t6521lrftqhfh9fn5us0ivt5smil2k5l@4ax.com>
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:30:14 GMT, Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:55:29 -0600, Boy Toy <BoyToy@Toyz4Boyz.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote in message <124opnjoht0blcb@corp.supernews.com>
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
It's funny that non-discrimination against homosexual members has not
destroyed the Girl Scouts or the Boy Scouts in other countries
(including Britain, where scouting was founded.) America, the land of
the free! Protector of liberty and freedom! lol. What a joke.
Do you have a passport, lamb chops? Or you could always sneak across
the border. Don't let the crowd cheering your departure discourage
you.
Couldn't respond to the point being made?
What else is new? Besides, as a Canuck, I don't have to move anywhere
to enjoy my equal rights.
Unless you criticize homosuxuals -- then they'll throw your ***** in
jail.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 09:37:17 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
__
‘The wicked freely strut about when what is vile is honored among
men.’”
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 11:41:21 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership.
Really? Every single fucking one?!
Oh, wait. You're just making ***** up.
The Girl Scouts haven't lost membership over the last
few years. The BSA has lost 25%. That a HUGE decline.
Most of the losses are in Cub Scouts, which is where
most of their membership starts, so it's even worse
for the future.
The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
They don't have such a policy. They exclude atheists and gays.
Moral people are leaving the BSA, because the BSA is immoral.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bitchin Bonney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 02:31:03 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:41:21 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership.
Really? Every single fucking one?!
Oh, wait. You're just making ***** up.
The Girl Scouts haven't lost membership over the last
few years. The BSA has lost 25%. That a HUGE decline.
Most of the losses are in Cub Scouts, which is where
most of their membership starts, so it's even worse
for the future.
Oh, wait. You're just making ***** up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 03:43:05 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:41:21 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership.
Really? Every single fucking one?!
Oh, wait. You're just making ***** up.
The Girl Scouts haven't lost membership over the last
few years. The BSA has lost 25%. That a HUGE decline.
Most of the losses are in Cub Scouts, which is where
most of their membership starts, so it's even worse
for the future.
Oh, wait. You're just making ***** up.
No, you're the one doing that.
http://www.bsa-discrimination.org/html/bsa_membership.html
http://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/facts/pdf/2003annual_report.pdf
http://www.girlscouts.org/who_we_are/facts/pdf/2004annual_report.pdf
Now, I'm still waiting for your evidence that "all voluntary
organizations have lost membership". As I'm sure there are
tens of thousands of voluntary organizations, you have a lot
of work ahead of you. Unless you want to admit you're a lying
wanker now, which everyone knows already.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fact Attack" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 03:01:07 PM |
|
|
I would like a gay scout leader to rape the kids of these fuckin
assholes that drive so obnoxiously, everywhere you go, these spoiled
militant driver brats. I hope gas goes to 20 dollars a gallon.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fact Attack" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 03:02:59 PM |
|
|
and considering they are risking causing death or serious injury to the
people they attack with their cars, it's hardly extreme to say that, a
little rubbing on their kids is hardly as damaging as running over
someone.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
25 Apr 2006 05:38:46 AM |
|
|
In article <gfop42hqv3n9ndttrrs66t99bvavutl90g@4ax.com>, Bitchin' Bonney
<bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
• Indeed, Merlyn. Allowing homosexual men into the BSA is like allowing
coyotes into one's chicken coop.
--
•R.L.Measures, 805-386-3734
.
|
|
|
| User: "Brian Westley" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
25 Apr 2006 09:01:31 AM |
|
|
(Richard Measures) writes:
In article <gfop42hqv3n9ndttrrs66t99bvavutl90g@4ax.com>, Bitchin' Bonney
<bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
Indeed, Merlyn. Allowing homosexual men into the BSA is like allowing
coyotes into one's chicken coop.
Or like allowing men to be leaders in Girl Scouts.
Oh wait, the Girl Scouts DO allow men to be leaders.
So, it's like allowing gays to be elementary schoolteachers.
Oh wait, they already CAN be elementary schoolteachers.
So, it's like having a BSA policy that only excludes KNOWN gays,
but allows gays who don't reveal themselves to be gay.
Oh wait, that's the BSA policy NOW.
---
Merlyn LeRoy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
25 Apr 2006 02:20:46 PM |
|
|
Brian Westley wrote:
r@somis.org (Richard Measures) writes:
In article <gfop42hqv3n9ndttrrs66t99bvavutl90g@4ax.com>, Bitchin' Bonney
<bibon@r=E2lant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@r=E2lant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
**********************************************************************=
*************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the B=
oy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
Indeed, Merlyn. Allowing homosexual men into the BSA is like allowing
coyotes into one's chicken coop.
Or like allowing men to be leaders in Girl Scouts.
Oh wait, the Girl Scouts DO allow men to be leaders.
So, it's like allowing gays to be elementary schoolteachers.
Oh wait, they already CAN be elementary schoolteachers.
So, it's like having a BSA policy that only excludes KNOWN gays,
but allows gays who don't reveal themselves to be gay.
Oh wait, that's the BSA policy NOW.
The same principle of individual freedom that makes it legal to be
homosexual, also makes it legal to choose to not associate with
homosexual people. You are free to wear a dress, and I'm free to
believe that dress-wearing men make poor role models for young
children.
The BSA should pass on any government sponsored subsidization, and
maintain their core values. As long as they don't take tax dollars,
they should be free to exclude anyone that they don't want in their
private club.
I have to wonder if there are any homosexual oriented organizations
that receive tax funding that are not also exclusionary in their
choices of membership. Certainly nothing as well known as the BSA, but
I'd be surprised if there wasn't an example of one such organization.
Think I will do a little googling on that subject.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 10:09:28 AM |
|
|
On 25 Apr 2006 12:20:46 -0700, wrote:
Brian Westley wrote:
r@somis.org (Richard Measures) writes:
In article <gfop42hqv3n9ndttrrs66t99bvavutl90g@4ax.com>, Bitchin' Bonney
<bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
Indeed, Merlyn. Allowing homosexual men into the BSA is like allowing
coyotes into one's chicken coop.
Or like allowing men to be leaders in Girl Scouts.
Oh wait, the Girl Scouts DO allow men to be leaders.
So, it's like allowing gays to be elementary schoolteachers.
Oh wait, they already CAN be elementary schoolteachers.
So, it's like having a BSA policy that only excludes KNOWN gays,
but allows gays who don't reveal themselves to be gay.
Oh wait, that's the BSA policy NOW.
The same principle of individual freedom that makes it legal to be
homosexual, also makes it legal to choose to not associate with
homosexual people. You are free to wear a dress, and I'm free to
believe that dress-wearing men make poor role models for young
children.
The BSA should pass on any government sponsored subsidization, and
maintain their core values. As long as they don't take tax dollars,
they should be free to exclude anyone that they don't want in their
private club.
That is the problem isn't it?
I have to wonder if there are any homosexual oriented organizations
that receive tax funding that are not also exclusionary in their
choices of membership.
How very strange. I have to wonder why you would think such a thing
likely.
Certainly nothing as well known as the BSA, but
I'd be surprised if there wasn't an example of one such organization.
Think I will do a little googling on that subject.
Have fun.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Boy Toy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
29 Apr 2006 01:44:23 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 17:09:28 +0200, thomas p
<tonyofbexarnospam@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
<0ss6529ugs11ps1h32v8pl5phde023qhss@4ax.com>
On 25 Apr 2006 12:20:46 -0700, wrote:
Brian Westley wrote:
r@somis.org (Richard Measures) writes:
In article <gfop42hqv3n9ndttrrs66t99bvavutl90g@4ax.com>, Bitchin' Bonney
<bibon@râlant.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:49:39 -0000, Brian Westley <westley@visi.com>
wrote:
Bitchin' Bonney <bibon@râlant.org> writes:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
by Paul Varnell
Chicago Free Press.
Please note that this article was written July 5, 2000.
Nearly six years ago.
***********************************************************************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
It looks like they're doing just that. The Boy Scouts have lost
nearly one-forth of their membership in the last few years.
Discrimination ain't as popular as it used to be.
All voluntary organizations have lost membership. The BSA policy to
exclude immoral people remains beneficial.
Indeed, Merlyn. Allowing homosexual men into the BSA is like allowing
coyotes into one's chicken coop.
Or like allowing men to be leaders in Girl Scouts.
Oh wait, the Girl Scouts DO allow men to be leaders.
So, it's like allowing gays to be elementary schoolteachers.
Oh wait, they already CAN be elementary schoolteachers.
So, it's like having a BSA policy that only excludes KNOWN gays,
but allows gays who don't reveal themselves to be gay.
Oh wait, that's the BSA policy NOW.
The same principle of individual freedom that makes it legal to be
homosexual, also makes it legal to choose to not associate with
homosexual people. You are free to wear a dress, and I'm free to
believe that dress-wearing men make poor role models for young
children.
The BSA should pass on any government sponsored subsidization, and
maintain their core values. As long as they don't take tax dollars,
they should be free to exclude anyone that they don't want in their
private club.
That is the problem isn't it?
I have to wonder if there are any homosexual oriented organizations
that receive tax funding that are not also exclusionary in their
choices of membership.
I've never heard of such a case, regardless of funding, although I
expect there are some private clubs that wouldn't appeal to heteros.
But then again, come to think of it, even there you find fag hags and
straights.
How very strange. I have to wonder why you would think such a thing
likely.
Certainly nothing as well known as the BSA, but
I'd be surprised if there wasn't an example of one such organization.
Think I will do a little googling on that subject.
Have fun.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
30 Apr 2006 04:25:51 AM |
|
|
thomas p wrote:
I have to wonder if there are any homosexual oriented organizations
that receive tax funding that are not also exclusionary in their
choices of membership.
How very strange. I have to wonder why you would think such a thing
likely.
Why? Because the government just can't resist spending tax dollars on
useless unconstitutional crap, like the BSA.
.
|
|
|
| User: "thomas p" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
30 Apr 2006 10:15:30 AM |
|
|
On 30 Apr 2006 02:25:51 -0700, wrote:
thomas p wrote:
I have to wonder if there are any homosexual oriented organizations
that receive tax funding that are not also exclusionary in their
choices of membership.
How very strange. I have to wonder why you would think such a thing
likely.
Why? Because the government just can't resist spending tax dollars on
useless unconstitutional crap, like the BSA.
Curioser and curioser.
Thomas P.
"Life must be lived forwards but understood backwards"
(Kierkegaard)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dionisio" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
24 Apr 2006 08:35:52 PM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
Even if Boy Scout officials viewed homosexuality as morally neutral,
they would feel a need to accede to the sizable number of parents who
think otherwise. And so long as some parents fear their children might
be "recruited" by gay scout leaders, officials will feel a need to
take that fear into account.
What can gays do then?
Offer more money? But, um, why?
--
"If Christians want us to believe in a Redeemer, let them act redeemed."
--Voltaire
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: The Homosexual Plan To Destroy Boy Scouts of America |
25 Apr 2006 12:01:30 AM |
|
|
Bitchin' Bonney wrote:
Heterosexual Scouts of America
*****************************
No, it will come only if homosexuals can convince society in general
that their perverted agenda is more important than the role of the Boy
Scouts of America.
Odd that the Girl Scouts don't seem to be having any problems.
Maybe it's because they are just girls and not important to the Christians
opposing the real issue at hand.
The Boy Scouts have been ruled a private organization and have every right
to discriminate, just as the KKK and various other white supremacy groups
do.
I just don't want them doing it free on the land I pay taxes to support. Let
them pay rent like the other groups do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
