| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka666" |
| Date: |
20 Mar 2005 10:23:39 PM |
| Object: |
The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
So now the executive branch and the legislative branch have decided to
undermine the judicial branch and force life upon her.
And this is the same president who has murdered 1500+ American soldiers
in Iraq, along with literally thousands of Iraqi civilians, and he
values life?
This is the same president of whom Kayne Robinson (NRA President) said,
"If we win, we'll have a Supreme Court that will back us to the
hilt...[and] a president where we work out of their office.
Unbelievably friendly relations."?
This is the same president who supports the death penalty?
This is the same president who countenances a child dying of malaria
every 30 seconds somewhere in the world and a person dying of measles
every 60 seconds in Africa alone?
Clearly this is the president who wnats to get government off people's
backs, but apparently firmly lodged inside everyone's own body.
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 08:54:45 PM |
|
|
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Check the videos.
http://www.terrisfight.net/
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nivlem" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 09:32:58 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:54:45 GMT, wrote:
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Check the videos.
http://www.terrisfight.net/
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
They're doctored. They represent a tiny fraction of a much
longer tape, in which she demonstrated, to the satisfaction
of the court anyway, that there was nothing going on but
random tics. You are being manipulated. Personally, I resent
it when people try to do that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 12:56:26 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:32:58 -0800, Nivlem <mlml@svn.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:54:45 GMT, wrote:
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Check the videos.
http://www.terrisfight.net/
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
They're doctored. They represent a tiny fraction of a much
longer tape, in which she demonstrated, to the satisfaction
of the court anyway, that there was nothing going on but
random tics. You are being manipulated. Personally, I resent
it when people try to do that.
Actually I've dealt with people like Terri frequently.
I'm not really being manipulated, the tapes are just evidence of the
reason the people who care about her are hanging on.
They have a point to hopefully prove and it wouldn't be reasonable to
expect them to show videos of their daughter not responding.
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nivlem" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 03:11:34 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:56:26 GMT, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:32:58 -0800, Nivlem <mlml@svn.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:54:45 GMT, wrote:
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Check the videos.
http://www.terrisfight.net/
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
They're doctored. They represent a tiny fraction of a much
longer tape, in which she demonstrated, to the satisfaction
of the court anyway, that there was nothing going on but
random tics. You are being manipulated. Personally, I resent
it when people try to do that.
Actually I've dealt with people like Terri frequently.
I'm not really being manipulated, the tapes are just evidence of the
reason the people who care about her are hanging on.
They have a point to hopefully prove and it wouldn't be reasonable to
expect them to show videos of their daughter not responding.
atheist@home#1554
It's both dishonest and unreasonable to ignore and
furthermore to hide the evidence of their daughter not
responding. They have no point. Nothing but a case of denial
even worse than the one exhibited by the pet shop owner in
the Monty Python Dead Parrot skit. It would be laughable if
the fucking politicians and religious fanatics hadn't
decided to demagogue the issue into the ground.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 03:24:46 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:11:34 -0800, Nivlem <mlml@svn.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:56:26 GMT, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:32:58 -0800, Nivlem <mlml@svn.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:54:45 GMT, wrote:
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Check the videos.
http://www.terrisfight.net/
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
They're doctored. They represent a tiny fraction of a much
longer tape, in which she demonstrated, to the satisfaction
of the court anyway, that there was nothing going on but
random tics. You are being manipulated. Personally, I resent
it when people try to do that.
Actually I've dealt with people like Terri frequently.
I'm not really being manipulated, the tapes are just evidence of the
reason the people who care about her are hanging on.
They have a point to hopefully prove and it wouldn't be reasonable to
expect them to show videos of their daughter not responding.
atheist@home#1554
It's both dishonest and unreasonable to ignore and
furthermore to hide the evidence of their daughter not
responding.
I don't understand the problem here.
Why would people who wanted to prove she does sometimes respond focus
on anything but that?
How exactly would that make sense?
Should the evidence that she does sometimes respond be excluded?
If so why?
They have no point. Nothing but a case of denial
even worse than the one exhibited by the pet shop owner in
the Monty Python Dead Parrot skit. It would be laughable if
the fucking politicians and religious fanatics hadn't
decided to demagogue the issue into the ground.
Do we have a right to express our opinions but they do not?
What would be inexcusably dishonest is if the tapes are old and her
condition has deteriorated since.
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
20 Mar 2005 11:29:20 PM |
|
|
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Very simple, dummy. There's no record of her claiming that she did not want
special efforts to keep her alive.
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
duke
*****
Acts 2
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every
one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit".
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 12:03:58 AM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:fn1s31dhgcf2cuj74raklvv28m1lnjs2ku@4ax.com...
On 20 Mar 2005 14:23:39 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/20/schiavo/index.html
reveals that the USA's First Hypocrite is returning to the Whitehouse
so he can grandstand while paradoxically prostrating himself before the
might of the religious right.
It's taken seven years and a dozen court rulings, yet a dumbass Florida
Republican still thinks Terri Schiavo, whose express wish was "that she
not remain in a permanent vegetative state" should be given the
"benefit of the doubt"! What doubt?
Very simple, dummy. There's no record of her claiming that she did not
want
special efforts to keep her alive.
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
duke
What money would this be duke? The several million dollar offers the
husband has turned down to release control over his wife to her parents?
http://tinyurl.com/7x39k
Or perhaps you mean the money from the malpractice suit that he already has
($300,000)?
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/timeline.htm
Exactly what money are you talking about?
She'd gone. She's been gone for 15 years and no amount of breastbeating and
grandstanding by politicl hacks and lunatics is going to bring her back.
Jeff Jones
Austin, Texas
aa #2044
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 01:54:04 AM |
|
|
Le Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:58 +0000, Jeff Jones a écrit :
What money would this be duke? The several million dollar offers the
husband has turned down to release control over his wife to her parents?
http://tinyurl.com/7x39k
Ever wondered how many poor people could be saved in Africa with that much
money? Real people with real lives, not zombies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 04:37:45 AM |
|
|
Divin Marquis wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:58 +0000, Jeff Jones a écrit :
What money would this be duke? The several million dollar offers the
husband has turned down to release control over his wife to her parents?
http://tinyurl.com/7x39k
Ever wondered how many poor people could be saved in Africa with that much
money?
False dichotomy.
Real people with real lives, not zombies.
She's not exactly a zombie, from what I know. It's a tough case, though.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 02:11:00 PM |
|
|
Le Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:37:45 -0500, Olrik a écrit :
Ever wondered how many poor people could be saved in Africa with that much
money?
False dichotomy.
In that case, not at all.
Real people with real lives, not zombies.
She's not exactly a zombie, from what I know. It's a tough case, though.
She's braindead.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 03:52:14 PM |
|
|
Divin Marquis wrote:
Le Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:37:45 -0500, Olrik a écrit :
Ever wondered how many poor people could be saved in Africa with that much
money?
False dichotomy.
In that case, not at all.
Yes, it is : you assume that the money saved would go to poor Africans.
Real people with real lives, not zombies.
She's not exactly a zombie, from what I know. It's a tough case, though.
She's braindead.
From what I heard, not completely. Like I said, it's a tough case. I'm
ambivalent at best, and prefer to side on life on this one.
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divin Marquis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 12:15:19 AM |
|
|
Le Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:52:14 -0500, Olrik a écrit :
In that case, not at all.
Yes, it is : you assume that the money saved would go to poor Africans.
No, I mean that the money is being given away by a "charitable" person;
it would just take this person to write "Doctors without Borders" on the
cheque instead of "Mr Schiavo". Don't tell me that's far fetched!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 06:13:20 AM |
|
|
Divin Marquis wrote:
Le Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:52:14 -0500, Olrik a écrit :
In that case, not at all.
Yes, it is : you assume that the money saved would go to poor Africans.
No, I mean that the money is being given away by a "charitable" person;
it would just take this person to write "Doctors without Borders" on the
cheque instead of "Mr Schiavo". Don't tell me that's far fetched!
No, indeed!
--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 08:50:14 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:52:14 -0500, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo_BACON!_.com>
wrote:
Divin Marquis wrote:
Le Sun, 20 Mar 2005 23:37:45 -0500, Olrik a écrit :
Ever wondered how many poor people could be saved in Africa with that much
money?
False dichotomy.
In that case, not at all.
Yes, it is : you assume that the money saved would go to poor Africans.
Real people with real lives, not zombies.
She's not exactly a zombie, from what I know. It's a tough case, though.
She's braindead.
From what I heard, not completely. Like I said, it's a tough case. I'm
ambivalent at best, and prefer to side on life on this one.
The whole thing is pretty confusing.
I've read that some of the medical people who have cared for her claim
she is not brain dead and I have seen photos in which she seems to be
responding to her mother and a camera.
Point of fact is that none of us can really know the truth with
certainity and imo most of the people who have not seen her or so much
as spoken with those involved but who are getting their information
from the press and publically expressing absolute opinions in favor of
letting her starve to death or forcing her to live may be making a
terrible mistake.
I do believe that if I were a person with the power to affect this
legally I would visit her a number of times myself before making a
decision.
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 11:24:56 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:58 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
What money would this be duke? The several million dollar offers the
husband has turned down to release control over his wife to her parents?
http://tinyurl.com/7x39k
That's why I said "may very well be".
She'd gone. She's been gone for 15 years and no amount of breastbeating and
grandstanding by politicl hacks and lunatics is going to bring her back.
Yet the tube has been removed and she is still alive. She's starving to death.
Why don't you support putting a bullet in her head?
duke
*****
Acts 2
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every
one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit".
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 01:13:56 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7kbt31hq5im2s87g606lrue4dtqp68qepg@4ax.com...
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:03:58 GMT, "Jeff Jones"
<jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
What money would this be duke? The several million dollar offers the
husband has turned down to release control over his wife to her parents?
http://tinyurl.com/7x39k
That's why I said "may very well be".
She'd gone. She's been gone for 15 years and no amount of breastbeating
and
grandstanding by politicl hacks and lunatics is going to bring her back.
Yet the tube has been removed and she is still alive. She's starving to
death.
Why don't you support putting a bullet in her head?
Why would I support a bullet to her head? Once again duke you come up with
an either/or situation that you and your irrationalist kind have set up and
then have the gall to bring it up as a point. Freaking amazing. A bullet
in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and peaceful ways
to end a life. But that option is not aqailable to Schiavo or the hundereds
of people a day who are removed from methods that keep them alive well after
they are ready to go. That option is not available becuase of the inhumane
objections of the religious nutcakes in this world who feel they know better
what is right for a eprson than that person themselves.
Jeff Jones
Austin, Texas
aa #2044
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 11:51:47 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:13:56 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Why don't you support putting a bullet in her head?
Why would I support a bullet to her head?
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
duke
*****
Acts 2
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every
one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit".
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jeff Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 01:20:03 PM |
|
|
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:ek10411dqpn25gf0uhn7pjjgj5o5f2icdp@4ax.com...
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:13:56 GMT, "Jeff Jones"
<jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Why don't you support putting a bullet in her head?
Why would I support a bullet to her head?
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again. You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
But that option is not available to Schiavo or the hundreds of people a day
who are removed from methods that keep them alive well after they are ready
to go.
That option is not available becuase of the inhumane objections of the
religious nutcakes in this world who feel they know better what is right for
a person than that person themselves.
Now, did you get it that time dimbulb?
Jeff Jones
Austin, Texas
aa #2044
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 09:35:29 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Terri and I are lifers. Are you on the death squad?
But that option is not available to Schiavo or the hundreds of people a day
who are removed from methods that keep them alive well after they are ready
to go.
That option is not available becuase of the inhumane objections of the
religious nutcakes in this world who feel they know better what is right for
a person than that person themselves.
You must be a member of the death squad.
Now, did you get it that time dimbulb?
Yep, you *are a member of the death squad.
God is taking names.
duke
*****
Acts 2
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every
one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit".
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 10:20:09 PM |
|
|
In article <4k3141lctkp55obn36gk83k8su666lnttb@4ax.com> duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> writes:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
So, you believe this is some sort of grand psychological experiment
God is mounting? Was He having some problem gathering information
on peoples attitudes, and so he decided to de-brain Terri and
use her as kind of bioethical decoy, like a worm on a hook?
Terri and I are lifers. Are you on the death squad?
"Terri and I"? Really?
That's very interesting. When did your bud Terri confess to you her feelings
on this matter?
And for God's sakes, why didn't you make some effort to let the court
know about your old pal Terri's views? That could have made all the difference,
you know.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
atheist@home#1554
<snip>
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
24 Mar 2005 02:35:23 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
Ok, Mr. SmithJones, you've made their list! :D
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
24 Mar 2005 07:59:40 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:35:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
Ok, Mr. SmithJones, you've made their list! :D
Damn!
I've been ratted out!
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
24 Mar 2005 08:22:39 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:59:40 GMT, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:35:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
Ok, Mr. SmithJones, you've made their list! :D
Damn!
I've been ratted out!
Carnivore got you.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
24 Mar 2005 11:09:35 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:22:39 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:59:40 GMT, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:35:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
Ok, Mr. SmithJones, you've made their list! :D
Damn!
I've been ratted out!
Carnivore got you.
Can't.
I'm a registered veggie ;-)
atheist@home#1554
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
26 Mar 2005 11:06:09 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:09:35 GMT, wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:22:39 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:59:40 GMT, wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:35:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:33:16 GMT, wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:35:29 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:20:03 GMT, "Jeff Jones" <jeffj@austinSPAMOFF.rr.com>
wrote:
Then it would be quick and easy for you, death squad member, rather than
starving her to death.
Will you pull the trigger?
Since you have, very dishonestly I might add, snipped the part of my post
where I actually answer you I'll post it again.
I usually snip the garbage.
You seem to have trouble
reading more than one sentance at a time. I'll help you out and post it
that way.
A bullet in the head is unneccesary because there are very humane and
peaceful ways to end a life.
Then let her die. God will take her when **he's** ready, not when you're ready.
This case is really dividing the troops. Half the people are voting for life,
and half are voting for death. She is doing her part, and God is writing down
names.
Ha!
I'm using an alias!
Ok, Mr. SmithJones, you've made their list! :D
Damn!
I've been ratted out!
Carnivore got you.
Can't.
I'm a registered veggie ;-)
Ah, but veggie marinated in month olde gazelle au jus is a tasty treat
for Carnivore. (Let's give it to Carnivore, it eats everything.
YEAH!)
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 10:51:43 AM |
|
|
PUKE LIED:
Very simple, dummy. There's no record of her claiming that she did
not want
special efforts to keep her alive.
Address all the other issues I raised, you cowardly puppet.
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
Well that's what I'll be saying to you when we meet in court. Except
it won't be "money", it'll be **EVDIENCE**. That's what you need to
prepare for instead of going into ever more threads from which I will
inevitably chase you like the cowardly, lying, hypocrite that you are.
Deal with your sin of bearing false witness. Get yourself right with
THE LORD, Duck *****.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
21 Mar 2005 11:26:50 AM |
|
|
On 21 Mar 2005 02:51:43 -0800, "Budikka666" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote:
PUKE LIED:
Very simple, dummy. There's no record of her claiming that she did
not want
special efforts to keep her alive.
Address all the other issues I raised, you cowardly puppet.
Oh, I thought you were making jokes.
So her husband may very well be saying "show me the money".
Well that's what I'll be saying to you when we meet in court. Except
it won't be "money", it'll be **EVDIENCE**. That's what you need to
prepare for instead of going into ever more threads from which I will
inevitably chase you like the cowardly, lying, hypocrite that you are.
Deal with your sin of bearing false witness. Get yourself right with
THE LORD, Duck *****.
Budikka
I work on that every day, dud, oops, bud.
duke
*****
Acts 2
38Peter replied, "Repent and be baptized, every
one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the
forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive
the gift of the Holy Spirit".
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: The Hypocrite Returns to the Whitehouse |
22 Mar 2005 01:54:46 AM |
|
|
PUKE LIED:
Oh, I thought you were making jokes.
The joke will be on you in the courtroom, coward. I seriously hope the
Judge likes your cheap excuse for wit, because it's all you're going to
have when he asks where your evidence is, Liar.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
