see #1, http://tinyurl.com/x24x, for an introduction to this series.
This question is in *two* (2) parts, Jabriol, so you will need to
measure once (or not at all in your case) and snip twice, okay?
8a. Do you agree that it is hypocritical for someone to post in an
Internet news group thread a demand of others for peer-reviewed
material if you yourself have never offered a single peer-reviewed
reference?
(A lack of competent and intelligent rebuttal to this part of the
question will be understood to be an open admission by you to the
Internet population that you are indeed a hypocrite)
8b. Do you truly believe that unreferenced material, unsupported
opinion, poorly referenced material, dishonestly referenced material,
plagiarized inaccurate material, outdated argument, or argument from
incredulity can competently stack up against the weight of scientific
evidence buttressing the Theory of Evolution?
(A lack of competent and intelligent rebuttal to this part of the
question will be understood to be an open admission by you to the
Internet population that you agree that the material you have so far
posted in various news groups is 100% inadequate to the task of
challenging the Theory of Evolution)
Budikka
.
|
