| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Gactimus" |
| Date: |
17 Jan 2005 07:35:34 AM |
| Object: |
The New DNC Chairman |
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found that
Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could actually win
this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
The Democrats have to be careful in this selection. After all, it is the
most powerful office that they currently have anywhere in the country.
The constant press regarding the selection is beginning to wear thin, but
it underscores how the Democrats place more emphasis on style than
substance. This is true in the coverage that Tim Roemer is receiving as a
pro-life Democrat. The Democrats have no intention of choosing Roemer; they
are only trotting him out there as a sign that they will be inclusive on
the abortion issue. This is what Democrats do on most issues. Many of their
members will talk before a tax cut vote, for example, about how they
support tax cuts, but they'll vote against it 99 times out of 100 when it's
time to vote. The Rats are simply not going to put someone over their party
who is pro-life. Pure and simple.
Now, I realize that many liberals would ask me why they chose the pro-life
Harry Reid to lead Senate Democrats if my assumption is correct. First, did
anyone really want Reid's job? Who would want to lead a group of only 44
senators that is likely to get even smaller in the near future? And it is
debatable how firmly pro-life that Reid is. He said recently that Kate
Michelman is one of his biggest fans and vice versa. Also, he has went
along with all filibusters of Bush judges. Abortion is the only real reason
that the filibustering of judges is going on because of liberals' fear that
if Roe v. Wade is overturned that the country would cease to exist. If Reid
is that firmly pro-life, he wouldn't be joining these ridiculous
filibusters.
The bottom line with liberals is to not listen to what they say about
issues, but watch how they act (i.e. vote on them). With Republicans, you
are much more likely to get what you vote for.
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
17 Jan 2005 11:04:25 PM |
|
|
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found that
Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could actually win
this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
If Bush can get elected ...
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gactimus" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
18 Jan 2005 06:25:06 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:csi5cp$dc4$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found
that Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could
actually win this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
If Bush can get elected ...
He already has been, jackass.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
18 Jan 2005 09:57:57 PM |
|
|
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:csi5cp$dc4$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found
that Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could
actually win this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
If Bush can get elected ...
He already has been, jackass.
I keep forgetting to dumb it down so that you neocn halfwits might
understand what I'm saying.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "GreyCloud" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
19 Jan 2005 06:56:09 PM |
|
|
Ray Fischer wrote:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:csi5cp$dc4$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found
that Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could
actually win this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
If Bush can get elected ...
He already has been, jackass.
I keep forgetting to dumb it down so that you neocn halfwits might
understand what I'm saying.
How could anybody understand the braying of a jackass??
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
18 Jan 2005 08:17:09 AM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:csi5cp$dc4$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found
that Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could
actually win this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
If Bush can get elected ...
He already has been, jackass.
That was the point.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
17 Jan 2005 02:33:38 PM |
|
|
Gactimus wrote:
< snip >
The bottom line with liberals is to not listen to what they say about
issues, but watch how they act (i.e. vote on them). With Republicans, you
are much more likely to get what you vote for.
Yes, religious fanatics and corporate *****-lickers.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eyeball Kid" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
23 Jan 2005 01:50:32 AM |
|
|
In article <GaPGd.28899$Xs6.6951@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, Gactimus
<gactimus@xrs.net> wrote:
The Hotline surveyed 187 - out of 447 - members of the DNC and found that
Howard Dean was the first choice, with 58 votes! Dean could actually win
this thing! Could Republicans really be so lucky?
The Democrats have to be careful in this selection. After all, it is the
most powerful office that they currently have anywhere in the country.
The constant press regarding the selection is beginning to wear thin, but
it underscores how the Democrats place more emphasis on style than
substance. This is true in the coverage that Tim Roemer is receiving as a
pro-life Democrat. The Democrats have no intention of choosing Roemer; they
are only trotting him out there as a sign that they will be inclusive on
the abortion issue. This is what Democrats do on most issues. Many of their
members will talk before a tax cut vote, for example, about how they
support tax cuts, but they'll vote against it 99 times out of 100 when it's
time to vote. The Rats are simply not going to put someone over their party
who is pro-life. Pure and simple.
Now, I realize that many liberals would ask me why they chose the pro-life
Harry Reid to lead Senate Democrats if my assumption is correct. First, did
anyone really want Reid's job? Who would want to lead a group of only 44
senators that is likely to get even smaller in the near future? And it is
debatable how firmly pro-life that Reid is. He said recently that Kate
Michelman is one of his biggest fans and vice versa. Also, he has went
along with all filibusters of Bush judges. Abortion is the only real reason
that the filibustering of judges is going on because of liberals' fear that
if Roe v. Wade is overturned that the country would cease to exist. If Reid
is that firmly pro-life, he wouldn't be joining these ridiculous
filibusters.
The bottom line with liberals is to not listen to what they say about
issues, but watch how they act (i.e. vote on them). With Republicans, you
are much more likely to get what you vote for.
Gactimus.
Did you write this?
"Negroes Should Be Thankful for Slavery!"
Thanks in advance for answering.
E. K.
--
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003
"The American Way of Life is not negotiable." ***** Cheney, 2001
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "natch" |
|
| Title: Re: The New DNC Chairman |
24 Jan 2005 04:08:22 PM |
|
|
The bottom line with liberals is to not listen to what they say about
issues, but watch how they act (i.e. vote on them). With Republicans,
you
are much more likely to get what you vote for.
yeah like Bush being a domestic president (when he ran in 2000)
youre funny gactimush
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
