| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"dapra" |
| Date: |
07 Dec 2007 10:15:06 PM |
| Object: |
The NIA report. |
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
.
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 05:17:52 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:IpSdnZ5rXLbKh8fanZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
This was a scene right out of "Wag the Dog".
("http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FWag-Dog-New-Line-Platinum%2Fdp%2F0780622561%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1197147160%26sr%3D1-1&tag=thekaufmannet-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325")
In that movie, the president's staff pretended a war with Albania.
So he announced that they had done some big wrong.
The CIA wanted to stop it, without exposing secrets.
So they announced that the crisis had been resolved.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 12:14:09 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:15:06 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
Was that last phrase a joke?
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
Hear, hear.
And Britain and Australia's war criminals.
Especially now that Johnny Howard is unemployed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 05:06:48 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:15:06 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
Was that last phrase a joke?
No. I was serious. Though I would modify it to "the intelligent agencies
took up the task to preserve [some remaining] democracy [in America]".
The Republicans are too corrupt to stand up to Bush like Howard Baker
did over 33 years ago. The Democrats? Their leader is Pelosi. That says
it all.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
Hear, hear.
And Britain and Australia's war criminals.
Especially now that Johnny Howard is unemployed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 07:14:21 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:06:48 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael Gray wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:15:06 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
Was that last phrase a joke?
No. I was serious. Though I would modify it to "the intelligent agencies
took up the task to preserve [some remaining] democracy [in America]".
Would they be the same intelligence agencies who supplied tons of
fabricated evidence in order to justify another holocaust in Iraq?
The Republicans are too corrupt to stand up to Bush like Howard Baker
did over 33 years ago. The Democrats? Their leader is Pelosi. That says
it all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 09:09:53 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:
Would they be the same intelligence agencies who
supplied tons of fabricated evidence in order to
justify another holocaust in Iraq?
You've *Got* to be kidding.
Iraq can be compared to a lot of things, but the holocaust
isn't one of them.
Please get a clue.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 07:33:29 PM |
|
|
Michael Gray wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:06:48 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
Michael Gray wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:15:06 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
Was that last phrase a joke?
No. I was serious. Though I would modify it to "the intelligent agencies
took up the task to preserve [some remaining] democracy [in America]".
Would they be the same intelligence agencies who supplied tons of
fabricated evidence in order to justify another holocaust in Iraq?
No. That was the one operated out of Cheney's office.
The Republicans are too corrupt to stand up to Bush like Howard Baker
did over 33 years ago. The Democrats? Their leader is Pelosi. That says
it all.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "redc1c4" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 03:34:36 AM |
|
|
dapra wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
you ignore the important part, which no one, including Iran is denying:
that Iran has a weapons program that they put on hold. previously they,
and their useful idiots such as yourself, denied that they had any such
program or plan.
you are now faces with the reality of an Islamic nuke, and all you can whine
about is imaginary "war criminals" and "blood for oil".
you are really too stupid to take seriously.
redc1c4,
fortunately, i just consider you a running joke. (with a limp. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."
Army Officer's Guide
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 05:17:52 PM |
|
|
"redc1c4" <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message
news:475A6567.54F6B105@drunkenbastards.org.ies...
that Iran has a weapons program that they put on hold. previously they,
and their useful idiots such as yourself, denied that they had any such
program or plan.
NOBODY denied the Iranians had a nuke program.
You've been listening to too much talk radio - pitting you against honest
Americans.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Campbell remove underscore" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 09:40:34 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:34:36 GMT, redc1c4
<redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:
dapra wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
you ignore the important part, which no one, including Iran is denying:
that Iran has a weapons program that they put on hold. previously they,
and their useful idiots such as yourself, denied that they had any such
program or plan.
A program which they placed on hold after they acquired the blueprints
for a nuclear warhead.
Interesting now that they have everything they need except for the
plutonium - they placed the development program 'on hold' and
accelerated the programs to produce enriched uranium and plutonium.
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 11:17:44 AM |
|
|
Colin Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:34:36 GMT, redc1c4
<redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:
dapra wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
you ignore the important part, which no one, including Iran is denying:
that Iran has a weapons program that they put on hold. previously they,
and their useful idiots such as yourself, denied that they had any such
program or plan.
A program which they placed on hold after they acquired the blueprints
for a nuclear warhead.
Nuclear bombs are not a recent invention (1945). Ten nations actually
have or had them (5 + 4 + 1). Most of the information is available on
the net.
"Blueprints" is a nebulous definition. The prints has a blue color? Or
detailed mechanical drawings, schematics, procedures? And if the former,
any work had been done using the information, or just a young nuclear
physicist's intellectual interest?
Interesting now that they have everything they need except for the
plutonium - they placed the development program 'on hold' and
accelerated the programs to produce enriched uranium and plutonium.
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Your leading question suggest, they will make a bomb. But let's raise
the stake. Let's suppose, that they have 4 nuclear warheads and
delivery vehicles to reach any place on the globe. What would Iran do,
in your opinion?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 02:57:06 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:zKGdnddnbq9P6cDanZ2dnUVZ_t6onZ2d@comcast.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
A program which they placed on hold after they acquired the blueprints
for a nuclear warhead.
Nuclear bombs are not a recent invention (1945). Ten nations actually have
or had them (5 + 4 + 1). Most of the information is available on the net.
For the hillbillies in the GOP - 1945 is future-times.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
08 Dec 2007 10:00:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:40:34 -0800, Colin Campbell
<activated_95b@gmail.com (remove underscore)> wrote:
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:34:36 GMT, redc1c4
<redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote:
dapra wrote:
There has not been an answer provided, why this report were published at
this time. Seemingly the intelligent agencies, not really girl scout
organizations themselves, are undermining Bush and the neocons goal to
take over the oil fields of the Gulf and control the economy of the World.
Of course Bush and the neocons are imperialist pigs. They saw an opening
of spreading neoliberal economy after the USSR collapsed, enslaving the
rest of humanity to the Corporate Oligarchy called 'spreading democracy'
by their Orwellian distortion of the English language.
While the Congress, fully owned by the Corporate Oligarchy, had no or
little objections, Republicans or Democrats, against Bush imperial wars,
the intelligent agencies took up the task to preserve democracy.
What an up side down world! Though, one could detect some conflict
before and after the Iraq war between the administration and the
intelligent agencies. I was sure the CIA will plant some WMD's after the
invasion in Iraq. But nothing happened. The Bush regime were in trouble.
With incredibly good propaganda they limped along. But the time is
running out. The Spandau prison could be rebuilt to give accommodation
to our war criminals.
you ignore the important part, which no one, including Iran is denying:
that Iran has a weapons program that they put on hold. previously they,
and their useful idiots such as yourself, denied that they had any such
program or plan.
A program which they placed on hold after they acquired the blueprints
for a nuclear warhead.
Interesting now that they have everything they need except for the
plutonium - they placed the development program 'on hold' and
accelerated the programs to produce enriched uranium and plutonium.
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Blow up Nagasaki & Hiroshima?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
09 Dec 2007 03:05:13 PM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:92qml3l2ip334bntf0geua8fvhj60q20dp@4ax.com...
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:40:34 -0800, Colin Campbell
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Blow up Nagasaki & Hiroshima?
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
The oil in the mideast will run out in about 50 years.
When that happens, it'll be too late to START a nuclear power program.
Any nation that doesn't *already* have a nuclear power program in place will
suffer hugely.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Campbell remove underscore" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
09 Dec 2007 05:14:44 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:92qml3l2ip334bntf0geua8fvhj60q20dp@4ax.com...
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:40:34 -0800, Colin Campbell
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Blow up Nagasaki & Hiroshima?
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
You do not need plutonium and weapons grade uranium to build power
plants.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 04:03:16 PM |
|
|
Colin Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:92qml3l2ip334bntf0geua8fvhj60q20dp@4ax.com...
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:40:34 -0800, Colin Campbell
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Blow up Nagasaki & Hiroshima?
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
You do not need plutonium and weapons grade uranium to build power
plants.
No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium. But so far the
Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor grade (3-4%) in a small
amount, if they did.
I am some what familiar with history. By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time. Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense. Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation, as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one. Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked are defenseless. A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a
chance against N Korea. That's the good part of Bush being a cowered, at
least he is not reckless. He only picks on defenseless nations.
But of course as a high school bully he is, Bush do not understand or
care of the long term consequences of his actions.
You, Colin may say, the extermination of indians worked very well. Yes,
it did 300-150 years ago. But times has changed. The holocaust did not
work for the Germans 60 years ago.
(One can make an argument, that Germany could have won the WW II if
Hitler didn't go after the Jews. The European, Hungarian Jews were
instrumental in the Manhattan Project. Imagine that the first two atom
bombs were detonated above New York and Chicago. An aggressive police
state did not work for Nazi Germany, neither will work for Bush. I hope!)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Colin Campbell remove underscore" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 08:32:38 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:24:24 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:PpSdnd5JcLUjKsDanZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a chance against N Korea. That's
the good part of Bush being a cowered, at least he is not reckless. He
only picks on defenseless nations.
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives can
tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing eternal
life on our young missionaries.
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
--
There can be no triumph without loss.
No victory without suffering.
No freedom without sacrifice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 09:54:32 PM |
|
|
Colin Campbell wrote:
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
A neocon cliché with complete lack of understanding. You, Colin operate
at a very low intellectual level. You must be targeting HS drop outs.
Here is my post. Can you shift up? To 100 IQ at least?
"No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium [to power a
nuclear plant]. But so far the Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor
grade (3-4%) in a small amount, if they did.
I am some what familiar with history. By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time. Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense. Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation, as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one. Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked is defenseless. A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a
chance against N Korea. That's the good part of Bush being a cowered, at
least he is not reckless. He only picks on defenseless nations.
But of course as a high school bully he is, Bush do not understand or
care of the long term consequences of his actions.
You, Colin may say, the extermination of indians worked very well, so it
can work in Iraq. Yes, it did 300-150 years ago. But times has changed.
The holocaust did not work for the Germans 60 years ago.
(One can make an argument, that Germany could have won WW II if Hitler
didn't go after the Jews. The European, Hungarian Jews were instrumental
in the Manhattan Project. Imagine, that the first two atom bombs were
detonated above New York and Chicago. An aggressive police state did not
work for Nazi Germany, neither will work for Bush. I hope!)"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hertz Donut" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 10:32:28 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tN2dnXeKioyPl8PanZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@comcast.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
A neocon cliché with complete lack of understanding.
So you are claiming that you do not support those who send suicide bombers
into public areas to indescriminately kill innocent people?
You, Colin operate
at a very low intellectual level.
And you operate without the benefit of any intellect whatsoever.
You must be targeting HS drop outs.
Since you never made it even to high school, I guess you don't have to
worry.
Here is my post. Can you shift up? To 100 IQ at least?
If you found every living member of your gene pool, added their IQs
together, *AND* included all the family pets, the collective IQ would still
be in the single digits.
"No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium [to power a
nuclear plant]. But so far the Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor
grade (3-4%) in a small amount, if they did.
Citation?
I am some what familiar with history.
The extent of your familiarity with history is that you know how to spell
the word.
By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time.
Are you suggesting that countries with inferior military should be attacking
countries with superior military?
Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense.
Nothing you post makes sense.
Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation,
So being stronger is a Christian thing?
as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one.
How would you know? You've been completely wrong aboyut everything else....
Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked is defenseless.
And how did they manage to do so?
A cowered
Learn to spell
---rest of post snipped due to Godwin's law kicking in...---
Honu
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 10:44:43 PM |
|
|
Hertz Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tN2dnXeKioyPl8PanZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@comcast.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
A neocon cliché with complete lack of understanding.
So you are claiming that you do not support those who send suicide bombers
into public areas to indescriminately kill innocent people?
You, Colin operate
at a very low intellectual level.
And you operate without the benefit of any intellect whatsoever.
You must be targeting HS drop outs.
Since you never made it even to high school, I guess you don't have to
worry.
Here is my post. Can you shift up? To 100 IQ at least?
If you found every living member of your gene pool, added their IQs
together, *AND* included all the family pets, the collective IQ would still
be in the single digits.
"No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium [to power a
nuclear plant]. But so far the Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor
grade (3-4%) in a small amount, if they did.
Citation?
I am some what familiar with history.
The extent of your familiarity with history is that you know how to spell
the word.
By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time.
Are you suggesting that countries with inferior military should be attacking
countries with superior military?
Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense.
Nothing you post makes sense.
Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation,
So being stronger is a Christian thing?
as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one.
How would you know? You've been completely wrong aboyut everything else....
Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked is defenseless.
And how did they manage to do so?
A cowered
Learn to spell
---rest of post snipped due to Godwin's law kicking in...---
Honu
You are quite a clown Honu. Managed to come up with no coherent argument.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hertz Donut" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 12:58:49 AM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mbGdnYjdV4dIiMPanZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com...
Hertz Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tN2dnXeKioyPl8PanZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@comcast.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
A neocon cliché with complete lack of understanding.
So you are claiming that you do not support those who send suicide
bombers into public areas to indescriminately kill innocent people?
You, Colin operate
at a very low intellectual level.
And you operate without the benefit of any intellect whatsoever.
You must be targeting HS drop outs.
Since you never made it even to high school, I guess you don't have to
worry.
Here is my post. Can you shift up? To 100 IQ at least?
If you found every living member of your gene pool, added their IQs
together, *AND* included all the family pets, the collective IQ would
still be in the single digits.
"No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium [to power a
nuclear plant]. But so far the Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor
grade (3-4%) in a small amount, if they did.
Citation?
I am some what familiar with history.
The extent of your familiarity with history is that you know how to spell
the word.
By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time.
Are you suggesting that countries with inferior military should be
attacking countries with superior military?
Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense.
Nothing you post makes sense.
Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation,
So being stronger is a Christian thing?
as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one.
How would you know? You've been completely wrong aboyut everything
else....
Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked is defenseless.
And how did they manage to do so?
A cowered
Learn to spell
---rest of post snipped due to Godwin's law kicking in...---
Honu
You are quite a clown Honu. Managed to come up with no coherent argument.
Here is a question for you:
How would you ever know if it is coherent or not?
Honu
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "redc1c4" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 12:06:30 AM |
|
|
dapra wrote:
Hertz Donut wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:tN2dnXeKioyPl8PanZ2dnUVZ_qSonZ2d@comcast.com...
Colin Campbell wrote:
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
A neocon cliché with complete lack of understanding.
So you are claiming that you do not support those who send suicide bombers
into public areas to indescriminately kill innocent people?
You, Colin operate
at a very low intellectual level.
And you operate without the benefit of any intellect whatsoever.
You must be targeting HS drop outs.
Since you never made it even to high school, I guess you don't have to
worry.
Here is my post. Can you shift up? To 100 IQ at least?
If you found every living member of your gene pool, added their IQs
together, *AND* included all the family pets, the collective IQ would still
be in the single digits.
"No, you don't need plutonium and weapons grade uranium [to power a
nuclear plant]. But so far the Iranians only enriched uranium to reactor
grade (3-4%) in a small amount, if they did.
Citation?
I am some what familiar with history.
The extent of your familiarity with history is that you know how to spell
the word.
By in large, nations with military
superiority attacked inferior nations all the time.
Are you suggesting that countries with inferior military should be attacking
countries with superior military?
Rarely the other way
around, if ever. It makes sense.
Nothing you post makes sense.
Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation,
So being stronger is a Christian thing?
as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one.
How would you know? You've been completely wrong aboyut everything else....
Especially when inspectors made sure the nation to
be attacked is defenseless.
And how did they manage to do so?
A cowered
Learn to spell
---rest of post snipped due to Godwin's law kicking in...---
Honu
You are quite a clown Honu. Managed to come up with no coherent argument.
he's obviously imitating you.
redc1c4,
you're an immodest man, with much to be modest about. %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."
Army Officer's Guide
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 12:34:51 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:54:32 -0500, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
Might makes right in the eye of a
moralist Christian Nation, as our aggressive imperialist ruling class
claims it to be one.
What does being a Christian nation have to do with it? Was Stalin
Christian? Xerxes? Alexander? Caesar? The Moghuls? The Mongols?
Were these mighty empires built by Christians?
Swill
--
Money isn't always dollars, but dollars are always money.
Picture of the day
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Turner" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 05:56:10 PM |
|
|
Colin Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:24:24 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a chance against N Korea. That's
the good part of Bush being a cowered, at least he is not reckless. He
only picks on defenseless nations.
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives can
tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing eternal
life on our young missionaries.
Figures that your heroes are the people who send suicide bombers to
mosques and markets.
Yes. Much better to drop 500-lb bombs on sleeping families.
--Jeff
There can be no propaganda without dupes.
--
I object to violence because when it
appears to do good, the good is only
temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
-Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jeffrey Turner" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 06:02:00 PM |
|
|
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:PpSdnd5JcLUjKsDanZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a chance against N Korea. That's
the good part of Bush being a cowered, at least he is not reckless. He
only picks on defenseless nations.
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives can
tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing eternal
life on our young missionaries.
A small price to pay for control of the world's second largest proven
reserves of light crude and permanent military bases on the Persian
Gulf.
--Jeff
--
I object to violence because when it
appears to do good, the good is only
temporary; the evil it does is permanent.
-Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 01:28:12 PM |
|
|
"Jeffrey Turner" <jturner@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:13lrkrqh02ci680@corp.supernews.com...
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives
can tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing
eternal life on our young missionaries.
A small price to pay for control of the world's second largest proven
reserves of light crude and permanent military bases on the Persian
Gulf.
Do you really think there's something in the Pesion Gulf that the US
"controls"?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 10:24:39 PM |
|
|
In article <yEC7j.3689$Vq.708@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>,
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"Jeffrey Turner" <jturner@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:13lrkrqh02ci680@corp.supernews.com...
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives
can tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing
eternal life on our young missionaries.
A small price to pay for control of the world's second largest proven
reserves of light crude and permanent military bases on the Persian
Gulf.
Do you really think there's something in the Pesion Gulf that the US
"controls"?
A couple of aircraft carriers.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 12:25:47 AM |
|
|
In article <13lrkrqh02ci680@corp.supernews.com>,
Jeffrey Turner <jturner@localnet.com> wrote:
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:PpSdnd5JcLUjKsDanZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
A cowered bully like Bush wouldn't take a chance against N Korea. That's
the good part of Bush being a cowered, at least he is not reckless. He
only picks on defenseless nations.
Well - that depends on your definition of the term "defenseless".
4000 US soldiers and a few thousand more of their terrorist operatives can
tell you - the Iraqi people are NOT defenseless.
We bombed them back to the stone-age - and they're STILL bestowing eternal
life on our young missionaries.
A small price to pay for control of the world's second largest proven
reserves of light crude and permanent military bases on the Persian
Gulf.
I don't think so. It will be less than a year before the Iraqis kick us
out.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
09 Dec 2007 03:37:56 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:92qml3l2ip334bntf0geua8fvhj60q20dp@4ax.com...
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 19:40:34 -0800, Colin Campbell
Anybody want to make any bets about what they will do after they
produce enough to make a bomb?
Blow up Nagasaki & Hiroshima?
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
The oil in the mideast will run out in about 50 years.
When that happens, it'll be too late to START a nuclear power program.
Any nation that doesn't *already* have a nuclear power program in place will
suffer hugely.
How will nuclear run trucks and cars?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
10 Dec 2007 02:56:56 PM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:21ool3hoto4ogig2j72s6gt4tedht6fupg@4ax.com...
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
The oil in the mideast will run out in about 50 years.
When that happens, it'll be too late to START a nuclear power program.
Any nation that doesn't *already* have a nuclear power program in place
will
suffer hugely.
How will nuclear run trucks and cars?
Electric, rechargeable.
You can buy one TODAY at wal-mart.
It goes up to 80mph, for 100 miles on a 5-hour charge.
$30k
Right now, when you plug one of these into a Texas power outlet, it's being
charged by coal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: The NIA report. |
11 Dec 2007 12:28:27 AM |
|
|
In article <oKh7j.79988$Um6.61421@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>,
"Sanders Kaufman" <bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
"Michael Gray" <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:21ool3hoto4ogig2j72s6gt4tedht6fupg@4ax.com...
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:05:13 GMT, "Sanders Kaufman"
More likely - they'll build nuclear power plants.
The oil in the mideast will run out in about 50 years.
When that happens, it'll be too late to START a nuclear power program.
Any nation that doesn't *already* have a nuclear power program in place
will
suffer hugely.
How will nuclear run trucks and cars?
Electric, rechargeable.
You can buy one TODAY at wal-mart.
It goes up to 80mph, for 100 miles on a 5-hour charge.
$30k
Right now, when you plug one of these into a Texas power outlet, it's being
charged by coal.
40%
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
