The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence



 Religions > Atheism > The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 22 Nov 2005 05:22:19 PM
Object: The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
[excerpt]
Expanding Universe
By Frederick Clarkson
The Religious Right’s Orbits of Influence
Click on a celestial body to visit the web site of that organization.
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: "fred"

Title: Re: The Religious Right's Orbits of Influence; Orbits diagram fails 10th Amendment teste 22 Nov 2005 07:55:12 PM
alt.education removed.
buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
[excerpt]

As far as I can tell, the Right's Orbit's diagram fails the 10th
Amendment test.


Expanding Universe
By Frederick Clarkson
The Religious Right's Orbits of Influence
Click on a celestial body to visit the web site of that organization.

**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education

You are invited to check out the following:

The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm

American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm

The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html

[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]

HRSepCnS =B7 Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/

[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]

***************************************************************
. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why =

"a

page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisne=

r,

256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************

.
User: ""

Title: Re: The Religious Right's Orbits of Influence; Orbits diagram fails 10th Amendment teste 23 Nov 2005 07:14:22 PM
"fred" <clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:

:|alt.education removed.
:|
:|buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:
:|> http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
:|> [excerpt]
:|
:|As far as I can tell,

is totally irrelevant

:|the Right's Orbit's diagram fails the 10th
:|Amendment test.

No such test exists
**************************************************************
Posting and reading from alt.politics.usa.constitution OR alt.education
You are invited to check out the following:
The Rise of the Theocratic States of America
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocracy.htm
American Theocrats - Past and Present
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/theocrats.htm
The Constitutional Principle: Separation of Church and State
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
[and to join the discussion group for the above site and/or Separation of
Church and State in general, listed below]
HRSepCnS · Hampton Roads [Virginia] SepChurch&State
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HRSepCnS/
[Its not just Hampton Roads folks who are members, there are members from
all over the U.S. and a couple from overseas as well]
***************************************************************
.. . . You can't understand a phrase such as "Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion" by syllogistic reasoning. Words
take their meaning from social as well as textual contexts, which is why "a
page of history is worth a volume of logic." New York Trust Co. v. Eisner,
256 U.S. 345, 349, 41 S.Ct. 506, 507, 65 L.Ed. 963 (1921) (Holmes, J.).
Sherman v. Community Consol. Dist. 21, 980 F.2d 437, 445 (7th Cir. 1992)
.. . .
****************************************************************
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLE:
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/index.html
****************************************************************
.

User: ""

Title: Re: The Religious Right's Orbits of Influence; Orbits diagram fails 10th Amendment teste 23 Nov 2005 03:24:43 AM
On 22 Nov 2005 11:55:12 -0800, "fred"
<clarma1@gmail.com> wrote:

alt.education removed.

buckeye-ELO@nospam.net wrote:

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2005/12/expanding_universe.html
[excerpt]


As far as I can tell, the Right's Orbit's diagram fails the 10th
Amendment test.

Still not seeing the "problem" yet, Freddie?
First 6 words are the key...........
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Australian Abortion Rights Under Attack: A Sign Of The Coming Rise Of Howard's Religious Reich
"My Religious Rights are being Trampled!"
"Religious Accommodation" & Atheist's rights in Corporate America
Re : Religious rights Violated and outlawed by the State
Romney's religious rights
The Religious Right¹s Political Power Ebbs
Religious rights trumped by sexual rights
Rally for religious rights
Abortion Rights as Religious Freedom
Re: Hundreds of SENSIBLE RELIGIOUS EGALITARIANS support gay rights
France violates Sikhs' religious rights
UN Report Hightlights Rights of Atheists and the Non-Religious
High court to weigh prisoners' religious rights
Criticism of Religions is Not Free Speech: Don't Abuse your Free Speech Rights by Offending Religious BelieversBelievers insist that they and their religion should be respected and, therefore, that attacks on religion are not a valid use of one's fre
In the News: U.N. rights council adopts resolution against religious defamation at Muslim prodding
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER