| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"lw8112" |
| Date: |
02 Oct 2006 03:29:33 PM |
| Object: |
The snake and truth |
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
.
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
07 Oct 2006 11:17:02 PM |
|
|
On 2 Oct 2006 08:29:33 -0700, "lw8112" <torgnywickman@hotmail.com> wrote
in alt.atheism
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible.
Unthinking obediance lesson.
My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
But 'God' has.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Because Republicans wrote the book....
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
The 'original sin' was the eating of the apple.
--
Fundies and trolls are cordially invited to
shove a wooden cross up their arses and rotate
at a high rate of speed. I trust you'll
be 'blessed' with a plethora of splinters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "leo" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
03 Oct 2006 09:01:52 AM |
|
|
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
.
|
|
|
| User: "DarkAngel" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
05 Oct 2006 01:02:25 PM |
|
|
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University
ROFL. I'll see your paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University and
raise you an anthropologist from Clown College.
---
No Gods. No Masters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Masked Avenger" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
03 Oct 2006 01:48:38 PM |
|
|
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
ROFLMAO ....... I can't wait until this research tries for peer review
....... BWAAAAAAAA ........
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
.............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "leo" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
03 Oct 2006 08:51:59 PM |
|
|
Masked Avenger ha escrito:
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
ROFLMAO ....... I can't wait until this research tries for peer review
...... BWAAAAAAAA ........
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
You liked the news about the fossils of Adam and Eve, don't you? It
would prove that Bible is unerrand for sure. Searchers are hopign to
find nearby some fossils of dinosaurs and other biblical creatures. I
am just studying to confirm that the plans for Noe's Arch are right to
fill the boat with all the dinosaurs and brontosaurs, as well as other
godly creatures. There is a mennonite theory that claims god made the
dinosaurs to kill the sinners of Sodoma and Gomarrah as well as other
sinners thoughout the wide world.
Leopoldo
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
07 Oct 2006 11:33:29 PM |
|
|
leo wrote:
Masked Avenger ha escrito:
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
ROFLMAO ....... I can't wait until this research tries for peer review
...... BWAAAAAAAA ........
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
You liked the news about the fossils of Adam and Eve, don't you? It
would prove that Bible is unerrand for sure. Searchers are hopign to
find nearby some fossils of dinosaurs and other biblical creatures. I
How would we be able to verify all this nonsense?
am just studying to confirm that the plans for Noe's Arch are right to
fill the boat with all the dinosaurs and brontosaurs, as well as other
godly creatures. There is a mennonite theory that claims god made the
dinosaurs to kill the sinners of Sodoma and Gomarrah as well as other
sinners thoughout the wide world.
Leopoldo
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Masked Avenger" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
05 Oct 2006 12:22:24 PM |
|
|
leo wrote:
Masked Avenger ha escrito:
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
ROFLMAO ....... I can't wait until this research tries for peer review
...... BWAAAAAAAA ........
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
You liked the news about the fossils of Adam and Eve, don't you? It
would prove that Bible is unerrand for sure. Searchers are hopign to
find nearby some fossils of dinosaurs and other biblical creatures. I
am just studying to confirm that the plans for Noe's Arch are right to
fill the boat with all the dinosaurs and brontosaurs, as well as other
godly creatures. There is a mennonite theory that claims god made the
dinosaurs to kill the sinners of Sodoma and Gomarrah as well as other
sinners thoughout the wide world.
Leopoldo
Yeah, it was the funniest thing I'd read in ages. It was so ridiculous I
laughed out loud. But it gets funnier ....... I think you might
actually BELIEVE it ......... please tell me you're joking .......
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
.............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Darrell Stec" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
05 Oct 2006 01:17:08 PM |
|
|
After serious contemplation, on or about Thursday 05 October 2006 8:22
am Masked Avenger perhaps from cootey59_@_yahoo.com wrote:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I
wonder how it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale
about Adam and Eve is that God in principle says that the fruit of
knowledge of Good and Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the
other hand says that it will do them like God. Both Adam and Eve
survive the eating with many years and God later says that they
have become like him and exile them to keep them from the tree of
life.
Actually the bible does not say that at all. The bible says ADAM and
Adam alone was kicked out of the Garden. It never mentions Eve.
Almost everyone misses that point. Biblicists ignore it totally. It
presents too many problems. Those tales were meant for the children of
goatherders. I doubt the scribes in the sixth century BCE ever
expected grown men to take the stories as real when they created many
of the books of the bible at that time.
It's clear that the snake hasn't lied. Why is the snake then
identified with Satan and God is called omnipotent and omniscient
later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare to let them get the
other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the first until he saw
them.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The snake and truth |
07 Oct 2006 11:32:02 PM |
|
|
Masked Avenger wrote:
leo wrote:
lw8112 ha escrito:
I don't believe that the tale of Adam and Eve is true, but I wonder how
it functions in the Bible. My impression of the tale about Adam and Eve
is that God in principle says that the fruit of knowledge of Good and
Evil is deadly poisonus. The snake on the other hand says that it will
do them like God. Both Adam and Eve survive the eating with many years
and God later says that they have become like him and exile them to
keep them from the tree of life. It's clear that the snake hasn't lied.
Why is the snake then identified with Satan and God is called
omnipotent and omniscient later, when it's clear that he doesn't dare
to let them get the other fruit and didn't know they had eaten the
first until he saw them.
Besides I wonder where the origin sin appeared. It isn't mentioned
somewhere in this tale as far as I can see. There is heridatory curses
there, but I can find no origin sin and yet it's supposed to begin here.
Some paleontologues from Mormon Iowa University had discovered some
human fossils in a cave, near Wilkingson ravine, in Arkansas. After
careful studies they gave out the theory that are those of Adam and
Eve, together with a fossils of snake some yards nearby. That if
confirmed true it would be an undeniable prove of the story of Genesis
and the Garden od Eden. They are now studying the fossils of pollen to
confirm what sort of flora was growing in that miraculous garden.
Leopoldo
ROFLMAO ....... I can't wait until this research tries for peer review
...... BWAAAAAAAA ........
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha LOL
Me either. People try hard to give bad name to Chritsianity
or Monotheism at large
--
Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
