| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"IKnowHimDoYou" |
| Date: |
28 May 2004 10:34:47 AM |
| Object: |
The Soul That Cannot Be |
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed into His
created beings(Gen 2:7). God calls them brute beasts and therefore
catagorizes them along with the other beasts in the world. This we, who
belong to Him, know from His Word.
The sub-species of evolved semi-men are still in the process of evolving
by chance and accident with some a little behind and a few a little ahead
of others. Now those who are ahead will, of course, try and survive by
competing with those who are not so advanced(survival of the
fittest-Darwin) and they will do this by eliminating them through death,
starvation, disease or some other means. Since they have no
soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is not much one
can do with them to improve them. When they die they just die and new
ones come along as with cattle. We could manage their breeding to develop
stronger semi-men as we do with cattle, dogs, cats, birds, etc(animal
husbandry) however they prefer to be left to chance and accident. And
since the intellect is missing there is no opportunity to communicate with
them anymore than with a cow or a pig so trying to make a silk purse of
them is useless as well.
Just be aware of there evolving condition when around them and treat them
as you would your cattle or pets but never take them as one of us...
.
|
|
| User: "torch" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 11:14:28 AM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com...
The Soul That Cannot Be
snip vile excrement<
Your description of your vile religion leads me to one conclusion - you
worship the devil
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Elf M. Sternberg" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 04:36:23 PM |
|
|
(IKnowHimDoYou) writes:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Yeah, but even your pure-bred, gawd-fearing women-folk can't
resist our big, brutish cocks.
Elf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 11:59:22 AM |
|
|
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in
news:IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a
soul in them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed
Since souls are created individually by God, and since science has no
method of detecting or measuring them, it is fatuous to speak of
"mechanism" in connection with them.
into His created beings(Gen 2:7). God calls them brute beasts and
therefore catagorizes them along with the other beasts in the world.
This we, who belong to Him, know from His Word.
The sub-species of evolved semi-men are still in the process of
evolving by chance and accident with some a little behind and a few a
little ahead of others. Now those who are ahead will, of course, try
and survive by competing with those who are not so advanced(survival
of the fittest-Darwin) and they will do this by eliminating them
through death, starvation, disease or some other means. Since they
Actually, for extremely similar species, the crucial difference can be as
small as 1% difference in live birth rate. That, along with genetic
drift will eventually extinguish the "weaker" species.
have no soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is
not much one can do with them to improve them. When they die they
just die and new ones come along as with cattle. We could manage
This is actually somewhat contrary to orthodox Christian teaching on the
souls of animals. All SENTIENT animals have souls that are suited to
their particular natures. Perhaps this has been confusing you.
their breeding to develop stronger semi-men as we do with cattle,
dogs, cats, birds, etc(animal husbandry) however they prefer to be
left to chance and accident. And since the intellect is missing there
is no opportunity to communicate with them anymore than with a cow or
a pig so trying to make a silk purse of them is useless as well.
The reason it's so hard to communicate with a pig is that humans have
this anti-pig bias that makes (at least some of us) think that pigs are
stupid. They are not.
Just be aware of there evolving condition when around them and treat
them as you would your cattle or pets but never take them as one of
us...
What subspecies are you talking about here? Homo creationistus? Those
are robots (at least they claim to be, since they deny any common
ancestry with chimpanzees).
Personally, I'd suggest that you work on your own soul and its
relationship to the God you are so quick to hijack in service of your
ego. In the end, God will endure, but your ego will prove to have been
an illusion.
--
Dave Oldridge
ICQ 1800667
Paradoxically, most real events are highly improbable.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Wostenberg" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 09:38:51 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in
news:IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a
soul in them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed
have no soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is
not much one can do with them to improve them. When they die they
just die and new ones come along as with cattle. We could manage
This is actually somewhat contrary to orthodox Christian teaching on the
souls of animals. All SENTIENT animals have souls that are suited to
their particular natures. Perhaps this has been confusing you.
True. So do plants. Since the soul is defined to be the form of a living
body, any living organism is besouled. But there are grades of souls,
and not all souls are rational.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 12:27:10 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004 21:38:51 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in
news:IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a
soul in them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed
have no soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is
not much one can do with them to improve them. When they die they
just die and new ones come along as with cattle. We could manage
This is actually somewhat contrary to orthodox Christian teaching on the
souls of animals. All SENTIENT animals have souls that are suited to
their particular natures. Perhaps this has been confusing you.
True. So do plants. Since the soul is defined to be the form of a living
body, any living organism is besouled. But there are grades of souls,
and not all souls are rational.
Oh, the irony!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 10:59:07 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 05:27:10 +0000 in episode
<po7gb0pcf2db6k8lufin2kr3k3ed7vmcmq@4ax.com> we saw our hero raven1
<quoththeraven@nevermore.com>:
On Fri, 28 May 2004 21:38:51 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote in
news:IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a
soul in them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed
have no soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is not
much one can do with them to improve them. When they die they just die
and new ones come along as with cattle. We could manage
This is actually somewhat contrary to orthodox Christian teaching on
the souls of animals. All SENTIENT animals have souls that are suited
to their particular natures. Perhaps this has been confusing you.
True. So do plants. Since the soul is defined to be the form of a living
body, any living organism is besouled. But there are grades of souls, and
not all souls are rational.
Oh, the irony!
I damn near besouled myself...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thore Schmechtig" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 09:36:27 PM |
|
|
The sub-species of evolved semi-men are still in the process of evolving
by chance and accident with some a little behind and a few a little ahead
of others.
Aah, what would the babblical cretinist be without its convenient
strawmen?
12 - 9 = ?
--
UNWRITTEN RULES OF (PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN) FUNDAMENTALISM
(Found in alt.bible, authors unknown)
1. "I'm right and you are wrong".
2. Never admit that you are wrong, even if you really are.
3. When you have nothing to say, hurl insults.
4. Regard and portray your own violence, whether physical, psychological,
or verbal, at all times as defensive
4a. Specific example for 4.: Cry for "freedom of religion", but whenever followers of other faiths want the same freedom and courts agree, scream "Persecution!"
5. Be prepared at all times to lie and bluster, particularly when backed
into a corner in an argument
5a. When caught lying, always accuse the opposition of lying rather than be honest and admit the obvious
6. Never accept responsibility for any mess you have personally caused.
7. When you are forced to admit to an error, regard the whole process of
error and correction as part of God's personal plan for you and not as a
something for which you should apologise retract or make amends except
verbally and secretly to God himself
8. Always see yourself and you personal actions as part of God's plans for
the world. Recognise that even your errors are just part of Gods will for
the betterment of mankind.
9.Profess humility but avoid the actual experience of it.
10.Refuse to take in information that differs from your own view and
oppose all such information through classification of such information in
a derogatory and simplistic manner(eg by categorising it as left wing
propaganda)
11.Refuse to accept that truth is not black and white; that reality is
complex and there are shades of grey
12.Refuse to forgive anyone else for anything unless you purport to
forgive on behalf of other people unconnected with you for whom you don't
have that right anyhow.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Silver Blaze" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
30 May 2004 06:00:15 PM |
|
|
For those who do not recognise this - this is National Socialism, the
defining and internal separation of humanity based on the presumed
possession of "soul" by only one sector
It is FILTH.
Know it - recognise it but do not stare too deeply into it - for as
Nietzsche said if you stare too long into an abbyss, eventually that
abbyss will stare into you
As it seems to do in IKnowHims case
Not of God but of what some call "the devil incarnate"
In article <IKnowHim-2805040834470001@pm6-26.kalama.com>,
IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them. They are without the "living soul" that God breathed into His
created beings(Gen 2:7). God calls them brute beasts and therefore
catagorizes them along with the other beasts in the world. This we, who
belong to Him, know from His Word.
The sub-species of evolved semi-men are still in the process of evolving
by chance and accident with some a little behind and a few a little ahead
of others. Now those who are ahead will, of course, try and survive by
competing with those who are not so advanced(survival of the
fittest-Darwin) and they will do this by eliminating them through death,
starvation, disease or some other means. Since they have no
soul(intellect, will and emotions) such as we have there is not much one
can do with them to improve them. When they die they just die and new
ones come along as with cattle. We could manage their breeding to develop
stronger semi-men as we do with cattle, dogs, cats, birds, etc(animal
husbandry) however they prefer to be left to chance and accident. And
since the intellect is missing there is no opportunity to communicate with
them anymore than with a cow or a pig so trying to make a silk purse of
them is useless as well.
Just be aware of there evolving condition when around them and treat them
as you would your cattle or pets but never take them as one of us...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
31 May 2004 08:19:59 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 10:00:15 +1100 in episode
<pintaguinness-3105041000150001@ppp3402.dyn.pacific.net.au> we saw our
hero (Silver Blaze):
For those who do not recognise this - this is National Socialism, the
defining and internal separation of humanity based on the presumed
possession of "soul" by only one sector
It is FILTH.
Well, at least over alt.atheism way, we recognized it right off.
IKnowTheFuhrerDoYou is just finally showing his true colors...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"I think it's the worst kept secret in Washington.
That everybody - everybody I talk to in Washington
has known and fully knows what [the neo-conservative]
agenda was and what they were trying to do."
[Retired General Anthony Zinni]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Graham Kennedy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 11:01:52 AM |
|
|
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "bardi" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 12:37:51 PM |
|
|
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net...
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul
in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
Dubito ergo Sum?
dnp
bardi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "IKnowHimDoYou" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 11:33:41 AM |
|
|
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thorack Thorack of the" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 10:04:15 PM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <IKnowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-2805040933410001@pm6-26.kalama.com...
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being
by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul
in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Good answer IKHDY, in other words you are stumped.
Thorack
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
31 May 2004 07:02:29 PM |
|
|
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "IKnowHimDoYou" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 10:38:09 AM |
|
|
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Another Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 10:38:53 AM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-0106040838090001@pm4-16.kalama.com...
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
Is IKHDY advocating cannibalism?
--
Another Apostate
anotherapo@hotmail.com
aa #2182 EAC Director of Covert Operations and Black Helicopter Pilot
"If you are ethical only because you believe in God, you are buying your
ticket to heaven or trying to tear up your ticket to hell. In either case,
you are just being a shrewd profiteer, nothing else. The idea of being
ethical is to be ethical for no reason except that that is the way to be if
you want the world to run smoothly. I think that people who say virtue is
its own reward or honesty is the best policy have the right idea."
-Isaac Asimov
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Blow" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 10:52:16 AM |
|
|
Another Apostate wrote:
"IKnowHimDoYou" < > wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-0106040838090001@pm4-16.kalama.com...
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
Is IKHDY advocating cannibalism?
No, I think he is talking about cat pot pie.
Joe
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 12:02:57 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 15:38:53 GMT, "Another Apostate"
<AnotherApo@hotmail.com> wrote:
"IKnowHimDoYou" < > wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-0106040838090001@pm4-16.kalama.com...
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
Is IKHDY advocating cannibalism?
He's a fool that only proves as much every time he sets his hands to
the keyboard.
Alberich
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 04:06:02 PM |
|
|
"IKnowHimDoYou" <> wrote in message
news:IKnowHim-0106040838090001@pm4-16.kalama.com...
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
I'll be happy to tell you where I live if you'd care to try it. But you'd
better bring lots of backup, or else the only thing you'll be putting on
your table is your own thoroughly kicked ***** on a platter.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 12:18:06 PM |
|
|
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Tue, 01 Jun
2004 08:38:09 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
Sure. Understand that I'm a better fighter than you, and will happily
defend myself!
(Oh, and look up animal cruelity laws.)
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
01 Jun 2004 02:31:51 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:38:09 -0700,
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote:
In article <ithnb0p6aqd2blou6vd95e6pqojvqbq5oo@4ax.com>, Douglas Berry
<penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote:
Great Lord (IKnowHimDoYou), braving the
raging storm, scaled the mighty crag called alt.atheism on Fri, 28 May
2004 09:33:41 -0700 and screamed this to the uncaring Gods.
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
You will provide him food, shelter and medical care without demanding
any payment?
Meow.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
__________________________________________________________
Just like I do my cat and any other brute beasts that are mine.
Some, however, risk the reality of being butchered for my table.
Would you like to volunteer for that?
And the question becomes "exactly how much farther will this nut case
melt down?"...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Blow" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 01:37:41 PM |
|
|
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't
<snip>
How do you know?
Joe
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 02:02:04 PM |
|
|
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
.
|
|
|
| User: "IKnowHimDoYou" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 11:12:17 AM |
|
|
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nikolaos D. Bougalis" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 06:27:13 PM |
|
|
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
I can't prove that you have a soul? Of course not, a proof requires
evidence, and no evidence for the existence of a soul exists.
Let's see your proof.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 11:28:44 AM |
|
|
In alt.talk.creationism, (IKnowHimDoYou) wrote
in <IKnowHim-2905040912170001@pm1-05.kalama.com>:
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
Please prove it then.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 09:08:42 PM |
|
|
In article <IKnowHim-2905040912170001@pm1-05.kalama.com>, IKnowHimDoYou says...
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:snip
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
What is this? The fundie version of "I know you are, but what am I?"
Well, if you can prove you have a soul - Do it.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 01:28:50 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 09:12:17 -0700,
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote:
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
So prove it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
29 May 2004 04:28:09 PM |
|
|
Alberich <Alberich@NoSpam.com> wrote in
news:milhb0pphld014d7gej5vtrfn14h61gipr@4ax.com:
On Sat, 29 May 2004 09:12:17 -0700,
(IKnowHimDoYou) wrote:
In article <Q0Mtc.5876$oi5.991@fed1read07>, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into
being by evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to
produce a soul in them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
-n
________________________________________________
I can- but you can't.
So prove it.
He'll have to buy it back first. Sold it for a pat on the back from Ken
Ham.
--
Dave Oldridge
ICQ 1800667
Paradoxically, most real events are highly improbable.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alberich" |
|
| Title: Re: The Soul That Cannot Be |
28 May 2004 02:13:20 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 May 2004 12:02:04 -0700, "Nikolaos D. Bougalis"
<nikb@webmaster.com> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
In article <1085759949.14009.0@ersa.uk.clara.net>, Graham Kennedy
<graham@ditl.org> wrote:
IKnowHimDoYou wrote:
The Soul That Cannot Be
As we learn more about how the sub-species of semi-men came into being by
evolution we must realize that there is no mechanism to produce a soul in
them.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think we have a soul in us?
--
Graham Kennedy
______________________________________________________
You don't but I will treat you as well as my cat, okay?
Can you *prove* that you have a soul?
Of course he can!! To wit: The recent movie "21 Grams" said that the
body loses 21 grams of weight when it dies. Ergo, this must be the
soul. And, since it was in an American movie, it must be true!
Alberich
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
