| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"joelove01" |
| Date: |
18 Nov 2004 01:55:44 PM |
| Object: |
The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
.
|
|
| User: "Moose" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
19 Nov 2004 06:26:52 AM |
|
|
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
blaaa blaaa blaaa blaaa
(yawn) , think the bigger question here is who the **** cares?
some people just need to get a frigging life.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JD\eagles" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 04:20:29 PM |
|
|
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
You put way too much thought into this.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andy P. Jung" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 06:11:21 PM |
|
|
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
Screw that, how about Asian males and White females! It seem like the only
site that offers that is
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/asianmenandwhitegirls/
--
Andy P. Jung
Metairie, Louisiana U.S.A.
(Home of Senator Elect David Vitter)
http://www.JungWorld.com/
To reply via e-mail, please visit my web site.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
23 Nov 2004 06:47:21 AM |
|
|
(joelove01) wrote in message news:<a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com>...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
Al "Qaeda" Michaels, "Osama bin" Madden and the Towel-ban
are all Terrell-ists.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
Is that a swastika in your pocket, or are you just happy
to spam me?
Bob Dog
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Truth" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 03:53:05 PM |
|
|
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player
No one saw a naked body. How deceptive.
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man
People are not saying this, only blacks are. Again, very deceptive.
Just about every modern day television series has interracial couples, and
blacks making out with whites, even James Bond had to make out with Grace
Jones.
This is not the reason at all. And negro Powel at the FCC would not be
against it either for that reason, so stop the *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pro-Humanist FREELOVER" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 02:12:08 PM |
|
|
Desperate Housewives has white women and an
Hispanic woman in it (and the Hispanic woman has
already appeared on the show nude, multiple times
if I'm not mistaken, though perhaps that's my imagin-
ation getting carried away, or just wishes at play). As
far as choosing Terrell Owens as the football player
to be paired with the woman, obviously, he's the most
outspoken player on that team, and I've heard Donovan
McNabb might not have been interested for reasons
having to do with his marriage and his promotion of
Campbell Soup ...
I suppose they could have chosen Andy Reid to
be the partner of the woman in question, but most
would've probably perceived that as downright gross
(just kidding, almost) ...
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Norm³" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 04:32:28 PM |
|
|
I knew the race thing would start, give it a rest! I would be upset if they
were any color!
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:28:33 PM |
|
|
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do with a
black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it right
before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the race
card..
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:34:00 PM |
|
|
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do with
a black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the race
card..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen, we have a
winner! 8-)
As "Private Ryan" was also used as a protest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 11:38:40 PM |
|
|
TV's Fester wrote:
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard
Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has
nothing to do with a black man and a white woman.. it has everything
to do with placing it right before a football game that alot of kids
watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use
the race card..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen, we have a
winner! 8-)
Yeah, play the "liberals hate _____" card and you automatically win. You're
a true idiot, Fester.
--
"Them white boys had me on crystal meth" - some crackhead in GTA:SA
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
22 Nov 2004 05:30:13 PM |
|
|
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:305f6uF2tc783U1@uni-berlin.de...
TV's Fester wrote:
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard
Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has
nothing to do with a black man and a white woman.. it has everything
to do with placing it right before a football game that alot of kids
watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use
the race card..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen, we have a
winner! 8-)
Yeah, play the "liberals hate _____" card and you automatically win.
You're
a true idiot, Fester.
I haven't been counting, but I know that this is not the first your entire
rebuttal to valid point has been "you're an idiot." I'm very impressed with
the scope and depth of your reasoning.
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
23 Nov 2004 02:05:43 AM |
|
|
TV's Fester wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:305f6uF2tc783U1@uni-berlin.de...
TV's Fester wrote:
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard
Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has
nothing to do with a black man and a white woman.. it has
everything
to do with placing it right before a football game that alot of
kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use
the race card..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen, we
have a winner! 8-)
Yeah, play the "liberals hate _____" card and you automatically win.
You're
a true idiot, Fester.
I haven't been counting, but I know that this is not the first your
entire rebuttal to valid point has been "you're an idiot." I'm very
impressed with the scope and depth of your reasoning.
I bet you're also impressed by my accuracy and consistency.
--
"Them white boys had me on crystal meth" - some crackhead in GTA:SA
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fester" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
23 Nov 2004 05:32:50 AM |
|
|
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:30g9aeF2us70jU1@uni-berlin.de...
TV's Fester wrote:
"towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:305f6uF2tc783U1@uni-berlin.de...
TV's Fester wrote:
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard
Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has
nothing to do with a black man and a white woman.. it has
everything
to do with placing it right before a football game that alot of
kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use
the race card..
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner, ladies and gentlemen, we
have a winner! 8-)
Yeah, play the "liberals hate _____" card and you automatically win.
You're
a true idiot, Fester.
I haven't been counting, but I know that this is not the first your
entire rebuttal to valid point has been "you're an idiot." I'm very
impressed with the scope and depth of your reasoning.
I bet you're also impressed by my accuracy and consistency.
Yes, you're consistently inaccurate.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JD\eagles" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:35:39 PM |
|
|
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do with
a black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the race
card..
Tony Dungy is a born again religous man, you calling him a liberal?
"joelove01" <joelove01@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a2e21c0a.0411181155.492faa29@posting.google.com...
On Monday Night Football we saw the scene where the white woman drops
her towel and throws her naked body at the black football player, and
we've heard in the news that people are morally outraged about it. All
across usenet people are saying that the real reason white people are
upset is because it's an interracial relationship between a white
woman and black man, and that it wasn't really family "values" the NFL
offended, this is all about a gorgeous white woman hopping in the arms
of a loud-mouthed black stud: white people are just scared by the site
of a white woman jumping into a black dude's arms, and using family
values as an excuse. Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong. Or
maybe, white people are tired of how the media uses interracial
relationships as anti-white propaganda.
The most common interracial pairing in the real world is white
males/asian females. Why isn't this portrayed in any where the numbers
as the black male/white female representations? Asian women and white
men, the most common interracial couple in the world, is nowhere to be
seen in the media. Yet white females with black males is portrayed
everywhere.
While white males and asian females - again, the most common
interracial couple in America and the world - is ignored by the media,
white females and black males get a much different treatment. As a
matter of fact, you could say the media LIKES to pair off white
females with black males, almost as if they were actively promoting
it. I started noticing this about two years ago. Then it picked up
speed.
For example:
- I had never watched daytime TV, but then started looking at it
occasionally during breaks after I started working on software
contracts out of my home. I was stunned as I watched more and more.
"Daytime TV" might as well be called ""White female/black male TV".
There is the Jerry Springer show and its clones, Ricki Lake and
"Maury". All of them could be renamed "The black male white female
relationships problem show" -- almost all of such shows are about two
things: BM/WF relationships, plus the occasional appearance of rural
people to make fun of as rednecks. Other shows are Montel (Williams?)
and Wayne Brady -- every time I channel surf to those shows, there's
one thing there: them talking to a white woman.
- Television ads: I would say for the MAJORITY of these, they stick a
black guy with a white woman. Why? (I live in southern california,
maybe it's different where you live.) The champion of this is the
Oxygen Network, which is crammed full of movies showing BM/WF movies,
talk shows, and advertisements. I can cite LOTS of these just from
memory.
- Movies: If you go to the movies you know there's TONS of this, with
a lot of them following the format of white female/black male romance,
and stupid/evil/unmasculine white guy somehow involved. Awful example
: "Save the Last Dance". Denzel Washington is ALWAYS paired with a
white female, for which there is always explicit or implied sex, plus
stupid/evil/unmasculine white guys. Example: "Man on Fire".
- Saturday morning kiddie cartoons: (No kidding! ): While channel
surfing one recent saturday morning, I saw all of the following: A
"superheroes" cartoon which showed a black male, white male and white
female (which seems to be a standard pattern) triumvirate - the BM
looked kind of macho, the WM looked kind of boyish. To zoom to the
rescue, the WM flies kind of like superman, while the BM has a sort of
airborne surf board, with the WF, hugging him close (REAL close) from
behind. A filmed show called "extreme adventures" or something like
that, showing two white girls and one black male teen exploring the
arctic. The closing credits background shots of previous "adventures"
showed that it is always just this same three. A "Trix" cereal
commercial showing the Trix rabbit and a bunch of kiddies on a train
going to the "Trix convention". The seats are in pairs, and TWO pairs,
not one, show white girls sitting next to what look like "rapper"
black boys. A cartoon show (on PBS Kids?) about a young black boy
private detective. He has a white female colleague or secretary, I
don't know which, who interacts with him in a way that makes the
cartoon about two notches short of softcore porn. In the episode I
saw, she's pissed because he has to see a previous girlfriend (white,
naturally) about a case. He goes to her house and she serves him
dinner, and then when he tries to talk about the case, she seductively
taps in on the lips and admonishes him to find, well "something else"
to talk about. This is saturday morning cartoons aimed at kids!!
- Big City Local News Broadcasts: They follow the "rule" - black male
and white female news anchors are paired together. There are SEVERAL
such pairs in the LA market area, and on cable I see that they follow
the same "rule" in other cities. Why? How did all this become a
"rule"?
- Print ads: A lot of department stores in their advertisements seem
to be obsessed with sticking white females with black males. Target
Store newspaper inserts almost ALWAYS have this, and they seem to put
a premium on turning up blonde females, just to make sure you "get
it", as do the other graphic media. Lots of other mainline stores -
Sears, JCPenney, Kohls, etc I've noticed, not to be left out of
whatever craze this is, have started doing the same thing.
I have been noticing that in many TV commercials there is frequent
stereo-typing of non-jewish white male roles. If there are male and
female characters in "real life" situations, the non-jewish white male
guy is frequently portrayed as immature, ignorant, goofy, passive
and/or lacking in self control or social skills. The female
character's role is consistently controlling, mature and responsible.
If the commercial has Black and white roles, the non-jewish white guy
is submissive, immature, and inept. The Black character will act in a
mature, authoritative and controlling. The non-jewish white male
character will often be of lower social/professional status than the
character portrayed by the Black male (who will invariably have a
deeper, more manly voice).
I could go on and on about this, but you get the idea. Or did you
already get the idea before I broached the subject? I'm starting to
feel like the protagonist in the story "The King's New Clothes" -
there's this overwhelming thing in the media, it's damn near
EVERYWHERE, in every graphic medium, and I've never heard, as I say,
anyone mention it. I emphasize all the above are just examples of
zillions of instances I've seen.
NOW, here's a question: Why is this being done? What's the point?
Note: One type of answer that you can spare me is "it's not there,
you're imagining it". If you want to argue gravity doesn't exist,
don't waste my time. Another waste of time is "What are you - a
racist?" Please, only those who have some grasp of what a rational
debate is respond.
The question is WHY?
One important factor that must be considere is that the media is
controlled by jews. Now, I know certain posters reading this are
scrambling to hit the reply button because they can't wait to call me
an anti-semite, but let's drop the politically-correct make-believe
crap and stop being so naive, and let's stop pretending that it isn't
true. We ALL know the truth, whether or not your liberal guilt
prevents you from admitting it: the media IS controlled by jews.
We have a media that actively PROMOTES relationships between white
females and black males to the point of shoving it down our throats,
while ignoring all other interracial relationships. We have the most
common interracial pairing in the real world, white males/asian
females, and it isn't portrayed in the media any where the numbers as
the black male/white female representations. We have the media
portraying black male/white female pairs much more frequently than any
of the other many possibilities, even the one (asian female/white
male) that is more widespread in the real world. We have black
male/white female pairings that are also frequently accompanied by
negative portrayals of white males in the same movie, ad, etc. The
most general theme is macho/upright/brave black male, white female
with the black male, and stupid/unhip/asexual/criminal/insane white
male. We also have an ever-more frequent portrayal of white males in a
negative way, particularly against a background or in a context where
non-white males are portrayed positively. We have huge numbers of
token blacks in movies and tv these days, and the blacks are never,
ever, portrayed negatively, but are OVERWHELMINGLY portrayed as
smart/sexy/courageous -- everything that is the opposite of how
non-jewish white males are defamed.
The television, movie and music industries, where all this is going
on, JUST HAPPEN to be controlled by jews.
Is a leftwingjew agenda at work here?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Justin Pate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:41:58 PM |
|
|
"JD(eagles)" <JDeagles@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:304pu7F2q16ucU1@uni-berlin.de...
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern
as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do
with
a black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday
night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the
race
card..
Tony Dungy is a born again religous man, you calling him a liberal?
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JD\eagles" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:56:43 PM |
|
|
"Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:arand.9224$g21.5605@fe1.texas.rr.com...
"JD(eagles)" <JDeagles@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:304pu7F2q16ucU1@uni-berlin.de...
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern
as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do
with
a black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday
night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the
race
card..
Tony Dungy is a born again religous man, you calling him a liberal?
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
Tony Dungy played the race card today. What? Only Liberals play the race
card?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Armand" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
19 Nov 2004 05:54:42 AM |
|
|
In article <arand.9224$g21.5605@fe1.texas.rr.com>,
says...
"JD(eagles)" <JDeagles@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:304pu7F2q16ucU1@uni-berlin.de...
"Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01...
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern
as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do
with
a black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday
night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the
race
card..
Tony Dungy is a born again religous man, you calling him a liberal?
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
It was his response to the issue that has everything to do with it. Typical
Religeous Wrong. Bringing up the Bryant case was stupid and irrelevant.
Something you wouldn't hear from a liberal.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Allister Fiend" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 06:00:56 PM |
|
|
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
.
|
|
|
| User: "Justin Pate" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 06:03:17 PM |
|
|
"Allister Fiend" <EaglesFan20@adelphia.NOnet> wrote in message
news:Xns95A5C170066D1Zildjian@Tama-Drums.com...
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
Tony Dungy is cool.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JD\eagles" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 06:25:22 PM |
|
|
"Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9Land.6363$KQ2.12@fe2.texas.rr.com...
"Allister Fiend" <EaglesFan20@adelphia.NOnet> wrote in message
news:Xns95A5C170066D1Zildjian@Tama-Drums.com...
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
Tony Dungy is cool.
To you maybe. To me he's a hypocritcal over reacative jerk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "pablo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
19 Nov 2004 02:14:10 AM |
|
|
JD(eagles) wrote:
"Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9Land.6363$KQ2.12@fe2.texas.rr.com...
"Allister Fiend" <EaglesFan20@adelphia.NOnet> wrote in message
news:Xns95A5C170066D1Zildjian@Tama-Drums.com...
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
Tony Dungy is cool.
To you maybe. To me he's a hypocritcal over reacative jerk.
Him comparing that stupid skit to Kobe and that girl has to be one
of the stupidest things I have ever heard. What the hell does one have
to do with the other? Because he plays sports and is black and she is white?
What a freakin idiot.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick Sharer" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 09:02:40 PM |
|
|
JD(eagles) wrote:
"Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9Land.6363$KQ2.12@fe2.texas.rr.com...
"Allister Fiend" <EaglesFan20@adelphia.NOnet> wrote in message
news:Xns95A5C170066D1Zildjian@Tama-Drums.com...
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
Tony Dungy is cool.
To you maybe. To me he's a hypocritcal over reacative jerk.
OK, now you're talking about McNabb.
RC
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 11:40:11 PM |
|
|
TV's JD(eagles) wrote:
"Justin Pate" <JP51307@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9Land.6363$KQ2.12@fe2.texas.rr.com...
"Allister Fiend" <EaglesFan20@adelphia.NOnet> wrote in message
news:Xns95A5C170066D1Zildjian@Tama-Drums.com...
On 18 Nov 2004, Justin Pate posted:
What does Tony Dungy have to do with anything?
http://tinyurl.com/5sjyh
Tony Dungy is cool.
To you maybe. To me he's a hypocritcal over reacative jerk.
He's an outstanding football coach, but in this case you're correct, he did
overreact. There was nothing racial about the spot.
--
"Them white boys had me on crystal meth" - some crackhead in GTA:SA
aa #2133
ap #19
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
18 Nov 2004 05:55:42 PM |
|
|
In article <Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01> "Douglas" <doug@anonymous.com> writes:
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude Howard Stern as
the most reported to the FCC... Bottom line is this has nothing to do with a
black man and a white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it right
before a football game that alot of kids watch each Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell to use the race
card..
Beg pardon? The criticism of the FCC of late has been that it's gone
much too lightly on incidents that offend some people, such as
the incredible disappearing halter during the Super Bowl.
You think it's liberals who have been getting down on the FCC
for permitting too much lasciviousness on the airwaves?
And while the subject's afloat, are you suggesting that the original
poster, who laid all this at the feet of the "Jewish-controlled media",
is displaying a LIBERAL attitude with such a theory?
You need to get your Field Guide to Liberal Behavior updated, I think.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stewart Millen" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
19 Nov 2004 10:41:47 AM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:cnjcpu$rvp$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01> "Douglas"
<doug@anonymous.com> writes:
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude
Howard Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom
line is this has nothing to do with a black man and a
white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each
Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell
to use the race card..
Beg pardon? The criticism of the FCC of late has been that
it's gone much too lightly on incidents that offend some
people, such as the incredible disappearing halter during
the Super Bowl.
You think it's liberals who have been getting down on the
FCC for permitting too much lasciviousness on the airwaves?
And while the subject's afloat, are you suggesting that the
original poster, who laid all this at the feet of the
"Jewish-controlled media", is displaying a LIBERAL attitude
with such a theory?
You need to get your Field Guide to Liberal Behavior
updated, I think.
Hi Cary! Funny seeing you out here on the football groups.
Ain't cross-posting wonderful? (like "how many unrelated
groups can one post to?" seems to be the central idea of
this thread)
Stewart
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQCVAwUBQZ4h/zSyh6XxoDgRAQEVDwP8Dk/k7bAt4tMNxDjMNyXdOciaIaxya/i9
1/FitGDDaFGzPJLXFetM0O0IToNovNbAqf4gOQ9dna77hZpACBB5ULbM6FIwsMWX
cAOsTmbnHsiPs5NaU6SrFD+DL+PFIb6k8RBqMIn8bAHg/HPhProkz49dspIIZ03J
yUAkXa5zL3U=
=zYvt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Terrell Owens/Nicollette Sheridan MNF racial thing |
19 Nov 2004 11:04:02 AM |
|
|
In article <306m2bF2s35a3U1@uni-berlin.de> Stewart Millen <Stewart_Millen@hotmail.com> writes:
cary@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote in
news:cnjcpu$rvp$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu:
In article <Beand.108339$HA.12766@attbi_s01> "Douglas"
<doug@anonymous.com> writes:
If the racist situation were true then that would disclude
Howard Stern as the most reported to the FCC... Bottom
line is this has nothing to do with a black man and a
white woman.. it has everything to do with placing it
right before a football game that alot of kids watch each
Monday night...
This is a way for the liberals who hate the FCC and Powell
to use the race card..
Beg pardon? The criticism of the FCC of late has been that
it's gone much too lightly on incidents that offend some
people, such as the incredible disappearing halter during
the Super Bowl.
You think it's liberals who have been getting down on the
FCC for permitting too much lasciviousness on the airwaves?
And while the subject's afloat, are you suggesting that the
original poster, who laid all this at the feet of the
"Jewish-controlled media", is displaying a LIBERAL attitude
with such a theory?
You need to get your Field Guide to Liberal Behavior
updated, I think.
Hi Cary! Funny seeing you out here on the football groups.
Ain't cross-posting wonderful? (like "how many unrelated
groups can one post to?" seems to be the central idea of
this thread)
Stewart
Whoa! I'm posting to a F | | | | |