|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
26 Feb 2007 11:02:14 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just like ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins, the forests full of splinters of the "true" cross ...
These "tombs of Jesus" are just more of the same.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DaveJr" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
27 Feb 2007 12:31:13 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just like
ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins, the forests full of splinters of the "true" cross ...
These "tombs of Jesus" are just more of the same.
True. Perhaps James should do his next 'documentary' on toast.
I keep thinking of Monty Python "We Have His Shoe!"
I do keep hearing about what this might do to christian faith. Probably
nothing. They will simply 'modify' their beliefs to fit their personal
projections.
They do seem to impose their projections above known reality.
But what will it take for this nonsense to fade away and die? It will
eventually,
just like all it's predasesors have in the past.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
27 Feb 2007 07:37:42 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:31:13 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
I do keep hearing about what this might do to christian faith. Probably
nothing. They will simply 'modify' their beliefs to fit their personal
projections.
As they have for thousands of years. Most of Christianity today isn't
found in the Bible.
But what will it take for this nonsense to fade away and die? It will
eventually, just like all it's predasesors have in the past.
Other nonsense, just like it did in the past. There will always be
children who need a fairy tale to face another day.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
27 Feb 2007 09:52:05 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just like
ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in consecrated
ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish law)
Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted away a long,
long time ago.
Smiler,
The godless one
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 07:49:05 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:52:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just like
ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in consecrated
ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish law)
Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted away a long,
long time ago.
Jebus was "speshul" - his foreskin survived.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Darrell Stec" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 03:07:32 PM |
|
|
After serious contemplation, on or about Wednesday 28 February 2007 8:49
am Al Klein perhaps from rukbat@pern.invalid wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:52:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just
like ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in
consecrated ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish
law) Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted
away a long, long time ago.
Jebus was "speshul" - his foreskin survived.
And multiplied like the loaves and fishes.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 03:16:39 PM |
|
|
In article <54m98kF1v4oteU1@mid.individual.net> Darrell Stec <darrell_stec@webpagesorcery.com> writes:
After serious contemplation, on or about Wednesday 28 February 2007 8:49
am Al Klein perhaps from rukbat@pern.invalid wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:52:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just
like ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in
consecrated ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish
law) Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted
away a long, long time ago.
Jebus was "speshul" - his foreskin survived.
And multiplied like the loaves and fishes.
Or pieces of the One True Cross...
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Darrell Stec" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 03:53:40 PM |
|
|
After serious contemplation, on or about Wednesday 28 February 2007 4:16
pm Cary Kittrell perhaps from wrote:
In article <54m98kF1v4oteU1@mid.individual.net> Darrell Stec
<darrell_stec@webpagesorcery.com> writes:
After serious contemplation, on or about Wednesday 28 February 2007
8:49 am Al Klein perhaps from rukbat@pern.invalid wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:52:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr"
<davesbrain@qwest.net> wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved,
just like ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The
James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of
"actual" foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in
consecrated ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish
law) Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted
away a long, long time ago.
Jebus was "speshul" - his foreskin survived.
And multiplied like the loaves and fishes.
Or pieces of the One True Cross...
Neither of which are bargains these days because they don't come with
indulgences nor get out of hell free cards.
-- cary
--
Later,
Darrell Stec
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 08:48:41 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:16:39 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
And multiplied like the loaves and fishes.
Or pieces of the One True Cross...
You DO realize that it took every single tree in the Sahara Forest to
make the cross, aren't you? Which is why there are so many tons of
slivers of it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Smiler" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 09:10:02 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:nmfcu2d4185dcdvc81jc7j10oqdgkuv2de@4ax.com...
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:16:39 +0000 (UTC),
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:
And multiplied like the loaves and fishes.
Or pieces of the One True Cross...
You DO realize that it took every single tree in the Sahara Forest to
make the cross, aren't you? Which is why there are so many tons of
slivers of it.
By the time of Jebus, there weren't many trees left in the Sahara Forest.
Noah had to cut most of them down to build his arc big enough to fit all
those dinosaurs in :-)
Smiler,
The godless one
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Therion Ware" |
|
| Title: Re: The Tombs of Jesus |
28 Feb 2007 09:54:01 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:49:05 -0500, Al Klein wrote in message
<v02bu21qveam7v0rv4g4u3chb9najdk2je@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:52:05 GMT, "Smiler" <Smiler@Joe.King.com>
wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vme7u21hrgiqfb1ego9buj0dj4jflqobhi@4ax.com...
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:00:51 -0700, "DaveJr" <davesbrain@qwest.net>
wrote:
"JHood" <thatcathood@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1172536672.463896.49610@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
http://theviewfromherenow.blogspot.com/2007/02/tombs-of-jesus.html
Even if these are his bones...just a man, a man that evolved, just like
ALL
the rest of us on this 4.6 billion year old rock.
If they are. But they've already cried wolf too many times - the
Shroud of Turin ... that was over 1,000 years too young. The James
Ossuary ... that was faked. And, of course, the dozens of "actual"
foreskins,
I've never heard of that one before.
It's so easy to disprove.
After the circumcision, the rabbi has to bury the foreskin in consecrated
ground.
(It's a part of the human body so it has to be buried, under jewish law)
Therefore, a foreskin removed 2000 years ago would have rotted away a long,
long time ago.
Jebus was "speshul" - his foreskin survived.
and I expect the miraculous multiplication of foreskins can be
explained by reference to the, erm ... omnipotence of God...
--
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".
attrib: Pauline Réage.
-
www.eac-nudis.com = Evil Atheist Conspiracy NNTP / Usenet Distributed Intelligence System...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
