The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT)



 Religions > Atheism > The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "LC"
Date: 01 Aug 2005 09:49:18 AM
Object: The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT)
Well, it's Monday, and we now have a jury for the proceedings. Shall we
begin?
Quick back story:
It is my contention that the poster known as "J Young" is also posting via
and number of other sockpuppets. The one that, for the purposes of this
exercise, is to be ruled on is a particularly vile bigot known around
UsenetLand as "IBen Getiner" <Lappcatt@AOL.com>. Several others to be
introduced as part of the evidence are forgeries of my (now former) User ID
"Loose Cannon" <looseain't@this.com>, including, but not limited to:
"loose cannon" <looseaint@aol.com>
From: "Loose Cannon" <loosecannon__@hotmail.com>
From: "LC" <Looseaintthis@aol.com>
"Loose Cannon"

From:
(Loose Cannon)
From: A variety of names that use the addy <superasswipe@hotmail.com>
"J Young" has _denied_ being involved in all but one ("loose cannon"
<looseaint@aol.com>) of the aforementioned ID's. "J Young's" own words:
"Other than the UserID <looseaint@aol.com>, which I used to *****-slap
you from one end of Usenet to the other as punishment for stalking and
harrassing me, I deny every other so-called sockpuppet."
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Message-ID: <1122307637.734375.119970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Mr. "Young", during the course of negotiations to establish the groundrules
for this exercise, has substantially backpedaled from his initial bold
proclamation quoted above. Those that choose may verify this by reviewing
the thread titled <"LC"'s challenge>, originated by "J" on 7/25 and
crossposted to
<alt.abortion,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.auto.mercedes,tx.politics>.
In addition, Mr. Young has, during negotiations, played coy on the User ID
(<superasswipe@hotmail.com>), invoking the Fifth Amendment:
"I take the 5th for "superasswipe@hotmail".'
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Message-ID: <1122756610.744333.107160@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
I'll let the 'jury' decide if that is something they want to consider these
facts in weighing their decision.
Mr. "Young" now does not wish to be judged on anything other than whether my
evidence shows him to be "IBen Getiner" <Lappcatt@AOL.com>. Although that is
clearly not what was initially established, I will honor that request.
I ask jurors to rule on that aspect only.
However, there is such a body of compelling evidence contained in the
numerous posts of the assorted AOL "loose cannon" forgeries, they will be
used as part of the presentations to follow.
That established, I shall proceed as follows:
In the first post, I'll provide a rather substantial list of overlapping
NNTP's in which all the above sockpuppets originate from.
You will note they all come via AOL servers. I *am* aware that these numbers
*do not* originate from or denote a single source (eg: only J Young's
computer), but offer them as significant circumstantial evidence. Futher,
you will find that, in later presentations, the alleged sockpuppets
communicate with and/or 'support' each other, sometimes from *identical
NNTP's*. Again, perhaps not conclusive evidence, but very strong
nonetheless. As always, questions and comments are encouraged from the jury.
Understanding that we all have different schedules to abide to away from
UsenetLand, all individual threads may remain active until all questions are
addressed regarding the info contained therein.
In subsequent posts, I will provide other information linking "J Young" with
"IBen" and these assorted sockpuppets. The procedure shall remain the same
(presentation, questions, comments). To avoid troll-ish disruptions, I would
ask that only the 'jurors", Mr. "Young" and Mr. "Getiner" participate
directly.
I further ask that Mr. "Getiner" stick to the topic at hand and be succint
as possible. If he becomes a sideshow, I would ask the jury to decide if it
would be best to either ignore or killfile him until this process is
complete.
I would prefer that the threads not be come a raucous 'peanut gallery'.
If any lurkers have comments or questions, I will do my best to address them
off line. You may email me at:
loosefortheprosecution@hotmail.com
Although there is a virtual mountain of evidence, I will strive to be as
succint as I possibly can, while still providing as much information
linking the User ID's as I feel is necessary. In many cases, there will be
much additional information available on any given presentation theme, which
I will provide if jurors request it. I don't anticipate more than a
single-digit number of total threads for the 'presentation', lest one fears
this being an interminable process.<g>
When that's completed, I will ask the jury to decide if, beyond any
reasonable doubt, they conclude that "J Young" is indeed behind these other
entities. Simple majority.
Since one 'juror' (chosen by Mr. Young) has stated he could not be
impartial, that leaves us with 4 'jurors'. While that might be a problem in
the event of a 2/2 tie, I feel the evidence is compelling enough that that
will not be a problem. In addition, one 'juror' (Ray Fischer) has a *far*
more pressing obligation later in the week (vacation), in the event a
decision has not been reached prior to his departure, in the event of a 2/1
decision (in either direction) final tally will await that moment in which
Ray has an opportunity to cast his vote.
Post # 1 is a bit of a whopper @ 76 kb. I apologize for that.
For curious lurkers, the contents of this post consists of numerous
Usenet headers, categorized for the purpose of showing the significant
linkage between Mr. "Young", Mr. "Getiner", and the assorted AOL forgeries.
I ask only that 'jurors' quickly review the information (headers) provided,
noting the rather dramatic number of times these assorted User ID's overlap
NNTP's. All message ID's are provided, should there be any question as to
the veracity of the headers. Ultimately, this will come down to not only the
evidence provided, but to the 'juror's' read on the character and veracity
of Mr. "Young" and myself.
Thanks for your cooperation in this sure-to-be entertaining exercise.
LC~ Thinking this should be just like Judge Judy on acid.
"Truth is generally the best vindication against slander."~Abraham Lincoln
.

User: "J Young"

Title: Re: The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT) 01 Aug 2005 10:59:49 PM
LC wrote:

Well, it's Monday, and we now have a jury for the proceedings. Shall we
begin?

We are still 1 juror short. I would like to suggest Sanders Kaufman
(alt.politics.homosexuality,tx.politics) as the 5th juror.


Quick back story:

Quick? Molly's soliloquy was quicker.
You can start by eliminating any other posters who are not J Young or
Iben Getiner, unless you are submitting posts from all AOL customers
who use Usenet and not just the ones who suit your purposes, for
comparison.
.
User: "LC"

Title: Re: The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT) 02 Aug 2005 07:16:55 AM
"J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1122955189.577680.53070@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

LC wrote:

Well, it's Monday, and we now have a jury for the proceedings. Shall we
begin?

We are still 1 juror short. I would like to suggest Sanders Kaufman
(alt.politics.homosexuality,tx.politics) as the 5th juror.

That would be fine. Line him up. He'll be welcomed.

Quick back story:

Quick? Molly's soliloquy was quicker.
You can start by eliminating any other posters who are not J Young or
Iben Getiner, unless you are submitting posts from all AOL customers
who use Usenet and not just the ones who suit your purposes, for
comparison.

I've set it up just as you asked.
That is, after you *suddenly backed away* from this bold statement:
"Other than the UserID <looseaint@aol.com>, which I used to *****-slap
you from one end of Usenet to the other as punishment for stalking and
harrassing me, I deny every other so-called sockpuppet."
From: "J Young" <youngopinions@aol.com>
Message-ID: <1122307637.734375.119970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
I guess you just couldn't figure out which incriminating messages you needed
to cancel, hmmmm?
You *do* have a verifiable record in that regard, y'know.

Them and 35,000,000 other customers.

Well, the jury, per your late demand, will only be ruling on two:
You, and your 'friend' IBen.
LC~ Don't go away mad, boys. Just go away.
"Look...! It's the LYNCHING of IBen Getiner!
Hateful bleeding hypocrites, and they know it. All of them."
From:
(IBen Getiner)
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: A message to "loose cannons" supporters.
Date: 22 Apr 2004 21:15:34 -0700
Message-ID: <396a5984.0404222015.6731f0c1@posting.google.com>
.


User: "IBen Getiner"

Title: Re: The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 (OT) 02 Aug 2005 12:01:01 AM
Path:
g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!d4f656ab!not-for-mail
From: "Loose Cannon" <looseai...@this.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles
References: <1116269482.797132.24180@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
<20281-4288F4F5-370@storefull-3333.bay.webtv.net>
<1116274147.211440.145660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Greatest Beatles' Concert
Lines: 23
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <YM7ie.2023$Lc1.47@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 20:55:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.248.30.30
X-Complaints-To:

X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1116276920 209.248.30.30
(Mon, 16 May 2005 13:55:20 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:55:20 PDT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
#35
<fattuc...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1116274147.211440.145660@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
<snip crap>

You seem to see Ibens jumping out at you at every corner.

Your cowardly failure to address the insurmountable evidence as
presented
is noted.
How...not surprising.
LC~ Run, IBen, run!
"Ordinarily he was insane, but he had lucid moments when he was merely
stupid."~Heinrich Heine
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.music.beatles/browse_frm/thread/480207e371cac2dc?scoring=d&q
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
The trial of "J Young", pt.2 (OT)
J Young Christian of the Day: Convicted Pedophile Priest On Trial for Yet Abother Crime
The trial of "J Young", pt.3 (OT)
The trial of "J Young", Conclusion (OT)
The Trial of "J Young": Request for a Verdict.
The trial of 'J Young', pt. 1 NNTP's. (OT)
J Young Christian Morality: Another Pedophile Priest on Trial in PA
J Young Christian Morality: NY Priest on Trial for Sex Abuse
J Young Christian Morality: KY Priest On Trial for Rape of Woman
J Young Christian Morality: Memphis Priest on Trial for Molesting Underage Girl
Keith Ray of Tucson is an atheist Re: Welcome to the JP Young jihad
Iraq policy leading up to military draft for young Americans
Louisa Young
J Young Christian of the Day: CA Youth Pastor Sentenced for Molesting Kids
J Young Christianity: St Petersburg Girl STABBED for Being Black (Praise Rightwing Jesus! Hallelujah!)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER