RamRod Sword of Baal wrote:

Now at first glance it would seem that, by this post, 23% of these people
(adults) have had sex with 13 to 15 year olds, now I have no way of
knowing
if this is true or not, but what this does not say if those very same
people
were not 13 to 15 years old when they had sex with those 13 to 15 year
olds.

IE it was not necessarily a case of adults having sex with kids, but it
can
be kids having sex with kids.

INDEED: "Tragically [LOL!! Why is sex always so "tragic" to these
people?] ], 50 percent of the males in their survey experienced their
first sexual encounter at age 15 or less."

The "Gay Report", as it is known, is fatally flawed.
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,005.htm

The numbers presented are not achieved by a random selection of
respondents. No statistician would look at the research methods and
come to the conclusion that the numbers would be representative of the
larger gay population.

The conclusions are invalid as presented.

Masculist wrote:

Note that about the first ten posts to this article were by faggots

Honey, wake-up call for ya: most of the people who post here are gay.
Or at least support gays.

Which presents the question: What are YOU doing here?

Masculist wrote:

Note that about the first ten posts to this article were by faggots

Honey, wake-up call for ya: most of the people who post here are gay.
Or at least support gays.

Which presents the question: What are YOU doing here?

*applause*

Yet another fine example of the bigotry & hatred [...]

On 8 Oct 2006 12:08:16 -0700, in article
<1160334496.008644.300360@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Masculist
<MASCULIST@gmail.com> spewed forth....

J Young wrote:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52330

Note that about the first ten posts to this article were by faggots
doing their wise ***** redirection and obfuscation number like the good
marxists they are...not to mention the ***** head faggots they also are.

As for the usual critical ***** of the study which may or may not be
true, but when it comes from faggots and feminists you can bet it isn't
true, it was a large sample and done by faggots who would only use
questionable samples in a way to support them. That means the
correlation between faggotry and child molestation is likely MUCH
LARGER. They know it too and that's why they want into the Boy Scouts.
I know it from extensive personal and professional experience. I've
lived with them as well as studied and worked helping them. "Them"
being child molesters and gays, oh excuse me, I meant to say faggots.
I should clarify that I like most gays and the word ***** is meant to
apply to gay activists who I think are evil and trying to destroy our
society. I feel the same way about feminists.

The question is why are republicans so ineffective in countering the
gays? They're pussies and gays too that's why.

*applause*

Yet another fine example of the bigotry & hatred which flows through the
veins of one Tom Smith.

It's quite interesting how heterosexual pedophilia is practically
encouraged in our society, while homosexual pedophilia is viewed as an
unacceptable abomination. For instance, I doubt Michael Jackson would
have even received half the scrutiny he did, has his victims been young
teen females. Yes, if they were girls, we would have witnessed more of
the usual victim blame game, which alleges that the girl somehow "brought
it on herself" by dressing a certain way, or the old classic rapist
standby "She seduced me". In the US, women are STILL considered
inferiors, in spite of any civil rights laws. As such, sexual abuse is
viewed as something which is our "duty" to tolerate. When this same crime
is committed against a young male (at the hands of another male), the
typical misogynist stance is that such actions are deplorable, NOT for
the obvious reason (violation of a child is wrong, regardless of gender),
but because they feel that a male child is somehow superior to females &
undeserving of such treatment. Remember, in the typical American
heterosexual male's mind, getting raped (regardless of age) is a payback
to females for imagined wrongs.

I think the law labeling sums it up nicely:

Man + 14 year old boy = Child molestation

Man + 14 year old girl = Statutory rape

And we all know how lightly the crime of Statutory rape is punished.
Child molestation is another case, however. It is also worth mentioning
that the reaction from most heterosexual American males (in regard to
man/boy molestation) is based not only on prejudice against females, but
their seething hatred for homosexuals... regardless of whether these men
are pedophiles or not. The heterosexual male is just looking for an
excuse to criticize a gay man's lifestyle... the occasional "young stuff"
incident provides him with the opportunity. "You're all a bunch of filthy
perverts!" is commonly blurted from the mouths & keyboards of these
hypocrites. A few days later, you will see these very same men... lusting
after some young girl, 20+ years their junior.

LOL Oh, the irony of it all.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"ScottyFLL" <ScottyFLL@gmail.com> wrote in message

(The children don't care. It's the uptight parents who have seizures
whenever sex is mentioned. Not a single child died as a result of
having witnessed Janet Jackson's fabulous wardrobe malfunction. Nor
have any children died as a result of two women having a wedding.)

As a direct result, no.

Lesbian marriage promotes in which anything that a woman does with her

is considered acceptable, and in which no criticism of sexual conduct is
legitimate.

That in turn leads to unborn babies being pulled to pieces.

However not all lesbians are abortive or even support abortion, I fully
accept that.

--
www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm
freeware games to download.

"ScottyFLL" <ScottyFLL@gmail.com> wrote in message

(The children don't care. It's the uptight parents who have seizures
whenever sex is mentioned. Not a single child died as a result of
having witnessed Janet Jackson's fabulous wardrobe malfunction. Nor
have any children died as a result of two women having a wedding.)

As a direct result, no.

Lesbian marriage promotes in which

anything that a woman does with her body
is considered acceptable, and in which no criticism of sexual conduct is
legitimate.

That in turn leads to unborn babies being pulled to pieces.

However not all lesbians are abortive or even support abortion, I fully
accept that.

Lesbian marriage promotes in which anything that a woman does with her body
is considered acceptable, and in which no criticism of sexual conduct is
legitimate. That in turn leads to unborn babies being pulled to pieces.

However not all lesbians are abortive or even support abortion, I fully
accept that.