| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Atheist Crusher" |
| Date: |
26 Sep 2004 09:47:12 PM |
| Object: |
The truth about the aclu |
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably represent
the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist support. Like
mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the deceptive party line
(hence the term "front"), while actually advancing the real party line. In
this way the party is able to influence thousands of non-Communists, collect
large sums of money, and reach the minds, pens, and tongues of many
high-ranking and distinguished individuals. Moreover fronts are excellent
fields for party recruitment."
http://www.atheistfools.com/Truth%20about%20the%20aclu.htm
--
Atheistfools.com
Information to stimulate your rational mind!
.
|
|
| User: "Tom" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 08:35:19 AM |
|
|
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote in message
news:QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net...
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably represent
the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist support.
Like mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the deceptive party
line (hence the term "front"), while actually advancing the real party
line. In this way the party is able to influence thousands of
non-Communists, collect large sums of money, and reach the minds, pens,
and tongues of many high-ranking and distinguished individuals. Moreover
fronts are excellent fields for party recruitment."
http://www.atheistfools.com/Truth%20about%20the%20aclu.htm
--
Atheistfools.com
Information to stimulate your rational mind.
Did you have a point with this post?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atheist Crusher" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 11:30:38 AM |
|
|
"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10lg5opso1nir4f@corp.supernews.com...
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote in message
news:QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net...
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably
represent the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist
support. Like mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the
deceptive party line (hence the term "front"), while actually advancing
the real party line. In this way the party is able to influence thousands
of non-Communists, collect large sums of money, and reach the minds,
pens, and tongues of many high-ranking and distinguished individuals.
Moreover fronts are excellent fields for party recruitment."
http://www.atheistfools.com/Truth%20about%20the%20aclu.htm
--
Atheistfools.com
Information to stimulate your rational mind.
Did you have a point with this post?
Your high regard of me is as suitable as your self-deprecation. However, I
am concerned by your overuse of the personal pronoun "I". Fantasizing must
not have the author as the subject. I couldn't possibly have anyone around
me who, because of pathological self-indulgence, was more interested in
themselves than in me - remember that in future communication!
.
|
|
|
| User: "VoiceOfReason" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 10:11:12 PM |
|
|
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote in message news:<OeX5d.1343$En6.22826@news.uswest.net>...
"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10lg5opso1nir4f@corp.supernews.com...
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote in message
news:QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net...
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably
represent the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist
support. Like mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the
deceptive party line (hence the term "front"), while actually advancing
the real party line. In this way the party is able to influence thousands
of non-Communists, collect large sums of money, and reach the minds,
pens, and tongues of many high-ranking and distinguished individuals.
Moreover fronts are excellent fields for party recruitment."
http://www.atheistfools.com/Truth%20about%20the%20aclu.htm
--
Atheistfools.com
Information to stimulate your rational mind.
Did you have a point with this post?
Your high regard of me is as suitable as your self-deprecation. However, I
am concerned by your overuse of the personal pronoun "I". Fantasizing must
not have the author as the subject. I couldn't possibly have anyone around
me who, because of pathological self-indulgence, was more interested in
themselves than in me - remember that in future communication!
Ask the doctor to adjust your dosage. Soon.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "VoiceOfReason" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 10:08:41 PM |
|
|
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote in message news:<QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net>...
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover,
<snip>
Do you always quote infamous gay men to support your position? And
were you aware your post didn't even mention the ACLU?
Did your parents have any children that lived?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
26 Sep 2004 10:26:39 PM |
|
|
In article <QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net>,
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote:
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably represent
the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist support. Like
mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the deceptive party line
(hence the term "front"), while actually advancing the real party line. In
this way the party is able to influence thousands of non-Communists, collect
large sums of money, and reach the minds, pens, and tongues of many
high-ranking and distinguished individuals. Moreover fronts are excellent
fields for party recruitment."
J. Edgar was a master of deceit himself, and was probably a greater
danger to the basic principles of America than any communist.
The ACLU is dedicated to supporting those civil liberties promised us by
the Bill of Rights of our Constitution. Why was J.E. so opposed to them
if he actaully supported the Constitution?
I get a similar feeling about GWB, that he would do away with all our
Constutional guarantees in a second, and without any thought for what he
was destroying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 09:35:51 AM |
|
|
"Virgil" <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@COMCAST.com> wrote in message
news:ITSnetNOTcom%23virgil-BA931C.21263926092004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
In article <QaL5d.770$Pg6.57140@news.uswest.net>,
"Atheist Crusher" <Atheist@fools.com> wrote:
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228: "Fronts probably
represent
the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist support.
Like
mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the deceptive party line
(hence the term "front"), while actually advancing the real party line.
In
this way the party is able to influence thousands of non-Communists,
collect
large sums of money, and reach the minds, pens, and tongues of many
high-ranking and distinguished individuals. Moreover fronts are
excellent
fields for party recruitment."
J. Edgar was a master of deceit himself, and was probably a greater
danger to the basic principles of America than any communist.
The ACLU is dedicated to supporting those civil liberties promised us by
the Bill of Rights of our Constitution. Why was J.E. so opposed to them
if he actaully supported the Constitution?
I get a similar feeling about GWB, that he would do away with all our
Constutional guarantees in a second, and without any thought for what he
was destroying.
Slow down. Back up. There is no logical continuity. First JEH's quote did
not mention the ACLU. What is this, a factual wasteland?
--
Freedom of thought entails no "Intellectual Property".
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: The truth about the aclu |
27 Sep 2004 02:51:06 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:47:12 -0700, "Atheist Crusher"
<Atheist@fools.com> wrote:
"Masters of Deceit," J. Edgar Hoover, page 228:
One of the most ridiculously hyperbolic, frothing-at-the-mouth pieces
of Cold War agitprop ever written, one might note. (And by a drag
queen, no less).
"Fronts probably represent
the party's most successful tactic in capturing non-Communist support. Like
mass agitation and infiltration, fronts espouse the deceptive party line
(hence the term "front"), while actually advancing the real party line. In
this way the party is able to influence thousands of non-Communists, collect
large sums of money, and reach the minds, pens, and tongues of many
high-ranking and distinguished individuals. Moreover fronts are excellent
fields for party recruitment."
I search in vain for a reference to the ACLU in the above. Perhaps you
could point it out?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
