| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Jarmo Antero Manninen" |
| Date: |
05 Feb 2005 07:52:13 AM |
| Object: |
The Truth is God? |
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
Born.8th of November, 1970, in Pieksamaki
http://www.iki.fi/manninen/
.
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 10:17:17 AM |
|
|
"Jarmo Antero Manninen" <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
Born.8th of November, 1970, in Pieksamaki
http://www.iki.fi/manninen/
Then you would have us assume that there is an entity called Truth. In the
Hindu there is Varuna. Varuna is also God-truth.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Raptor514" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 09:32:56 AM |
|
|
"Jarmo Antero Manninen" <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
What you define as 'God' here is best referred to as the 'universe.'
Raptor514
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
Born.8th of November, 1970, in Pieksamaki
http://www.iki.fi/manninen/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 08:49:35 AM |
|
|
"Jarmo Antero Manninen" <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
You're still saying there is a being called god.
What part of NO THERE ISN'T don't you understand? Unless you're redefining
your god to mean that thing that you need to use as a mental crutch to get
through life, we're never going to agree.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ScotMc" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
02 Mar 2005 07:52:24 AM |
|
|
"Jarmo Antero Manninen" <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
Analogy: Freud's investigations of the mind led
him to develop a model of how the mind functions.
If we look at the physical structure of the brain, we
can't find any parts that we can point to and say
"here are the Ego, Id and Superego". But nontheless,
Freud's concepts form a model and that model
can be quite useful. But does the Ego, for example,
actually exist? Or did Freud try to define something
that doesn't actually exist into existence? My best
answer to that question is Ego exists as a concept
and the concept is useful. When you know the model
people can be see to operate as having an Ego.
This is repeatable and intersubjectively testable.
Now, in the case of God: Are you trying to define
something that doesn't actually exist into existence?
Does the God concept explain any objective or
even subjective phenomena? The answer to this
question, surprisingly, is "Yes the God concept
does explain some phenomena" and here it
is.
Through the practise of meditation a person
can enter a mental state known in yoga-speak
as samadhi. Samadhi can be characterized
as a feeling of one-ness with everything and a
one-ness of everything. Samadhi is also said
to feel *more real* than regular waking
consciousness. In Hinduism the one-ness is
known as Brahman or God (not Brahma but
Brahman. There is a difference.)
The "one-ness" is considered to be the true reality
and 'normal reality' as it is usually perceived is
considered to be an illusion. So, it is not at all
surprising that Hinduism is a pantheistic religion.
Also, this feeling of one-ness can be achieved
using certain hallucinogenic drugs.
So the God concept forms a model that explains
what happens through the practise of meditation.
(or smoking some really good *****)
This is repeatable and intersubjectively testable.
But it leaves the question Is God real or just a
state of mind?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Josef Balluch" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 07:41:23 PM |
|
|
In a message sent 'round the world, Jarmo Antero Manninen poured fuel on
the fire with the following:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
How did your deity become nifed?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
Deities cannot be defined into existence.
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Contradicts #2.
I don't try prove anything here.
And you have succeeded.
This is just a
definition.
I know.
But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
There are plenty of gods that would be possible.
Regards,
Josef
Everything that deceives may be said to enchant.
-- Plato
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Bohn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 01:44:22 PM |
|
|
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
Born.8th of November, 1970, in Pieksamaki
http://www.iki.fi/manninen/
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife him in
the first place?
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 01:47:10 PM |
|
|
Gary Bohn wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife him
in
the first place?
Now now, it's not nife to make fun of other people's typos... ;)
m
.
|
|
|
| User: "Atheistagnostic" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 04:49:00 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Gary Bohn wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife him
in
the first place?
Now now, it's not nife to make fun of other people's typos... ;)
m
You are being equivocal with the term, 'God' with a capital G. That term
comes with it's own already well established load of baggage (Creator,
First Cause, Granter of Prayers, Meddler in Human Affairs, Chooser of
God's Chosen People, the Jews, etc. etc.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 05:12:42 PM |
|
|
Atheistagnostic wrote:
manutter51@alethian.org wrote:
Gary Bohn wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife
him
in
the first place?
Now now, it's not nife to make fun of other people's typos... ;)
m
You are being equivocal with the term, 'God' with a capital G. That
term
comes with it's own already well established load of baggage
(Creator,
First Cause, Granter of Prayers, Meddler in Human Affairs, Chooser of
God's Chosen People, the Jews, etc. etc.)
If you say so.
m
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Bohn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 07:34:13 PM |
|
|
"manutter51@alethian.org" <manutter51@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1107645162.798566.189880@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Atheistagnostic wrote:
manutter51@alethian.org wrote:
Gary Bohn wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife
him
in
the first place?
Now now, it's not nife to make fun of other people's typos... ;)
m
You are being equivocal with the term, 'God' with a capital G. That
term
comes with it's own already well established load of baggage
(Creator,
First Cause, Granter of Prayers, Meddler in Human Affairs, Chooser of
God's Chosen People, the Jews, etc. etc.)
If you say so.
m
Bloody hell. If they can't stick in the vein of the joke they should
just pull out.
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Virgil" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 05:10:59 PM |
|
|
In article <g9CdnaTPwpzB0JjfRVn-uw@comcast.com>,
Atheistagnostic <atheistagnostic@nospam.net> wrote:
manutter51@alethian.org wrote:
Gary Bohn wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
Why would you want to denife god when it took 6000 years to nife him
in
the first place?
Now now, it's not nife to make fun of other people's typos... ;)
m
You are being equivocal with the term, 'God' with a capital G. That term
comes with it's own already well established load of baggage (Creator,
First Cause, Granter of Prayers, Meddler in Human Affairs, Chooser of
God's Chosen People, the Jews, etc. etc.)
That presumes one cannot escape the Judeo-Christian-Moslem tradition of
"God", which both begs a large number of serious questions and ignores
considerable varaitions in details.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woden" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 09:38:30 AM |
|
|
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
All the best!
Jarmo Antero Manninen
Born.8th of November, 1970, in Pieksamaki
http://www.iki.fi/manninen/
Why is it necessary to seek any god, no matter what verbal gymnastics you
go through trying to define it.
--
Woden
"religion is a socio-political system for controlling people's thoughts,
lives and actions based on ancient myths and superstitions, perpetrated
through generations of subtle yet pervasive brainwashing."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 08:24:16 AM |
|
|
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
--
Enkidu AA# 2165
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then where does evil come from?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
Attributed to Epicurus 341-270 B.C.E.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 02:43:42 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb 2005 14:24:16 GMT, Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
I'll go along with that, if I can have mustard.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
January 27th
Na bister 500,000
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 09:31:48 AM |
|
|
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
07 Feb 2005 11:53:29 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:31:48 -0600, Vic Sagerquist
<address@withheld.com> wrote:
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted, whirled, then
shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
I guess that's one way to get 'mayonaise'........
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Bohn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 01:45:41 PM |
|
|
Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns95F44CD4044ECvicman@127.0.0.1:
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
Not for the person who wants to eat the sandwich.
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Six Million Dollar Clayton" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 06:15:41 PM |
|
|
"Gary Bohn" <garybohn@REMOVETHISaccesscomm.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns95F5314FDAC6DGaryBohn@130.133.1.4...
Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns95F44CD4044ECvicman@127.0.0.1:
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
Not for the person who wants to eat the sandwich.
Yeah...makes it stick to the roof of your mouth!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary Bohn" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 07:28:06 PM |
|
|
"The Six Million Dollar Clayton" <cjfat@SPAMBLOCKphonymails.com> wrote
in news:42056181$0$14721$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:
"Gary Bohn" <garybohn@REMOVETHISaccesscomm.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns95F5314FDAC6DGaryBohn@130.133.1.4...
Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns95F44CD4044ECvicman@127.0.0.1:
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted,
whirled, then shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God
into existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
Not for the person who wants to eat the sandwich.
Yeah...makes it stick to the roof of your mouth!
Particularly bad for someone with gout.
--
apatriot #23, aa #1779, Grand Poobah, EAC Department of Oxygen
Deprivation
Responsible for brain damage everywhere!
Gary Bohn
Science rationally modifies a theory to fit evidence, creationism
emotionally modifies evidence to fit the bible.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 02:25:15 PM |
|
|
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Gary Bohn dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Vic Sagerquist <address@withheld.com> wrote in
news:Xns95F44CD4044ECvicman@127.0.0.1:
on 05 Feb 2005 in alt.atheism, Enkidu dropped trou, farted, whirled,
then shouted:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi:
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
I don't try prove anything here. This is just a
definition. But I believe when you seek the truth
you are also seeking the possible God.
You are merely misusing a few words in an effort to define God into
existance. Your logic is no better than this:
1) Nothing is better than sex.
2) A ham sandwich is better than nothing.
3) Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than sex.
But having sex with a ham sandwich is better than nothing.
Not for the person who wants to eat the sandwich.
Yup, mayonnaise is not good for a low-carb diet.
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
Why is it that most of the people who are against abortion are the kind of
people you wouldn't want to ***** in the first place?
--George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
05 Feb 2005 08:02:44 PM |
|
|
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
06 Feb 2005 08:45:18 AM |
|
|
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
06 Feb 2005 09:52:29 PM |
|
|
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
07 Feb 2005 03:51:25 PM |
|
|
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
Loser.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
07 Feb 2005 10:11:08 PM |
|
|
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107813085.730088.76300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
Loser.
I know what you are but what am I???
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
07 Feb 2005 11:37:01 PM |
|
|
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107813085.730088.76300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
Loser.
I know what you are but what am I???
QED.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
08 Feb 2005 08:36:29 PM |
|
|
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107841021.539012.62900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107813085.730088.76300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
Loser.
I know what you are but what am I???
QED.
Spell it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
10 Feb 2005 01:13:27 PM |
|
|
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107841021.539012.62900@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107813085.730088.76300@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Rump Ranger <buttpirate@fadmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107701118.319520.317270@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Jarmo Antero Manninen <jmannine@vipunen.hut.fi> wrote in
message
news:m85k6pnglma.fsf@vipunen.hut.fi...
If I denife God like this, can you atheists believe in
Him?
1. The Truth is God (the matter of facts)
2. Everything that exists is God (God is everything
that exists)
3. A human being is not God, but a part of God
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
Hence, your response...
Loser.
I know what you are but what am I???
QED.
Spell it.
Quod erat demonstrandum.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "sanguinevikings" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
06 Feb 2005 09:29:04 AM |
|
|
Rump Ranger wrote:
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
They all thought Jesus was a god
'cause somebody nicked his torso.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rump Ranger" |
|
| Title: Re: The Truth is God? |
06 Feb 2005 09:45:23 AM |
|
|
sanguinevikings wrote:
Rump Ranger wrote:
sAnToLiNa wrote:
Your definition is trivial and worthless.
Your response was even moreso.
They all thought Jesus was a god
'cause somebody nicked his torso.
Do you always post non-sequiters on Usenet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Re: Proof of LORD Almighty GOD: Sin sickness in those without the truth.
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: the sword of the truth cuts Sermo withprecision.
In exactly the same way that you link people who believe in God to Hitler, I link you to Stalin. Atheists have a dangerous potential for fanaticism!!! They are epistemologically arrogant, believe they have the only real truth, and can slaughter anyon
PRAISE GOD! A MUSEUM THAT TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT HUMAN ORIGIN! (note to half-wit atheists: it was not by any evolutionary process)
Proof of LORD Almighty GOD: The truth prevails and remains invincible.
Proofs of LORD Almighty GOD: Pastorio died on April Fool's day, diabetic FR's delusion of grandeur that he is now a psychiatrist is being fed by satan's sockpuppets, and onlookers are starting to accept the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ.
Re: Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan fails in his attempt to block out the light of the truth.
Dear God give me and Jason power to proclaim the TRUTH!!
| The Honest-to-God Truth About Abiogenesis
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: the frustrated efforts of satan to stop the light of the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, from helping diabetics escape from his trap.
Re: Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life: no one can come to the Father(God)(in Heaven), but by me." (John 14:6) This means that if you die without trusting in Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour you will die in your sins and be foreve
Re: The Truth Is Found In God's Word
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan rages furiously as the light of the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, burns him terribly.
Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: satan defeated by the truth.
Proof of LORD Almighty GOD: The truth cuts demons like a hot knife through butter.
|
|
|
