| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
04 Sep 2004 12:04:00 PM |
| Object: |
The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks — bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.2 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -978 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and
mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "dwacon" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
06 Sep 2004 01:25:23 AM |
|
|
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Maybe they're bad at math?
--
The generation that used acid to escape reality
Is now using antacid to deal with reality
http://www.dwacon.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clave" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
06 Sep 2004 01:39:15 AM |
|
|
"dwacon" <hee.haw@jack.*****> wrote in message
news:lpT_c.7840$aW5.3376@fed1read07...
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Maybe they're bad at math?
Odds that there's some academic thing they're good at?
I'll make book against.
Jim
--
"There's no degree in party? Who knew?"
-- Paris Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ike Schuman" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
06 Sep 2004 01:54:55 AM |
|
|
"Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@CableSpeed.com> wrote in message
news:7uadnTaapd4gmKHcRVn-tg@cablespeedwa.com...
"dwacon" <hee.haw@jack.*****> wrote in message
news:lpT_c.7840$aW5.3376@fed1read07...
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Maybe they're bad at math?
Odds that there's some academic thing they're good at?
I'll make book against.
Jim
Too bad you can't call them "dogs".
From: "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDammit@gte.net>
Newsgroups:
seattle.politics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh
References: <Rlru7.916$VZ3.360923@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>
<L3wu7.269$p4.101940@newsfeed.slurp.net>
<9pe56k$jp7$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net>
Subject: Re: Pigboy Steps On His Crank
Lines: 16
Organization: Snoqualmie Valley Aging Hippies' Assn.
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <DZwu7.1567$VZ3.568437@paloalto-snr1.gtei.net>
X-Trace:
/wzbxflwN4C0FjAgqfCN0p32FSB0WrQz4Uh1gRfbFAJUSyGnIqNN8oURzJjr7kG0CJrVJigTa3za!H2On1qZbe3/jk3sa71MZxQLQi0Va31JXFZNDQVJ4rGt72ZnaIZfMMnVYAC7AixFvDdM7bPa4o/mk!BSDnag4=
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 05:02:27 GMT
Distribution: world
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 05:02:28 GMT
"Dave Lagergren (formerly Colonel Clink)" <lagergre@sprynet.com> wrote in
message news:9pe56k$jp7$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net...
Really? I missed that one! Could you give me a source for that??
The bit about calling the 13-year old a dog?
It was on his TV show -- (paraphrased) he asked if anyone had heard about
the
new White House dog, and held up a picture of Chelsea.
It's documented all over the web.
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "dwacon" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
06 Sep 2004 04:52:54 PM |
|
|
Put the twins together with Kerry's two girls and you have an instant HBO
sitcom!
--
The generation that used acid to escape reality
Is now using antacid to deal with reality
http://www.dwacon.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "enry" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
06 Sep 2004 01:29:05 AM |
|
|
dwacon wrote:
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Maybe they're bad at math?
48 bucks and some head, not a bad tip!
If you know what I mean! :)
'enry
--
'enry VIII, I am, I am!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rafael Block" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
08 Sep 2004 12:09:32 PM |
|
|
dwacon wrote:
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Maybe they're bad at math?
Homeschooled?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jésus Pépé" |
|
| Title: Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart????????? |
08 Sep 2004 06:01:18 PM |
|
|
Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart?????????
The Swiftboat vets raise a timeless issue: this is not about what
happened (or did not happen) 5 or 35 years ago in Vietnam or Cambodia.
Rather, it is about honor and courage -- then and now.
John FuckingLiar KKKerry is a self-confessed war criminal who:
* LIES about his self-inflicted injuries for the purpose of obtaining
a medal reserved for those who, in sacrifice for their country,
sustained serious physical injury while in combat with the enemy
* LIES about his opposition to SUVs, of which he is a proud owner
* LIES about his opposition to NAFTA, for which he voted
* LIES about his opposition to Operation Iraqi Freedom, for which he
voted
* LIES about his opposition to the USA PATRIOT Act, for which he voted
* LIES about his support for weapons and body armor for our military,
AGAINST which he voted
* LIES about his support for funding our intelligence agencies,
AGAINST which he voted
* LIES ad infinitum
John FuckingLiar KKKerry is totally unfit for command of any
swiftboat, much less as Commander and Chief of the world's greatest
military! To allow John FuckingLiar KKKerry to get away with such LIES
about his military record -- which are Federal offenses -- is to
dishonor and disrespect all the brave men and women who truly
sacrificed for us all.
FREE!!! Read the book John KKKerry doesn't want you to read!
INTRO
http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier%20Inro.pdf
MAIN CONTENT
http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier.pdf
EPILOGUE
http://nomayo.mu.nu/archives/New%20Soldier%20Epilogue.pdf
Buy it now! http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/002073610X/
mp3 Audio - John "Flipflop" Kerry Admits to War Crimes in Vietnam
http://www.streamload.com/jmstein77/Kerry2.mp3
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,131319,00.html
Navy Probes KKKerry Medal
Friday, September 03, 2004
NEW YORK -- In what has been described by Navy officials as a routine
process, the Pentagon's inspector general's office on Thursday
referred to the secretary of the Navy a request to investigate medals
won by
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry during the Vietnam War.
Government watchdog group Judicial Watch submitted the request for an
investigation. Navy sources said the service will probe the medals,
but added that most questions have arisen because of what appear to be
errors in processing records.
Kerry received five medals during his four months in combat in
Vietnam. Judicial Watch asked the Pentagon to investigate Kerry's
receipt of the Silver Star with a "Combat V" designation, which stands
for valor under fire.
Kerry's campaign Web site includes military records listing the Combat
V citation. Navy procedures show that the Silver Star cannot carry a
Combat V designation because part of the reason the medal is awarded
is
for valor under fire -- the added designation would be redundant. The
findings of the probe, therefore, will not change the record of
Kerry's Vietnam service.
In a letter to Judicial Watch, the inspector general's office said:
"Concerning our allegations of violations of Uniform Code of Military
Justice, we have the responsibility to ... 'report suspected or
alleged violations.' We have informed the secretary of the Navy of the
allegations."
Kerry campaign adviser Michael Meehan released a statement to FOX News
that criticized the attention being paid to the request.
"The facts are clear, the Navy awarded John Kerry the Silver Star, a
Bronze Star with a Combat V and three Purple Hearts. It is waste of
taxpayer's dollars and the Pentagon's time, especially during wartime,
to investigate a 35-year-old Navy clerical error," the statement
reads.
The Navy has said that it's the responsibility of all personnel to
correct errors in official records.
In 1996, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Jeremy Boorda committed
suicide when he learned that a reporter was about to disclose he had
wrongly worn two Combat V pins on a Bronze Star, a medal that does not
denote valor under fire.
At the time, Kerry told the Boston Herald that wrongly wearing the
medals is a severe error in judgment.
"Is it wrong? Yes, it is very wrong. Sufficient to question his
leadership position? The answer is yes," he is quoted as saying.
Kerry also spoke to the Boston Globe about the matter.
"If you wind up being less than what you're pretending to be, there is
a major confrontation with value, self-esteem and your sense of how
others view you."
Judicial Watch representatives said the group also wants an
investigation into Kerry's third citation for the same Silver Star. In
1986, Kerry received the third citation after requesting a copy of his
original citations. This one carried the signature and some additional
words of praise under the signature of then-Navy Secretary John
Lehman.
In a statement to FOX News, Lehman, who served on the Sept. 11
commission that investigated pre-2001 terror attack intelligence
failings, said he had no idea why Kerry received a third citation
under his signature, and that Navy records should be "thoroughly
researched and the facts established."
Meanwhile, in an exclusive interview with FOX News, former President
George H.W. Bush said questions raised about Kerry's protests against
the Vietnam War were legitimate, and he saw nothing wrong with airing
a TV ad assailing Kerry's anti-war testimony by the Swift Boat
Veterans for Truth, a loosely regulated, independent political action
group known as a 527.
"My view is the advertisement showing Senator Kerry as a young veteran
coming back and using his own words to describe atrocities committed
by his own soldiers, sailors, marines or whatever it is, is
devastating," Bush said.
Bush 41 also said Kerry owes the nation and Vietnam veterans an
apology.
"I think it is not enough to say, well, I made a youthful
indiscretion, and I think Senator Kerry ought to apologize."
FOX News' Major Garrett contributed to this report.
Kerry Sends Troops to War But Votes Against Weapons
* In 1983, Kerry voted to send troops to Grenada (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1989, Kerry voted to send troops to Panama (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1992, Kerry voted to send troops to Somalia (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1992 he voted to send troops in to Kosovo (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1999, Kerry voted to bomb Bosnia (which did not attack the USA)
* In 2001, Kerry voted to send troops to Afghanistan (which did not
attack the USA)
* In 2002, Kerry voted to send troops to Iraq (which did not attack
the USA)
* On 9 August 2004, Kerry said that he would have sent troops to Iraq
even if he had known that there were no weapons of mass destruction
Even more hypocritical, and why Kerry is totally unfit for command, is
that while Kerry has been so willing to send our troops all over the
world in harm's way, Kerry at the same time has voted against
providing them with weapons that keep them safe. In fact, in 19 years
he voted dozens of times to cut military and intelligence spending. He
also voted against systems that have been the mainstay of keeping our
troops safe:
* Kerry Voted Against B-1 Bomber (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16:
R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against B-2 Stealth Bomber (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-14 (H. R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R
37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-15 (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R
37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-16 (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R
37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against AV-8B Harrier Vertical Takeoff And Landing Jet
Fighters (H.R. 2126, CQ Vote #579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34,
11/16/95, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against AH-64 Apache Helicopters (H.R. 2126, CQ Vote
#579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34, 11/16/95, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Patriot Missiles (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed
79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Aegis Air Defense Cruiser (S. 3189, CQ Vote
#273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Trident Missile System For U.S. Submarines (S.
3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry
Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against M-1 Abrams Tanks (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed
79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Bradley Fighting Vehicle (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Tomahawk Cruise Missile (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
---------------
Liberals Hate America!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kermit" |
|
| Title: Re: Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart????????? |
08 Sep 2004 10:25:11 PM |
|
|
Jésus Pépé <jpepe@N0SPAM.C0M> wrote in message news:<3p3vj01ndcie26gn9n9p9t1rad4h67dg4j@4ax.com>...
Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart?????????
No. Does being drunk for the first 20 years of adulthood prepare you
for the presidency?
The Swiftboat vets raise a timeless issue: this is not about what
happened (or did not happen) 5 or 35 years ago in Vietnam or Cambodia.
Rather, it is about honor and courage -- then and now.
John FuckingLiar KKKerry is a self-confessed war criminal who:
He said he fired in non-fire zones, and burned civilian houses under
orders. He said this was common, and illegal. But our current
president says that neither international law nor the US Consitution
applies to him during wartime, so what's the big deal?
BTW, when is the war on terror going to be over?
<snip unverified claims for multiple lies>
* LIES ad infinitum
John FuckingLiar KKKerry is totally unfit for command of any
swiftboat, much less as Commander and Chief of the world's greatest
military! To allow John FuckingLiar KKKerry to get away with such LIES
about his military record -- which are Federal offenses -- is to
dishonor and disrespect all the brave men and women who truly
sacrificed for us all.
Infant, sustantiate these so-called lies. Justify your association of
Kerry with the Klan. Please explain why an accusation of lies are
sufficient to tar a reputation.
<snip plea for money>
Navy Probes KKKerry Medal
Friday, September 03, 2004
<snip investigation of a 35-year old clerical error>
Judicial Watch representatives said the group also wants an
investigation into Kerry's third citation for the same Silver Star. In
1986, Kerry received the third citation after requesting a copy of his
original citations. This one carried the signature and some additional
words of praise under the signature of then-Navy Secretary John
Lehman.
In a statement to FOX News, Lehman, who served on the Sept. 11
commission that investigated pre-2001 terror attack intelligence
failings, said he had no idea why Kerry received a third citation
under his signature, and that Navy records should be "thoroughly
researched and the facts established."
So far, the records indicate that Thurlow, Elliot, and Hoffman are
lying.
Meanwhile, in an exclusive interview with FOX News, former President
George H.W. Bush said questions raised about Kerry's protests against
the Vietnam War were legitimate, and he saw nothing wrong with airing
a TV ad assailing Kerry's anti-war testimony by the Swift Boat
Veterans for Truth, a loosely regulated, independent political action
group known as a 527.
With an emphasis on loosely regulated. They can make an argument
against his criticizing the war (I think they're wrong, but it's a
legitimate political opinion). But they are lying SOBs when they claim
he didn't do what their own reports claimed in 1969.
Most of the SBVfT are just vets angry with Kerry about his politics
after the war. *They have political opinions, not "truth" to reveal.
"My view is the advertisement showing Senator Kerry as a young veteran
coming back and using his own words to describe atrocities committed
by his own soldiers, sailors, marines or whatever it is, is
devastating," Bush said.
So... if criticism gives encouragement to an enemy (and it does), does
that mean that our republic is no longer free to criticize the
president? Does that mean political discourse must come to an end? If
we should not have been in Vietnam, then which is the greater sin -
escalating the war, as LBJ and Nixon did, or criticizing our wrong, as
Kerry did?
Fortunately, the GOP never criticized Clinton during our engagements
in Bosnia and Somalia. Oh, wait...
Bush 41 also said Kerry owes the nation and Vietnam veterans an
apology.
Does Bush 43 owe us an apology for driving drunk for 20 years? This
shows a disdain for fellow ctizens, and contempt for life and law
which is *very disturbing in a commander in chief.
Nixon and LBJ owed us apologies for creating that war, but we never
got 'em.
"I think it is not enough to say, well, I made a youthful
indiscretion, and I think Senator Kerry ought to apologize."
FOX News' Major Garrett contributed to this report.
Kerry Sends Troops to War But Votes Against Weapons
* In 1983, Kerry voted to send troops to Grenada (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1989, Kerry voted to send troops to Panama (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1992, Kerry voted to send troops to Somalia (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1992 he voted to send troops in to Kosovo (which did not attack
the USA)
* In 1999, Kerry voted to bomb Bosnia (which did not attack the USA)
* In 2001, Kerry voted to send troops to Afghanistan (which did not
attack the USA)
* In 2002, Kerry voted to send troops to Iraq (which did not attack
the USA)
* On 9 August 2004, Kerry said that he would have sent troops to Iraq
even if he had known that there were no weapons of mass destruction
Even more hypocritical, and why Kerry is totally unfit for command,
Speaking of hypocrisy and total lack of honor, your lying,
dishonorable, sleazy, and anti-American representation of the Bush
gang of thugs explains why we have to vote him out.
is
that while Kerry has been so willing to send our troops all over the
world in harm's way,
The irony here is so thick you can cut it with a knife. *Bush sent
them into an unnecessary and unjust war.
Kerry at the same time has voted against
providing them with weapons that keep them safe. In fact, in 19 years
he voted dozens of times to cut military and intelligence spending. He
also voted against systems that have been the mainstay of keeping our
troops safe:
http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=209
Note that S- 3189 and S-2126 were opposed by the same gang of
barbarians currently in power. For S-3189, in which are listed 9 or 10
weapons Kerry voted against, the elder President Bush, Colin Powell,
and ***** Cheney wanted it to fail. Cheney sent an open letter to the
senate in which he said that "you guys are making me spend too much
money on weapons systems we don't need". (For those of you old enuf to
remember, Bush 41 was voted into office partly on the economic
windfall of the fall of the Soviet Union. The ending of the cold war
gave us a "Peace Dividend".) Kerry, several other Democrats, and
several Republicans showed the fiscal restraint that G. H. W. Bush and
Cheney wanted. Who's the hypocrit?
* Kerry Voted Against B-1 Bomber (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16:
R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against B-2 Stealth Bomber (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-14 (H. R. 5803, CQ Vote #319: Adopted 80-17: R
37-6; D 43-11, 10/26/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-15 (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R
37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against F-16 (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R
37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against AV-8B Harrier Vertical Takeoff And Landing Jet
Fighters (H.R. 2126, CQ Vote #579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34,
11/16/95, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against AH-64 Apache Helicopters (H.R. 2126, CQ Vote
#579: Adopted 59-39: R 48-5; D 11-34, 11/16/95, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Patriot Missiles (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed
79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Aegis Air Defense Cruiser (S. 3189, CQ Vote
#273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Trident Missile System For U.S. Submarines (S.
3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry
Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against M-1 Abrams Tanks (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273: Passed
79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Bradley Fighting Vehicle (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
* Kerry Voted Against Tomahawk Cruise Missile (S. 3189, CQ Vote #273:
Passed 79-16: R 37-5; D 42-11, 10/15/90, Kerry Voted Nay)
All aquiescing to Cheney's requests, liar.
---------------
Liberals Hate America!
The neo-cons hate everything America stood for: courage,
self-sacrifice, honor, and liberty. They hate state rights,
democracies, open government, fiscal responsibility, global stability,
keeping commitments, truth, and honor. I felt OK when Eisenhower and
Ford were president. Bring back the conservatives! Then if my guy or
gal loses, it'll be OK. This gang of lying thieves and imperialists
have to go!
Kermit
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rafael Block" |
|
| Title: Re: Does a self-inflicted paper cut qualify for a Purple Heart????????? |
09 Sep 2004 02:26:31 PM |
|
|
Kermit wrote:
The neo-cons hate everything America stood for: courage,
self-sacrifice, honor, and liberty.
Don't forget standing up for those unable to do so for themselves.
They hate state rights,
democracies, open government, fiscal responsibility, global stability,
keeping commitments, truth, and honor. I felt OK when Eisenhower and
Ford were president. Bring back the conservatives! Then if my guy or
gal loses, it'll be OK. This gang of lying thieves and imperialists
have to go!
Kermit
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
04 Sep 2004 12:13:43 PM |
|
|
"Yang AthD h.c" <eacmole@mail.com> wrote in message
news:8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks - bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Tips are for the little people. Not for elitists like the Bushes.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
04 Sep 2004 05:49:30 PM |
|
|
(Yang AthD h.c) wrote in message news:<8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com>...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks ? bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Where was this at? Most place automatically put the tip on the bill
for a party that size.
.
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
04 Sep 2004 07:05:37 PM |
|
|
On 4 Sep 2004 15:49:30 -0700, (Al) wrote:
eacmole@mail.com (Yang AthD h.c) wrote in message news:<8927c4e8.0409040904.e5b93e7@posting.google.com>...
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks ? bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider. "Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Where was this at? Most place automatically put the tip on the bill
for a party that size.
What, you couldn't be bothered to click on the URL? Or even read what
you were replying to?
It was at one of the newest trendy NYC clubs, "17", as per the article
referenced, and they were "comped" for their drinks as is quoted
above, (meaning they weren't charged, but given the drinks free as a
courtesy because of their celebrity value for the club) so there was
no bill to pay. Ordinarily, celebrities of their stature are expected
to tip commensurately in return, and most do.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Darnell" |
|
| Title: Bush turkey was real, not fake (Another Lie Debunked-This one Really Nutty) |
04 Sep 2004 03:27:40 PM |
|
|
Bush turkey was real, not fake (Another Lie Debunked-This one Really
Nutty)
New York Times Corrections July 11, 2004
An article last Sunday about surprises in politics referred
incorrectly to the turkey carried by President Bush during his
unannounced visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving. It
was real, not fake.
For some months various raving lunatics on the Left has been bizarrely
trumpeting the fact that the turkey Bush served during his unannounced
visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving was fake. This
one needs no comment except by those interested in acquired
psychiatric disorders and political infantilism.
Transcript Sunday, August 31, 2003 Meet the Press
Oct. 9, 2002 MSNBC
MR. RUSSERT: I went back and re-read your speech on the floor of the
Senate October 9, and I want to share that with you and our viewers...
SEN. KERRY: Absolutely.
MR. RUSSERT: ...because you repeated many of exactly the same claims
and concerns that President Bush did.
SEN. KERRY: Correct.
MR. RUSSERT: Let’s watch.
(Videotape, October 9, 2002):
SEN. KERRY: Iraq has some lethal and incapacitating agents and is
capable of quickly producing weaponizing of a variety of such agents,
including anthrax, for delivery on a range of vehicles, such as bombs,
missiles, aerial sprayers and covert operatives which would bring them
to the United States itself.
In addition, we know they are developing unmanned aerial vehicles
capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents.
According to the CIA’s report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree
that they are seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that
Saddam Hussein wants to develop them. In the wake of September 11,
who among us can say with any certainty to anybody that the weapons
might not be used against our troops or against allies in the region?
Who can say that this master of miscalculation will not develop a
weapon of mass destruction even greater, a nuclear weapon?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Obvious" |
|
| Title: Re: Bush turkey was real, not fake (Another Lie Debunked-This one Really Nutty) |
04 Sep 2004 03:35:17 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:27:40 -0400, Bill Darnell wrote:
Bush turkey was real, not fake (Another Lie Debunked-This one Really
Nutty)
New York Times Corrections July 11, 2004
An article last Sunday about surprises in politics referred
incorrectly to the turkey carried by President Bush during his
unannounced visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving. It
was real, not fake.
For some months various raving lunatics on the Left has been bizarrely
trumpeting the fact that the turkey Bush served during his unannounced
visit to American troops in Baghdad over Thanksgiving was fake. This
one needs no comment except by those interested in acquired
psychiatric disorders and political infantilism.
Transcript Sunday, August 31, 2003 Meet the Press
Oct. 9, 2002 MSNBC
MR. RUSSERT: I went back and re-read your speech on the floor of the
Senate October 9, and I want to share that with you and our viewers...
SEN. KERRY: Absolutely.
MR. RUSSERT: ...because you repeated many of exactly the same claims
and concerns that President Bush did.
SEN. KERRY: Correct.
MR. RUSSERT: Let’s watch.
(Videotape, October 9, 2002):
SEN. KERRY: Iraq has some lethal and incapacitating agents and is
capable of quickly producing weaponizing of a variety of such agents,
including anthrax, for delivery on a range of vehicles, such as bombs,
missiles, aerial sprayers and covert operatives which would bring them
to the United States itself.
In addition, we know they are developing unmanned aerial vehicles
capable of delivering chemical and biological warfare agents.
According to the CIA’s report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree
that they are seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that
Saddam Hussein wants to develop them. In the wake of September 11,
who among us can say with any certainty to anybody that the weapons
might not be used against our troops or against allies in the region?
Who can say that this master of miscalculation will not develop a
weapon of mass destruction even greater, a nuclear weapon?
Yes, I completely agree, Dubyah really is a turkey...
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Darnell" |
|
| Title: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
04 Sep 2004 03:23:57 PM |
|
|
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Buck Fush" |
|
| Title: Re: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
04 Sep 2004 08:52:50 PM |
|
|
In article <829kj0p22vr30jbfg2bc1fuc06vucj7de1@4ax.com>, Bill Darnell
<bdarnell@N0SPAM.0RG> wrote:
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
THIS WAS GREAT NEWS...........in July!!!!!!!!!
Look at the date of the article >July 27.
Damn Republicans are easily duped...
see
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/0901economy01.
html
Consumer confidence in Aug. fell sharply
Anne D'Innocenzio
Associated Press
Sept. 1, 2004 12:00 AM
NEW YORK - Consumers' renewed worries about job prospects led to a
bigger-than-expected drop in confidence in August and provided more
evidence of the fragility of the economic expansion.
The Consumer Confidence Index, which had been rising since April,
dropped to 98.2 from a revised reading of 105.7 in July, according to a
report Tuesday from The Conference Board, a private research group.
The reading was well below the 103.5 that analysts expected, and was
the lowest since May, when it registered 93.1.
"The slowdown in job growth has curbed consumers' confidence," said
Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board's Consumer Research
Center. "The level of consumer optimism has fallen off and caution has
returned. Until the job market and pace of hiring picks up, this
cautious attitude will prevail."
Economists closely track consumer confidence because consumer spending
accounts for two-thirds of all U.S. economic activity.
The report of the surprising large decline in consumer confidence came
a day after the Commerce Department said consumers spent more freely in
July, raising hopes that June's economic pause would only be temporary.
The government disclosed at the same time, however, that personal
incomes grew slower than analysts expected in July.
But some economists were not deeply concerned about the dip in
confidence.
Mark Vitner, an economist at Wachovia Securities, sees the latest
snapshot of consumer sentiment as only a "bump in the road" and expects
the index will rebound in September.
"Consumers still sense that the recovery is on track, and they are
expressing their concerns on the lack of job growth," he added.
Michael Niemira, chief economist at the International Council of
Shopping Centers, believes that when taking the numbers in context with
the big rise in consumer confidence levels in June and July, "they're
not as bad as they might appear." Consumer confidence jumped to 102.8
in June from 93.1 in May.
The consumer confidence report, whose cutoff date for preliminary
results was Aug. 24, captures the period when oil prices surged,
briefly topping $49 per barrel, before falling dramatically at the end
of the month.
However, Franco said she hasn't seen the surge in oil prices taking a
"bite out of confidence" in surveys with consumers. Rather, she said,
consumers' overall job outlook is what's hurting confidence because "it
is a source of spending and income."
Economists are also anxiously awaiting August job figures from the
Labor Department, due out Friday. Analysts are expecting the nation's
non-farm payrolls to add 150,000 jobs. Job growth slowed dramatically
in July; a meager 32,000 jobs were added, the slowest pace since
December.
The consumer confidence report said the Present Situation index fell
to 100.7 from 106.4, while the Expectations Index, which measures
consumers' outlook over the next six months, dropped to 96.6 from
105.3.
Consumers' assessment of current conditions was less upbeat than last
month. Those saying business conditions are "good" declined to 23.2
percent from 25.2 percent. Those claiming conditions are "bad" rose to
20.1 percent from 19.1 percent. Consumers saying jobs are "plentiful"
decreased to 18.1 percent from 19.7 percent while those claiming jobs
are "hard to get" rose to 25.8 percent from 25.7 percent in July.
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Obvious" |
|
| Title: Re: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
04 Sep 2004 03:38:01 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Bill Darnell wrote:
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
Odd, I saw an article in the Indianapolis Star, a Repug rag, that said
consumer confidence on the wane.... I guess it's all in who you actually
ask...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Egbert Sousè" |
|
| Title: Re: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
04 Sep 2004 04:24:45 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:38:01 GMT, "Mr. Obvious"
<mr.obviousnospam@frontiernet.net> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Bill Darnell wrote:
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
Odd, I saw an article in the Indianapolis Star, a Repug rag, that said
consumer confidence on the wane.... I guess it's all in who you actually
ask...
Depends on who the consumer is. If he's a Democrat; his confidence is
surely on the wane.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Obvious" |
|
| Title: Re: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
05 Sep 2004 12:29:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 21:24:45 GMT, Egbert Sousè wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:38:01 GMT, "Mr. Obvious"
<mr.obviousnospam@frontiernet.net> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Bill Darnell wrote:
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
Odd, I saw an article in the Indianapolis Star, a Repug rag, that said
consumer confidence on the wane.... I guess it's all in who you actually
ask...
Depends on who the consumer is. If he's a Democrat; his confidence is
surely on the wane.
Well, actually, it's probably every Middle Class family who spent their tax
cut on a week's worth of groceries while Priscilla Millionaira spent hers
on bling bling, yatchs and fast sporty cars. All of which she already had
in abundance. She's sure got the confidence.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Egbert Sousè" |
|
| Title: Re: Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!! |
05 Sep 2004 12:03:46 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 05:29:19 GMT, "Mr. Obvious"
<mr.obviousnospam@frontiernet.net> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 21:24:45 GMT, Egbert Sousè wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 20:38:01 GMT, "Mr. Obvious"
<mr.obviousnospam@frontiernet.net> wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 16:23:57 -0400, Bill Darnell wrote:
Consumer confidence hits 2 year high. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!!!
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=5790089
Consumer Confidence Soars, Housing Strong
Tue Jul 27, 2004 05:09 PM ET
By Mark Felsenthal
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence surged to a two-year
high this month on hiring hopes while new home sales in June posted a
smaller decline than expected, according to two reports on Tuesday
that signaled the economy may be picking up after a brief hiatus.
The Conference Board, a private forecasting group, said its consumer
sentiment gauge climbed in July for the fourth straight month to 106.1
from an upwardly revised 102.8 in June, outpacing Wall Street
forecasts.
"These are strong numbers. I have no doubt they indicate continuity
for the economic expansion, and are a prelude to a second half that is
stronger than the first half," said David Littmann, chief economist at
Comerica Bank.
Stock markets and the dollar rallied on the buoyant data, while
investors dumped safe-haven Treasuries.
The Dow Jones Industrials rose 123 points, or 1.2 percent, to 10,085,
its biggest gain since early June. The dollar rose to five-week highs
against the euro.
--------------
Liberals Hate America!
Odd, I saw an article in the Indianapolis Star, a Repug rag, that said
consumer confidence on the wane.... I guess it's all in who you actually
ask...
Depends on who the consumer is. If he's a Democrat; his confidence is
surely on the wane.
Well, actually, it's probably every Middle Class family who spent their tax
cut on a week's worth of groceries while Priscilla Millionaira spent hers
on bling bling, yatchs and fast sporty cars. All of which she already had
in abundance. She's sure got the confidence.
Is Priscilla Millionaira related to Terayza Billionaira? I've heard
that Terayza bought her gigilo a big new SUV and a new wind surfing
rig.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: The Twins: Drunks And Lousy Tippers |
04 Sep 2004 12:20:24 PM |
|
|
On 4 Sep 2004 10:04:00 -0700, (Yang AthD h.c) wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix.htm
"They [and their entourage of about 25] drank $4,500 dollars worth of
drinks — bottles and bottles of vodka," says a club insider.
In fairness, at some of New York's trendier clubs, that amount of
money will get you around three bottles, not all that much for 25+
people.
"Then,
having been comped all the alcohol, they left a $48 tip. We thought 1
per cent was kind of outrageous, considering they are the president's
daughters."
Cheap little lushes, aren't they?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
