THE WORD OF GOD?


 Religions > Atheism > THE WORD OF GOD?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Bill"
Date: 09 Feb 2005 07:29:25 PM
Object: THE WORD OF GOD?
I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles are
the word of their God.
There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does God agree
with?
and whose God?
But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence that
this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?
If there is no objective evidence for the existence of the
Christian/Jewish/Islamic God
than there is no evidence that the Bibles/Koran are the words of any God?
You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of God and
then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is circular
and illogical reasoning
--
Bill
.

User: "Ike"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 10 Feb 2005 05:21:44 PM
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles are
the word of their God.

Define amusing.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does God

agree

with?
and whose God?

God agrees with everything because al things are possible.


But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence that
this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?

A problem for whom? God doesn't need any stinking evidence.
<Incoherent rant snipped:

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of God

and

then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is circular
and illogical reasoning


Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all things
are possible.
.
User: "Michelle Malkin"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 10 Feb 2005 11:22:30 PM
"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:c0SOd.5233$UX3.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles

are

the word of their God.

Define amusing.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does God

agree

with?
and whose God?


God agrees with everything because al things are possible.


But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence

that

this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?


A problem for whom? God doesn't need any stinking evidence.

<Incoherent rant snipped:

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of God

and

then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is

circular

and illogical reasoning


Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all things
are possible.

And, one of those possible things is that your god doesn't exist.
.
User: "Ike"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 11 Feb 2005 03:08:38 PM
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WZSdneD07taa3JHfRVn-iw@comcast.com...


"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:c0SOd.5233$UX3.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles

are

the word of their God.

Define amusing.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does God

agree

with?
and whose God?


God agrees with everything because al things are possible.


But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence

that

this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?


A problem for whom? God doesn't need any stinking evidence.

<Incoherent rant snipped:

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of

God

and

then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is

circular

and illogical reasoning


Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all

things

are possible.

And, one of those possible things is that your god doesn't exist.

My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother to
argue with a sick mind.
I got tired of being ignored and decided to pull your string to get some
attention.
--
The argument that everything had a Creator because it's too complicated, is
about as reasonable as saying that it couldn't have been created since it's
too complicated.
It's about like saying that a super flea created a dog. Then
the good fleas go to a great dog in the sky, while the bad unbelieving fleas
are scratched off into a super rug to be forever hungry. If you think dogs
weren't created by a Great Flea then you are an afleaist.
.
User: "Michelle Malkin"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 11 Feb 2005 11:01:38 PM
"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:q99Pd.6139$mG6.448@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WZSdneD07taa3JHfRVn-iw@comcast.com...


"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:c0SOd.5233$UX3.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the

Bibles

are

the word of their God.

Define amusing.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does

God

agree

with?
and whose God?


God agrees with everything because al things are possible.


But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence

that

this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?


A problem for whom? God doesn't need any stinking evidence.

<Incoherent rant snipped:

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of

God

and

then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is

circular

and illogical reasoning


Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all

things

are possible.

And, one of those possible things is that your god doesn't exist.

My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother to
argue with a sick mind.

I got tired of being ignored and decided to pull your string to get some
attention.

My string in particular? Are you that desperate for attention?
And, which sick mind do you mean?
So, are you saying that you don't believe in a god?

--
The argument that everything had a Creator because it's too complicated,

is

about as reasonable as saying that it couldn't have been created since

it's

too complicated.
It's about like saying that a super flea created a dog. Then
the good fleas go to a great dog in the sky, while the bad unbelieving

fleas

are scratched off into a super rug to be forever hungry. If you think dogs
weren't created by a Great Flea then you are an afleaist.


Ah, so you're an atheist. We have nothing to argue about than.
By the way, can you prove that all things are possible?
.
User: "Ike"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 12 Feb 2005 10:32:13 AM
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:DaidnUf3B_89EJDfRVn-jA@comcast.com...


"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:q99Pd.6139$mG6.448@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WZSdneD07taa3JHfRVn-iw@comcast.com...


"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:c0SOd.5233$UX3.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the

<snip>
..


My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother

to

argue with a sick mind.

I got tired of being ignored and decided to pull your string to get some
attention.


My string in particular?

Nothing personal.

Are you that desperate for attention?

Sure.

And, which sick mind do you mean?

Mine of course. Duh!


So, are you saying that you don't believe in a god?

I don't know exactly where people get the idea I might be a theist, unless
they fail to grok the sarcasm. I like to make fun of posts I consider
sophomoric, for instance by paraphrasing them in an even more inane manner.

--
The argument that everything had a Creator because it's too complicated,

is

about as reasonable as saying that it couldn't have been created since

it's

too complicated.
It's about like saying that a super flea created a dog. Then
the good fleas go to a great dog in the sky, while the bad unbelieving

fleas

are scratched off into a super rug to be forever hungry. If you think

dogs

weren't created by a Great Flea then you are an afleaist.


Ah, so you're an atheist. We have nothing to argue about than.

Damn! Blew my cover by my sig.


By the way, can you prove that all things are possible?

That's a really tall order. Empirically, it can't be. Mathematically either.
Philosophically depending on proving it to whom.
.


User: "Bill"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 11 Feb 2005 04:37:29 PM
Good show!!!
--
Bill
"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:q99Pd.6139$mG6.448@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WZSdneD07taa3JHfRVn-iw@comcast.com...


"Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:c0SOd.5233$UX3.861@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...


"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the

Bibles

are

the word of their God.

Define amusing.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does

God

agree

with?
and whose God?


God agrees with everything because al things are possible.


But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence

that

this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?


A problem for whom? God doesn't need any stinking evidence.

<Incoherent rant snipped:

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of

God

and

then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is

circular

and illogical reasoning


Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all

things

are possible.

And, one of those possible things is that your god doesn't exist.

My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother to
argue with a sick mind.

I got tired of being ignored and decided to pull your string to get some
attention.
--
The argument that everything had a Creator because it's too complicated,

is

about as reasonable as saying that it couldn't have been created since

it's

too complicated.
It's about like saying that a super flea created a dog. Then
the good fleas go to a great dog in the sky, while the bad unbelieving

fleas

are scratched off into a super rug to be forever hungry. If you think dogs
weren't created by a Great Flea then you are an afleaist.


.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 11 Feb 2005 09:26:07 PM
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:08:38 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:

My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother to
argue with a sick mind.

If you had one you wouldn't bother to post with one.
--
"Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution."
- Theodosuis Dobzhansky
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
User: "Ike"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 12 Feb 2005 10:32:09 AM
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:sptq0116hdqffok9lv1j35t9snrcc63r9n@4ax.com...

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:08:38 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:

My God? Whom are you talking to? If you had a clue you wouldn't bother to
argue with a sick mind.


If you had one you wouldn't bother to post with one.

Touche, and the same back at you.
--

"Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution."
- Theodosuis Dobzhansky
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net

.




User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 10 Feb 2005 09:26:08 PM
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:21:44 GMT, "Ike" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com>
said in alt.atheism:

Circular and illogical reasoning are not disproof of God since all things
are possible.

Including educating a Fundy? That's never been demonstrated.
--
"A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education and social
ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he
had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."
-Albert Einstein
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.


User: "*nemo*"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 09 Feb 2005 09:15:20 PM
In article
<VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles are
the word of their God.

Read the Book of Mormon, then read some of the things Mormons say about
it. You'll be beyond simple amusement. I promise.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
.

User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim"

Title: Re: THE WORD OF GOD? 09 Feb 2005 07:35:38 PM
The "word of god", lmao.....
Let me write a book, bury it in the sand for two thousands years, then
someone will find it, and all of a sudden it will magically become "god's
word". LMAO.
yup, the religious people sure are stupid.
"Bill" <wmech@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:VNyOd.182438$w62.109811@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

I find it amusing how most Christians/Jews/Islamists claim the Bibles are
the word of their God.

There are 18 different English translations alone. Which one does God
agree
with?
and whose God?

But that is the minor problem. Where is there any objective evidence that
this God
are any of the hundreds of other Gods actually exist?

If there is no objective evidence for the existence of the
Christian/Jewish/Islamic God
than there is no evidence that the Bibles/Koran are the words of any God?

You can't use the Bibles as objective evidence for the existence of God
and
then reverse the
evidence by claiming that the Bibles are the word of God. This is circular
and illogical reasoning

--
Bill


.


  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER