To Believe Or Not to Believe



 Religions > Atheism > To Believe Or Not to Believe

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 12 of 20

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

 

10

 

11

 

12

 

13

 

14

 

15

 

16

 

17

 

18

 

19

 

20

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "IKnowHimDoYou"
Date: 09 Apr 2004 10:50:55 AM
Object: To Believe Or Not to Believe
To Believe Or Not to Believe
Each person struggles with finding truth. Each person brings their own
bias and prejudices to this struggle as they search for what is true
versus what is false. The search is not IF we have faith(trust) in
somthing or someone for we ALL have faith in something or someone For
example:
The Christian believes in the Bible and what it says concerning his
relaionship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ. He knows that there is
no scientific proof of God's existance, only legal, historical and
biographical evidence exists.
The atheist believes there is no God but he too has no scientific proof to
confirm or disprove that. He simply takes it on faith believing it to be
so without any proof or evidence.
The rules of logic tell us that two opposite claims cannot both be true;
if one is truth than the other must be false. If there is no God as the
atheists believes but cannot prove then he is operating on faith or trust
in this hypothsis. If God is then his faith is in vain(empty) and he has
nowhere to place his faith so he is in error. His behaviour is determined
by what he thinks is right although he never really knows what the rigtht
is so he is left to his own devices.
The Christian believes what God says and that He exists and desires to
have a relationship with man sending His only begotten Son to earth to
secure the path of that relationship. The Christian uses, along with the
Bible, historical and biographical evidence for God's presence along with
the seen and experiential effects on men in this world such as changed
lives, self sacrifice for others, a love of all men, a quickening of
conscience, a radical difference in thinking and behaving among other
changes.
.

User: "John Baker"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 26 Apr 2004 01:34:10 PM
"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:daeq80ddf04kk1tjdcq2kka8s2nfkttock@4ax.com...

On 25 Apr 2004 14:02:05 -0700,


(Not-easily-duped) wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message > >> >they

deny God and God's word.


I am rejecting what you claim is god's word. The fact that I do not
believe you does not make me evil. Just because you say it is god's
word does not make it true. Just because you say the Bible is the
word of god does not make it so.




Hey Thomas Pimp,


What was the point of the insult? I did not insult anybody above.
Why do you feel the need to make personal attacks even when others are
being civil?

Partly because theists know they don't have a leg to stand on as far as
evidence for their claims goes, so gratuitous insults are their only
recourse when asked to present said evidence which they don't have. <G>
And, of course, partly because Very-easily duped is just a stupid,
arrogant, mean-natured puddle of maggot-infested dog vomit.



the fact that you don't believe it is the word Of God
does not make it so. GOD always speaks through men and that is called
inspiration or Revelation


You certainly have every right to believe the above, but, since you
post no evidence for it, I have no reason to believe you.



None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.

.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 26 Apr 2004 07:47:00 PM
On 25 Apr 2004 14:02:05 -0700,
(Not-easily-duped)
wrote:

Hey Thomas Pimp, the fact that you don't believe it is the word Of God
does not make it so. GOD always speaks through men and that is called
inspiration or Revelation

He Dopey, the fact that you believe in one god with three heads
doesn't make it so. The rest you drooled is an assertion.
.

User: "grateful"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 12:35:44 PM
Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<4aqm80lljkieg5a2cpl0cgn5qkev1vc1t2@4ax.com>...

On 24 Apr 2004 20:52:23 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<d29k80h51cls24bj4fi1hln75n77qv30gl@4ax.com>...

On 23 Apr 2004 22:25:39 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

snip


It is also just possible that you do not know what you are talking about.
It might also be possible that the people who disagree with you are not
evil,



They are not evil because they don't accept my word, they are evil because
they deny God and God's word.


I am rejecting what you claim is god's word. The fact that I do not
believe you does not make me evil. Just because you say it is god's
word does not make it true. Just because you say the Bible is the
word of god does not make it so.



Rejecting what I say is one thing, but rejecting God and His word is
sinful. That makes you God's enemy and therefore evil.


Why did you ignore what I said above? I have never rejected the word
of any god. I have rejected the words of men when they claimed to be
quoting the words of some god. I have rejected the claim that the
Bible is the word of some god. I have done that because there is no
reason to do otherwise.

Just because you reject it Thomas, does not mean that what
you are rejecting isn't God's word. You don't get to make
the determination as to whether or not the Bible is the word
of God. You only have your opinion, and your opinion is no
more fact than you attribute to what I believe.


In your

sentimental, humanistic pov you're basically good by your own
standards rather than God's. Nothing is true by virtue of the fact
that I say it, truth comes from God's word. You may believe that
if I am right, that you will have some kind of loophole, because
you just could not detect any evidence for the existence of God,
but you will find out that you are without excuse.


I am not able to believe something that sounds incredible to me and
for which no evidence exists. Not only is there is no evidence, the
story is contradictory and illogical.

You are still held accountable for your failure to believe.

It would be both courteous and honest if you would stop attributing
motives to me. You are not able to read my mind.

What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used the
qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right, where
does that leave you?


If there is a God, and the Bible is His word, then the truth of
the matter is that evidence for God is innate, but is suppressed,
ignored, denied and rejected by sinful man. That is how you fail
to see the complexity of creation and yet deny that a Designer
is essential.



The problem is that there is no reason to believe that there is a god
or that the Bible is his word.

Many millions of believers past, present and future have, do
and will vigorously disagree with your findings.



snip


Do you really think that your responses to my posts truly reflect what you
stated above concerning my beliefs? Are you not arrogant regarding your
beliefs and intolerant of theistic belief?



I totally respect your right to your beliefs. I have no respect
however, for your beliefs.



This gives the illusion of fair mindedness in a humanistic
way, but it's not God's way.


Your god is irrational? What about my position is unfair?

He is pure reason, and it is He who has determined what our
rights are concerning what we believe about Him. Unbelievers
are tolerant of many human behaviors that God calls sin, but
it makes them feel good about themselves to be considered
tolerant.




snip


No, I didn't cite these verses because I thought you would be
persuaded to accept them as truth. I know better than that.
But I do accept them as the truth, now you tell be how I can
be tolerant of the opinions and beliefs of mere men when the
very opinions, views and beliefs they hold conflict with the
word of God?



They conflict with what you believe to be the word of god. They are
your opinions. You have a right to them. Nobody is, however, obliged
to believe what you believe.



I am not the one who can oblige anyone to believe, but there is
One who does, and He is the one with whom you have to do.


That is your belief. You have no evidence for it. I do not believe
you. You might as well threaten me with the boogie man. So far no
god has obliged me to do anything.

Jesus is the most perfect and complete evidence for
God there is.
If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father
also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have
seen him. John 14:7...he that hath seen me hath
seen the Father...v9
Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast
seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they
that have not seen, and yet have believed.
John 20:29
God works through imperfect mankind, but I hope
you will meet someone in whom you will be able
to see the glory of Jesus manifested in him/her.



If god appeared to me and established he
was god (naturally he would be able to do that),



God lives in unapproachable light, no one can look upon his
face and live. Be careful of what you ask for.


In other words you have no evidence to present.


I would be obliged to
accept his existence; I am not obliged to believe you.



If a person reveals to you God's truth, you are not obliged
to believe that person as such, but God makes it your
obligation to believe His truth for His truth's sake.


No god has obliged me to believe anything. All I have heard is men
telling me what they believe.

God works through men as His instruments to witness to
other men. Surely you know this, but no man has the
power to make you savingly believe.




Thomas P.

None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.

.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 02:08:58 PM
"grateful" <
> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message

news:<4aqm80lljkieg5a2cpl0cgn5qkev1vc1t2@4ax.com>...

On 24 Apr 2004 20:52:23 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message

news:<d29k80h51cls24bj4fi1hln75n77qv30gl@4ax.com>...

On 23 Apr 2004 22:25:39 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

snip


It is also just possible that you do not know what you are talking

about.

It might also be possible that the people who disagree with you

are not

evil,



They are not evil because they don't accept my word, they are evil

because

they deny God and God's word.


I am rejecting what you claim is god's word. The fact that I do not
believe you does not make me evil. Just because you say it is god's
word does not make it true. Just because you say the Bible is the
word of god does not make it so.



Rejecting what I say is one thing, but rejecting God and His word is
sinful. That makes you God's enemy and therefore evil.


Why did you ignore what I said above? I have never rejected the word
of any god. I have rejected the words of men when they claimed to be
quoting the words of some god. I have rejected the claim that the
Bible is the word of some god. I have done that because there is no
reason to do otherwise.


Just because you reject it Thomas, does not mean that what
you are rejecting isn't God's word. You don't get to make
the determination as to whether or not the Bible is the word
of God. You only have your opinion, and your opinion is no
more fact than you attribute to what I believe.

Of course it isn't the "word of god".

In your

sentimental, humanistic pov you're basically good by your own
standards rather than God's. Nothing is true by virtue of the fact
that I say it, truth comes from God's word. You may believe that
if I am right, that you will have some kind of loophole, because
you just could not detect any evidence for the existence of God,
but you will find out that you are without excuse.


I am not able to believe something that sounds incredible to me and
for which no evidence exists. Not only is there is no evidence, the
story is contradictory and illogical.

You are still held accountable for your failure to believe.

To whom?

It would be both courteous and honest if you would stop attributing
motives to me. You are not able to read my mind.

What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used the
qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right, where
does that leave you?

You're not right.

If there is a God, and the Bible is His word, then the truth of
the matter is that evidence for God is innate, but is suppressed,
ignored, denied and rejected by sinful man. That is how you fail
to see the complexity of creation and yet deny that a Designer
is essential.



The problem is that there is no reason to believe that there is a god
or that the Bible is his word.

Many millions of believers past, present and future have, do
and will vigorously disagree with your findings.

Perhaps so, but they have no evidence that would support either premise.

snip


Do you really think that your responses to my posts truly reflect

what you

stated above concerning my beliefs? Are you not arrogant regarding

your

beliefs and intolerant of theistic belief?



I totally respect your right to your beliefs. I have no respect
however, for your beliefs.



This gives the illusion of fair mindedness in a humanistic
way, but it's not God's way.


Your god is irrational? What about my position is unfair?


He is pure reason, and it is He who has determined what our
rights are concerning what we believe about Him.

Evidently you haven't read the Old Testament. There is nothing that remotely
resembles a reasoned god.

Unbelievers are tolerant of many human behaviors that God calls sin, but
it makes them feel good about themselves to be considered
tolerant.

Unbelievers are tolerant period, compared to fundie creationist Christians.


snip


No, I didn't cite these verses because I thought you would be
persuaded to accept them as truth. I know better than that.
But I do accept them as the truth, now you tell be how I can
be tolerant of the opinions and beliefs of mere men when the
very opinions, views and beliefs they hold conflict with the
word of God?



They conflict with what you believe to be the word of god. They are
your opinions. You have a right to them. Nobody is, however,

obliged

to believe what you believe.



I am not the one who can oblige anyone to believe, but there is
One who does, and He is the one with whom you have to do.


That is your belief. You have no evidence for it. I do not believe
you. You might as well threaten me with the boogie man. So far no
god has obliged me to do anything.

Jesus is the most perfect and complete evidence for
God there is.

There isn't any evidence that Jesus is who you say that he is.
<snip quotes from the bible


If god appeared to me and established he
was god (naturally he would be able to do that),



God lives in unapproachable light, no one can look upon his
face and live. Be careful of what you ask for.


In other words you have no evidence to present.


I would be obliged to
accept his existence; I am not obliged to believe you.



If a person reveals to you God's truth, you are not obliged
to believe that person as such, but God makes it your
obligation to believe His truth for His truth's sake.


No god has obliged me to believe anything. All I have heard is men
telling me what they believe.

God works through men as His instruments to witness to
other men. Surely you know this, but no man has the
power to make you savingly believe.

God has to work through men for anything that he needs done. There is a good
reason for this, god doesn't exist.
.
User: "Tiger"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 02:26:47 PM
"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108o36fieq1hjff@corp.supernews.com:


"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...

What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used the
qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right, where
does that leave you?


You're not right.

And you have the gall to call me a "fundie." LOL.
--
Tiger
[Insert humorous, clever or profound quote here]
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 05:04:38 PM
"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D69D540A6FAjefscrrcom@24.25.9.43...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108o36fieq1hjff@corp.supernews.com:


"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...


What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used the
qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right, where
does that leave you?


You're not right.

And you have the gall to call me a "fundie." LOL.

Well, well, the idiot tries to LOL. You remind me of "Pastor" Frank trying
to LOL. He couldn't do it either. You see a relation here that no one else
can see? I imagine so since you believe in mythology.
.
User: "Tiger"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 05:16:15 PM
"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108odfqothf3896@corp.supernews.com:


"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D69D540A6FAjefscrrcom@24.25.9.43...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108o36fieq1hjff@corp.supernews.com:


"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...


What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used
the qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right,
where does that leave you?


You're not right.

And you have the gall to call me a "fundie." LOL.


Well, well, the idiot tries to LOL. You remind me of "Pastor"
Frank trying to LOL. He couldn't do it either. You see a relation
here that no one else can see? I imagine so since you believe in
mythology.

You don't have the first clue about what I believe. All you have are
baseless assumptions and you continue to assert them as if they are
facts. That's the methodology of the religious fundamentalist.
--
Tiger
[Insert humorous, clever or profound quote here]
.
User: "Tom"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 07:39:40 PM
"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D6B9DCB896Fjefscrrcom@24.25.9.41...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108odfqothf3896@corp.supernews.com:


"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D69D540A6FAjefscrrcom@24.25.9.43...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108o36fieq1hjff@corp.supernews.com:


"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...


What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I used
the qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am right,
where does that leave you?


You're not right.

And you have the gall to call me a "fundie." LOL.


Well, well, the idiot tries to LOL. You remind me of "Pastor"
Frank trying to LOL. He couldn't do it either. You see a relation
here that no one else can see? I imagine so since you believe in
mythology.

You don't have the first clue about what I believe. All you have are
baseless assumptions and you continue to assert them as if they are
facts. That's the methodology of the religious fundamentalist.

They are facts "Tiger", you're just in denial. If anyone should know the
methodology of the fundie, it is you.
.
User: "Tiger"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 08:30:02 PM
"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108omidnp1jfk2a@corp.supernews.com:


"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D6B9DCB896Fjefscrrcom@24.25.9.41...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108odfqothf3896@corp.supernews.com:


"Tiger" <Tiger@box.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns94D69D540A6FAjefscrrcom@24.25.9.43...

"Tom" <mmman_90@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:108o36fieq1hjff@corp.supernews.com:


"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404250935.1d465937@posting.google.com...


What you write reveals what is on your mind. Besides I
used the qualifiers may and if. Well, Thomas what if I am
right, where does that leave you?


You're not right.

And you have the gall to call me a "fundie." LOL.


Well, well, the idiot tries to LOL. You remind me of "Pastor"
Frank trying to LOL. He couldn't do it either. You see a
relation here that no one else can see? I imagine so since you
believe in mythology.

You don't have the first clue about what I believe. All you have
are baseless assumptions and you continue to assert them as if
they are facts. That's the methodology of the religious
fundamentalist.


They are facts "Tiger", you're just in denial. If anyone should
know the methodology of the fundie, it is you.

Go back to playing with "Pastor Frank." He's more your speed.
--
Tiger
[Insert humorous, clever or profound quote here]
.






User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 03:11:28 PM
On 25 Apr 2004 10:35:44 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<4aqm80lljkieg5a2cpl0cgn5qkev1vc1t2@4ax.com>...

On 24 Apr 2004 20:52:23 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<d29k80h51cls24bj4fi1hln75n77qv30gl@4ax.com>...

On 23 Apr 2004 22:25:39 -0700,

(grateful)
wrote:

snip


It is also just possible that you do not know what you are talking about.
It might also be possible that the people who disagree with you are not
evil,



They are not evil because they don't accept my word, they are evil because
they deny God and God's word.


I am rejecting what you claim is god's word. The fact that I do not
believe you does not make me evil. Just because you say it is god's
word does not make it true. Just because you say the Bible is the
word of god does not make it so.



Rejecting what I say is one thing, but rejecting God and His word is
sinful. That makes you God's enemy and therefore evil.


Why did you ignore what I said above? I have never rejected the word
of any god. I have rejected the words of men when they claimed to be
quoting the words of some god. I have rejected the claim that the
Bible is the word of some god. I have done that because there is no
reason to do otherwise.


Just because you reject it Thomas, does not mean that what
you are rejecting isn't God's word.

Yes, that is actually exactly what it means. I am rejecting your
word. No god is telling me anything, you are.

You don't get to make
the determination as to whether or not the Bible is the word
of God. You only have your opinion, and your opinion is no
more fact than you attribute to what I believe.

I do get to determine if there is any reason for me to accept your
claims or not. I am not obliged to listen to everybody that has
something they want me to believe. You are no exception.



In your

sentimental, humanistic pov you're basically good by your own
standards rather than God's. Nothing is true by virtue of the fact
that I say it, truth comes from God's word. You may believe that
if I am right, that you will have some kind of loophole, because
you just could not detect any evidence for the existence of God,
but you will find out that you are without excuse.


I am not able to believe something that sounds incredible to me and
for which no evidence exists. Not only is there is no evidence, the
story is contradictory and illogical.

You are still held accountable for your failure to believe.

That would mean that the god you believe in is irrational and unjust.
In any case I still can only believe what is reasonable.

It would be both courteous and honest if you would stop attributing
motives to me. You are not able to read my mind.

What you write reveals what is on your mind.

I have no place in my writing indicated that I have rejected your
claims for any other reasons than honest and rational ones. You have
created a strawman to argue with, and you are making believe it is me.
You do not know what I think.

Besides I used the
qualifiers may and if.

There was no reason to bring it up at all. The qualifiers amount to
your excuse for making an unjustified accusation.

Well, Thomas what if I am right, where
does that leave you?

Meaningless question. What if the Koran is right, where does that
leave you? I have no reason to believe you are right. You cannot
give me any evidence, and your god acts just like a being that does
not exist. I reject the Koran and the Bible for exactly the same
reasons; there are no reasons to believe either one of them.



If there is a God, and the Bible is His word, then the truth of
the matter is that evidence for God is innate, but is suppressed,
ignored, denied and rejected by sinful man. That is how you fail
to see the complexity of creation and yet deny that a Designer
is essential.



The problem is that there is no reason to believe that there is a god
or that the Bible is his word.


Many millions of believers past, present and future have, do
and will vigorously disagree with your findings.

That is not a good reason to believe anything. There are more than
one billion Moslems in the world. They would vigorously disagree with
you. Reality does not care how many people believe something.



snip


Do you really think that your responses to my posts truly reflect what you
stated above concerning my beliefs? Are you not arrogant regarding your
beliefs and intolerant of theistic belief?



I totally respect your right to your beliefs. I have no respect
however, for your beliefs.



This gives the illusion of fair mindedness in a humanistic
way, but it's not God's way.


Your god is irrational? What about my position is unfair?


He is pure reason, and it is He who has determined what our
rights are concerning what we believe about Him. Unbelievers
are tolerant of many human behaviors that God calls sin, but
it makes them feel good about themselves to be considered
tolerant.

Once again you make the assumption that you know what I think, and
your assumption is insulting. Too bad you could not offer some
objective reasons for believing your claims.





snip


No, I didn't cite these verses because I thought you would be
persuaded to accept them as truth. I know better than that.
But I do accept them as the truth, now you tell be how I can
be tolerant of the opinions and beliefs of mere men when the
very opinions, views and beliefs they hold conflict with the
word of God?



They conflict with what you believe to be the word of god. They are
your opinions. You have a right to them. Nobody is, however, obliged
to believe what you believe.



I am not the one who can oblige anyone to believe, but there is
One who does, and He is the one with whom you have to do.


That is your belief. You have no evidence for it. I do not believe
you. You might as well threaten me with the boogie man. So far no
god has obliged me to do anything.

Jesus is the most perfect and complete evidence for
God there is.

Then there is no evidence, since the above is a perfect example of a
circular argument.


If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father
also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have
seen him. John 14:7...he that hath seen me hath
seen the Father...v9
Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast
seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they
that have not seen, and yet have believed.
John 20:29

Convenient statement, but it is not evidence for anything except
perhaps for gullibility.


God works through imperfect mankind, but I hope
you will meet someone in whom you will be able
to see the glory of Jesus manifested in him/her.

I hope you develop some humility and respect for people who do not
share your very subjective and undemonstrated beliefs.




If god appeared to me and established he
was god (naturally he would be able to do that),



God lives in unapproachable light, no one can look upon his
face and live. Be careful of what you ask for.


In other words you have no evidence to present.


I would be obliged to
accept his existence; I am not obliged to believe you.



If a person reveals to you God's truth, you are not obliged
to believe that person as such, but God makes it your
obligation to believe His truth for His truth's sake.


No god has obliged me to believe anything. All I have heard is men
telling me what they believe.

God works through men as His instruments to witness to
other men. Surely you know this, but no man has the
power to make you savingly believe.

Surely I do not know it, because then I would not be an atheist. You
seem to have a really hard time grasping that.

Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.


User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 06:55:07 AM
On 24 Apr 2004 20:52:23 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

I am rejecting what you claim is god's word. The fact that I do not
believe you does not make me evil. Just because you say it is god's
word does not make it true. Just because you say the Bible is the
word of god does not make it so.


Rejecting what I say is one thing, but rejecting God and His word is
sinful.

Rejecting Allah is sinful too. So what? You rejected Allah, didn't
you? Don't pretend you never heard about him. That isn't an excuse.

That makes you God's enemy and therefore evil.

Rejecting Allah...

In your
sentimental, humanistic pov you're basically good by your own
standards rather than God's.

Sure thing. I don't mind picking up sticks on a Saturday.

Nothing is true by virtue of the fact that I say it, truth comes from God's word.

Assertion.

You may believe that
if I am right, that you will have some kind of loophole, because
you just could not detect any evidence for the existence of God,
but you will find out that you are without excuse.

What if I don't believe you are right?

If there is a God, and the Bible is His word, then the truth of

If .....

Do you really think that your responses to my posts truly reflect what you
stated above concerning my beliefs? Are you not arrogant regarding your
beliefs and intolerant of theistic belief?


I totally respect your right to your beliefs. I have no respect
however, for your beliefs.

So, short story: you don't respect anyone not sharing your
superstition.

This gives the illusion of fair mindedness in a humanistic
way, but it's not God's way.

Again, sure thing. I don't even want to worship a god running an
eternal concentration camp.

They conflict with what you believe to be the word of god. They are
your opinions. You have a right to them. Nobody is, however, obliged
to believe what you believe.


I am not the one who can oblige anyone to believe, but

you wish you could?

there is
One who does, and He is the one with whom you have to do.

Free will?

If god appeared to me and established he
was god (naturally he would be able to do that),


God lives in unapproachable light,

Assertion.

no one can look upon his face and live.

Assertion.

Be careful of what you ask for.

The gods may grant your wish...

I would be obliged to
accept his existence; I am not obliged to believe you.

If a person reveals to you God's truth, you are not obliged
to believe that person as such, but God makes it your
obligation to believe His truth for His truth's sake.

Free will?
.

User: "Jim"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 24 Apr 2004 07:50:42 AM
remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.
Two Dogs & the Egg
"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."
We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.
I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.
He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.
"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."
"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.
"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."
And there you have it, I thought to myself. As always, I had to go
and ask. But like it or not, I could see his point. After all, it
was true.
The Bible remains powerful because it has the very power of God
Himself behind it and all through it. In fact, the message of
Scripture is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who
believes it. The Bible alone is faithful to always point to Jesus
Christ, no matter what. And Jesus Christ is the only way to eternal
life.
No matter how you look at it, the Word of God can only be as powerful
as the God who speaks it and who also backs it up. As the word of any
human being is only as powerful or as great as that person, so it is
with Scripture in the Bible. The Bible carries the power of the
Spirit of God (see John 6:63) who caused it to be written, and who
causes it to remain.
The Bible has been attacked for thousands of years -- even centuries
before Jesus Christ was born as a human being -- but it has never lost
any of its ability to transform all who believe it into God's own
children. In fact, today there are more Bibles, in more translations
available in more locations than at any earlier time in history.
Millions of Bibles find their way into China, India, and other regions
of the world where the Scriptures may even be outlawed.
But don't get me wrong. The Bible is not a magical object. I mean,
it doesn't glow in the dark or anything. Owning a Bible, touching a
Bible, reading a Bible — none of these things save us. But allowing
God's Holy Spirit to speak to us, as He applies the words and
testimony of Scripture to our own hearts, that can lead us to faith
in Jesus Christ, which leads to the confession and forgiveness of sin,
and to eternal life with God.
And so the spiritual war goes on. Satan tries in many clever (but
very, very obvious) ways, in every generation, to destroy, to
belittle, to do away with what God has said. Even the ancient prophet
Jeremiah had to rewrite his entire book of prophecy, because as it was
being read aloud to the king (Jehoiakim) of Judah, it was being cut
from the scroll and thrown into the fire (see Jeremiah 36).
Jeremiah's prophecy was a much-hated message, as are all the Holy
Scriptures in the Bible. But Jeremiah had his assistant help him
gather all the notes and scraps together so they could produce another
edition of the message God had given him.
Scripture says it this way:
Now, after the king had burned the scroll with the words that Baruch
wrote at Jeremiah's dictation, the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah:
"Take another scroll and write on it all the former words that were in
the first scroll, which King Jehoiakim of Judah has burned…."
And so Jeremiah set to work, gathering all the scraps and notes he had
piled up over the years, and putting them back into a single scroll.
The result was a book that was even bigger, with even more prophetic
words than the first one. As the Bible says: "Then Jeremiah took
another scroll and gave it to the secretary Baruch son of Neriah, who
wrote on it, at Jeremiah's dictation, all the words of the scroll that
King Jehoiakim of Judah had burned in the fire; and many similar words
were added to them."
(It's interesting -- to me, anyway -- to note that while the book of
Isaiah has been divided into 14 more chapters than Jeremiah, the
prophecy of Jeremiah still has "more words". Wherever sin abounds,
God's grace will always much more abound. And the Lord has even taken
the very enemy of the Gospel and transformed him into a preacher of
the Gospel -- time and time again in history. Hallelujah!)
The Bible has endured many attacks in the past, and it continues to be
under constant attack today. But it has already had a profound impact
on modern human civilization, even in nations that are not Christian
at all. And it's still transforming human lives all around the world
-- right now while you read these words.
Whoever follows Jesus Christ can do himself harm by ignoring the
Scriptures, but he can also do himself much good by reading the Bible
daily. Nothing helps the heart & life like God's living and
unbreakable Word. Nothing silences the raging stupidity of this dark
age like God's Word. As the old slogan goes, never leave home without
it. Spend some time alone with Scripture every day.
So I guess I have to agree with what my Uncle Tom was saying.
Had the Bible failed to be the very power of God unto salvation for
generation after generation, it would've faded away long, long ago.
But since it remains supremely powerful -- in every succeeding
generation -- to transform broken and ruined human lives, and to alter
even the world itself, it's still here. And foolish people, whose
hearts are darkened, still rage against it.
The fact that those who hate God most also hate the Scriptures and
openly attack them says it all. And at the same time, whoever knows
and loves the Lord Jesus Christ will also honor His Word, relying on
God for direction, teaching and strength in all of life.
Praise God that His Word continues to do the work of God in the hearts
of everyone who loves the Lord Jesus Christ. Whoever continues to
live according to the words and teachings of our Lord in the
Scriptures, proves to be a true disciple and follower of Jesus Christ.
Amen.
Jim
.
User: "grateful"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 24 Apr 2004 03:31:36 PM
(Jim) wrote in message news:<bb4dcba0.0404240450.41c804a0@posting.google.com>...

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."

We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.

I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.

He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."

And there you have it, I thought to myself. As always, I had to go
and ask. But like it or not, I could see his point. After all, it
was true.

The Bible remains powerful because it has the very power of God
Himself behind it and all through it. In fact, the message of
Scripture is the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who
believes it. The Bible alone is faithful to always point to Jesus
Christ, no matter what. And Jesus Christ is the only way to eternal
life.

No matter how you look at it, the Word of God can only be as powerful
as the God who speaks it and who also backs it up. As the word of any
human being is only as powerful or as great as that person, so it is
with Scripture in the Bible. The Bible carries the power of the
Spirit of God (see John 6:63) who caused it to be written, and who
causes it to remain.

The Bible has been attacked for thousands of years -- even centuries
before Jesus Christ was born as a human being -- but it has never lost
any of its ability to transform all who believe it into God's own
children. In fact, today there are more Bibles, in more translations
available in more locations than at any earlier time in history.
Millions of Bibles find their way into China, India, and other regions
of the world where the Scriptures may even be outlawed.

But don't get me wrong. The Bible is not a magical object. I mean,
it doesn't glow in the dark or anything. Owning a Bible, touching a
Bible, reading a Bible ? none of these things save us. But allowing
God's Holy Spirit to speak to us, as He applies the words and
testimony of Scripture to our own hearts, that can lead us to faith
in Jesus Christ, which leads to the confession and forgiveness of sin,
and to eternal life with God.

And so the spiritual war goes on. Satan tries in many clever (but
very, very obvious) ways, in every generation, to destroy, to
belittle, to do away with what God has said. Even the ancient prophet
Jeremiah had to rewrite his entire book of prophecy, because as it was
being read aloud to the king (Jehoiakim) of Judah, it was being cut
from the scroll and thrown into the fire (see Jeremiah 36).

Jeremiah's prophecy was a much-hated message, as are all the Holy
Scriptures in the Bible. But Jeremiah had his assistant help him
gather all the notes and scraps together so they could produce another
edition of the message God had given him.

Scripture says it this way:
Now, after the king had burned the scroll with the words that Baruch
wrote at Jeremiah's dictation, the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah:
"Take another scroll and write on it all the former words that were in
the first scroll, which King Jehoiakim of Judah has burned?."

And so Jeremiah set to work, gathering all the scraps and notes he had
piled up over the years, and putting them back into a single scroll.
The result was a book that was even bigger, with even more prophetic
words than the first one. As the Bible says: "Then Jeremiah took
another scroll and gave it to the secretary Baruch son of Neriah, who
wrote on it, at Jeremiah's dictation, all the words of the scroll that
King Jehoiakim of Judah had burned in the fire; and many similar words
were added to them."

(It's interesting -- to me, anyway -- to note that while the book of
Isaiah has been divided into 14 more chapters than Jeremiah, the
prophecy of Jeremiah still has "more words". Wherever sin abounds,
God's grace will always much more abound. And the Lord has even taken
the very enemy of the Gospel and transformed him into a preacher of
the Gospel -- time and time again in history. Hallelujah!)

The Bible has endured many attacks in the past, and it continues to be
under constant attack today. But it has already had a profound impact
on modern human civilization, even in nations that are not Christian
at all. And it's still transforming human lives all around the world
-- right now while you read these words.

Whoever follows Jesus Christ can do himself harm by ignoring the
Scriptures, but he can also do himself much good by reading the Bible
daily. Nothing helps the heart & life like God's living and
unbreakable Word. Nothing silences the raging stupidity of this dark
age like God's Word. As the old slogan goes, never leave home without
it. Spend some time alone with Scripture every day.

So I guess I have to agree with what my Uncle Tom was saying.

Had the Bible failed to be the very power of God unto salvation for
generation after generation, it would've faded away long, long ago.
But since it remains supremely powerful -- in every succeeding
generation -- to transform broken and ruined human lives, and to alter
even the world itself, it's still here. And foolish people, whose
hearts are darkened, still rage against it.

The fact that those who hate God most also hate the Scriptures and
openly attack them says it all. And at the same time, whoever knows
and loves the Lord Jesus Christ will also honor His Word, relying on
God for direction, teaching and strength in all of life.

Praise God that His Word continues to do the work of God in the hearts
of everyone who loves the Lord Jesus Christ. Whoever continues to
live according to the words and teachings of our Lord in the
Scriptures, proves to be a true disciple and follower of Jesus Christ.
Amen.

Jim

Thank you Jim, for a truly beautiful post. It's a brilliant
light in a dark and gloomy place.
.

User: "Billy Goat"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 11:34:51 AM
(Jim) wrote in message news:<bb4dcba0.0404240450.41c804a0@posting.google.com>...

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."

We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.

I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.

He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."

Nice analogy, except both you and Uncle Tom seem to have missed the
point: the dogs did not hate the egg. They fought over the egg because
they *wanted* it.
Similarly, the *believers*, the ones who *love* God, are the ones
fighting over the Scriptures.
--Billy
.

User: "Billy Goat"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 11:36:37 AM
(Jim) wrote in message news:<bb4dcba0.0404240450.41c804a0@posting.google.com>...

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."

Nice analogy, except both you and Uncle Tom seem to have missed the
point: the dogs did not hate the egg. They fought over the egg because
they *wanted* it.
Similarly, the *believers*, the ones who *love* God, are the ones
fighting over the Scriptures.
--Billy
.

User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 24 Apr 2004 09:15:46 AM
On 24 Apr 2004 05:50:42 -0700,
(Jim) wrote:

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."

We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.

I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.

He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."

How can anyone think the above makes any sense? The Hindu scriptures
remain. The Koran remains. The Tibetan Book of the Dead remains.
The Bible remains. Does that prove the objective truth of any of
those books? Of course it doesn't.
snip
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
User: "grateful"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 24 Apr 2004 03:29:29 PM
Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<fftk801l4ugi3mq297vkbgga522g3nfee6@4ax.com>...

On 24 Apr 2004 05:50:42 -0700,

(Jim) wrote:

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."

We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.

I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.

He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."



How can anyone think the above makes any sense? The Hindu scriptures
remain. The Koran remains. The Tibetan Book of the Dead remains.
The Bible remains. Does that prove the objective truth of any of
those books? Of course it doesn't.

The Bible has the words of life.
The Jewish people are evidence that the Bible is true.
God made a promise to Abram in Gen. 13:14-17 concerning
the land of Israel, and a few hundred years later millions
of Jews entered that land. Before they entered in, however,
the Lord warned them that if they were unfaithful to Him,
He would scatter them among the nations of the earth Deut.
28:64, by their enemies v. 25. This was listed among
the curses they would inherit for turning away from Him.
He also promised to return them to Israel Deut. 30:3.
The Assyrians brought destruction to the northern kingdom of
Israel and, Judah and Benjamin were exiled to Babylon for 70
years because of idolatry. After the seventy years were up,
those who wanted to were allowed to return. Titus destroyed
Jerusalem in A.D. 70, and scattered the people, and in 135
A.D. the Jews were banished from Jerusalem. At that time
Israel ceased to exist as a nation. Israel has always had
a Jewish presence in the land however.
After nearly two millennia on Friday, May 14, 1948, at 4:00 p.m.
the nation was reborn in a day. Isa. 66:8. After centuries of
wandering because of persecution and expulsion from Gentile nations,
which finally culminated in the Holocaust, millions of Jews are
back in the land God promised on oath to Abram, renamed Abraham.
Many of the peoples of the ancient nations that persecuted the
Jews have been destroyed or lost their national identity. Not
so with the Jews, praise God. They have survived with their
national identity intact. God has preserved them through the
most heinous persecutions and violations of their persons, even
preserved them from genocide.
There are American Jews, French Jews, Chinese Jews, Japanese Jews, etc.
There are no American Ammorites, French Moabites, Chinese Edomites, etc.
The situation in Israel is far from ideal at this time, but the story
isn't over yet, and prophecy is still unfolding as the nations turn
against the tiny state.
God is faithful to perform all His holy will.
You may be too blind to "see" this, but so too are many Christians.



snip


Thomas P.

None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.

.
User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 25 Apr 2004 02:38:43 AM
On 24 Apr 2004 13:29:29 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<fftk801l4ugi3mq297vkbgga522g3nfee6@4ax.com>...

On 24 Apr 2004 05:50:42 -0700,

(Jim) wrote:

remembering a story from Uncle Tom's cabin.

Two Dogs & the Egg

"Never forget," my uncle was saying, "the lesson of the two dogs and
the egg."

We were sitting on the front porch in the afternoon sun, soaking in
the warmth of its rays. That warmth was very welcomed on that crisp
January day. So was the perfectly blue sky, and the bright sunlight
reflecting on white snow.

I puzzled over his remark. How could a story about two dogs and an
egg have any meaningful or spiritual application? My Uncle Tom has a
strange way of thinking and talking, at times. It isn't always easy
to follow his line of thought.

He saw the look on my face and so he offered a little hint.

"The two dogs would've had little to argue about," he said, "had the
egg not been hardboiled. A raw egg would've simply broken and
spilled, but the boiled egg held its shape, rolling all around even
after the shell had been cracked. So here's the application: Because
it remained a little while, it continued to give them something to
fight over."

"Yes, but what does a boiled egg have to do with the Bible?" I asked
the question, but I was already beginning to see where he must be
going with this.

"Because the Bible remains," he said, "and cannot be dispelled,
disproven, dismissed, or weakened by the bitter attacks of those who
hate the true God. No matter what unbelievers say or do, or what laws
they manage to have passed in this or that nation, the Bible remains
the same from generation to generation. Therefore, the controversy
over the Scriptures will continue until the end of time. Until Jesus
Christ Himself returns to settle things on earth."



How can anyone think the above makes any sense? The Hindu scriptures
remain. The Koran remains. The Tibetan Book of the Dead remains.
The Bible remains. Does that prove the objective truth of any of
those books? Of course it doesn't.


The Bible has the words of life.

Unsubstantiated claim.


The Jewish people are evidence that the Bible is true.

They are not any such thing.

God made a promise to Abram in Gen. 13:14-17 concerning
the land of Israel, and a few hundred years later millions
of Jews entered that land.

Millions of Jews? That is nonsense.

Before they entered in, however,
the Lord warned them that if they were unfaithful to Him,
He would scatter them among the nations of the earth Deut.
28:64, by their enemies v. 25. This was listed among
the curses they would inherit for turning away from Him.
He also promised to return them to Israel Deut. 30:3.

Prophecies told after the fact or prophecies made of events that were
nearly certain are not very amazing. The Bible is full of such
prophecies. It also contains prophecies that did not come true.
Tyre, for example, was never totally destroyed and continues to exist
today. The 12 tribes of Israel never occupied all the land that was
supposedly promised, and those 12 tribes no longer exist.
snip
.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 24 Apr 2004 08:59:16 PM
On 24 Apr 2004 13:29:29 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

How can anyone think the above makes any sense? The Hindu scriptures
remain. The Koran remains. The Tibetan Book of the Dead remains.
The Bible remains. Does that prove the objective truth of any of
those books? Of course it doesn't.


The Bible has the words of life.

The Hindu scriptures, Koran, etc ...

The Jewish people are evidence that the Bible is true.

the Jewish people are evidence of the Jewish people.

God made a promise to Abram in Gen. 13:14-17

Quoting silly lines meeting your demands of the moment is something we
laugh about in alt.atheism.

The Assyrians brought destruction to the northern kingdom of

The Assyrians brought destruction to a whole host of kingdoms.

After nearly two millennia on Friday, May 14, 1948, at 4:00 p.m.
the nation was reborn in a day.

Not reborn, created.

Many of the peoples of the ancient nations that persecuted the
Jews have been destroyed or lost their national identity.

So? Many of the peoples of the ancient nations that did not perscute
the Jews have been destroyed as well.

Not so with the Jews, praise God.

Are they amongst the groups that persecuted the Jews?

The situation in Israel is far from ideal at this time, but the story
isn't over yet, and prophecy is still unfolding as the nations turn
against the tiny state.

No prophesy has ever been unfolded.

God is faithful to perform all His holy will.

Do they exist? Really?

You may be too blind to "see" this, but so too are many Christians.

But you are Super Christian®, right? Do you hear any voices, perhaps?
.




User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 20 Apr 2004 09:19:35 PM
Lo, many moons past, on 20 Apr 2004 14:20:56 -0700, a stranger called
by some
(grateful) came forth and told this
tale in alt.atheism

No, what formal law of logic is violated? God is an eternal,
self-existent being, who has life within Himself. He is the
transcendent, uncaused First Cause. He must exist in order for
anything else to exist.

Yet you fail to provide hard evidence for this "God" thing.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Ezekiel 13:20 "Wherefore thus saith the
Lord GOD; Behold, I am against your pillows"
.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 20 Apr 2004 07:32:33 PM
On 20 Apr 2004 14:20:56 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

No, what formal law of logic is violated? God is an eternal,
self-existent being, who has life within Himself.

Proof?

He is the
transcendent, uncaused First Cause. He must exist in order for
anything else to exist.

Proof?
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 20 Apr 2004 06:07:03 PM
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 14:20:56 -0700 in episode
<13f2c124.0404201320.24f74b13@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
crossroads1991@aol.com (grateful):

"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.20.12.26.32.110612@hoo.com-amikchi>...

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:06:31 -0700 in episode
<13f2c124.0404200406.491549f9@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
crossroads1991@aol.com (grateful):

"Mark K. Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote in message
news:<pan.2004.04.20.03.45.47.647997@hoo.com-amikchi>...

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:30:04 -0700 in episode
<13f2c124.0404191430.53962d77@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
crossroads1991@aol.com (grateful):

Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message
news:<cb25809kv7r8aae17pm9bcsqs8conqbfjr@4ax.com>...


It appears to you that there's a lack of evidence, that's as much
as you can assert.

Let's make it very easy. You proof your gods exist. How about
that?


Unregenerates won't/can't believe.


So you're preaching at us why?

You have a better answer? Present it.


"We don't know yet." It is a far better, more accurate and less
arrogant answer than yours.


There's no arrogance in my reply, you just can't or won't see the
logic in it.

Because there is no logic in it.


Oh, but there is. How can anything exist without something having
the power of being within itself?


How can you write something like that without realizing it makes no
***** sense?


What is nonsensical about it?


See what I mean?


No, what formal law of logic is violated? God is an eternal,
self-existent being, who has life within Himself. He is the transcendent,
uncaused First Cause. He must exist in order for anything else to exist.

There you go again...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 18 Apr 2004 09:45:08 AM
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:31:20 -0700 in episode
<13f2c124.0404171731.3f061d8@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
crossroads1991@aol.com (grateful):

I cannot believe that our existence in this universe is a mere quirk of
fate, an accident of history, an incidental blip in a great cosmic
drama...

And *that is the actual source of your alleged "logic." You just don't
*wanna.
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 18 Apr 2004 01:46:53 PM
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 09:45:08 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:

On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 18:31:20 -0700 in episode
<13f2c124.0404171731.3f061d8@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
crossroads1991@aol.com (grateful):

I cannot believe that our existence in this universe is a mere quirk of
fate, an accident of history, an incidental blip in a great cosmic
drama...


And *that is the actual source of your alleged "logic." You just don't
*wanna.

I can't remember how many times I have heard someone say that "there
just has to be more than this". They never say why that should be
true other than that is how they feel about it. How very profound!
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.


User: "Thomas P."

Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe 16 Apr 2004 01:33:44 AM
On 15 Apr 2004 13:31:06 -0700,
(grateful)
wrote:

David Jensen <david@dajensen-family.com> wrote in message news:<b4sr70t9rnuc8opga7rkvtos1vu64cephm@4ax.com>...

snip


Please define this uncaused cause and tell us how that is the case.


In order for anything to exist, something eternal has to have the power
of being within itself.

You begin with an assertion. It goes down-hill from there.
snip
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
User: "grateful"