| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"IKnowHimDoYou" |
| Date: |
09 Apr 2004 10:50:55 AM |
| Object: |
To Believe Or Not to Believe |
To Believe Or Not to Believe
Each person struggles with finding truth. Each person brings their own
bias and prejudices to this struggle as they search for what is true
versus what is false. The search is not IF we have faith(trust) in
somthing or someone for we ALL have faith in something or someone For
example:
The Christian believes in the Bible and what it says concerning his
relaionship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ. He knows that there is
no scientific proof of God's existance, only legal, historical and
biographical evidence exists.
The atheist believes there is no God but he too has no scientific proof to
confirm or disprove that. He simply takes it on faith believing it to be
so without any proof or evidence.
The rules of logic tell us that two opposite claims cannot both be true;
if one is truth than the other must be false. If there is no God as the
atheists believes but cannot prove then he is operating on faith or trust
in this hypothsis. If God is then his faith is in vain(empty) and he has
nowhere to place his faith so he is in error. His behaviour is determined
by what he thinks is right although he never really knows what the rigtht
is so he is left to his own devices.
The Christian believes what God says and that He exists and desires to
have a relationship with man sending His only begotten Son to earth to
secure the path of that relationship. The Christian uses, along with the
Bible, historical and biographical evidence for God's presence along with
the seen and experiential effects on men in this world such as changed
lives, self sacrifice for others, a love of all men, a quickening of
conscience, a radical difference in thinking and behaving among other
changes.
.
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
29 Apr 2004 08:03:11 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
"Thomas P." <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message
news:64a190thrtger3dv5sgfr96anttfsas67v@4ax.com...
On 28 Apr 2004 09:07:27 -0700, (grateful)
wrote:
"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote in message
news:<spjjc.
snip
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Would you happen to have any evidence for your assertion?
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
29 Apr 2004 05:30:41 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
Figments of your deluded imagination don't need anything.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Until you demonstrate that it actually exists outside your deluded
imagination you have nothing to say on the subject.
So either put up or shut up.
Preferably the latter when you realise you can't do the former.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
29 Apr 2004 11:06:39 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
.
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 01:23:11 AM |
|
|
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human traits.
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Icono" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 04:09:52 AM |
|
|
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is that? If
a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she could have
let you fall?
Did the skydiver "condemn"? No.
The sky diver saved.
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 06:21:49 AM |
|
|
"Icono" <iconoclst@home.com> wrote in
news:BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man
and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion
of non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
It would be pretty stupid of us to pretend that a *concept* called God
doesn't exist in the minds of believers. Are you suggesting that God is
nothing more than a concept that we can discuss as *someone's fantasy*?
We agree.
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is
that? If a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he
/ she could have let you fall?
Did the skydiver "condemn"? No.
The sky diver saved.
Does the skydiver demand that we believe in pixies before she will can
us?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
Cthulhu for President! Why vote for a lesser evil?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 06:34:13 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700, "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com> let us all know that:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
How did he do that?
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is that?
If, for the sake of argument, your god exists, then it's your
god's fault because your god created everything and knew everything.
If a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she could have
let you fall?
Yes, because the skydiver interfered in the will of the god,
which is bad.
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Icono" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 09:08:02 AM |
|
|
"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:7be4905a627tvkoua0cfkuo8dkaguhl96r@4ax.com...
In alt.atheism on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700, "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com> let us all know that:
". R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
. This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
How did he do that?
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is that?
If, for the sake of argument, your god exists, then it's your
god's fault because your god created everything and knew everything.
If a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she
could have
let you fall?
Yes, because the skydiver interfered in the will of the god,
which is bad.
So, You believe in God. Interesting.
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 07:17:48 PM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:08:02 -0700, "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com> let us all know that:
"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:7be4905a627tvkoua0cfkuo8dkaguhl96r@4ax.com...
In alt.atheism on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700, "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com> let us all know that:
". R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
. This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
How did he do that?
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is that?
If, for the sake of argument, your god exists, then it's your
god's fault because your god created everything and knew everything.
If a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she
could have
let you fall?
Yes, because the skydiver interfered in the will of the god,
which is bad.
So, You believe in God.
I do?
Prove it.
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
02 May 2004 09:25:30 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 07:08:02 -0700 in episode
<65tkc.6793$k24.2010@fed1read01> we saw our hero "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com>:
"Don Kresch" <ROT13.qxerfpu@jv.ee.pbz.com> wrote in message
news:7be4905a627tvkoua0cfkuo8dkaguhl96r@4ax.com...
In alt.atheism on Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700, "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com> let us all know that:
". R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe. God already knows that
He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion
of non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that
do not lick up to him to hell?
. This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
How did he do that?
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is
that?
If, for the sake of argument, your god exists, then it's your god's
fault because your god created everything and knew everything.
If a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she
could have
let you fall?
Yes, because the skydiver interfered in the will of the god, which is
bad.
So, You believe in God. Interesting.
How breathtakingly lame. Don also quotes Jean-Luc Picard in his sig. Does
that mean the Enterprise exists?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
30 Apr 2004 07:26:14 AM |
|
|
In article <BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01>, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com> wrote:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe.
God already knows that He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
If you jump from a plane and are destined to splat, who's fault is that? If
a sky diver saves you, is that skydiver terrible because he / she could have
let you fall?
Did the skydiver "condemn"? No.
The sky diver saved.
• ____
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
02 May 2004 09:24:27 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700 in episode
<BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01> we saw our hero "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com>:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe. God already knows that He
created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
<snip>
Not hardly. We talk about fictional characters all the time in alt.atheism
without admitting they exist. Or do you think that when people in
alt.atheism talk about the Lord of the Rings they're admitting Frodo
exists?
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
02 May 2004 11:11:11 AM |
|
|
In article <pan.2004.05.02.14.24.26.791418@hoo.com-amikchi>, "Mark K.
Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700 in episode
<BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01> we saw our hero "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com>:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe. God already knows that He
created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
<snip>
Not hardly. We talk about fictional characters all the time in alt.atheism
without admitting they exist. Or do you think that when people in
alt.atheism talk about the Lord of the Rings they're admitting Frodo
exists?
• nice one. congrats
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
02 May 2004 06:33:04 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:11:11 -0700 in episode
<+r-0205040911110001@192.168.1.100> we saw our hero +r@somis.org (• R.L.
Measures):
In article <pan.2004.05.02.14.24.26.791418@hoo.com-amikchi>, "Mark K.
Bilbo" <y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700 in episode
<BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01> we saw our hero "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com>:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe. God already knows that
He created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion
of non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that
do not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
<snip>
Not hardly. We talk about fictional characters all the time in
alt.atheism without admitting they exist. Or do you think that when
people in alt.atheism talk about the Lord of the Rings they're admitting
Frodo exists?
• nice one. congrats
Only a fool in his heart says Sauron does not exist! <G>
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism,
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."
- Mussolini
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "raven1" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
02 May 2004 12:55:15 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 02 May 2004 09:24:27 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<y@hoo.com-amikchi> wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 02:09:52 -0700 in episode
<BJokc.6776$k24.2319@fed1read01> we saw our hero "Icono"
<iconoclst@home.com>:
"• R.L. Measures" <+r@somis.org> wrote in message
news:+r-2904042323110001@192.168.1.100...
In article <e4k39090m0j0udj11rqib9kt0trvg167q7@4ax.com>,
wcruise@ksc15.th.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 03:26:16 -0700, "Icono" <iconoclst@home.com>
wrote:
God doesn't need or require you to believe. God already knows that He
created a group of animals called man and
that
some would be too stupid to believe and actually have a religion of
non-belief.
Then why does this omni everything® character condemn those that do
not lick up to him to hell?
• This God dude seems to have a hell of a lot of the worst human
traits.
Thank you for admitting that a god exists.
<snip>
Not hardly. We talk about fictional characters all the time in alt.atheism
without admitting they exist. Or do you think that when people in
alt.atheism talk about the Lord of the Rings they're admitting Frodo
exists?
Well, yes. Tolkien did always claim that his writings were historical,
rather than fictional... ;-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Watcher" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
29 Apr 2004 11:35:49 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:05:44 +0200, Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk>
wrote:
(snip)
If I believed in your horrible nightmare of a god, I would be
terrified; but it would be impossible for me to love it.
Same for me. If I was in the market for a supreme being, I think I'd be looking
for something like Santa Claus. He's a much nicer god.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
29 Apr 2004 04:21:20 AM |
|
|
On 28 Apr 2004 09:07:27 -0700, (grateful)
wrote:
God being sovereignly autonomous has mercy and compassion
on whom He will, and He hardens who He will.
Assertion. Any proof?
To some He shows mercy, and others are the recipients
of His justice. He's the potter, we are but the clay.
Assertion. Any proof? For your information, I am not made of clay.
You can read Romans 9, if you are so inclined.
You can also read The Lord of the Rings, if you are so inclined.
Once again, God does all for His glory, and for the
good of those He has chosen for His own.
Assertion. Any proof?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "walksalone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
28 Apr 2004 03:09:30 PM |
|
|
On 28 Apr 2004 09:07:27 -0700, grateful In a display of stellar ignorance
whined the following in his trolling for glory.
follow up set, I don't need the audience, but not so grateful does.
"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote in message news:<spjjc.> > > Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
God being sovereignly autonomous has mercy and compassion
Sovereign, really, nice assumption you have there.
Now, you have been whining about this pantheon of yours for a while, care
to ***** or get off the pot?
Of course you you will just bleat, for liars for the god of the revealed
of the desert are not permitted to think or actually provide evidence for
their whining that they abuse others with.
on whom He will, and He hardens who He will.
AKA the bully of heaven.
To some He shows mercy, and others are the recipients
Suck up & its fine, stand up & get your ***** kicked.
of His justice. He's the potter, we are but the clay.
You are the spineless one, you are the clay, unable to stand up on your own
without your god to scare you into submission.
You can read Romans 9, if you are so inclined.
Or we can read books dealing with life, ethics, we can stand on our own
feet or we can, like you are acting, & stay on our knees. I prefer to stand
on my own.
Once again, God does all for His glory, and for the
good of those He has chosen for His own.
AKA Luther was right, for you can not sin enough for god made man to sin.
Sucker bait to me.
walksalone who in spite of all his faults, does not crawl on his knees,
never have, never will.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 03:47:18 AM |
|
|
In article <spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "Scot
McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
...
Obiviously the payoff for the atheist was thinking he would
show her that it is man who provided for her, not God, and
he expected to get the glory for having done so in the bargain.
Actually he was doing the will of God, for one of His children,
and God thwarted the atheist's intention.
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
• Indeed.
- łIf you understand it, it is not God.˛ -- from Saint Augustine's
Sermon 117.
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 07:25:45 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> in news message
<spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
[-----]
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
And every good thing that happens to atheists is God® answering a
prayer whether the atheist prayed or not because good things can not
happen without God®'s direct intervention.
Do people really think like that? Don't they have vertigo from going
around in circles?
Liz #658 BAAWA
Faith is a method designed to keep a person willfully ignorant of the odds
by arbitrarily assigning certainty where certainty is not justified. - Denis Loubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Scot McDermid" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 08:55:24 AM |
|
|
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:ucks801t430uu0k89fng0a506ltou3pi9b@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> in news message
<spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
[-----]
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
And every good thing that happens to atheists is God® answering a
prayer whether the atheist prayed or not because good things can not
happen without God®'s direct intervention.
I know some believers who, in one breath, attribute everything in the
universe to God®. But then in the next breath, tell you that God® isn't
responsible for anything bad that happens.
Do people really think like that? Don't they have vertigo from going
around in circles?
Not vertigo, just dizzy but they appear not to realize that they are dizzy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 09:32:02 AM |
|
|
In article <gDtjc.8762$Gd3.1700515@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "Scot
McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote:
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:ucks801t430uu0k89fng0a506ltou3pi9b@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> in news message
<spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
[-----]
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
And every good thing that happens to atheists is God® answering a
prayer whether the atheist prayed or not because good things can not
happen without God®'s direct intervention.
I know some believers who, in one breath, attribute everything in the
universe to God®. But then in the next breath, tell you that God® isn't
responsible for anything bad that happens.
• Excellent. I like the one about God ® inventing HIV because He
passionately hates homosexuals - yet it's all roo obvious as to who
connected the prostate gland to the brain's pleasure center in the first
place. Essentially the same thing can be said about those "sinful" women
who delight in the feeling of a glans penis rubbing their
Grafenberg-spot.
Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum. ("How suasive is religion to our bane.")
Lucretius, (96?-55? B.C.):
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 01:56:49 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:32:02 -0700, +r@somis.org (• R.L. Measures)
wrote:
In article <gDtjc.8762$Gd3.1700515@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "Scot
McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote:
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:ucks801t430uu0k89fng0a506ltou3pi9b@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> in news message
<spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
[-----]
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
And every good thing that happens to atheists is God® answering a
prayer whether the atheist prayed or not because good things can not
happen without God®'s direct intervention.
I know some believers who, in one breath, attribute everything in the
universe to God®. But then in the next breath, tell you that God® isn't
responsible for anything bad that happens.
• Excellent. I like the one about God ® inventing HIV because He
passionately hates homosexuals - yet it's all roo obvious as to who
connected the prostate gland to the brain's pleasure center in the first
place. Essentially the same thing can be said about those "sinful" women
who delight in the feeling of a glans penis rubbing their
Grafenberg-spot.
I bet the girls love it when you talk dirty like that.
Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum. ("How suasive is religion to our bane.")
Lucretius, (96?-55? B.C.):
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "• R.L. Measures" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 02:21:07 PM |
|
|
In article <gq9t801630qh2usb8g0oaes2gnuum29ek4@4ax.com>, Thomas P.
<tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:32:02 -0700, +r@somis.org (• R.L. Measures)
wrote:
In article <gDtjc.8762$Gd3.1700515@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>, "Scot
McDermid" <scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote:
"Liz" <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:ucks801t430uu0k89fng0a506ltou3pi9b@4ax.com...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> in news message
<spjjc.35960$t26.11891816@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
[-----]
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
And every good thing that happens to atheists is God® answering a
prayer whether the atheist prayed or not because good things can not
happen without God®'s direct intervention.
I know some believers who, in one breath, attribute everything in the
universe to God®. But then in the next breath, tell you that God® isn't
responsible for anything bad that happens.
• Excellent. I like the one about God ® inventing HIV because He
passionately hates homosexuals - yet it's all roo obvious as to who
connected the prostate gland to the brain's pleasure center in the first
place. Essentially the same thing can be said about those "sinful" women
who delight in the feeling of a glans penis rubbing their
Grafenberg-spot.
I bet the girls love it when you talk dirty like that.
• I plead the fifth amendment.
cheers, Thomas
--
€ R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
27 Apr 2004 01:52:31 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 02:18:00 GMT, "Scot McDermid"
<scotmc@optNOonSPAMline.net> wrote:
"grateful" <crossroads1991@aol.com> wrote in message
news:13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com...
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message
news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
snip
Obiviously the payoff for the atheist was thinking he would
show her that it is man who provided for her, not God, and
he expected to get the glory for having done so in the bargain.
Actually he was doing the will of God, for one of His children,
and God thwarted the atheist's intention.
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, even atheists are doing God's work whether they realize
it or not. Atheists are only fulfilling their role in God's plan, yet
*you* say God condemns atheists for it. Seems odd that
God would reward one set of people who are fulfilling the role
in God's plan but condemn other who are fulfilling their role
in God's plan. But of course this is all for a greater good
that cannot possibly be understood by mere mortals.
Or by anyone capable of putting two and two together and coming up
with four.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liz" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
26 Apr 2004 05:57:57 PM |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2004 12:09:57 -0700, (grateful) in
news message <13f2c124.0404261109.105a1422@posting.google.com> wrote:
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message news:<l3jo80dl8tgp8d2amgn0cfvvn538drd23m@4ax.com>...
On 25 Apr 2004 11:01:17 -0700, (grateful) in
news message <13f2c124.0404251001.5420b1f5@posting.google.com> wrote:
Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote in message news:<3m5n80tonjv8j2hohi1m0urqkn643cm5im@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:43:14 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> in news message
<408B17B2.5080304@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Thomas P. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:02:21 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
On the contrary, how could atheists, like all creation, not shout God's
glory?
How can you make an argument based on an assuming your conclusion?
You have assumed that there is a creation, you then assert that it
shouts something.
I accept it as axiomatic all creation shouts God's glory. So we can
study any creature -- an atheist for example -- and investigate how this
one shouts it. Reminds me of a joke{1}.
There's a little old Christian lady living next door to an atheist.
Every morning the lady comes out onto her front porch and shouts "Praise
the Lord!".
The atheist yells back, "There is no God".
She does this every morning with the same result. As time goes on, the
lady runs into financial difficulties and has trouble buying food. She
goes out onto the porch and asks God for help with groceries, then says
"Praise the Lord".
The next morning she goes out onto the porch and there's the groceries
she asked for, and of course, she shouts "Praise the Lord!!!".
The atheist jumps out from behind a bush and says, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God".
The lady looks at him and smiles, she shouts "Praise the Lord, not only
did you provide for me Lord, you made Satan pay for the groceries!!"
IOW, the atheist is altruistic, compassionate, and tolerant because he
helps even those who have different beliefs when they have need.
OTOH, the Christian is ungrateful and insulting even to the point of
*biting the hand that feeds her.
No, Liz, there was no altruism, compassion or tolerance involved
here because the man's motivation was evil. His intent was to
act like the devil and separate this woman from her legitimately
held belief in God.
Yet, he gave her the food when no one else did because she had the
need. He gave her food for which he paid with his own money.
She didn't ask any person to provide for her needs, she asked
God alone who is the source of all provision.
No she didn't ask the atheist to buy her groceries. He did because he
knew that she had a need.
The atheist was
the second cause of the benefit as it pleased God for him to be.
IOW, God® could not provide anything for the woman by himself.
There
were no strings attached to the food. That is altruism, compassion,
and tolerance. Possibly you do not recognize these traits because you
do not practice them.
Obiviously the payoff for the atheist was thinking he would
show her that it is man who provided for her, not God, and
he expected to get the glory for having done so in the bargain.
Yet, he gave the woman food when God® did nothing.
Actually he was doing the will of God, for one of His children,
and God thwarted the atheist's intention.
No, the atheist gave the woman the food with no strings attached.
God® did nothing.
Did he not help her?
Yes, he was the means God used to help her.
Yes, the atheist helped her.
Should she have refused the food after she
found out that the food was from an atheist and waited until she
starved or received food from a fellow Christian, whichever came
first?
No, she knew who is the ultimate source of her provision.
She trusted God to answer her prayer to shield her from
starvation, and He did. Where in the story do we find her
beseeching anyone other than God for help?
We don't. Yet, it was the atheist who helped not God®. It was the
atheist's money that bought the groceries, and the woman accepted
them, and then was beyond rude to the person who helped her.
...for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the
outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. I Sam. 16:7
So, if the LORD® sees the heart and man only sees the outward
appearance, why are you doing the judging?
Because you don't have to be God to know the atheist's
motive for buying her groceries.
Ah, you can read others' minds. ROTFL
Why is he hiding behind
a bush so when she discovers the groceries on her porch,
he can jump out and exclaim, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God". Note: the "Ha"
Because he wanted her to know that he provided the groceries and that
they didn't come by supernatural means. And he was correct.
I've seen this type of behavior before. I wonder whom the little old
Christian lady will insult the next time she has no money to pay for
groceries. It is no wonder her children had abandoned her and the
compassionate conservative members of her church ignored her need so
that she must rely on the generosity of relative strangers.
It worked out beautifully; the wealth of the sinner was spent on
the just.
And the Christian kicks the atheist in the teeth for his trouble.
No, not for his trouble, but because of his obviously
evil motive.
Giving food to another person is not evil. So, it is okay with you to
kick other people in the teeth when they help you? That's a very
Christian attitude.
I
don't think you will find justification for that type of behavior in
your scriptures, but I'll give you a chance to find an appropriate
verse and show me that I am wrong, and Christians are supposed to
insult others and be ungrateful to those who have given them charity.
It is a story afterall, and the atheist got what he deserved
as a consequence of his evil intent.
So you can't provide scripture justifying the Christian woman's
behavior. I didn't think you could. Ah well, the woman was *****,
and since you approve of her rudeness, you are an *****. May I say that
your response doesn't surprise me in the least.
Normally the Christian
thanks both the first cause and the second cause for help.
I don't find that normal at all for True® Believers. They rarely
thank humans who have given them help.
Liz #658 BAAWA
A religious fanatic is someone who insists on proselyting the full
frontal ugliness of xtian mythology without shame or reservation.
-- Clothaire
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
25 Apr 2004 07:56:27 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 10:49:38 GMT, Liz <ehuth1@donotspam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:43:14 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
I accept it as axiomatic all creation shouts God's glory. So we can
study any creature -- an atheist for example -- and investigate how this
one shouts it. Reminds me of a joke{1}.
There's a little old Christian lady living next door to an atheist.
Every morning the lady comes out onto her front porch and shouts "Praise
the Lord!".
The atheist yells back, "There is no God".
She does this every morning with the same result. As time goes on, the
lady runs into financial difficulties and has trouble buying food. She
goes out onto the porch and asks God for help with groceries, then says
"Praise the Lord".
The next morning she goes out onto the porch and there's the groceries
she asked for, and of course, she shouts "Praise the Lord!!!".
The atheist jumps out from behind a bush and says, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God".
The lady looks at him and smiles, she shouts "Praise the Lord, not only
did you provide for me Lord, you made Satan pay for the groceries!!"
IOW, the atheist is altruistic, compassionate, and tolerant because he
helps even those who have different beliefs when they have need.
OTOH, the Christian is ungrateful and insulting even to the point of
*biting the hand that feeds her.
I've seen this type of behavior before. I wonder whom the little old
Christian lady will insult the next time she has no money to pay for
groceries. It is no wonder her children had abandoned her and the
compassionate conservative members of her church ignored her need so
that she must rely on the generosity of relative strangers.
I've never understood this - Wostenberg has the same mentality that
tells a Polack joke to a Pole, or an Irish joke to an Irishman.
There is something about christianity that destroys any consideration
or courtesy to others.
A bigot will tell an ethnic or similar joke to an audience of bigots
who find it funny.
When a member of a group tells it to others outside the group, it
makes a statement about the audience.
But it takes a total jerk for an outsider to tell it to a member of
the group.
But then it was Wostenberg.
Liz #658 BAAWA
They all agree on what their god wants. Each theist will tell you
that what the only true god wants, and what he, himself, wants, are
exactly the same. -- Al Klein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
25 Apr 2004 02:30:04 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:43:14 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Thomas P. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:02:21 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
On the contrary, how could atheists, like all creation, not shout God's
glory?
How can you make an argument based on an assuming your conclusion?
You have assumed that there is a creation, you then assert that it
shouts something.
I accept it as axiomatic all creation shouts God's glory.
Oh, OK. I see. The old "I believe it so it must be true" argument.
So we can
study any creature -- an atheist for example -- and investigate how this
one shouts it. Reminds me of a joke{1}.
You *are* a joke.
There's a little old Christian lady living next door to an atheist.
Every morning the lady comes out onto her front porch and shouts "Praise
the Lord!".
The atheist yells back, "There is no God".
She does this every morning with the same result. As time goes on, the
lady runs into financial difficulties and has trouble buying food. She
goes out onto the porch and asks God for help with groceries, then says
"Praise the Lord".
The next morning she goes out onto the porch and there's the groceries
she asked for, and of course, she shouts "Praise the Lord!!!".
The atheist jumps out from behind a bush and says, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God".
The lady looks at him and smiles, she shouts "Praise the Lord, not only
did you provide for me Lord, you made Satan pay for the groceries!!"
Thank you, Alan. That little story illustrates the utter intellectual
and moral bankruptcy of fundamentalist Christians far more eloquently
than I ever could.
"Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have
certainty without any proof."
~ Ashleigh Montague ~
aa #1898
BAAWA Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas P." |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
25 Apr 2004 02:38:44 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:43:14 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Thomas P. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:02:21 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
On the contrary, how could atheists, like all creation, not shout God's
glory?
How can you make an argument based on an assuming your conclusion?
You have assumed that there is a creation, you then assert that it
shouts something.
I accept it as axiomatic all creation shouts God's glory. So we can
study any creature -- an atheist for example -- and investigate how this
one shouts it. Reminds me of a joke{1}.
I see. You assume it is true and then use that assumption as evidence
for it being true. Very neat.
There's a little old Christian lady living next door to an atheist.
Every morning the lady comes out onto her front porch and shouts "Praise
the Lord!".
The atheist yells back, "There is no God".
She does this every morning with the same result. As time goes on, the
lady runs into financial difficulties and has trouble buying food. She
goes out onto the porch and asks God for help with groceries, then says
"Praise the Lord".
The next morning she goes out onto the porch and there's the groceries
she asked for, and of course, she shouts "Praise the Lord!!!".
The atheist jumps out from behind a bush and says, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God".
The lady looks at him and smiles, she shouts "Praise the Lord, not only
did you provide for me Lord, you made Satan pay for the groceries!!"
The point being that the atheist helped the old lady and the old lady
was too stupid to be grateful. She even had to throw in an insult.
In the meantime millions of people are starving every day. When will
god deliver the groceries?
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "grateful" |
|
| Title: Re: To Believe Or Not to Believe |
25 Apr 2004 02:04:55 PM |
|
|
Thomas P. <tonyofbexarremovethis@yahoo.dk> wrote in message news:<qiqm80tti25c3jca478kak1trhv0juiqfu@4ax.com>...
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 20:43:14 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
Thomas P. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:02:21 -0500, Alan Wostenberg
<awostenberg@psalmweaver.com> wrote:
On the contrary, how could atheists, like all creation, not shout God's
glory?
How can you make an argument based on an assuming your conclusion?
You have assumed that there is a creation, you then assert that it
shouts something.
I accept it as axiomatic all creation shouts God's glory. So we can
study any creature -- an atheist for example -- and investigate how this
one shouts it. Reminds me of a joke{1}.
I see. You assume it is true and then use that assumption as evidence
for it being true. Very neat.
There's a little old Christian lady living next door to an atheist.
Every morning the lady comes out onto her front porch and shouts "Praise
the Lord!".
The atheist yells back, "There is no God".
She does this every morning with the same result. As time goes on, the
lady runs into financial difficulties and has trouble buying food. She
goes out onto the porch and asks God for help with groceries, then says
"Praise the Lord".
The next morning she goes out onto the porch and there's the groceries
she asked for, and of course, she shouts "Praise the Lord!!!".
The atheist jumps out from behind a bush and says, "Ha, I bought those
groceries - there is no God".
The lady looks at him and smiles, she shouts "Praise the Lord, not only
did you provide for me Lord, you made Satan pay for the groceries!!"
The point being that the atheist helped the old lady and the old lady
was too stupid to be grateful.
The atheist was the second cause, the instrument used by God to help
the old lady. The atheist wanted to separate her from her legitmately
held belief in God. If he were looking out for her best interests, he
would not have hidden in the bushes to spy on her reaction. He would
have humbly given without seeking credit for what he had done. IOW,
his motivation was evil, and God, who looks on the heart, and not on
the outward appearance knew it, as did the old lady. All the glory
goes to God.
She even had to throw in an insult.
In the meantime millions of people are starving every day. When will
god deliver the groceries?
God was the first cause Provider, the unbeliever was His instrument.
The old lady knew who to thank for the benefit. Millions of people
are deliberately sinning against God everyday, but He still causes
the rain to fall and the sun to shine upon them just as He does
His own.
Thomas P.
None of the Emperor's clothes had been so successful before.
"But he has got nothing on," said a little child.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|