| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fred Stone" |
| Date: |
25 Aug 2007 07:07:48 PM |
| Object: |
To Surge or not to Surge |
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” - George
Orwell
.
|
|
| User: "ike milligan" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
25 Aug 2007 10:44:32 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is not
working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, " The surge is
working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I am sure that if the
elite who control the war give up, it will be because there is no choice.
Then, Fred, will you blame the Democrats for stabbing America in the back,
like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
26 Aug 2007 03:48:41 PM |
|
|
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is not
working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, " The
surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I am sure
that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be because
there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the Democrats for
stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing
WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're kicking al
Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
27 Aug 2007 11:28:59 AM |
|
|
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is not
working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, " The
surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I am sure
that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be because
there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the Democrats for
stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing
WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're kicking al
Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
27 Aug 2007 12:22:31 PM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is not
working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, " The
surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I am sure
that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be because
there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the Democrats for
stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing
WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're kicking
al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I have a
point.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
27 Aug 2007 02:07:55 PM |
|
|
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is not
working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, " The
surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I am sure
that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be because
there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the Democrats for
stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing
WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're kicking
al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I have a
point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in Iraq is
due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would not cause a
fundamental change in the situation.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
27 Aug 2007 08:20:06 PM |
|
|
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is
not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, "
The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I
am sure that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be
because there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the
Democrats for stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the
Jews for losing WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I have
a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in Iraq is
due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would not cause a
fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in retaliation
against those whom they perceive to be supporting the terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "ike milligan" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
28 Aug 2007 08:25:34 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9999D928910BAfreddybear@216.151.153.48...
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is
not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying, "
The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it. I
am sure that if the elite who control the war give up, it will be
because there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the
Democrats for stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed the
Jews for losing WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I have
a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in Iraq is
due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would not cause a
fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in retaliation
against those whom they perceive to be supporting the terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
Depends on how you define "real". Secondly, if the U.S. had never botched up
the place, a lot more people would still be alive, and have homes. Once
Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people would still be alive
if the U.S. had withdrawn. Also, the U.S. military may have killed more
people directly than Al Q did. But that's the point, Arab lives are not
considered of any value to the colonialist wannabes who control the
military. If Arab lives had any value to those elitists, Bush Sr. would not
have told the Shia to revolt and then done nothing to help them when Saddam
put them down and slaughtered them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
28 Aug 2007 09:04:26 PM |
|
|
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d9iq7r45jgkcd@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9999D928910BAfreddybear@216.151.153.48...
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is
not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying,
" The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it.
I am sure that if the elite who control the war give up, it will
be because there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the
Democrats for stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed
the Jews for losing WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I
have a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in Iraq
is due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would not
cause a fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in
retaliation against those whom they perceive to be supporting the
terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
Depends on how you define "real". Secondly, if the U.S. had never
botched up the place, a lot more people would still be alive, and have
homes.
Depends on whether you care about the Iraqis that Saddam would have
slaughtered. But you don't, do you? You only care about the ones that
you can blame on America, however much you have to strain to do it.
Once Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people
would still be alive if the U.S. had withdrawn.
And another subset of the Iraqi people, probably in the hundreds of
thousands would be dead.
Also, the U.S.
military may have killed more people directly than Al Q did.
Not likely.
But
that's the point, Arab lives are not considered of any value to the
colonialist wannabes who control the military.
Since the Americans are not "colonialist wannabes" that criticism is
misplaced at best, and outright propaganda at worst. Which description
do you prefer for yourself, ike, ignorant fool or deliberate liar?
If Arab lives had any
value to those elitists, Bush Sr. would not have told the Shia to
revolt and then done nothing to help them when Saddam put them down
and slaughtered them.
Now you're talking about the "realist" school of foreign policy wonks.
You know, the ones who give a flying ***** what the UN thinks.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "ike milligan" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
03 Sep 2007 09:19:15 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns999AE0AE9E420freddybear@216.151.153.47...
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d9iq7r45jgkcd@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9999D928910BAfreddybear@216.151.153.48...
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge is
not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey saying,
" The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I don't get it.
I am sure that if the elite who control the war give up, it will
be because there is no choice. Then, Fred, will you blame the
Democrats for stabbing America in the back, like Hitler blamed
the Jews for losing WW I by stabbing Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was the
problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one that we
caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I
have a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in Iraq
is due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would not
cause a fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in
retaliation against those whom they perceive to be supporting the
terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
Depends on how you define "real". Secondly, if the U.S. had never
botched up the place, a lot more people would still be alive, and have
homes.
Depends on whether you care about the Iraqis that Saddam would have
slaughtered. But you don't, do you? You only care about the ones that
you can blame on America, however much you have to strain to do it.
Wheter or not I care about those Iraqis, it is a non-sequitur to pretend to
care now that the country is trashed b the U.S.
Once Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people
would still be alive if the U.S. had withdrawn.
And another subset of the Iraqi people, probably in the hundreds of
thousands would be dead.
So it is better for american military to kill them than Saddam? And the
nubers are very debatable.
Also, the U.S.
military may have killed more people directly than Al Q did.
Not likely.
Plausible.
But
that's the point, Arab lives are not considered of any value to the
colonialist wannabes who control the military.
Since the Americans are not "colonialist wannabes" that criticism is
misplaced at best, and outright propaganda at worst. Which description
do you prefer for yourself, ike, ignorant fool or deliberate liar?
Neo-cons are.
If Arab lives had any
value to those elitists, Bush Sr. would not have told the Shia to
revolt and then done nothing to help them when Saddam put them down
and slaughtered them.
Now you're talking about the "realist" school of foreign policy wonks.
You know, the ones who give a flying ***** what the UN thinks.
I am not sure what that school of foreign policy is, or what is has to do
with the discussion. And as far as I know, no one cares what the UN
"thinks".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
03 Sep 2007 09:52:29 PM |
|
|
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13dpg61bctejs40@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns999AE0AE9E420freddybear@216.151.153.47...
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d9iq7r45jgkcd@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9999D928910BAfreddybear@216.151.153.48...
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com>
wrote in news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge
is not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey
saying, " The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I
don't get it. I am sure that if the elite who control the war
give up, it will be because there is no choice. Then, Fred,
will you blame the Democrats for stabbing America in the back,
like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing WW I by stabbing
Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know
it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was
the problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one
that we caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I
have a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in
Iraq is due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would
not cause a fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in
retaliation against those whom they perceive to be supporting the
terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
Depends on how you define "real". Secondly, if the U.S. had never
botched up the place, a lot more people would still be alive, and
have homes.
Depends on whether you care about the Iraqis that Saddam would have
slaughtered. But you don't, do you? You only care about the ones that
you can blame on America, however much you have to strain to do it.
Wheter or not I care about those Iraqis, it is a non-sequitur to
pretend to care now that the country is trashed b the U.S.
The US didn't trash the country. The US has tried to FIX the country.
Once Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people
would still be alive if the U.S. had withdrawn.
And another subset of the Iraqi people, probably in the hundreds of
thousands would be dead.
So it is better for american military to kill them than Saddam? And
the nubers are very debatable.
The American military didn't kill them either. MOST of the Iraqis have
been killed by other Iraqis or by foreign al Qaeda terrorists.
Also, the U.S.
military may have killed more people directly than Al Q did.
Not likely.
Plausible.
Not to anybody who isn't a rabid anti-American jackass.
But
that's the point, Arab lives are not considered of any value to the
colonialist wannabes who control the military.
Since the Americans are not "colonialist wannabes" that criticism is
misplaced at best, and outright propaganda at worst. Which
description do you prefer for yourself, ike, ignorant fool or
deliberate liar?
Neo-cons are.
Not.
If Arab lives had any
value to those elitists, Bush Sr. would not have told the Shia to
revolt and then done nothing to help them when Saddam put them down
and slaughtered them.
Now you're talking about the "realist" school of foreign policy
wonks. You know, the ones who give a flying ***** what the UN thinks.
I am not sure what that school of foreign policy is, or what is has to
do with the discussion. And as far as I know, no one cares what the UN
"thinks".
You mentioned them, ike. Don't you know anything about the sources of
the propaganda that you spout?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "ike milligan" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
04 Sep 2007 11:11:30 AM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99A0E8CFD256Efreddybear@216.151.153.13...
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13dpg61bctejs40@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns999AE0AE9E420freddybear@216.151.153.47...
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d9iq7r45jgkcd@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9999D928910BAfreddybear@216.151.153.48...
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote
in news:t686d319msqhd4a1fdfmmr2reqveh7mnb9@4ax.com:
On 27 Aug 2007 17:22:31 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9999882EC82CDfreddybear@216.151.153.47> wrote:
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com>
wrote in news:ksu5d3le39e332juhkuprtkv01d411dgqf@4ax.com:
On 26 Aug 2007 20:48:41 GMT, in alt.atheism , Fred Stone
<fstone69@earthling.com> in
<Xns9998AB24B45C3freddybear@216.151.153.44> wrote:
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13d1tr7fderpt12@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9997CCE1E1A47freddybear@216.151.153.45...
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
There are 2 panels. Panel A shows a donkey saying, "The surge
is not working; weshould give up." Panel B shows the donkey
saying, " The surge is working; we should give up." OK, I
don't get it. I am sure that if the elite who control the war
give up, it will be because there is no choice. Then, Fred,
will you blame the Democrats for stabbing America in the back,
like Hitler blamed the Jews for losing WW I by stabbing
Germany in the back?
They aren't going to give up, because we aren't losing. We're
kicking al Q's sorry little camel fucking asses and they know
it.
And if al Q *in Iraq* (we have ignored the real al Qaeda) was
the problem, and not simply a small bit of the problem and one
that we caused, then you might have a point.
They are the real al Qaeda, so thank you for acknowledging that I
have a point.
No, Fred, you don't. Very little of the problem or violence in
Iraq is due to al Qaeda. If we eliminated them tomorrow it would
not cause a fundamental change in the situation.
You are wrong, Matt. al Q causes the largest part of the violence,
either directly or by inciting other groups to lash out in
retaliation against those whom they perceive to be supporting the
terrorists.
And al Q in Iraq is the real al Q. Don't kid yourself.
Depends on how you define "real". Secondly, if the U.S. had never
botched up the place, a lot more people would still be alive, and
have homes.
Depends on whether you care about the Iraqis that Saddam would have
slaughtered. But you don't, do you? You only care about the ones that
you can blame on America, however much you have to strain to do it.
Wheter or not I care about those Iraqis, it is a non-sequitur to
pretend to care now that the country is trashed b the U.S.
The US didn't trash the country. The US has tried to FIX the country.
The U.S. claimed to be fixing it all the while trashing it.
Once Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people
would still be alive if the U.S. had withdrawn.
And another subset of the Iraqi people, probably in the hundreds of
thousands would be dead.
So it is better for american military to kill them than Saddam? And
the nubers are very debatable.
The American military didn't kill them either. MOST of the Iraqis have
been killed by other Iraqis or by foreign al Qaeda terrorists.
That's debatable, but in the least, the U.S. created the perception that it
was killing many of them, including civilians, and also creating the
conditions for other factions to kill them.
Also, the U.S.
military may have killed more people directly than Al Q did.
Not likely.
Plausible.
Not to anybody who isn't a rabid anti-American jackass.
I see. When all else fails use insults. Very well; in another thread I
called you batshit crazy.
But
that's the point, Arab lives are not considered of any value to the
colonialist wannabes who control the military.
Since the Americans are not "colonialist wannabes" that criticism is
misplaced at best, and outright propaganda at worst. Which
description do you prefer for yourself, ike, ignorant fool or
deliberate liar?
Neo-cons are.
Not.
Are colonialists. If Kruschev were still alive he would agree.
If Arab lives had any
value to those elitists, Bush Sr. would not have told the Shia to
revolt and then done nothing to help them when Saddam put them down
and slaughtered them.
Now you're talking about the "realist" school of foreign policy
wonks. You know, the ones who give a flying ***** what the UN thinks.
I am not sure what that school of foreign policy is, or what is has to
do with the discussion. And as far as I know, no one cares what the UN
"thinks".
You mentioned them, ike. Don't you know anything about the sources of
the propaganda that you spout?
That's incorrect. I did not bring in the UN. You mentioned "them" if you
refer to the U.N. And calling what I "spout" "propaganda" says nothing about
its veracity. Propaganda can be either true or false. Propaganda is a
product of governments or political entities, of which I am neither.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it." -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
04 Sep 2007 11:34:09 AM |
|
|
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13dr10btlrvt71d@corp.supernews.com:
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99A0E8CFD256Efreddybear@216.151.153.13...
"ike milligan" <accordiondoc@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:13dpg61bctejs40@corp.supernews.com:
<...>
Wheter or not I care about those Iraqis, it is a non-sequitur to
pretend to care now that the country is trashed b the U.S.
The US didn't trash the country. The US has tried to FIX the country.
The U.S. claimed to be fixing it all the while trashing it.
YOU claim that we're trashing it while we're fixing it.
Once Saddam was overthrown, many tens of thousands of people
would still be alive if the U.S. had withdrawn.
And another subset of the Iraqi people, probably in the hundreds of
thousands would be dead.
So it is better for american military to kill them than Saddam? And
the nubers are very debatable.
The American military didn't kill them either. MOST of the Iraqis
have been killed by other Iraqis or by foreign al Qaeda terrorists.
That's debatable, but in the least, the U.S. created the perception
that it was killing many of them, including civilians, and also
creating the conditions for other factions to kill them.
That perception was not created by the US. The US media, perhaps.
Also, the U.S.
military may have killed more people directly than Al Q did.
Not likely.
Plausible.
Not to anybody who isn't a rabid anti-American jackass.
I see. When all else fails use insults. Very well; in another thread I
called you batshit crazy.
But
that's the point, Arab lives are not considered of any value to
the colonialist wannabes who control the military.
Since the Americans are not "colonialist wannabes" that criticism
is misplaced at best, and outright propaganda at worst. Which
description do you prefer for yourself, ike, ignorant fool or
deliberate liar?
Neo-cons are.
Not.
Are colonialists. If Kruschev were still alive he would agree.
That is hardly a source of valid judgements about American character.
<...>
I am not sure what that school of foreign policy is, or what is has
to do with the discussion. And as far as I know, no one cares what
the UN "thinks".
You mentioned them, ike. Don't you know anything about the sources of
the propaganda that you spout?
That's incorrect. I did not bring in the UN. You mentioned "them" if
you refer to the U.N. And calling what I "spout" "propaganda" says
nothing about its veracity. Propaganda can be either true or false.
Propaganda is a product of governments or political entities, of which
I am neither.
If you're making this up on your own, ike, I'm the Man in the Moon.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"To abjure violence it is necessary to have no experience of it.” -
George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Backyard Astronomer" |
|
| Title: Re: To Surge or not to Surge |
27 Aug 2007 11:50:39 AM |
|
|
On 26 Aug 2007 00:07:48 GMT, Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com>
wrote:
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y23/drsanity/demlogic.jpg
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/v/M/iraq_chickenhawk.gif
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|