In a separate thread, the Internationally renowned liar and Hypocrite
known as
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> charged (in message
news:<KQhnb.6912680$cI2.984570@news.easynews.com>) someone with
"misdirection and failure to answer the question."

In doing this he has proven himself to be a hypocrite because he has
been running away form answering essentially every challenge or
question I have put to him since August (and he'll prove it right here
by running away from them again):

1. I am *still waiting* for him to admit that regardless of what it is
classed as and regardless of whether it was or was not in the line to
birds, the archaeopteryx had pretty much a fifty-fifty mix of
reptile/dino and bird features and therefore represented an example of
a potential intermediate stage.

2. I am *still waiting* for him to admit that the okapi is pretty much
what a transitional giraffe would have looked like.

3. I am *still waiting* for him to explain why something akin to a
mouse could not change 300 genes over 60 million years to become
either human or a modern mouse.

4. I am *still waiting* for him to acknowledge that no evolutionist
has ever claimed that modern birds evolved from modern reptiles and
that argument from incredulity addressing this non-issue, no matter
how ancient it is, does not constitute a "colossal hole" in the Theory
of Evolution.

5. I am *still waiting* for him to acknowledge that creationist
letters published as a courtesy (or maybe as a source of amusement) in
_New Scientist_ are *not* the equivalent of peer-reviewed science
papers, no matter how ancient and misguided they are.

6. I am *still waiting* for him to post a **LIST** of these "colossal
holes" in the Theory of Evolution that he has been lying about since
August.

7. I am *still waiting* for him to admit that the informally
peer-reviewed talk.origins archive is a valid reference, especially
when the articles to which I have repeatedly refered him are
themselves replete with references, many of which are to peer-reviewed
material.

8. I am *still waiting* for him to realize what a pathetic hypocrite
he is to demand peer-reviewed material of others when he has never
offered a single peer-reviewed reference himself - in fact, all he
essentially does offer is unreferenced and plagiarized argument from
incredulity.

9. I am *still waiting* for him to admit that the article he offered
as a reference for his claim that 75% or human DNA is the same as that
of the banana actually stated that *up to* 30% *may be* similar.

10. I am *still waiting* for him to offer even one useful reference
for his subsequent and previous claims that we are 90% identical to a
banana in our DNA, 60% identical to a banana in our DNA, 50% identical
to a banana in our DNA.

Any reply from Jabriol that does not respond competently (note,
snipping or running away are not considered to be adequate, or even
intelligent responses) to these questions will be a direct and open
admission by him to the world that he cannot answer them and that each
of the threads he started in which these and many other questions
*still* remain unanswered boil down to nothing but putrid hot air.

Budikka