| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"JaBrIoL" |
| Date: |
06 Nov 2003 06:21:55 PM |
| Object: |
TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Magazines, newspapers and books have displayed pictures of this small
creature with headings such as: "Monkey-like creature was our
ancestor." (Time) "Monkeylike African Primate Called Common Ancestor
of Man and Apes." (The New York Times) "Aegyptopithecus is an ancestor
which we share with living apes." (Origins) But where are the links
between it and the rodent before it? Where are the links to what is
placed after it in the evolutionary lineup? None have been found. So
first we have a ratman, then the pyramid-ape :-) with no links in the
fossil record.
.
|
|
| User: "MIB529" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
08 Nov 2003 03:09:55 PM |
|
|
(JaBrIoL) wrote in message news:<d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com>...
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Pre-dating the pyramids by 29,994,000 years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
08 Nov 2003 07:18:57 PM |
|
|
"MIB529" <man_in_black529@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4ad78f65.0311081309.323f67a8@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com>...
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Pre-dating the pyramids by 29,994,000 years.
some just dont have a semse of humour in these discussions :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Zachriel" |
|
| Title: Re: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 07:09:55 AM |
|
|
Apes built the pyramids? Yes, but they were very unusual apes.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Patrick James" |
|
| Title: Re: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 08:24:56 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 8:09:55 -0500, Zachriel wrote
(in message <ZQMqb.3450$tL2.945962001@twister2.starband.net>):
Apes built the pyramids? Yes, but they were very unusual apes.
Actually, the apes in question were all members of the single most successful
species of ape, and, in fact, of primate, so far discovered. Why, I'm sure
that there are more of those particular apes in Egypt alone right now than
there are of all other ape species, worldwide.
--
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 09:52:12 AM |
|
|
On 06 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com:
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Magazines, newspapers and books have displayed pictures of this small
creature with headings such as: "Monkey-like creature was our
ancestor." (Time) "Monkeylike African Primate Called Common Ancestor
of Man and Apes." (The New York Times) "Aegyptopithecus is an ancestor
which we share with living apes." (Origins) But where are the links
between it and the rodent before it? Where are the links to what is
placed after it in the evolutionary lineup? None have been found. So
first we have a ratman, then the pyramid-ape :-) with no links in the
fossil record.
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you? Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human? How many intermediary forms must
there be before you no longer demand yet more forms in between the known
ones? Do you know anything about how fossils are formed, and how rare
that process is? If a single creature between Aegyptopithecus and man
did not leave a fossil, does that invalidate the entire record? And if
not, how many fossils do we need to find in that chain for you to be
satisfied? Do you want an ancestor that is the same species as the
descendant? You won't find it. That's what evolution is about --
species gradually changing. So how large can the changes be between
known forms before you decide you're wrong?
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gloria Glomden" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 12:40:46 PM |
|
|
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:Xns942C646878217Mekkala@199.45.49.11...
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you? Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human?
===============
You may not know Jabbers. The only thing that with satisfy Jabbers is if
it's printed in his Jehovah's Witness literature - if it comes down from the
JWs Watchtower Publishing House. He will harass everyone on Usenet about
the evidence for evolution and never ONCE questioned anything his cult ever
claimed, printed or even suggested. You can't reason with a religious
fanatic. Although he claims he doesn't believe in creation he is lying. As
a JW he has no choice but to believe in a magical creation by their
special-edition god called Jehovah.
--
Gloria
==========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 02:28:15 PM |
|
|
"Gloria Glomden" <no0no@no0no.net> wrote in message
news:3fabe73c@news.heartoftn.net...
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:Xns942C646878217Mekkala@199.45.49.11...
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you? Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human?
===============
You may not know Jabbers. The only thing that with satisfy Jabbers is if
it's printed in his Jehovah's Witness literature - if it comes down from
the
JWs Watchtower Publishing House. He will harass everyone on Usenet about
the evidence for evolution and never ONCE questioned anything his cult
ever
claimed, printed or even suggested. You can't reason with a religious
fanatic. Although he claims he doesn't believe in creation he is lying.
As
a JW he has no choice but to believe in a magical creation by their
special-edition god called Jehovah.
We know Jabbers, all right. He's been a laughing stock here in alt.atheism
for nearly as long as I've been here (close to six years now). Everything
you say about him is true, and then some. :-)
--
Gloria
==========================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 11:40:05 AM |
|
|
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<Xns942C646878217Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 06 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com:
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Magazines, newspapers and books have displayed pictures of this small
creature with headings such as: "Monkey-like creature was our
ancestor." (Time) "Monkeylike African Primate Called Common Ancestor
of Man and Apes." (The New York Times) "Aegyptopithecus is an ancestor
which we share with living apes." (Origins) But where are the links
between it and the rodent before it? Where are the links to what is
placed after it in the evolutionary lineup? None have been found. So
first we have a ratman, then the pyramid-ape :-) with no links in the
fossil record.
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you?
Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human? How many intermediary forms must
there be before you no longer demand yet more forms in between the known
ones?
how many intermediate forms exist today?
Do you know anything about how fossils are formed, and how rare
that process is?
uh..yup.. I do.
If a single creature between Aegyptopithecus and man
did not leave a fossil, does that invalidate the entire record?
no, it will invalidate the certainty that said line would have existed.
And if
not, how many fossils do we need to find in that chain for you to be
satisfied?
how many is required now?
Do you want an ancestor that is the same species as the
descendant? You won't find it.
it all depends on your defintion of the term "species"
That's what evolution is about --
species gradually changing.
that happen today, but does sepcies of a rodent becomes a hominid?
can we accelarate this, so that it would pass the scientific method?
So how large can the changes be between
known forms before you decide you're wrong?
how can we prove and observe changes among known forms today?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 12:25:56 PM |
|
|
On 07 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311070940.5566e85c@posting.google.com:
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns942C646878217Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 06 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com:
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Magazines, newspapers and books have displayed pictures of this
small creature with headings such as: "Monkey-like creature was our
ancestor." (Time) "Monkeylike African Primate Called Common
Ancestor of Man and Apes." (The New York Times) "Aegyptopithecus is
an ancestor which we share with living apes." (Origins) But where
are the links between it and the rodent before it? Where are the
links to what is placed after it in the evolutionary lineup? None
have been found. So first we have a ratman, then the pyramid-ape
:-) with no links in the fossil record.
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you?
Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human? How many intermediary forms
must there be before you no longer demand yet more forms in between
the known ones?
how many intermediate forms exist today?
Do you know anything about how fossils are formed, and how rare
that process is?
uh..yup.. I do.
If a single creature between Aegyptopithecus and man
did not leave a fossil, does that invalidate the entire record?
no, it will invalidate the certainty that said line would have
existed.
And if
not, how many fossils do we need to find in that chain for you to be
satisfied?
how many is required now?
Do you want an ancestor that is the same species as the
descendant? You won't find it.
it all depends on your defintion of the term "species"
That's what evolution is about --
species gradually changing.
that happen today, but does sepcies of a rodent becomes a hominid?
can we accelarate this, so that it would pass the scientific method?
So how large can the changes be between
known forms before you decide you're wrong?
how can we prove and observe changes among known forms today?
Jabriol, I might have taken time out of my day to respond to this post,
except that I notice, in reading over your response, that you didn't
deign to answer even ONE of the questions I asked you. Instead, you
responded with questions to me. Since you did so, I in turn refuse to
answer *your* questions.
We've seen the evidence for evolution. You reject it, but won't answer
questions as to *why* you reject it and what would be required for you
to accept it. Therefore, due to your extreme arrogance and insufferable
rudeness, this discussion is over. Go crawl back into your hole until
you're ready to honestly discuss the subject.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built the Pyramids |
07 Nov 2003 06:02:17 PM |
|
|
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:Xns942C7E78484C4Mekkala@199.45.49.11...
On 07 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311070940.5566e85c@posting.google.com:
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns942C646878217Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 06 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311061621.47d0ccb4@posting.google.com:
Aegyptopithecus-Egypt ape:
This creature is said to have lived about 30 million years ago.
Magazines, newspapers and books have displayed pictures of this
small creature with headings such as: "Monkey-like creature was our
ancestor." (Time) "Monkeylike African Primate Called Common
Ancestor of Man and Apes." (The New York Times) "Aegyptopithecus is
an ancestor which we share with living apes." (Origins) But where
are the links between it and the rodent before it? Where are the
links to what is placed after it in the evolutionary lineup? None
have been found. So first we have a ratman, then the pyramid-ape
:-) with no links in the fossil record.
Tell me, Jabberwocky, what would satisfy you?
Every single animal along
the entire line from rodent to human? How many intermediary forms
must there be before you no longer demand yet more forms in between
the known ones?
how many intermediate forms exist today?
Do you know anything about how fossils are formed, and how rare
that process is?
uh..yup.. I do.
If a single creature between Aegyptopithecus and man
did not leave a fossil, does that invalidate the entire record?
no, it will invalidate the certainty that said line would have
existed.
And if
not, how many fossils do we need to find in that chain for you to be
satisfied?
how many is required now?
Do you want an ancestor that is the same species as the
descendant? You won't find it.
it all depends on your defintion of the term "species"
That's what evolution is about --
species gradually changing.
that happen today, but does sepcies of a rodent becomes a hominid?
can we accelarate this, so that it would pass the scientific method?
So how large can the changes be between
known forms before you decide you're wrong?
how can we prove and observe changes among known forms today?
Jabriol, I might have taken time out of my day to respond to this post,
except that I notice, in reading over your response, that you didn't
deign to answer even ONE of the questions I asked you. Instead, you
responded with questions to me. Since you did so, I in turn refuse to
answer *your* questions.
I answered your questions.. you are fustrated, because the answers I gave
you can not fuel your ad-hominen attack...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give you the old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Geo Zukowski" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
07 Nov 2003 07:53:20 PM |
|
|
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you people. That
means he can LIE in the name of furthering the Watchtower cause. As a
Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to accept a magical, fantastical
creation by the special-edition WTS god. You can reason with a religious
fanatic. You waste your time.
George....
.
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
08 Nov 2003 07:19:33 AM |
|
|
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you people. That
means he can LIE in the name of furthering the Watchtower cause. As a
Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to accept a magical, fantastical
creation by the special-edition WTS god. You can reason with a religious
fanatic. You waste your time.
George....
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or sling
mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time on
discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated information.
Therefore participating with her attempt at slander, and distributing
false information elsewhere, may make you a lying fool as well.. Why
throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none). Her
common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can't resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service her
husband, like any decent honorable housewife would.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Luinski" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
08 Nov 2003 02:43:52 PM |
|
|
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com...
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW's
===================
I see everyone where you've been crossposting has killfiled you. What
happens when you run out of NGs to troll and cross-post to? Do you
self-implode? LOL!!!!
Do something useful with yourself Jabbers. Go deliver meals-on-wheels. Go
teach illiterate immigrants to read and write....
--
MiKrobez......
(Jabriol) should be more careful in the way he presents
himself. Some people here might start pulling out all those
JW quotes about "knowing the tree by its fruit" (Credit to Campbell)
====================================================><>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
08 Nov 2003 12:12:34 PM |
|
|
(JaBrIoL) wrote in message news:<d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com>...
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
...religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
JWs in good standing? You are pulling my plonker, Jabbers!
Here in the UK, JWs are seen as an embarrasing, minor irritant, like
piles (haemorrhoids). JWs are wierd, slightly disturbing and socially
mal-adjusted.
Good standing my arse!
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
08 Nov 2003 01:06:55 PM |
|
|
...religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
JWs in good standing? You are pulling my plonker, Jabbers!
Here in the UK, JWs are seen as an embarrasing, minor irritant, like
piles (haemorrhoids). JWs are wierd, slightly disturbing and socially
mal-adjusted.
However we also must remember that it was JWs that have brought forth some of
the most important freedom of religion cases before the courts...to include one
of the most significant decisions of the 20th Century, West Virginia v.
Barnette. This was the decision which upheld that compulsory recitation of the
Pledge of Allegiance was not only unconstitutional but un-American.
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "~ Windago ~" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
08 Nov 2003 01:23:32 PM |
|
|
They're also seen as "weirdos" in most of Australia. People there lock
their doors when they see the JWs coming with their bookbags and other
paraphernalia. France has no great love for them either....
Windigo..........
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0311081012.1d78f6c6@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com>...
...religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
JWs in good standing? You are pulling my plonker, Jabbers!
Here in the UK, JWs are seen as an embarrasing, minor irritant, like
piles (haemorrhoids). JWs are wierd, slightly disturbing and socially
mal-adjusted.
Good standing my arse!
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
09 Nov 2003 10:31:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 13:23:32 -0600, "~ Windago ~"
<LessMadness@otherChurches.com> wrote:
They're also seen as "weirdos" in most of Australia. People there lock
their doors when they see the JWs coming with their bookbags and other
paraphernalia. France has no great love for them either....
Windigo..........
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0311081012.1d78f6c6@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com>...
...religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
JWs in good standing? You are pulling my plonker, Jabbers!
Here in the UK, JWs are seen as an embarrasing, minor irritant, like
piles (haemorrhoids). JWs are wierd, slightly disturbing and socially
mal-adjusted.
Good standing my arse!
(-: Ian :-)
chung
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
16 Nov 2003 07:50:24 PM |
|
|
(JaBrIoL) wrote in message news:<d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com>...
Jabriol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask him a few things or only one.
_Where does he get his information?
_Can his information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of his post? To present reliable facts or sling
mud on science in good standing in every
country in the world?
Ask his for evidence of his claims before proceeding with your
conversation with him, if not you may be end up wasting your time on
discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated information.
Therefore participating with him attempt at slander, and distributing
false information elsewhere, may make you a lying fool as well.. Why
throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Jabriol:
*He can never present evidence.
*He never reveal the source of his info(because there is none). His
common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*He always hides his identity. And changes his header to avoid
killfiles.
*He cuts and paste, rewrites postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which his ISP allows him to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read his reply on this thread..
He can't resists...
He knows Jabriol is always lying.
If you want to get rid of Jabriol, tell him to go home and service his
husband, like any decent honorable asswipe would.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
10 Nov 2003 09:22:45 AM |
|
|
On 08 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com:
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message
news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give
you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you
people. That means he can LIE in the name of furthering the
Watchtower cause. As a Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to
accept a magical, fantastical creation by the special-edition WTS
god. You can reason with a religious fanatic. You waste your time.
George....
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or sling
mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time on
discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated information.
Therefore participating with her attempt at slander, and distributing
false information elsewhere, may make you a lying fool as well.. Why
throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none). Her
common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can't resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service her
husband, like any decent honorable housewife would.
Jabriol, I hate to break it to you, but... EVERYBODY thinks you're a
blithering idiot. It's not just Carol, ya know. We ALL think that.
Nobody's weeping any tears for ol' Jabbers.
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
10 Nov 2003 11:54:14 AM |
|
|
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<Xns942F5F67B1A13Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 08 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com:
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message
news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give
you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you
people. That means he can LIE in the name of furthering the
Watchtower cause. As a Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to
accept a magical, fantastical creation by the special-edition WTS
god. You can reason with a religious fanatic. You waste your time.
George....
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to slander
JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or sling
mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost every
country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time on
discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated information.
Therefore participating with her attempt at slander, and distributing
false information elsewhere, may make you a lying fool as well.. Why
throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none). Her
common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can't resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service her
husband, like any decent honorable housewife would.
Jabriol, I hate to break it to you, but... EVERYBODY thinks you're a
blithering idiot. It's not just Carol, ya know. We ALL think that.
Nobody's weeping any tears for ol' Jabbers.
Me being the "blithering Idiot" must ask.... your point is?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mekkala" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
10 Nov 2003 01:42:58 PM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311100954.26de3e60@posting.google.com:
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns942F5F67B1A13Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 08 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com:
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message
news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give
you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you
people. That means he can LIE in the name of furthering the
Watchtower cause. As a Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to
accept a magical, fantastical creation by the special-edition WTS
god. You can reason with a religious fanatic. You waste your
time.
George....
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to
slander JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or
sling mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost
every country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time
on discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated
information. Therefore participating with her attempt at slander,
and distributing false information elsewhere, may make you a lying
fool as well.. Why throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none).
Her common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can't resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service
her husband, like any decent honorable housewife would.
Jabriol, I hate to break it to you, but... EVERYBODY thinks you're a
blithering idiot. It's not just Carol, ya know. We ALL think that.
Nobody's weeping any tears for ol' Jabbers.
Me being the "blithering Idiot" must ask.... your point is?
My point is, well, blasting Carol for "lying" isn't really going to get
you anywhere. Since we all know you to be a blithering idiot anyways,
and since you've been the laughingstock of every newsgroup you post at
for years, your blasting Carol will probably just make us like her more.
But don't be discouraged, you can keep posting. It's comic relief, you
know? We see a post by Jabriol and if we're stressed out we can always
read it for a good, healthy laugh.
By the way, Jabbers, is there any good way to get rid of those idiot JWs
that wander around disturbing people's lives and privacy in an effort to
ram their inane message down everyone's throat? I'd like to be able to
deal with it other than using a shotgun -- makes quite the mess, you
know.
(Sorry I'm so mean but, well, you deserve it)
--
Mekkala, Atheist #2148
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly
realized I was talking to myself!"
--Peter O'Toole.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
10 Nov 2003 05:26:26 PM |
|
|
"Mekkala" <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:Xns942F8B8862DB9Mekkala@199.45.49.11...
On 10 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311100954.26de3e60@posting.google.com:
Mekkala <joremovedathiskimtoreply@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns942F5F67B1A13Mekkala@199.45.49.11>...
On 08 Nov 2003, (JaBrIoL) screwed up his face,
groaned, pushed hard, and farted out the following message in
news:d222de3e.0311080519.d8e51ca@posting.google.com:
"Geo Zukowski" <fourmore@globo.net> wrote in message
news:<3fac4c93@news.heartoftn.net>...
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:doWqb.934190$oO4.9337471@news.easynews.com...
feel free to ask any question you want.. don't expect me to give
you the
old
heave-ho creationist reply.. because i am not a creationist
=================
Jabriol is a practicing Watchtower "theocratic warfare" on you
people. That means he can LIE in the name of furthering the
Watchtower cause. As a Jehovah's Witness he has no choice BUT to
accept a magical, fantastical creation by the special-edition WTS
god. You can reason with a religious fanatic. You waste your
time.
George....
Carol has been caught in various vicious lies, with intent to
slander JW's
Before you reply, you may want to ask her a few things or only one.
_Where does she get her information?
_Can her information be verified?
_Is the information up to date?
_What is the purpose of her post? To present reliable facts or
sling mud on a religious organization in good standing in almost
every country in the world?
Ask her for evidence of her claims before proceeding with your
conversation with her, if not you may be end up wasting your time
on discussing subjects based on fraudulent and fabricated
information. Therefore participating with her attempt at slander,
and distributing false information elsewhere, may make you a lying
fool as well.. Why throw Pearls at swine?
Facts about Carol:
*She can never present evidence.
*she never reveal the source of her info(because there is none).
Her common reply, is
"everybody already knows". If everybody knew, why bring it up?
*She always hide her identity. And change her header to avoid
killfiles.
*She cuts and paste, rewrite postings, and will even forge e-mail
addreses which her ISP allows her to do.
And if you don't belive me...just read her reply on this thread..
She can't resists...
She knows Jabriol is always right.
If you want to get rid of Carol, tell her to go home and service
her husband, like any decent honorable housewife would.
Jabriol, I hate to break it to you, but... EVERYBODY thinks you're a
blithering idiot. It's not just Carol, ya know. We ALL think that.
Nobody's weeping any tears for ol' Jabbers.
Me being the "blithering Idiot" must ask.... your point is?
My point is, well, blasting Carol for "lying" isn't really going to get
you anywhere. Since we all know you to be a blithering idiot anyways,
and since you've been the laughingstock of every newsgroup you post at
for years, your blasting Carol will probably just make us like her more.
But don't be discouraged, you can keep posting. It's comic relief, you
know? We see a post by Jabriol and if we're stressed out we can always
read it for a good, healthy laugh.
By the way, Jabbers, is there any good way to get rid of those idiot JWs
that wander around disturbing people's lives and privacy in an effort to
ram their inane message down everyone's throat? I'd like to be able to
deal with it other than using a shotgun -- makes quite the mess, you
know.
ok... and you point is?
.
|
|
|
| User: "George James Goldman" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Apes Built = Jabriol *IS* a creationist - all JWs are. |
10 Nov 2003 08:53:22 PM |
|
|
"jabriol" <jabriol@bluegender.org> wrote in message
news:C8Vrb.4689583$Bf5.638972@news.easynews.com...
===================
The posts JW JABRIOL nuked .. and how to get Jabriol NUKED!
Q1. Who is Jabriol, and where can I find his posts?
A1. Antonio Santana, of Camden, NJ, one of Jehovah's Witnesses and a
regular contributor to Usenet via a large number of different ISPs,
mail2news servers and email accounts (which he sometimes uses in misleading
ways so as to make himself difficult to track down). To find out about what
he posts, you should click on:
http://google.com/groups?as_uauthors=jabriol&num=100
You might quickly conclude that Jabriol:
* supports the act of rape, and believes the victim is often to blame - and
that the rape victim should be explicitly told this;
* actively encourages depressed people to commit suicide - and this has had
the predictable effect - at least once;
* supports violence by husbands against wives, who must show total
subjection;
* derives great satisfaction from images of billions of children and others
being slaughtered by the leader of his JW Cult;
* has beaten and driven away his own daughter, etc.
Jabriol has been doing this for many, many years. Indeed, there are so many
posts by him that you will fall afoul of Google's limitation of search
results to 1000 matches at most. To get around this, surf to:
http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
and then, in sequence:
(a) in the box marked "Author Return only messages where the author is "
enter Jabriol ; and
(b) Click on "Return messages posted between " ; and
(c) Enter a restricted date range of (say) 6 months (his first post was in
June 1996, and the volume of posts per month from him has grown and grown);
and
(d) Set the dropdown list which defaults to "10 messages" to "100
messages"; and
(e) Press the button marked "Google Search"; and
(f) Systematically work your way through the lists of messages you get -
this may be many pages full of headers, at a hundred per page. Then loop
back to the Search page and use a further date range.
Q2. I have read what he has put out there, and I am horrified and sickened.
If all this is known, how come Jabriol has not been disfellowshipped (the
kooky Watchtower word for "excommunicated") from the Jehovah's Witnesses?
A2. Firstly, JWs stick together. "The Brothers" routinely shield
wife-beaters, pedophiles and so on. Their official policy is to shield
accused pedophiles from the law (they won't report them to the cops unless
absolutely legally compelled to do so, and will threaten family members
with excommunication i.e. certain death if they whistleblow, the charge
being "bringing the name of Jehovah into disrepute") UNLESS the pedo
confesses OR there are two witnesses to the same occurrence (hey, how many
pedos invite non-pedo onlookers??). So it is not surprising that the
filthy, disgusting JW *SWINE* here in Usenet stick by Jabriol. For more
evidence of how the Jehovah's Witnesses stick together, irrespective of
right or wrong, please read A8 below.
Also, Jabriol knows something those immediately above him do not wish him
to divulge.
Q3. So, what did Jabriol nuke from the Google posting archives??
A3. You will have observed Jabriol posts quoting a huge number of different
email accounts. Many of these are fake ones (either non-existent, or
belonging to someone else). One drawback of this is that is hard (or
impossible) to nuke material that has originated from an email account one
does not control, as confirmation of identity must come from that email
account.
So, from time to time he uses real accounts. Two recent ones have been:
and
Naturally, he reserved some of his most disgusting material for those posts
he knew he could remove later on.
And, after his despicable actions re Chris Dubose (the suicide), these
posts HAVE been nuked from the archives. For proof, check out these URLs:
http://google.com/groups?as_uauthors= | | | | | | | | | | | |