| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"jabriol" |
| Date: |
19 Jun 2005 08:59:13 PM |
| Object: |
TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
* Scientists admit to misbehaving:
One third of U.S. scientists who took part in an
anonymous survey recently admitted to research
practices that could be considered dishonest, a
report says.
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/050616_misbehavefrm.htm
Of course those in the anthroplogy area are bonafide saints eh?
.
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
21 Jun 2005 09:01:36 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1119368526.056613.263030
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Wow, that is wonderful!!!!!
rice evolved into rice.
Yep...in fact those damn evil scientists keep MAKING it evolve into rice
that the bugs won't eat.
I imagine that if it wasn't for the intervention of these wonderful
scientists, give or tale a few millions years, eventually the rive
would had evolved into rice that bugs won't eat regardless.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeee.
to call Genetic engeenering, evolution is down right dishonest. In your
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no nothing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
22 Jun 2005 10:06:38 AM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in news:1119402299.054853.96950
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1119368526.056613.263030
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Wow, that is wonderful!!!!!
rice evolved into rice.
Yep...in fact those damn evil scientists keep MAKING it evolve into
rice
that the bugs won't eat.
I imagine that if it wasn't for the intervention of these wonderful
scientists, give or tale a few millions years, eventually the rive
would had evolved into rice that bugs won't eat regardless.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeee.
Nope, the bugs evolve naturally almost as fast as we force the rice.
to call Genetic engeenering, evolution is down right dishonest. In your
But that's not what I'm doing, moron.
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no nothing.
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is NEARLY
keeping up with what we force.
Your a moron. Which, if congenital would by something to be pitied, but
in your case it is self-inflicted injury to someone who richly deserves
to suffer for sins committed.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
22 Jun 2005 02:26:29 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in news:1119402299.054853.96950
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in news:1119368526.056613.263030
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Wow, that is wonderful!!!!!
rice evolved into rice.
Yep...in fact those damn evil scientists keep MAKING it evolve into
rice
that the bugs won't eat.
I imagine that if it wasn't for the intervention of these wonderful
scientists, give or tale a few millions years, eventually the rice
would had evolved into rice that bugs won't eat regardless.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeee.
Nope, the bugs evolve naturally almost as fast as we force the rice.
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
and this is documented where?
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic engineering.
to call Genetic engeenering, evolution is down right dishonest. In your
But that's not what I'm doing, moron.
it is exactly what your doing and name calling doesn't help yur case
neither.
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no nothing.
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is NEARLY
keeping up with what we force.
we were talking rice... not bugs.
Your a moron. Which, if congenital would by something to be pitied, but
in your case it is self-inflicted injury to someone who richly deserves
to suffer for sins committed.
stickts and stones....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:08:12 AM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119468389.093245.123650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119402299.054853.96950 @g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:1119368526.056613.263030 @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Wow, that is wonderful!!!!!
rice evolved into rice.
Yep...in fact those damn evil scientists keep MAKING it evolve
into
rice
that the bugs won't eat.
I imagine that if it wasn't for the intervention of these wonderful
scientists, give or tale a few millions years, eventually the rice
would had evolved into rice that bugs won't eat regardless.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeee.
Nope, the bugs evolve naturally almost as fast as we force the rice.
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for bug
resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for decades.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and profit.
This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
to call Genetic engeenering, evolution is down right dishonest. In
your
But that's not what I'm doing, moron.
it is exactly what your doing and name calling doesn't help yur case
neither.
It wasn't name calling. It was a descriptive epithet.
For it to be character assassination the victim would need to have been
living when attacked.
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no
nothing.
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is
NEARLY keeping up with what we force.
we were talking rice... not bugs.
Yes, and it's the increase in the mutation rate alone that is responsible
for speeding up the evolution of the rice--that and the artificial
selection.
Your a moron. Which, if congenital would by something to be pitied,
but in your case it is self-inflicted injury to someone who richly
deserves to suffer for sins committed.
stickts and stones....
Not a character assassination. That was a suicide so long ago there is
no point in discussing the corpse.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 04:28:04 AM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for bug
resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for decades.
I will look this up. since you can not provide a link.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and profit.
This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
reads like genetic engineering in my book. and all other in the
agriculture field. How is the mutatation accelerated?
It wasn't name calling. It was a descriptive epithet.
For it to be character assassination the victim would need to have been
living when attacked.
Sure... dishonesty become ye, sematics eh?
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no
nothing.
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is
NEARLY keeping up with what we force.
we were talking rice... not bugs.
Yes, and it's the increase in the mutation rate alone that is responsible
for speeding up the evolution of the rice--that and the artificial
selection.
and the mutation is accelarated... how?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:24:34 PM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119518884.810509.64940@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for
bug resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for
decades.
I will look this up. since you can not provide a link.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic
engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and
profit. This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
reads like genetic engineering in my book. and all other in the
agriculture field. How is the mutatation accelerated?
A little radiation. This is not gene splicing, it's accelerated
evolution. Too much radiation and you end up with dead seeds. It turns
out that a mutation rate about three times the natural rate is about
optimum for this purpose.
It wasn't name calling. It was a descriptive epithet.
For it to be character assassination the victim would need to have
been living when attacked.
Sure... dishonesty become ye, sematics eh?
There is nothing dishonest about pointing out your complete lack of
character. I'm just wondering if your religion actually teaches you to
harrass abuse victims or if you do that on your own.
example, there is no natural selection. no ramdom mutation. no
nothing.
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is
NEARLY keeping up with what we force.
we were talking rice... not bugs.
Yes, and it's the increase in the mutation rate alone that is
responsible for speeding up the evolution of the rice--that and the
artificial selection.
and the mutation is accelarated... how?
With a little radiation. There is always SOME radiation and it usually
incites some mutations. By increasing it a bit more are incited.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:32:26 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119518884.810509.64940@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for
bug resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for
decades.
I will look this up. since you can not provide a link.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic
engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and
profit. This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
reads like genetic engineering in my book. and all other in the
agriculture field. How is the mutatation accelerated?
A little radiation. This is not gene splicing, it's accelerated
evolution. Too much radiation and you end up with dead seeds. It turns
out that a mutation rate about three times the natural rate is about
optimum for this purpose.
I guess you did not read my follow up post demostrating that you are
wrong.
Of course you can provide links and the source of your radioactive
mutant rice paddies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
24 Jun 2005 09:34:26 AM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in news:1119547945.976750.58470
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119518884.810509.64940@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for
bug resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for
decades.
I will look this up. since you can not provide a link.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic
engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and
profit. This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation
rate.
reads like genetic engineering in my book. and all other in the
agriculture field. How is the mutatation accelerated?
A little radiation. This is not gene splicing, it's accelerated
evolution. Too much radiation and you end up with dead seeds. It
turns
out that a mutation rate about three times the natural rate is about
optimum for this purpose.
I guess you did not read my follow up post demostrating that you are
wrong.
Of course you can provide links and the source of your radioactive
mutant rice paddies.
Stuff it! I gave you the information, you persist in calling me a liar.
YOU! Who are one of the most persistent liars on the internet. Giving
you links is pointless.
Now go play in the traffic with your pet demon or something.
I'm done explaining to you.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 06:37:42 AM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for bug
resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for decades.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and profit.
This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
Well dave you are the classic example of dishonesty.
I look up your claim, and it is false.
and here is the link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/biltechnology.htm
Biotechnology Could Help Filipino Farmers Increase Yields and Reduce
Pesticide Use.
..... Genetically enhanced crops could help Filipino farmers reduce the
estimated 30 to 40 percent losses that are caused by diseases in
plants. These advances could also help farmers lower their costs by
reducing the amount of pesticides they need to use on their crops.
uhhhhh do you see the word evolution or mutation anywhere?
you lost this round.
oh here is another link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/grain_of_hope.htm
Grain Of Hope
Advances in the genetic modification of rice may lead to a variety
which helps to alleviate vitamin deficiency in developing countries.
all GENETIC ENGINEERING..
Duh
bye.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:26:30 PM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119526662.209497.172190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for
bug
resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for decades.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic
engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and profit.
This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
Well dave you are the classic example of dishonesty.
I look up your claim, and it is false.
and here is the link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/biltechnology.htm
Biotechnology Could Help Filipino Farmers Increase Yields and Reduce
Pesticide Use.
.... Genetically enhanced crops could help Filipino farmers reduce the
estimated 30 to 40 percent losses that are caused by diseases in
plants. These advances could also help farmers lower their costs by
reducing the amount of pesticides they need to use on their crops.
uhhhhh do you see the word evolution or mutation anywhere?
you lost this round.
oh here is another link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/grain_of_hope.htm
Grain Of Hope
Advances in the genetic modification of rice may lead to a variety
which helps to alleviate vitamin deficiency in developing countries.
all GENETIC ENGINEERING..
Yes, THAT is genetic engineering, and is fairly new. But this other
thing has been going on for decades.
Again, you are running around bearing false witness in God's name. Of
course that's what your religion (whatever that is) teaches you to do,
right?
Bye.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:33:31 PM |
|
|
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1119526662.209497.172190@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
so you geneticly enhance the rice (not evolution)
and the bugs catch up?
Nope...you induce a higher mutation rate in the rice and select for
bug
resistance.
and this is documented where?
The Rice Institute in the Phillipines has been doing this for decades.
by the by enhancing rice is not evolution. it is genentic
engineering.
No it's not. Genetic engineering is gene splicing for fun and profit.
This is forced evolution, done by tripling the mutation rate.
Well dave you are the classic example of dishonesty.
I look up your claim, and it is false.
and here is the link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/biltechnology.htm
Biotechnology Could Help Filipino Farmers Increase Yields and Reduce
Pesticide Use.
.... Genetically enhanced crops could help Filipino farmers reduce the
estimated 30 to 40 percent losses that are caused by diseases in
plants. These advances could also help farmers lower their costs by
reducing the amount of pesticides they need to use on their crops.
uhhhhh do you see the word evolution or mutation anywhere?
you lost this round.
oh here is another link:
http://www.punjabilok.com/agriculture/biotech/grain_of_hope.htm
Grain Of Hope
Advances in the genetic modification of rice may lead to a variety
which helps to alleviate vitamin deficiency in developing countries.
all GENETIC ENGINEERING..
Yes, THAT is genetic engineering, and is fairly new. But this other
thing has been going on for decades.
Again, you are running around bearing false witness in God's name. Of
course that's what your religion (whatever that is) teaches you to do,
right?
Bye.
provide us with links so I can read them myself..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 12:42:39 PM |
|
|
Jabriol wrote:
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in
provide us with links so I can read them myself..
Is this what you are ferring too?
http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Factsheets/English/ntiiaea.html
Plant breeding and genetics
Nuclear techniques--sometimes in combination with other
biotechnology--can be used to develop new strains of important food
crops. These techniques have yielded new varieties of many different
crop species, such as rice, wheat, and soybean. Such varieties may have
a better resistance to disease, be of a higher product quality, or have
a higher yield. Worldwide, more than 1500 mutant cultivars of crop
plants and ornamental plants have been released to growers in the past
30 years. Eight percent of agricultural land in China, for example, is
planted with mutants of rice, wheat, com, and cotton.
The Agency provides assistance to Member States in the proper
application of mutation breeding techniques in highly diversified plant
breeding programmes. Research contracts and agreements focus on the
advancement of mutation breeding technology particularly to improve
root and tuber crops, oil seed crops, and cereals, and to improve
resistance to disease.
---> it is still genetic engineering, and not evolution. strains of
crops are not new species or evolved one.The rice and plants do not
retain thier mutated forms. they constantly must be interfered with.
as I said, you are downright dishonest to the core.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
24 Jun 2005 09:36:16 AM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriolusenet@gmail.com> wrote in news:1119548559.909555.131680
@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
---> it is still genetic engineering, and not evolution. strains of
crops are not new species or evolved one.The rice and plants do not
retain thier mutated forms. they constantly must be interfered with.
as I said, you are downright dishonest to the core.
As you demonstrated, there isn't an honest bone in YOUR body.
I leave you to your pet demon. May you be as happy as it's possible to be
together.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
God is an evolutionist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roy" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
22 Jun 2005 02:55:30 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns967D5280F5532doldridgsprintca@24.71.223.159>
Dave Oldridge <doldridg@leavethisoutshaw.ca> wrote:
Actually there is, moron. The natural evolution of the bugs is
NEARLY
keeping up with what we force.
Your a moron. Which, if congenital would by something to be
pitied, but
in your case it is self-inflicted injury to someone who richly
deserves
to suffer for sins committed.
- = -
Indeed Jabriol is a moron creationist. All Jehovah Witnesses are
creationists. He's been plaguing any number of cross-posted
newsgroups over the years with the same old anti-evolution
creationist *****. You will get nowhere trying to reason with
him. And please, if you just cannot help yourself, remove those
newsgroups where we are sick to death of his redundant boring
threads on the topic = rec.ponds and ARJ-W.
Thank you.
Roy
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 10:35:47 AM |
|
|
DAMNIT, don't feed this troll, people! rec.ponds snipped.
jabriol wrote:
I think this flush the methodology right down the latrine eh?
jabriol, you have less honor than the pond scum you devolved
from. And, yes, it's the pond that's downstream from the latrine.
Now go practice your underwater breathing. And don't hold your
breath.
Cheers,
b&
--
God can never prove that this sentence is true.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 10:47:25 AM |
|
|
Found a new toy Carol LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
your direcway IP is still a showing.
let see, Ben Goren
Ben Goren
Trumpet
Post Office Box 964
Tempe, Arizona 85280-0964
Phone: 480.966.9472
FAX: 617.812.8582
ben@trumpetpower.com
www.trumpetpower.com
You know Carol, I must just infrom Ben, that you are forging his
headers on rec.ponds
Not a single time has this Ben ever show interest in any of the groups
other than playing his trumptet. and being an atheist
good try... carol
Ben Goren wrote:
DAMNIT, don't feed this troll, people! rec.ponds snipped.
jabriol wrote:
I think this flush the methodology right down the latrine eh?
jabriol, you have less honor than the pond scum you devolved
from. And, yes, it's the pond that's downstream from the latrine.
Now go practice your underwater breathing. And don't hold your
breath.
Cheers,
b&
--
God can never prove that this sentence is true.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
23 Jun 2005 08:52:41 PM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
jabriol wrote:
You know Carol, I must just infrom Ben, that you are forging his
headers on rec.ponds
Not a single time has this Ben ever show interest in any of the
groups other than playing his trumptet. and being an atheist
Jabriol, you are sick. You hate ponds so much, why don't you go
pollute one with your corpse?
Cheers,
b&
- --
God can never prove that this sentence is true.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Ben Goren http://www.trumpetpower.com/
iD8DBQFCu2c5pxyAy2XznCMRAsLwAKCNuaMz3DEeN43X64xmF40Ip22B9gCgpdpL
tBK88DJNg1yJ4m0b7CVnjfg=
=eXXH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thore \Tocis\ Schmechtig" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 10:42:36 AM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
Interesting enough that evolution can not be duplicated nor falsified,
and yet
it is tought as a fact. I think this flush the methodology right down
the latrine eh?
Willful ignorance will not help you. There are many ways to falsify
evolution (well, evolution has been _observed_ in our times, so you'd have
to be content for the first try with casting some significant doubt upon
it, but you can't win everytime...). One of those ways would be to prove
that the fossil record is not sorted by evolutionary descent... like the
often-conjured "hydrological sorting" that cretinists like to regurgitate
but that they somehow never can present.
Oh yeah, the "has been observed" fact also just _kind of_ negates the "can't
be duplicated" claim...
Now, turnabout is fair play. Tell us how to possibly falsify babblical
cretinism.
*crickets chirping*
I thought so.
Just for those who may be new to this group: This is what always happens
when a cretinist is asked for evidence. There is none.
(Wanna bet that jabberhole will either not reply at all, or desperately try
to change the topic... or hurl insults? ;) )
--
Regards
Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 10:55:35 AM |
|
|
Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig wrote:
jabriol wrote:
Interesting enough that evolution can not be duplicated nor falsified,
and yet
it is tought as a fact. I think this flush the methodology right down
the latrine eh?
Willful ignorance will not help you. There are many ways to falsify
evolution (well, evolution has been _observed_ in our times,
Really, so pry tell, please give us some good links on these
observations. I am sure we are all interested, on how one species
evolved into another species, where such could not mate with its
parents generetaion and when not interfered with will not devolved to
its original species.
snip... and uh,, just for the record I am not a creationist.
Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig
.
|
|
|
| User: "Les" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 01:46:24 PM |
|
|
In article
<1119282935.171310.228430@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"jabriol" <jabriol@hotmail.com> wrote: Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig
wrote:
jabriol wrote:
Interesting enough that evolution can not be duplicated nor falsified,
and yet
it is tought as a fact. I think this flush the methodology right down
the latrine eh?
Willful ignorance will not help you. There are many ways to falsify
evolution (well, evolution has been _observed_ in our times,
Really, so pry tell, please give us some good links on these
observations. I am sure we are all interested, on how one species
evolved into another species, where such could not mate with its
parents generetaion and when not interfered with will not
devolved to
its original species.
snip... and uh,, just for the record I am not a creationist.
==> JABRIOL is indeed an ignorant CREATIONIST and a troll on the
evolution and atheist newsgroups. All Jehovah's Witnesses are
CREATIONISTS. They have no choice. You will get nowhere trying
to reason with a CREATIONIST from alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,
JABRIOL'S home newsgroup.
Please remove ngs where these boring repititious JABRIOL
creation-evolution threads are totally irrelavant.
Thank you
Leslie
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thore \Tocis\ Schmechtig" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 11:18:36 PM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
I am sure we are all interested, on how one species
evolved into another species
www.talkorigins.org and check out the FAQs. Not that you'll do of course. If
you did, you might accidentally _learn_ something, and we can't have that,
can we?
...where such could not mate with its
parents generetaion and when not interfered with will not devolved to
its original species.
Oh, right, I almost forgot. Willful ignorance... desperately clinging to the
strawmen you know how to refute, instead of messing with the real thing...
because you are helpless against the real thing.
Come on fundie boy, show us that you know what you babble about. What are
the three prerequisites for evolution to happen, according to scientific
understanding?
After all, you surely wouldn't dare ranting about something you don't know
***** about, would you?
Would you?!
snip... and uh,, just for the record I am not a creationist.
Cretinist, anti-evolutionist, whatever. Talk like a moron, be called a
moron. Simple as that.
"Cretinist" fits you anyway. You know where the word came from, don't you?
Oh right, willful ignorance again.
--
Regards
Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Goren" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
19 Jun 2005 09:05:12 PM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
Of course those in the anthroplogy area are bonafide saints eh?
Only the worst of sinners like you would troll rec.ponds the way
you do. Kindly take a deep dive into a shallow pond.
Cheers,
b&
--
God can never prove that this sentence is true.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thore \Tocis\ Schmechtig" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
19 Jun 2005 10:16:16 PM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
Of course those in the anthroplogy area are bonafide saints eh?
So what?
Let's assume these figures are correct; that's still a good quota, compared
to the 100 % of cretinists and IDiots who are _always_ dishonest.
--
Regards
Thore "Tocis" Schmechtig
.
|
|
|
| User: "Razor 616" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 02:41:37 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:16:16 +0200, "Thore \"Tocis\" Schmechtig"
<MAILTOcommoner@carcosa.de> wrote:
Let's assume these figures are correct; that's still a good quota, compared
to the 100 % of cretinists and IDiots who are _always_ dishonest.
Even better... scientists are fessing up and admitting their flaws,
which are fewer and smaller than what the clergy, religious morons and
pseudo-religio-scientists.
Face it, creationists and christians, even in matters of virtue, we
kick your *****.
--
#1295
.
|
|
|
| User: "leo" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS: Scientist admit to dishonesty |
20 Jun 2005 05:56:32 AM |
|
|
that was what was trying to say. It is now time for the moron Xians to
confess they were scareting lies about their scripotures.
leo
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
