| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Usenet Sociopath" |
| Date: |
28 Feb 2005 10:03:11 PM |
| Object: |
today |
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
.
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 12:59:24 AM |
|
|
"Usenet Sociopath" <usnet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2115473.I7Fs7Dtq39@cox.cox.net...
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an atheist.
You're just another phony trying to make atheists look bad. All you've
managed to do is make yourself look bad. In other words, you are
living down to your handle.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Usenet Sociopath" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 06:05:41 AM |
|
|
Michelle Malkin wrote:
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an atheist.
This is a self-contradictory statement, kind of like "this statement is
wrong". Just goes to show you are an idiot. I am an atheist, and no one can
take that away from me, *****. See, atheism does not have a leader, that's
what makes us different from theists, who have Pope, Jesus and Lama.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JPG" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 06:47:56 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 04:05:41 -0800, Usenet Sociopath <usnet@socio.path> wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an atheist.
This is a self-contradictory statement, kind of like "this statement is
wrong". Just goes to show you are an idiot. I am an atheist, and no one can
take that away from me, *****. See, atheism does not have a leader, that's
what makes us different from theists, who have Pope, Jesus and Lama.
(Irrelevant newsgroups snipped).
You, sonny, are just a troll. Why post to religious and driving(?) newsgroups
if you weren't attempting to start a flame war, and why fling unprovoked insults
at a newsgroup regular?
Now just FOAD.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "N8N" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 07:11:20 AM |
|
|
Usenet Sociopath wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an
atheist.
This is a self-contradictory statement, kind of like "this statement
is
wrong". Just goes to show you are an idiot. I am an atheist, and no
one can
take that away from me, *****. See, atheism does not have a leader,
that's
what makes us different from theists, who have Pope, Jesus and Lama.
Since when was the Buddha a god?
nate
.
|
|
|
| User: "Usenet Sociopath" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 07:36:35 AM |
|
|
N8N wrote:
Usenet Sociopath wrote:
Michelle Malkin wrote:
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an
atheist.
This is a self-contradictory statement, kind of like "this statement
is
wrong". Just goes to show you are an idiot. I am an atheist, and no
one can
take that away from me, *****. See, atheism does not have a leader,
that's
what makes us different from theists, who have Pope, Jesus and Lama.
Since when was the Buddha a god?
Did I say Buddha was a God?
--
"Ad hominem would imply that there's no basis for the things people are
saying about you. Based on your posts, I don't think that that applies."
-- Nate Nagel, 2005
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Johnsenson" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 07:09:14 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:59:24 -0500, Michelle Malkin wrote:
"Usenet Sociopath" <usnet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2115473.I7Fs7Dtq39@cox.cox.net...
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
If that's your reason for becoming an atheist, then you aren't an atheist.
You're just another phony trying to make atheists look bad. All you've
managed to do is make yourself look bad. In other words, you are
living down to your handle.
Bogus.
That is completely bogus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bernard farquart" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
28 Feb 2005 10:57:22 PM |
|
|
"Usenet Sociopath" <usnet@socio.path> wrote in message
news:2115473.I7Fs7Dtq39@cox.cox.net...
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
What does this have to do with Driving?
Oh yeah, you are just a spamming troll, I forgot.
Bernard
(Plonk, for the fifth time, already.)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alex Rodriguez" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 12:08:38 PM |
|
|
In article <2115473.I7Fs7Dtq39@cox.cox.net>, says...
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
You have more problems to deal with if you think your religion has anything
to do with the way you drive.
----------------
Alex
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
28 Feb 2005 11:12:36 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:03:11 -0800, Usenet Sociopath
<usnet@socio.path> said in alt.atheism:
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
I've heard of agnostic atheists. I've heard of gnostic atheists.
This is the first time I've heard of a sociopathic atheist.
--
rukbat at verizon dot net
"...I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do.
When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand
why I dismiss yours."
- Stephen F. Roberts
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 12:32:42 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote
This is the first time I've heard of a sociopathic atheist.
They usually call themselves "Christians."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Scott en Aztlán" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 09:24:26 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 05:12:36 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
I've heard of agnostic atheists. I've heard of gnostic atheists.
Have you heard of trolls?
--
Sloth Kills!
http://www.geocities.com/slothkills/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 09:08:09 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:03:11 -0800, Usenet Sociopath wrote:
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
So you've decided to become a sociopath and an atheist both at the same
time? Lack of ambition isn't an issue for you, is it? A word of warning,
though: if you value to companionship of other sociopaths, you'll find a
lot more of them at your local church than anywhere else.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Usenet Sociopath" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 09:19:12 AM |
|
|
MarkA wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:03:11 -0800, Usenet Sociopath wrote:
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have to
join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you from
now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
So you've decided to become a sociopath and an atheist both at the same
time? Lack of ambition isn't an issue for you, is it? A word of warning,
though: if you value to companionship of other sociopaths,
no
you'll find a
lot more of them at your local church than anywhere else.
why?
.
|
|
|
| User: "MarkA" |
|
| Title: Re: today |
01 Mar 2005 10:19:28 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:19:12 -0800, Usenet Sociopath wrote:
MarkA wrote:
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:03:11 -0800, Usenet Sociopath wrote:
I've decided that since I can't beat these societal parasites, I have
to join them. No more turning the other cheek. It's me first, ***** you
from now on. Beginning today, I'm an atheist.
So you've decided to become a sociopath and an atheist both at the same
time? Lack of ambition isn't an issue for you, is it? A word of
warning, though: if you value to companionship of other sociopaths,
no
you'll find a
lot more of them at your local church than anywhere else.
why?
Good question. I suspect that it's a "birds of a feather" type thing. It
could also be that they don't want to be sociopaths, but have been
deceived into thinking that change requires something external to
themselves, such as belief in a god.
--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
