On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:37:36 -0600, "Rally"
<Rally_Round@mail.removethis.newsfeeds.com> wrote:

I am posting this as a new thread as it did not show up as one when I
made the original nomination.


"Mindless Drooling Libruls" <LibFoolz@DemWhackjobs.com> wrote in message
news:p2Jtd.11497$714.8812@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...

"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:cp7lau$29d$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...

In article <PuItd.211353$hj.44586@fed1read07> "Arizona Bushwhacker"
<azbushkicker@cox.net> writes:

OK!
Here I agree with you!

{...{

I walked into a store the other day and they had
"Winter Trees" with twinkling lights for sale. If
someone is retarded enough to call a Christmas tree
a "Winter Tree", the are not going to put up a tree.
So who the hell are the stores selling winter trees too?
"To everyone who calls them Christmas trees."
So why call them winter trees when the people who
call Christmas trees, winter trees don't buy winter
trees?

Hey, they were just being all PC in regard to your
feelings: if they weren't, they would have called
them "Yule Trees", to remind us of their pagan
origin and nature.

<Nominated Portion>

Their nature is that they are part of God's creation. Their origin
is Christianity. That's why they're called "Christmas trees", rather
than "yule trees", you see.

</Nominated Portion>

Seconded