(Sorry for the top post but I think it is approprate.)
Is this recordable?
Is Nemo around?
"The other Donald" <the_donald_13@gofuckyourself.yehaw.com> wrote in message
news:2lXrb.32773$PH6.8034@twister.austin.rr.com...
"Ron Baker" <rbaker4@msnn.com> wrote in message
news:VWVrb.34110$Ll5.15584@twister.socal.rr.com...
"Rob" <rob@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:7e3pqvkjg50knus25v309nr22rdiktrigo@4ax.com...
<>
I asked:
What is a 'nothing'?
Where is the nothing in:
"Is an apple not an orange?"
<Begin nominated portion>
The question poses the construct that an apple is not an orange. Thus,
there
is "nothing" in an apple that makes an apple an orange. But you cannot
prove
there is "nothing" in the apple that makes the apple not an orange
because
that
which is "nothing" does not exist.
<End nominated portion>
Seconds?
Holy CRAP!! Did that statement come with some sort of flow chart?
Talk about a Socrates-wannabe. I'll second this one from sheer confusion.
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.
