Religions > Atheism > Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Michelle Malkin" |
| Date: |
15 Sep 2006 02:17:10 PM |
| Object: |
Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster; it's no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against the
American people.
Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every American
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 6:59am. Editorials
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
It's as clear as day.
For political gain and to extend his unprecedented grab for unilateral power
at odds with our Constitution, Bush is blackmailing the national security
interests of the United States.
This is not an alarmist claim by BuzzFlash; it is a fact.
The President of the United States is holding the security of every American
as a hostage in a game of chicken.
For more years than we can remember, the Geneva Convention has guided the
conduct of civilized nations in matters of war. America has abided by the
treaty without dissent or difficulty. In fact, we prided ourselves on
implementing the standards spelled out by the Geneva Convention for the
treatment of prisoners of war.
But Bush is now saying, that suddenly for him, the Geneva Conventions do not
provide "clarity." This, of course, is the Rovia/Luntz use of framing to
make a betrayal of the American people by the Bush Administration look like
a reasonable act. The Geneva Conventions have provided uncontested "clarity"
through multiple Republican and Democratic administrations, but all of a
sudden they have become "vague" to Bush, even though not a word in them has
been changed.
So Bush went to Capitol Hill this past week -- as the Washington Post said
in an editorial -- as the first president of the United States to lobby for
torture.
Here is where the blackmailing of our national security comes in - and for
anyone to blackmail this nation in regards to our safety is a criminal
offense.
Bush is threatening to close up the CIA unit involved with terrorist
interrogations if he doesn't get the authority to thumb his nose at the
Geneva Conventions. In short, he is blackmailing America.
He is telling us that he will not allow the CIA to interrogate prisoners --
within the bounds of the Geneva Convention -- who might yield information,
unless they can be tortured. Bush is thus blackmailing all the residents of
America by telling us that he will shut the CIA out of all detainee
information gathering unless he can use barbaric methods.
This is isn't a threat being made against Osama bin Laden. This is Bush
threatening the American people, and endangering our lives.
It is one thing to be an immoral incompetent. It is another to side with
anyone who would do America harm by blackmailing the American public about
an issue that has never been a problem in all previous administrations - and
that makes all of them -- that have abided by the Geneva Convention.
When a president of the United States blackmails the citizens of his own
nation, it is time for him to be impeached and tried for high crimes and
misdemeanors.
Bush is brutally attacking the likes of Colin Powell and John McCain on this
issue -- men who actually know combat -- and don't wish to see our soldiers
subjected to the torture that Bush wants to continue using. Of course, how
could we ask enemies to abide by the Geneva Convention, when Bush is
abandoning it in the name of torture?
In this case, the blackmail Bush is using against the American people is
just flat out treason.
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
Moral Clarity
Submitted by klarose on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 1:38pm.
The Geneva Convention articles have clarity, all right, moral clarity. The
people working in this administration have absolutely no moral clarity; in
fact, I'm beginning to wonder if they have any morals at all, period.
Bush said, "Were it not for
Submitted by The coffee invi... on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 1:24pm.
Bush said, "Were it not for this program, our intelligence community
believes that al Qaeda and its allies would have succeeded in launching
another attack against the American homeland." The implication being that if
Congress fails to legalize torture, the US will be attacked again. Of
course, this is the same rationale for the NSA program and the Patriot Act.
This goes back to 9/11 and the failure of the Kean/Hamilton Commission to do
an honest investigation. That failure meant that Bush could make these
unproven claims and get away with it. Put another way, did 9/11 happen
because Bush 1)didn't have the Patriot Act 2)couldn't torture prisoners
3)didn't have domestic spying programs? Or did 9/11 happen because Bush is a
corrupt, unqualified President who ignored warnings from foreign leaders,
ignored CIA warnings, ignored the August PDB, clamped down on FBI
investigations into Saudi linked terrorism, went on vacation in August 01
and then sat in a classroom doing nothing while the attacks took place? The
lack of Congressional oversight should be a huge tipoff. If these terror
tools are so effective then why is Bush so reluctant to have Congress review
them?
ANY CAPABLE INVESTIGATORS; WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS
Submitted by Kathy on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 1:19pm.
MAYBE SOMEONE WILL FOLLOW MY ADVICE. DO A THOROUGH INTERNATIONAL BACKGROUND
INVESTIGATION ON THE ULL DANCE PROFESSORS. AND PARTICUARLY LOOK INTO THE
YEAR OF 1990. WAS BUSH SR PRESIDENT AT THIS TIME? WAS BUSH SR PRESIDENT WHEN
THE PROFESSORS CAME HERE IN OR ABOUT 1986? WHAT WERE THE ARRANGEMENTS THE US
MADE WITH THEM OR RUSSIA? IT APPEARS THAT SOMEONE IS ALLOWING RUSSIAN
DANCERS TO USE AMERICANS SOCIAL TO GET MEDICAL CARE. IF THAT PRIVELAGE
BECOMES THREATENED, THEN THEY ARE THREATENING TO ATTACK AMERICA. THAT IS
WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT. IN RUSSIA, BALLET DANCERS ARE SEEN IN A MUCH MORE
IMPORTANT LIGHT THEN IN AMERICA. AT ONE TIME, THE MEN RUNNING FOR OFFICE-OR
EVEN THEY JUST WANTED TO BE JUDGES IN A LEGAL COURT-THEY HAD TO PROVE THEY
WERE PROFICIENT AT BALLET. THEY COULD NOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT, CONGRESS,
SENATORS UNLESS THEY AUDITIONED AS A BALLET DANCER-LOOK IT UP IF YOU THINK I
AM LYING. THIS MEANS THE MEN. THEY WERE NOT AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED
GAY=THAT IS ONLY AMERICA'S ATTITUDE. IF WE HAVE TERRORISTS, ITS RUSSIA. AND
SOMEHOW SAUDIA ARABIA MUST BE ASSOCIATED WITH RUSSIA OR A PART OF RUSSIA.
BUSH IS COMING OUT WITH THE MOST SHOCKING THINGS HE CAN TO REDIRECT
EVERYONES FOCUS.
Bush Will Arrange an Attack on the USA Once Congress Votes
Submitted by incontext on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 1:05pm.
Of course, Bush plans to be 'right' about his illegal torture program
preventing attacks on US soil. After Repubs and Dems vote against his
proposed 'get-out-of-jail-free card,' he'll give bin Laden a call
instructing him it's time for another attack. Punishment of the USA is what
Bush is all about when he doesn't get his way.
Immunity from prosecution
Submitted by RDUhrich on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 12:14pm.
It's important to note that the legislation the Bush was pushing to get
Congress to "clarify" the Geneva Convention interrogation guidelines also
included provisions to grant immunity from prosecution to those who have
violated the anti-torture standards. This would include Bush and all his
administration as well as the Military and CIA who have been directed to use
whatever methods necessary. This is a tacit admission that their behavior
has been not only illegal but also treasonous and impeachable. It is amazing
that Republican Senators McCain and Warner have suddenly found a conscience
in resisting Bush's pressure to pass this legislation.
Bush Blackmail
Submitted by lizziewho on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:47am.
I sensed from listening to him that he has been warned by the CIA that they
will refuse to do any more interrogation if they are not protected so that
he has no choice but to try to blackmail all of us as you said by closing
down this unit. These CIA agents can see prosecution in the future by virtue
of their President's command and it looks like he has figured out that his
day to be prosecuted is looming also. lizziewho
Rules of War
Submitted by Greshwort on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:06am.
Greshwort ..."the Geneva Convention has guided the conduct of civilized
nations in matters of war." I have wondered all my long life how "war" and
"rules" and "civilized" could be used in the same sentence. Civiliation's
biggest oxymoron is the Rules of War. This is Orwell-speak.
How stupid are we?
Submitted by zorro on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:46am.
The president needs the tools to fight terrorists. Are we to treat those
murderers in the same manner as John Mark (Jon Benet's supposed murderer)
with wine and fine cuisine and flying first class? The muslim terrorists
will exploit our inabilities to detect them as they did on 9/11. It is the
stupidiest idea ever to tie down the very people that are on the frontlines
who protect all of us idiots every day. A sad day indeed!
Speak for youself. Your incorrect presumtions are what is sad!
Submitted by Kevin Schmidt S... on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 12:53pm.
Bush most certainly does very little to effectively fight terrorism. For the
benefit of the country, he needs to resign immediately , Cheney too, and
Rumpsfeld, and Rice, and Gonzales. Resign now, or be impeached next year.
Most military experts agree that what Bush wants will only make the
situation worse, not only for fighting the real war on terrorism, but also
for our Constitution, the supreme law of the land. We can have a strong
defense as well as a strong Constitution. Without our Constitution, America
no longer exists as the land of the free. A sad day indeed!
coffin
Submitted by Kevin Schmidt S... on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:05am.
Bush just handed the majority in the House of Representative and most likely
the Senate over to the Democrats on election day this coming November. Can
there be any doubt now that this election will be based on national and not
on local issues? I can't imagine how the Democrats could screw this one up.
Bush has committed yet another impeachable offense. This time however, it is
obvious to anyone with an IQ of a chimp, that Bush is a danger to every
American both at home and abroad and a danger to our Constitution, the
supreme law of the land that defines us as the USA.
Am I missing something here?
Submitted by BigHeavingSigh on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 10:02am.
Because this sounds like a win-win to me. GWB is threatening to have the CIA
stop torturing prisoners if Congress won't agree to let him keep on having
the CIA torture prisoners? What's not to like? And as most of those
prisoners have been held for 4 years or longer, what possible information
could they have that would be of any value TODAY??? The clock is running
down, and GWB is running scared. He is desperately trying to save his own
*****, and it's not looking too good for him either. At this point he will do
anything he thinks he needs to, to save himself. This is only the beginning.
His carefully created 'reality' is crumbling all around him, he is clearly
at the end of his mental rope. Not a good thing, not at all.
Good point!!
Submitted by Zee on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:34am.
Worth highlighting: as most of those prisoners have been held for 4 years or
longer, what possible information could they have that would be of any value
TODAY???
A simple formula
Submitted by Vierotchka on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:42am.
Since Bush proclaims to be such a good Christian, he should be reminded that
one of the "pillars" of Christianity and its teachings is the Golden Rule -
Do onto others as you would have them do onto you - and thus he should treat
detainees in the manner he would want American detainees to be treated in
other countries. It is as simple as that, if Bush and his clique really are
the Christians they claim to be.
Vierotchka
What's Obvious
Submitted by Gonnuts on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:37am.
That we are even having this discussion about torture is unconscionable. How
anyone can argue for torture is something that I simply can't phantom. How a
president of this country can advocate such is stomach-turning, bone-headed,
immorally, disgustingly, stupid! And then to actually say that if you don't
get the right to torture you'll take your ball and go home, ending the game
altogether? Christ! Can we impeach now?
If I may...
Submitted by Vierotchka on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:56am.
I think you meant "fathom", not "phantom". :)
Vierotchka
Ah, right
Submitted by Gonnuts on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 10:21am.
.... should stop writing before my first cup of coffee - thanks
Geneva Convention
Submitted by tom coombs on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:22am.
Geneva Convention hey buzz...we've got to protect our troops and stop little
georgie messing with the geneva convention .the rest of the world now,
thanks to george, cheney and rummy, sees america as a nation of
terrorists.(and why not?..the electorate keeps voting them in). american
soldiers are going to be subjected to some heavy duty interrogations if
georgie alters article three of the geneva convention. what information
could american soldiers give? they don't know when the next civilian is
going to kidnapped and disappeared to some dark prison. they don't know when
the next civilian household will be attacked, children raped and witnesses
killed. of course a little waterboarding might loosen their lips and get
them to admit to anything. these poor bastards wouldn't even be in this
situation if georgie hadn't used his preemptive strike to start an illegal
war. little georgie is scared of press conferences. he'd ***** himself if he
was led into an interrogation chamber. yet by changing the rules of the
geneva convention he's exposing american troops to retaliatory torture. hey
george there might come a time when you lose your crown and the cia might
want to ask you some questions. think about it.
Blackmail -- or insurance?
Submitted by bob5540 on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 8:27am.
There's one thing I'm personally certain of. This isn't about giving the CIA
the tools it needs. This president hasn't let the law hinder him in the
past, so why should he in the future?
But there are a lot of CIA and other people who are looking at the political
landscape and seeing that they might not have the protections after January
that they've supposedly enjoyed until now. The Chief Protector and his #2
may themselves be in some jeopardy. You may have read that many CIA
operatives are buying liability insurance these days. So what this is really
about is covering everybody's legal backsides before it is too late.
The CIA has long operated (at times) outside international law. It's done in
secret, and we all just pretend not to know. The same is true of Mossad and
other secret services. Once in a while we get caught at it, and Congress
steps in and/or the president apologizes. Then we go back to secrect ops.
I'm not arguing whether that's good or bad.
Ostensibly, Bush is asking Congress to openly legitemize future actions that
are presently outside the international law. Still, I am not arguing whether
that's good or bad -- but if you really want to know: It's bad because it's
unnecessary, and because it gives other nations and entities the excuse to
do the same, openly and with impunity.
What I am actually saying is this: The president's real goal is to cover
some butts for things that have already happened, to retroactively protect
people who have broken the law and who are afraid their acts will be
discovered and prosecuted -- if the Democrats get subpoena power.
So, what we have here is Bush pushing something that's quite unnecessary and
puts our soldiers and operatives at greater risk, just keep himself and his
cohorts out of jail. That I object to.
bob at 55-40
The Constitution specifically prohibits that
Submitted by Vierotchka on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:51am.
What I am actually saying is this: The president's real goal is to cover
some butts for things that have already happened, to retroactively protect
people who have broken the law and who are afraid their acts will be
discovered and prosecuted -- if the Democrats get subpoena power.
You cannot apply new laws to actions and crimes committed before that new
law comes into effect. I do believe the US Constitution specifies this in
Section 9:
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless
when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.
No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Vierotchka
I agree
Submitted by cagey on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:16am.
For the Bush crowd profit and self-protection trump the phony ideology they
preach, which is just a cover for their crime sprees anyway. They lost the
protection of the SCOTUS on this issue, so they have to get another
protection scheme into place.
Spoiled Brat
Submitted by Captain Jessie on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 7:47am.
According to child psychologists, temper tantrums range from whining and
crying to screaming, kicking, hitting, and breath holding. In Bush's case,
being told "No" results in screaming, kicking and threatening. He has been
so used to his rubber-stamp congress giving him his way that he refuses to
accept defeat in a mature manner. That's because he has always been a
spoiled little brat. According to his mother, Bush seemed to get his way
while growing up. Some may see a President in the White House, but I clearly
see a three-year-old spoiled child.
I Agree
Submitted by scullygrrrl on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:30am.
Bush is acting just like a spoiled child who's being threatened with losing
his favorite toy; an apt metaphor since his favorite toys are fear,
suffering and death. This is a VERY sick man. The rest of the world has
known it for some time now. However, I'm afraid even this won't wake up
those Americans who seem to have the attention spans of gnats. If it doesn't
hit them in their wallets, they don't notice. Add to that a symbiosis with
the mainstream media and "Houston, we have a problem."
I agree...
Submitted by laurietrup on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 9:32am.
I thought the same thing when I witnessed his near-meltdown at yesterday's
press conference.
And the Matt Lauer interview
Submitted by Zee on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 11:40am.
Did you see the way Bush crowded his personal space, poked his finger at him
repeatedly, motor-mouthed his way through Matt's dogged questioning of his
torture policy? I'm surprised Matt didn't ask him to stop. I doubt he'd
tolerate such invasive and assinine behavior from anyone else. Anyone who
can't see that Bush is a mentally and developmentally disturbed being is
blinded by cult-partisanship, delusion, or both.
begin 666 spacer.gif
K1TE&.#EA`0`!`( ``````````"'Y! $`````+ `````!``$```("1 $`.P``
`
end
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
17 Sep 2006 01:19:42 AM |
|
|
In article <bO6dnXfT-eHT0JHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster; it's no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against the
American people.
This is why we need to take back Congress so we can impeach, remove, and
try the disgusting creature and his ilk.
Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every American
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 6:59am. Editorials
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
It's as clear as day.
For political gain and to extend his unprecedented grab for unilateral power
at odds with our Constitution, Bush is blackmailing the national security
interests of the United States.
This is not an alarmist claim by BuzzFlash; it is a fact.
The President of the United States is holding the security of every American
as a hostage in a game of chicken.
For more years than we can remember, the Geneva Convention has guided the
conduct of civilized nations in matters of war. America has abided by the
treaty without dissent or difficulty. In fact, we prided ourselves on
implementing the standards spelled out by the Geneva Convention for the
treatment of prisoners of war.
But Bush is now saying, that suddenly for him, the Geneva Conventions do not
provide "clarity." This, of course, is the Rovia/Luntz use of framing to
make a betrayal of the American people by the Bush Administration look like
a reasonable act. The Geneva Conventions have provided uncontested "clarity"
through multiple Republican and Democratic administrations, but all of a
sudden they have become "vague" to Bush, even though not a word in them has
been changed.
So Bush went to Capitol Hill this past week -- as the Washington Post said
in an editorial -- as the first president of the United States to lobby for
torture.
Fascists and barbarians torture, civilized people don't.
<snip good articles>
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
16 Sep 2006 02:35:35 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-B95521.23194216092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <bO6dnXfT-eHT0JHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster; it's
no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against the
American people.
This is why we need to take back Congress so we can impeach, remove, and
try the disgusting creature and his ilk.
That's what he's afrqid of. And, he and his puppeteers
will do anything dirty/illegal they can think of to remain in
power.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every American
Submitted by BuzzFlash on Sat, 09/16/2006 - 6:59am. Editorials
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
It's as clear as day.
For political gain and to extend his unprecedented grab for unilateral
power
at odds with our Constitution, Bush is blackmailing the national security
interests of the United States.
This is not an alarmist claim by BuzzFlash; it is a fact.
The President of the United States is holding the security of every
American
as a hostage in a game of chicken.
For more years than we can remember, the Geneva Convention has guided the
conduct of civilized nations in matters of war. America has abided by the
treaty without dissent or difficulty. In fact, we prided ourselves on
implementing the standards spelled out by the Geneva Convention for the
treatment of prisoners of war.
But Bush is now saying, that suddenly for him, the Geneva Conventions do
not
provide "clarity." This, of course, is the Rovia/Luntz use of framing to
make a betrayal of the American people by the Bush Administration look
like
a reasonable act. The Geneva Conventions have provided uncontested
"clarity"
through multiple Republican and Democratic administrations, but all of a
sudden they have become "vague" to Bush, even though not a word in them
has
been changed.
So Bush went to Capitol Hill this past week -- as the Washington Post
said
in an editorial -- as the first president of the United States to lobby
for
torture.
Fascists and barbarians torture, civilized people don't.
<snip good articles>
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
17 Sep 2006 11:58:39 PM |
|
|
In article <CJ6dnd2ElZzDZ5HYnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-B95521.23194216092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <bO6dnXfT-eHT0JHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster; it's
no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against the
American people.
This is why we need to take back Congress so we can impeach, remove, and
try the disgusting creature and his ilk.
That's what he's afrqid of. And, he and his puppeteers
will do anything dirty/illegal they can think of to remain in
power.
What I'm afraid of is some sort of 'October Surprise' like a full scale
attack on Iran. Of course that would lead to catastrophe, but he doesn't
care as long as he retains power.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
17 Sep 2006 01:01:30 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-050382.21583917092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <CJ6dnd2ElZzDZ5HYnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-B95521.23194216092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <bO6dnXfT-eHT0JHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster;
it's
no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against
the
American people.
This is why we need to take back Congress so we can impeach, remove,
and
try the disgusting creature and his ilk.
That's what he's afrqid of. And, he and his puppeteers
will do anything dirty/illegal they can think of to remain in
power.
What I'm afraid of is some sort of 'October Surprise' like a full scale
attack on Iran. Of course that would lead to catastrophe, but he doesn't
care as long as he retains power.
If he goes to war without the permission of Congress,
again, he may be in for a big surprise himself.
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
BAAWA Knight & Bible Thumper Thumper
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Traitor Bush is Blackmailing the National Security of Every Americian |
18 Sep 2006 11:43:38 PM |
|
|
In article <y9ydndNNAb9NqJPYnZ2dnUVZ_qidnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-050382.21583917092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <CJ6dnd2ElZzDZ5HYnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachmann@sbcglobal.com> wrote in message
news:jhachmann-B95521.23194216092006@news.giganews.com...
In article <bO6dnXfT-eHT0JHYnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Michelle Malkin" <hypatiab7@comcast.net> wrote:
There should be so many treason counts against this spoiled monster;
it's
no
wonder he is in constant fear and fighting back with threats against
the
American people.
This is why we need to take back Congress so we can impeach, remove,
and
try the disgusting creature and his ilk.
That's what he's afrqid of. And, he and his puppeteers
will do anything dirty/illegal they can think of to remain in
power.
What I'm afraid of is some sort of 'October Surprise' like a full scale
attack on Iran. Of course that would lead to catastrophe, but he doesn't
care as long as he retains power.
If he goes to war without the permission of Congress,
again, he may be in for a big surprise himself.
He would certainly have a harder time convincing them than last time.
However, something may just 'happen' or perhaps he'll just do it and
claim it was part of his 'war on terrer'. Then he could use his fait
accompli by wrapping himself in the flag and then start whining to
Congress and the voters about how we have to 'support the troops'.
I'm really beginning to believe that he is losing it. There is no
telling what he might do.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
