True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils?



 Religions > Atheism > True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Precision"
Date: 16 Jul 2006 05:45:51 PM
Object: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils?
A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins

And I quoted:
"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein
On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.

User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 01:39:36 PM
"MarkA" <manthony@stopspam.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.07.17.11.29.03.823129@stopspam.net...

On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:45:51 -0700, Precision wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the threat to humanity posed
by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow' disease, and many others, but I think a
case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate." -- Richard
Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church, but they were
truly religious men because of their faith in the orderliness of the
universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein
-- and why?



Dawkins' whole point is that people make decisions based on their desire
to believe that their religious teachings are true, despite lack of
evidence. They are both saying the same thing.

--
MarkA
(still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)

Interesting perspective. I might be inclined to agree with your assessment
if you can answer these follow-up question: First, I gather from your reply
that you believe Dawkins would have agreed with the spirit of Einstein's
comment? Secondly, I gather you'll agree that Dawkins was referring to
misdirected faith built on a foundation that cannot withstand the test of
time?
.

User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 01:31:39 PM
"Midwinter" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns980388AD52B3EBIINBCEPAGGFYBVV@216.196.109.145...

"Precision" <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Then I gather you're not against a belief in God as the creator of the
universe but take exception to religions that dishonor God by
committing various sins such as denying proven science, believing they
absolutely and positively have the absolute truth even if proven
otherwise, lack the humility to admit that humans who have existed for
only a blip in the infinite dimensions of time cannot possibly presume
to know all there is to know about an infinite God, and other
embarrassing observations about our human nature in mankind's infancy?

Was I even close?


Allowing for a wide variety of interpretations of the concept of 'God',
you
were, well, precise.

Well, at least someone perceives my getting something right in this topic...
allowing for a wide variety of interpretation of the concept of God, of
course. ;-)
.

User: "GoDrex"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 16 Jul 2006 05:47:49 PM
"Precision" <precision@usenet.com> wrote in message
news:1153089421_34407@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

tough one... I'm tempted to say not faith in and of itself, but what faith
makes possible. Faith can also makes some good things happen.
.
User: "Aaron"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 31 Jul 2006 02:20:44 PM
Greywolf wrote:

"GoDrex" <godrex35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6sadnSVRSrSIXyfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...

tough one... I'm tempted to say not faith in and of itself, but what faith
makes possible. Faith can also makes some good things happen.


It most certainly can -- if it is well placed. Who among us has not heard
about some scientist who had a 'theory' that, despite some rather intense
skepticism, nevertheless, proved to be 'true'? We all know about people who

Absolutely! One of my favorite childhood books was "The Value of
Believing in Yourself, the Story of Louis Pasteur" starring a very
comical likeness of Louis and telling the story of his discovery of germs.
.

User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 08:15:41 PM
In article <1153110518_37361@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,

says...


"Greywolf" <greywolf@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:12blob84p1bf01b@corp.supernews.com...


"GoDrex" <godrex35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6sadnSVRSrSIXyfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...


"Precision" <

> wrote in message
news:1153089421_34407@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?


tough one... I'm tempted to say not faith in and of itself, but what
faith
makes possible. Faith can also makes some good things happen.


It most certainly can -- if it is well placed. Who among us has not heard
about some scientist who had a 'theory' that, despite some rather intense
skepticism, nevertheless, proved to be 'true'? We all know about people
who had 'faith' in themselves and their abilities to persevere in
seemingly hopeless, or against all odds, instances.

Faith in 'God', however, is an altogether different kettle of stinking
fish. Mankind has grown up a little. We should realize the truth when we
see it. We should recognize that after thousands of years no one has come
up with *any* proof for this 'God' that the theists continue to maintain
exists. They're down to shaking their index finger at us and demanding
that we prove he *doesn't* exist -- as if that's 'proof' that he does.
It's all a charade, boys and girls. Religion is a cancer that is eating
mankind alive. It needs to be 'surgically' removed. It's destroying us in
a slow, systematic way.



You're in good company with Marx,

Marx was a dictator?

Lenin and other dictators

I suppose that you supported the divine right monarchy that bankrupted
Russia, oppressed the serfs and got it entangled in one military
misadventure after another, ultimately culminating in their defeat in
WWI. The long, brutal reign of the religious Czars sure didn't do worth
a ***** for the Russians and most had a better life under communism, even
though the communist revolution was quickly co-opted by people like
Stalin who were merely totalitarians, with no commitment to the rights of
workers that people like Marx had championed.

who would have
eradicated religion from mankind if their regime had conquered.


The 'faith' of Einstein had absolutely nothing to do with Jesus/God.
Einstein's 'God' was science, knowledge; not some ridiculous and imaginary
creature that the Church created.



So you believe Einstein denied the existence of a higher intelligence behind
the laws of physics?

Einstein, at best, spoke of a sort of Spinozan entity associated with the
universe as a whole. In any event, your appeal to authority with respect
to Einstein doesn't get you very far. Belief that there might somehow be
greater than human intelligence in the universe doesn't necessarily
correspond to a god concept. But the bottom line is that Einstein wasn't
necessarily right about these things and speculation on such matters is
still quite a bit above and beyond his scientific expertise. Einstein
was trying to be poetic at times, and didn't really take the god concept
particularly seriously.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.


User: "Tabula Rasa"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 16 Jul 2006 06:02:19 PM
"Precision" <precision@usenet.com> wrote in message
news:1153089421_34407@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

I'm sure Dawkins has a lot of faith in his position...
.
User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 01:30:15 PM
"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f253d586d8d3002989b43@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <1153114473_37917@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,


says...


"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f24c5709128acff989b42@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <1153110863_37363@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,


says...


"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f2498bde49ca091989b39@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <e9eghg$98i$1@nntp.aioe.org>,


says...


"Precision" <

> wrote in message
news:1153089421_34407@sp6iad.superfeed.net...

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?


I'm sure Dawkins has a lot of faith in his position...



Are you really? Given the quote, he's admitting that if he did,
this
could be a bad thing. So, in fact, you have little basis to make
your
claim. Furthermore, if it's bad for Dawkins to have faith, how do
you
justify your own faith commitment?

In any event, as I've already pointed out, "Faith", as used in a
religious context means something quite distinct from mere guesses,
hunches, aspirations, longshots, etc. Since most people are well
aware
that religious "Faith" means something quite different than in the
general context, both you and Jones (aka Precision) are guilty of
equivocation.



Guilty of equivocation, you charge? Quibbler, aren't you the
judgmental
one
(and your faith that I'm 'Jones', whomever they are, is misplaced).

I suppose Einstein was also quite the equivocator when he said...

Science without religion is lame. Religion without science
is blind. -- Einstein


Or this equivocation:
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions,
a
lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a
personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it
clearly.
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the
unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our
science
can reveal it"

or this:
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or
has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I
nor
would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical
death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such
thoughts."

Did you honestly think your little quote mining enterprise would
accomplish anything?



What could I hope to accomplish?



I meant what did you hope to accomplish by using selective quoting which
are well known to be distortions of Einstein's view. Einstein himself
commented on and rejected the deceptive tactics you used there.
As to your view on faith, I'm sure that you would want to promote its
virulent and brain-rotting infection in other people, since you have
become a virus incubator for it now. However, blind faith is not only
treason against reason, it is grossly immoral, in that it asks people to
do things vehemently and dogmatically without justification. It is the
blind worship of obedience, for the sake of obedience, and is highly
conducive to evil for that reason. Faith is not a method of knowing, but
a method of ignorance. It shrinks one's ability to think and inspires
many to engage in revisionism against reality, based upon the fear that
reality may contradict the prejudices of faith. Faith assertions are the
opposite of the reasonable and responsible way to arrive at truth.
Rather than seeking what it is true, it starts with the unevidenced
assertion and bends data selectively, as you have already demonstrated,
to serve your own pernicious biases. As Douglas Kruegger asked, "Why ask
someone to believe something for no reason, if there are reasons?" Faith
has no good answer for this, though it flounders around with much idle
speculation.
As Russell noted, "We do not speak of faith that two and two are four or
that the earth is round. We only speak of faith when we wish to
substitute emotion for evidence." He also commented, "The whole problem
with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of
themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
Perhaps most importantly of all, he noted, "If you think that your belief
is based upon reason, you will support it by argument, rather than by
persecution...But if your belief is based on faith, you will realize that
argument is useless, and will therefore resort to force."

Finding those Einstein quotes in my research, I now find it ironic that
you're asking me to believe on faith that he specifically denied those
specific quotes himself? If you go back and reread your post, you made some
quotes that didn't specifically state they were (1) Einstein's own words
(and the year, publication and context given); (2) the words specifically
addressed the quotes I gave; (3) if Einstein was claiming the quotes I gave
were simply not said by him OR if these quotes were said by him but
misunderstood.
For example, if the quotes I gave were Einstein's words early in life, and
later in life he became cynical and wrote the words you attributed, then you
are being grossly dishonest in implying I'm deliberately misquoting.
Furthermore, I happen to know that I found the quotes I gave during the
course of my research, attributed to Einstein, and shared them in simply
asking a question. YOU on the otherhand replied ambiguously with quotes that
contradicted my quotes (but very noticeably avoided stating it was Einstein
who said them, and avoided stating whether you honestly believed his alleged
quoted meant to 'take back' what he said earlier, or if his words meant he
denied ever saying the words I quoted.
You're simply using a tactic, in rereading your ambiguous posts, that
politicians use in an attempt to smear an opponent. In this case your
perceived opponent is myself because in asking a simple question that
illuminates the issue of faith, you perceive my representing a point of view
you personally despise.
.
User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 03:58:15 PM
In article <1153160489_43293@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,

says...

Finding those Einstein quotes in my research, I now find it ironic that
you're asking me to believe on faith that he specifically denied those
specific quotes himself? If you go back and reread your post, you made some
quotes that didn't specifically state they were (1) Einstein's own words
(and the year, publication and context given); (2) the words specifically
addressed the quotes I gave; (3) if Einstein was claiming the quotes I gave
were simply not said by him OR if these quotes were said by him but
misunderstood.

If you do even a trivial amount of research, you will find that the
quotations I supplied are of well-known provenance and legitimate. The
only reason I didn't bother to type a byline again was because it was
clear that we were talking about Einstein already. The quotes were
sufficient to show that you were not fairly representing the range of
Einstein's views.


For example, if the quotes I gave were Einstein's words early in life, and
later in life he became cynical and wrote the words you attributed, then you
are being grossly dishonest in implying I'm deliberately misquoting.

Actually no, even if I was doing that, which I'm not, you have access to
his earlier and later work and presumably need to know what his view was
before you present some quite narrow stance as the definitive range of
his opinion. In any event, I'm not accusing you misquoting, so much as
misrepresenting the scope of his thinkings. The quotes you selected have
frequently and selectively been used by people to claim that Einstein was
some kind of devout theist, when in fact, he denies this.
<rest of your paranoid tripe snipped>
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.



User: "quibbler"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 03:40:42 PM
In article <1153112474_37831@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,

says...


"quibbler" <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f2497afe3f9e636989b38@news.readfreenews.net...

In article <1153089421_34407@sp6iad.superfeed.net>,


says...

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein



You're equivocating on the word "faith" here.



No I'm not. That is a judgmental statement. You cannot presume to know
whether I'm deliberately trying to mislead anyone.

Because that's what your rhetoric is aimed at. It's clear that you are
distorting the term "faith" by employing a selective quote from Einstein
in which faith is not being used in a religious context.
BTW, only a failed philosophy student like Jones would try to turn this
into an epistemic problem of how I know your intentions. It is likely,
based upon your behavior and your indicated agenda that you are
intentionally equivocating. It may be possible that you just aren't
smart enough to understand the error you are making, but you have still
misrepresented the concept of faith, nonetheless.
How can you possibly

presume to know anything about my motives through a simple question? Could
it possibly be that you are trying to avoid addressing the question and
implications of Einstein's beliefs in God (which are made clearer by other
quotes I have added to this topic recently by him)?


You can clearly see that
Einstein is not talking about religious Faith. Religious faith means
something entirely different than merely some kind of hunch or optimistic
guesstimate. The latter might describe the "faith" in the "orderliness
of the universe". The former is flying airplanes into buildings because
Allah promised you'd get 70 virgins.



Some might wonder if YOU are not equivocating

Upon which term would that be. Do you even know the meaning of the term?

to come extent yourself by
avoiding the reality of Einstein's belief in a higher intelligence behind
the laws of physics when he said...

No person knowledgable about Einstein would believe that. Einstein had a
reverence for nature, but did not consider it a "higher intelligence".
He specifically rejected belief in a personal type of creator god, as I
have already shown in separate quotations in this thread.


Science without religion is lame. Religion without science
is blind. -- Einstein

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a
lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a
personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly.
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the
unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science
can reveal it."


My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable
superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are
able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind. -- Einstein

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a
lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a
personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly.
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the
unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science
can reveal it." --Einstein.

The most important function of art and science is to awaken
the cosmic religious feeling and keep it alive. -- Einstein

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a
lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a
personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly.
If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the
unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science
can reveal it."



I say THAT is the real bugaboo that keeps many an atheist awake at night.

And how have you determined this? I say that you don't know jack *****
about atheists. It's never kept me up at all. I can have awe and
reverence for nature. Again, if you knew anything about Dawkins, he has
repeatedly expressed this sentiment as well, saying that this form of
awareness if far superior to religion.

Forget the 'Church'. Deal with the real question of whether Einstein was
right about our frail and feeble mind's limitations

He recognized, as many people do, that there are many things which humans
don't know. For you this is just an opportunity to fill those gaps with
your ridiculous god postulate.

perceiving "the
illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are
able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind."

Your mind is certainly more feeble than most. I've already explained to
you that Dawkins is on the record as having considerable reverence for
nature, as opposed to the feeble awe which some god myth is supposed to
inspire in the minds of the small.


Einstein accepted the reality there are illimitable reaches of space and
time and recognized that a 'superior spirit' could very well exist beyond
that limitation.

There are lots of things that humans don't know, which is all the more
reason not to pretend that there is a god, when there is no serious
evidence supporting the claim.





On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?



They're talking about different things. You seem to passionately dislike
Dawkins, despite the fact that you seem to know very little about him or
his positions on most issues.



Dislike him? As you point out, I know very little about him

You dont' know much about Einstein either. However, your ignorance about
both Dawkins and Einstein didn't seem to motivate you to find out the
context of their statements. You asked us to pass judgment based upon
the very limited quotations you provided and apparently already had
yourself.

or his positions
on most issues. How can is dislike him?

You tell me. I suspect that your antipathy is not rational.

I was just asking if Einstein was
more correct, but I didn't frame my question to preclude someone denying it
is either "true" or "false" but agreeing with both (as some have done).


You also seem to wrongly assume that I'm
some dedicated follower of his, just because I quote him. Dawkins is
very particularly talking about religious faith and the pernicious,
enslaving effects that blind obedience to reality distorting
superstitions can have. Einstein is talking about people's best guesses
of the way the universe may work. No god is judging people based upon
this. It's not considered virtuous to blindly affirm that the universe
may or may not contain some degree of order.



There is really no virtue to objective scientific observation about the
order of the universe.

That's why it shouldn't be equated with religious faith, since religious
faith is considered virtuous just for blindly guessing about the name of
god.

Einstein was willing to go out on a limb in quotes
such as the above, because he humbly recognized his limitations as a human
scientist.

There's nothing humble about religious faith. It dogmatically asserts
that not only is everyone wrong but them, but that those other people
will often be tortured in graphic ways for all of eternity because they
rejected the high-pressure,hurry-up sales pitch that a particular
religion offered.



For a so-called philosophy student, you don't seem to know jack *****
about simple distinctions like this.



You sure presume to know a lot about me, and are willing to make some
serious deductions about me, based on a simple question!

I notice you're not denying these claims so far.


For example, you probably assume that I have abandoned all reason to blindly
support the 'Church'

Well, that's an entirely new claim. What is easy to tell is taht you're
a theist, presumably of the Christian variety. I don't particularly care
which exact raindance your individual sect performs.

or religious beliefs published by the particular
Christian faith I happen to affiliate with. And if so then you would be
patently mistaken.

Ummmm, yeah, I'm going to have to go ahead and not take your self-
reported claims very seriously. Good, I'm glad we could agree on that.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.

User: "Kate "

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 16 Jul 2006 06:44:01 PM
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:45:51 -0700, "Precision" <precision@usenet.com>
wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

Define evil.
.

User: "raven1"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 16 Jul 2006 06:19:46 PM
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:45:51 -0700, "Precision" <precision@usenet.com>
wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

Given that the context is completely different, it's possible to agree
with both statements.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
.

User: "Scott Richter"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 10:44:52 AM
Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

Well, apparently you haven't spent much time reading either author's
works beyond the sound-bite quotes you posted. Dawkins goes to some
lengths to distinguish different types of faith--religious faith versus
scientific faith--which makes your question pointless.
.
User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 10:15:49 PM
"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiprpl.48x6al173c0g0N%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?


Well, apparently you haven't spent much time reading either author's
works beyond the sound-bite quotes you posted. Dawkins goes to some
lengths to distinguish different types of faith--religious faith versus
scientific faith--which makes your question pointless.

You may think it's "pointless" but I think the question is highly relevant
in light of the growing number of people who have abandoned faith in God
today.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
User: "Scott Richter"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 11:34:57 PM
Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?


Well, apparently you haven't spent much time reading either author's
works beyond the sound-bite quotes you posted. Dawkins goes to some
lengths to distinguish different types of faith--religious faith versus
scientific faith--which makes your question pointless.



You may think it's "pointless" but I think the question is highly relevant
in light of the growing number of people who have abandoned faith in God
today.

Einstein and Dawkins are talking about entirely different things.
Dawkins is talking about faith that resists reality, Einstein about
faith that embraces it. Dawkins is talking about faith that allows no
questioning, Einstein about faith that requires it.
Now, I think that Einstein's use of the term "religious men" is
fallacious, because religious faith is the faith of ignorance, not the
faith of knowledge.
.
User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 20 Jul 2006 02:57:00 AM
"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiqqxq.11bamgkd8n8osN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?


Well, apparently you haven't spent much time reading either author's
works beyond the sound-bite quotes you posted. Dawkins goes to some
lengths to distinguish different types of faith--religious faith versus
scientific faith--which makes your question pointless.



You may think it's "pointless" but I think the question is highly
relevant
in light of the growing number of people who have abandoned faith in God
today.


Einstein and Dawkins are talking about entirely different things.
Dawkins is talking about faith that resists reality, Einstein about
faith that embraces it. Dawkins is talking about faith that allows no
questioning, Einstein about faith that requires it.

Now, I think that Einstein's use of the term "religious men" is
fallacious, because religious faith is the faith of ignorance, not the
faith of knowledge.

Perhaps Einstein was hinting that true religion is indeed a rare diamond in
a sand pit of faux faith? Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary
defines religion in its 4th definition as follows: "a cause, principle, or
system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith".
Is it possible that Einstein was referring to causes, principles and systems
of beliefs that great men have held down through the ages, that brought us
to the point where Einstein could flourish in thought?
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
User: "Scott Richter"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 20 Jul 2006 09:56:34 AM
Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Perhaps Einstein was hinting that true religion is indeed a rare diamond in
a sand pit of faux faith? Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate Dictionary
defines religion in its 4th definition as follows: "a cause, principle, or
system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith".

Is it possible that Einstein was referring to causes, principles and systems
of beliefs that great men have held down through the ages, that brought us
to the point where Einstein could flourish in thought?

This is really the basis of secular humanism, which has long been
considered a mortal threat to organized religions. For more information
about this, a good source is http://www.secularhumanism.org/
.





User: "Scott Richter"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 10:44:52 AM
Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Where is here? You've posted this to a dozen NGs.


Well, the context of 'here' happens to be every newsgroup I thought was
relevant to this question.

Then how come there's no pro-wrestling newsgroups? Sheesh, get with the
program, would ya!
.
User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 10:14:07 PM
"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiprn7.r8yf59144i0vmN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Where is here? You've posted this to a dozen NGs.


Well, the context of 'here' happens to be every newsgroup I thought was
relevant to this question.


Then how come there's no pro-wrestling newsgroups? Sheesh, get with the
program, would ya!

Surely you jest? I think this kind of posting to a pro-wrestling group would
be off-topic. ;-)
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.
User: "Scott Richter"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 19 Jul 2006 11:34:57 PM
Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiprn7.r8yf59144i0vmN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Where is here? You've posted this to a dozen NGs.


Well, the context of 'here' happens to be every newsgroup I thought was
relevant to this question.


Then how come there's no pro-wrestling newsgroups? Sheesh, get with the
program, would ya!



Surely you jest? I think this kind of posting to a pro-wrestling group would
be off-topic. ;-)

Yes, I jest. For some strange reason, there's been a spat of cross
postings between rec.sports.pro-wrestling and alt.atheism lately, and
apparently there's not a lot of overlap betwixt those two groups. Go
figure...
.
User: "Precision"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 20 Jul 2006 02:52:43 AM
"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiqr90.1926mr874b30gN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

"Scott Richter" <scottrichter422@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1hiprn7.r8yf59144i0vmN%scottrichter422@yahoo.com...

Precision <precision@usenet.com> wrote:

Where is here? You've posted this to a dozen NGs.


Well, the context of 'here' happens to be every newsgroup I thought
was
relevant to this question.


Then how come there's no pro-wrestling newsgroups? Sheesh, get with the
program, would ya!



Surely you jest? I think this kind of posting to a pro-wrestling group
would
be off-topic. ;-)


Yes, I jest. For some strange reason, there's been a spat of cross
postings between rec.sports.pro-wrestling and alt.atheism lately, and
apparently there's not a lot of overlap betwixt those two groups. Go
figure...

I try to select newsgroups I feel might have interested individuals who
could provide valuable contributions to the thread. I figure that eventually
the conversation will polarize into a few groups, and perhaps eventually
I'll get a feel for what groups are interested in what threads (so as to
eventually cull out less relevant groups).
Unfortunately flamers to newsgroups abuse the cross-posting feature in
attempts to ignite fires and disrupt free speech. That's my theory at least.
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
.




User: "Pastor Kutchie"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 16 Jul 2006 06:02:50 PM
Precision wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

Dawkins. He's up to date and up to speed with where the debate stands
between religion and science, he is dealing with what religion has to
throw at us out of its desperation to still be relevant.
Faith, claims religion, is a necessity in order to comprehend what life
actually means. This wasn't always necessarily untrue when little was
understood about the origins of ourselves and the universe we are part
of, but now, in the 21st century, it is a barefaced lie.Faith is below
hypothesis or even speculation in the food chain of justifiable
thought. It's continued existence can only hamper civilisation, and the
desperation with which it is defended can only cause great suffering
and conflict.
.

User: "Richo"

Title: Re: True | False - Faith is one of the world's great evils? 17 Jul 2006 08:49:40 PM
Precision wrote:

A poster named Quibbler quoted:

"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins


And I quoted:

"Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church,
but they were truly religious men because of their faith in
the orderliness of the universe." -- Albert Einstein


On faith whom do people around here agree with most -- Dawkins or
Einstein -- and why?

I agree with both - I can do that without contradiction because they
are speaking of two different things.
Mark.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Engineering a Safer, More Beautiful World, One Failure at a Time
Am I the only one in the world who isn't on a Hoodoo train?
Don't look now, Yangie-pwn3d, but the US is still number one economy in the world.
One World Government: The Coming Future
OT; The world doesn't get it - no one 'owns'the internet
One less atheist in the world
Re: One of world's most committed atheists now believes in God
Darwinism Showing Its True Face: "Black People Are Less Intelligent Than Whites" Claims One Of The World's Most Eminent Darwinists
Re: One Religiousness -- a World of Spam
World Box Office Down 8% In One Year: Everyone Hates Dirty Trash Waste-of-Time Garbage Made By Satanist New World Order Scumbag Gangster Media Companies of Yesteryear!
Re: The Great Numbers of One - BOMBSHELL 'How Bush Misled the World' - Catholic Bishop: 9-11 was inside job - TO CON AMERICA TO DIE AS TRAITORS - Bush gave US zero evidence to form our free thoughts on the 911 issue - Justice Christ praises all men w
OT: The world in one city
One third of Russian marriages are between close relatives - Russians are learning from American rednecks
MARRIAGE ONE MAN ONE WOMAN LIE ! !
--- Everything can change in one day.
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER