<Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com> wrote

Fred Stone wrote:

insane enough to run with moonbat weirdness about 9/11 conspiracies and

http://www.bartcop.com/tt-moonbat.jpg

Fred's just doing his bit to waste our time talking with a brick wall.

Don't be hasty. Try to see things from "Fred's" point of view.

"Fred" is a Bush...um... we'll say "Supporter."

Anyhow, going back to the 2000 election, his god is flying around the
country
in Enron's corporate jet attacking McCain for accepting "corporate favors"
(like flying around in corporate jets), even as his men are calling homes in
South Carolina and telling voters about McCain's "Black Baby" and how he
went insane as a prisoner in Vietnam.

Sleeze pays off, and Bush successfully purchases the GOP Presidential
nonimation.

Bush then follows up the integrety of his primary campaign my smearing
Al Gore for making "Wild Claims," such as the author of "Love Story"
based the male lead on him (something the author did state), that he visited
a distaster area in Texas (which he did visit) and that he invented the
internet
(something Gore never claimed).

Oh. And just for good measure -- and to absolutely/positely prove his
integrety beyond all doubt -- Bush made a few claims like this one, stated
during a debate with Al Gore:

| ...the time for campaign funding reform is after the election, this man
has
| outspent me, the special interests are outspending me, and I am not
| going to lay down my arms in the middle of a campaign for somebody
| who has got no credibility on the issue
| http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0010/03/se.01.html

Here on our planet, Bush outspent Al Gore by nearly 2-to-1 ( $120
million to Al Gore's $65 million). Another way of putting it: Bush was
lying.

Then there was the actual 2000 election & Florida. Interesting thing
about that being, not one single party involved ever denied the
blaringly obvious fact that thousands of people -- the vast majority
black people -- were disenfranchised.

Everybody -- the Feds, the state of Florida, the counties were the
voting was took take place & the plantifs -- all agreed that thousands
of people were in fact disenfranchised, denied their vote.

This in an election that was supposedly decided by a few hundred
votes.

The Supreme Court, in hearing the case over the Florida 2000
election, stated flat out that votes didn't matter. The Supreme
Court stated flat out that what was at issue was the will of the
legislature, not the voters. That, according to the constitution,
it is the Electors that actually vote for a President, and it is the
state legislature that appoints the electors.

So, what was the will of the Florida legislature? According to
not just the legislature itself but the actual election laws it passed,
the candidate who got the most votes wins the state's Electoral
votes.

But all that was thrown out the window by the Supreme
Court, who decided that the will of the legislature is not expressed
by the laws passed by the legislature,

but by the election results
as reported by the Bush's campaign chair for the state of Florida...
who happened to also be the Secretary of State.

So Bush is sworn into office. Yup.

First thing he does is fill
the media with made-up stories about the Clinton Administration
vandalizing the Whitehouse offices & equipment. It's all a lie.
None of it is true. Brand new administration, just starting out
and the VERY FIRST thing Bush does is smear Bill Clinton
with lies. Next up on his to-do list: Energy!

California, all by itself, has the 8th largest economy in the
world. California's economy is so large that if it were it's
own country they would have to throw someone out of the
G8, because California would out-rank them. California's
economy is so large, so important that when when it catches
cold jobs all over the nation get sick & die. In 2001, with
Bush at the helm, California's economy was sent into a
tumble with enormous spikes in energy costs, and rolling
blackouts cutting off energy to consumers & businesses.

Turns out that these energy shortages were artificially
created. Yup. Energy brokers -- including Enron -- were
caught actually paying power plants to shut down, causing
blackouts and forcing the state to sign long term contracts
for energy at hugely inflated prices. By July of 2001 the
Bush administration had not only investigated this rape of
California's economy (and America's economy with it),
but identified wrong doing.

They sealed the evidence. Yup. They made it a crime to
use the evidence against ***** Cheney's friends in state
criminal & civil cases against the energy brokers. But, they
did go after one or two of the plants that accepted the
bribes. They even made one of the plants pay back SOME
of the bribe. On to tax cuts...

Bush swore up & down that his huge tax give-aways to the
rich were not going to return us to deficits. They did. Starting
in August of 2001 the U.S. was officially back in deficit
spending. In only eight months Bush had taken us from the
single largest budget surpluses the world had ever seen into
borrowing money just to get by.

Oh; maybe I should point out that it was the Bush
administration itself that identified Bush's tax policies as
the cause of the deficit. The Treasury Department flat
out stated that they had to borrow to make up for the
deficit caused by the tax cuts. A month later 9/11 happened.

Free clue: The PDB, "Bin Laden Determend To Attack
Inside The United States" was a SUPPLIMENTAL
briefing. It was BACKGROUND information, HISTORICAL
data.

If it still hasn't clicked for you: There had been AT LEAST
one other PREVIOUS Presidential briefing on the current
(as of August of 2001) terrorist threat. The brief released to
the public was a SUPPLIMENTAL brief, to provide
BACKGROUND, HISTORICAL INFORMATION behind
the *Real* briefing.

Anyhow, none of the CREDIBLE and ACTIONABLE
intelligence on the threat mattered, as Bush's only response
to the KNOWN TERRORIST THREAT was to stay as
far away from Washington as he could for that summer.

Hint: You only do that if the *Real* brief, the one that wasn't
just a suppliment, warned you that Washington was a likely
target.

Meaning.... what? That the information Bush had was not
simply on some generic, non-specific threat, but was in fact
so specific that it identified AT LEAST one likely target...
a city that in fact WAS TARGETTED.

So WE KNOW that the intelligence Bush was reading was
SO GOOD that it not only warned of a threat, but accurately
identified AT LEAST one city that was targetted.

So Bush fucked up everything, and the result was 9/11. 2001
drew to a close, and for Bush 2002 was spent on his three
highest priorities on Earth: Raising money, cutting taxes and
invading Iraq.

With 2001 such a successful year for Bush -- he bankrupted
the government, threw us into a recession and hid his own
pampered ***** safely away while the worst terrorist attack in
the history of the planet took place -- he decided to take it
easy for 2002.

"It's hard work."
--G. Dubya Bush

In 2002 Bush spent more time away from Washington,
campaigning for his hand-picked congressional candidates,
than any President in history. America was losing more than
100,000 job a month, and Bush spent his time raising well
in excess of $100,000,000.00 for his Partisan favorites.

"You were doing a heck of a job, Bushie!"

It was also in 2002 that Bush invented his case for war against
Iraq. I guess that qualifies as another high point in his career.

And, oh, let's not forget more & more tax cuts!

Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote in
news:1146769601.189908.272890@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:

Fred Stone wrote:

insane enough to run with moonbat weirdness about 9/11 conspiracies
and

http://www.bartcop.com/tt-moonbat.jpg

Fred's just doing his bit to waste our time talking with a brick
wall.

Hey, if you don't like being called a moonbat, don't act like one.

BTW, Fred, as you already know, the whole flap about Colbert's Roast
of Bush is that the mainstream media universally tried to ignore it
then universally panned it, just like you right wingers universally
spout off talking points on cue. We never expected it to be
universally covered or universally praised, but you seem to have no
problem with the reverse being true.

Coal-bear flopped.

Even your pet media couldn't pretend that he
deserved positive reviews.