| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Ian Chesterton" |
| Date: |
16 Aug 2005 10:55:17 PM |
| Object: |
"under God" |
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 09:22:52 AM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Gee, what do you think?
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
19 Aug 2005 02:08:32 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:22:52 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Gee, what do you think?
Please! Robyn, it's really really cruel to ask the braindead to do
something they're not equipped for.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Chesterton" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 09:56:17 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Gee, what do you think?
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
I'm not an atehist. I really wouldn't know unless I asked one. Which I
did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 10:29:09 AM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4303504C.4BAB@spfd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Gee, what do you think?
I'm not an atehist.
Wow, neither am I. I have no idea what that even is ;)
Now, in answer to your question. Am I offended? I think it's religious
nonsense, but not really. I just never said that part of the pledge from
about 5th grade on. No one even noticed.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Chesterton" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 10:38:53 AM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4303504C.4BAB@spfd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Gee, what do you think?
I'm not an atehist.
Wow, neither am I. I have no idea what that even is ;)
Now, in answer to your question. Am I offended? I think it's religious
nonsense, but not really. I just never said that part of the pledge from
about 5th grade on. No one even noticed.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
I stopped saying the pledge in high school. That's when I realized I
was not comfortable pledging my allegience to an entity that might do
things that offend me and my values.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "GoDrex" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 05:43:33 PM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm not offended by it - I just think it's completely meaningless. Which God
are we under? And he he/she/it's so spiffy, why do we put him on money (or
is that the real God?)? The Pledge it's self is a bit of a joke. I never
took it seriously as a kid when I was forced to repeat it on a daily basis.
It took me a long time before I even knew what "indivisible" meant. I'm not
big on loyalty oaths in general. Why do i have to mindlessly repeat
something to prove my loyalty to someone else? Seems pretty stupid to me.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 03:23:34 AM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American. But the original version without the
"under god" is a less bitter pill to swallow if I had to choose between the
two.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
.
|
|
|
| User: "creation.of.insane.rule" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 03:33:56 AM |
|
|
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 04:01:34 AM |
|
|
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
.
|
|
|
| User: "primordial" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 08:35:20 AM |
|
|
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
18 Aug 2005 04:23:32 AM |
|
|
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor, for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days, but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of allegiance to be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gail Futoran" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
18 Aug 2005 07:56:50 PM |
|
|
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mj2cmF179j8kU1@individual.net...
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God"
in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor, for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days, but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of allegiance to
be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better
served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
Texas Senate Bill 83:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB00083F.HTM
Note especially:
"Sec. 25.082. SCHOOL DAY; PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE; MINUTE OF
SILENCE.
SECTION 2. Section 25.082, Education Code, is amended by
amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read
as follows:
(b) The board of trustees of each school district shall
require students, once during each school day at each school in the
district, to recite:
(1) the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag
in accordance with 4 U.S.C. Section 4, and its subsequent
amendments; and
(2) the pledge of allegiance to the state flag in
accordance with Subchapter C, Chapter 3100, Government Code.
(c) On written request from a student's parent or guardian,
a school district shall excuse the student from reciting a pledge of
allegiance under Subsection (b)."
Sure, there's an out, but until (and unless) the written
request from student's parent or guardian is
received and acted upon, presumably a student
no matter what her or his nationality will be required
to pledge allegiance to the USA and TX in
TX schools.
I didn't check other states - I live in TX - but
while googling I've seen references to other
states that have requirements similar to TX.
Gail
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
18 Aug 2005 09:31:18 PM |
|
|
"Gail Futoran" <futoran@nospam.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:m7aNe.631518$cg1.592136@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mj2cmF179j8kU1@individual.net...
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God"
in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes
the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor,
for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days, but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of allegiance
to
be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better
served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks
of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
Texas Senate Bill 83:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB00083F.HTM
Note especially:
"Sec. 25.082. SCHOOL DAY; PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE; MINUTE OF
SILENCE.
SECTION 2. Section 25.082, Education Code, is amended by
amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read
as follows:
(b) The board of trustees of each school district shall
require students, once during each school day at each school in the
district, to recite:
(1) the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag
in accordance with 4 U.S.C. Section 4, and its subsequent
amendments; and
(2) the pledge of allegiance to the state flag in
accordance with Subchapter C, Chapter 3100, Government Code.
(c) On written request from a student's parent or guardian,
a school district shall excuse the student from reciting a pledge of
allegiance under Subsection (b)."
Sure, there's an out, but until (and unless) the written
request from student's parent or guardian is
received and acted upon, presumably a student
no matter what her or his nationality will be required
to pledge allegiance to the USA and TX in
TX schools.
I didn't check other states - I live in TX - but
while googling I've seen references to other
states that have requirements similar to TX.
Gail
Well, thanks for the info, but my request for was geared more for foreigners
that weren't school age and in the US. I read the original poster's comment
to mean that he was claiming that the US was requiring foreigners *outside*
the US to pledge allegiance to the flag. I would expect that foreign
nationals attending a school in a state where they require the pledge to be
spoken would be encouraged to play along.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gail Futoran" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
20 Aug 2005 08:02:14 AM |
|
|
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mkukaF17cobrU1@individual.net...
"Gail Futoran" <futoran@nospam.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:m7aNe.631518$cg1.592136@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mj2cmF179j8kU1@individual.net...
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under
God"
in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes
the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor,
for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days,
but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of allegiance
to
be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that
this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better
served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks
of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
Texas Senate Bill 83:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB00083F.HTM
Note especially:
"Sec. 25.082. SCHOOL DAY; PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE; MINUTE OF
SILENCE.
SECTION 2. Section 25.082, Education Code, is amended by
amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read
as follows:
(b) The board of trustees of each school district shall
require students, once during each school day at each school in the
district, to recite:
(1) the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag
in accordance with 4 U.S.C. Section 4, and its subsequent
amendments; and
(2) the pledge of allegiance to the state flag in
accordance with Subchapter C, Chapter 3100, Government Code.
(c) On written request from a student's parent or guardian,
a school district shall excuse the student from reciting a pledge of
allegiance under Subsection (b)."
Sure, there's an out, but until (and unless) the written
request from student's parent or guardian is
received and acted upon, presumably a student
no matter what her or his nationality will be required
to pledge allegiance to the USA and TX in
TX schools.
I didn't check other states - I live in TX - but
while googling I've seen references to other
states that have requirements similar to TX.
Gail
Well, thanks for the info, but my request for was geared more for
foreigners
that weren't school age and in the US. I read the original poster's
comment
to mean that he was claiming that the US was requiring foreigners
*outside*
the US to pledge allegiance to the flag.
That would be rather silly, wouldn't it? I was responding
to your question in the general sense, not something
totally idiotic posted by someone else.
I would expect that foreign
nationals attending a school in a state where they require the pledge to
be
spoken would be encouraged to play along.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
I'm confused. Are you saying if you're working
temporarily in a foreign country, and your
kids are attending public school in that country,
and they're required to pledge allegiance to,
say, Japan, or Germany, or Saudi Arabia, that
you wouldn't have a problem with that?
Or perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you mean
when you say "encouraged to play along".
That's kind of like lying, isn't it?
What if you were Hindu-American and your
kids were required to pledge allegiance to a nation
"under god" rather than the several gods you and
your family worship. What if the pledge were
changed to read "One Nation Under Jesus Christ
the Lord of All" (something the Far(ce) Right
would love to see). Should Jewish-American and
Muslim-American schoolkids be "encouraged to
play along"??
Gail
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
20 Aug 2005 02:02:05 PM |
|
|
"Gail Futoran" <futoran@nospam.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:qRFNe.640605$cg1.85422@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mkukaF17cobrU1@individual.net...
"Gail Futoran" <futoran@nospam.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:m7aNe.631518$cg1.592136@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mj2cmF179j8kU1@individual.net...
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under
God"
in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes
the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of
pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor,
for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days,
but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of
allegiance
to
be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that
this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better
served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with
sticks
of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
Texas Senate Bill 83:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB00083F.HTM
Note especially:
"Sec. 25.082. SCHOOL DAY; PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE; MINUTE OF
SILENCE.
SECTION 2. Section 25.082, Education Code, is amended by
amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read
as follows:
(b) The board of trustees of each school district shall
require students, once during each school day at each school in the
district, to recite:
(1) the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag
in accordance with 4 U.S.C. Section 4, and its subsequent
amendments; and
(2) the pledge of allegiance to the state flag in
accordance with Subchapter C, Chapter 3100, Government Code.
(c) On written request from a student's parent or guardian,
a school district shall excuse the student from reciting a pledge of
allegiance under Subsection (b)."
Sure, there's an out, but until (and unless) the written
request from student's parent or guardian is
received and acted upon, presumably a student
no matter what her or his nationality will be required
to pledge allegiance to the USA and TX in
TX schools.
I didn't check other states - I live in TX - but
while googling I've seen references to other
states that have requirements similar to TX.
Gail
Well, thanks for the info, but my request for was geared more for
foreigners
that weren't school age and in the US. I read the original poster's
comment
to mean that he was claiming that the US was requiring foreigners
*outside*
the US to pledge allegiance to the flag.
That would be rather silly, wouldn't it? I was responding
to your question in the general sense, not something
totally idiotic posted by someone else.
It certainly seems silly to me. Which is why I asked the other poster to
provide evidence of his seemingly silly claim.
I would expect that foreign
nationals attending a school in a state where they require the pledge to
be
spoken would be encouraged to play along.
I'm confused. Are you saying if you're working
temporarily in a foreign country, and your
kids are attending public school in that country,
and they're required to pledge allegiance to,
say, Japan, or Germany, or Saudi Arabia, that
you wouldn't have a problem with that?
I didn't say anything of the sort. I would have a problem with my kids
pledging allegiance to a foreign flag - just as I would have a problem with
my kids pledging allegiance to the US flag.
Or perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you mean
when you say "encouraged to play along".
That's kind of like lying, isn't it?
I mean that it wouldn't surprise me that a teacher would encourage a foreign
student to join the class for the recitation of the pledge. At the very
least, ask them to stand with the rest of the class and show respect to the
"patriotic" activity. I recall having a few foreign students in class w/ me
at various times during my elementary school days, and if memory serves me
correctly, they participated (or at least stood respectfully) during the
daily pledge etc. That's all.
And if I was in a foreign country and my kids were in a class that pledged
allegiance to that country's flag, I would tell them to stand with the rest
of the class and be quietly respectful. Just as I do now as an atheist when
I'm in a setting that calls for group prayer and/or blessing of food etc. I
don't make a scene, I stand quietly and wait for the exercise to (hopefully)
end quickly.
What if you were Hindu-American and your
kids were required to pledge allegiance to a nation
"under god" rather than the several gods you and
your family worship. What if the pledge were
changed to read "One Nation Under Jesus Christ
the Lord of All" (something the Far(ce) Right
would love to see). Should Jewish-American and
Muslim-American schoolkids be "encouraged to
play along"??
I don't think "under god" belongs in the pledge. As I've already stated, I
don't approve of the pledge of allegiance *at all*. You seem to think that
my "encouraged to play along" statement means that I agree with it. That is
not the case.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gail Futoran" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
20 Aug 2005 08:02:12 AM |
|
|
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mkukaF17cobrU1@individual.net...
"Gail Futoran" <futoran@nospam.worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:m7aNe.631518$cg1.592136@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mj2cmF179j8kU1@individual.net...
"primordial" <primordial@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddvevv$hoc$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgcncF167q6dU1@individual.net...
"creation.of.insane.rule" <creation@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddut41$pa5$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
"G-Ride" <gride42nospammotherfucker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3mgag3F16hjdtU1@individual.net...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under
God"
in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
I'm offended by the Pledge of Allegiance - whether it includes
the
words
"under god" or not. I think that the entire notion of pledging
allegiance
to *any* flag is rather un-American.
Un-ameriKKKan alright. It's usually you who make others pledge
allegiance to YOUR flag. And yes, THAT is oh so 'ameriKKKan'.
Oh well...
What the ***** are you babbling about?
Oh well indeed.
I was merely implying that your country goes around telling
people what to do, and that everybody should pledge allegiance
to the flag of the US of A. Nothing more. Hope you get it this time.
You need to work on your delivery.
Also, it may have paid to notice that I am no fan of the pledge (nor,
for
that matter, the US' cavalier approach to foreign policy these days,
but
that wasn't as obvious). I find the concept of a pledge of allegiance
to
be
rather fascist and I believe that it is contrary to the ideals that
this
country was founded upon. As such, your rant would have been better
served
elsewhere. Hopefully you'll get that this time.
And if you have any evidence of the US requiring foreigners to pledge
allegiance the the US flag, I'd like to see it.
--
Aloha,
G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks
of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
Texas Senate Bill 83:
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/78R/billtext/SB00083F.HTM
Note especially:
"Sec. 25.082. SCHOOL DAY; PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE; MINUTE OF
SILENCE.
SECTION 2. Section 25.082, Education Code, is amended by
amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsections (c) and (d) to read
as follows:
(b) The board of trustees of each school district shall
require students, once during each school day at each school in the
district, to recite:
(1) the pledge of allegiance to the United States flag
in accordance with 4 U.S.C. Section 4, and its subsequent
amendments; and
(2) the pledge of allegiance to the state flag in
accordance with Subchapter C, Chapter 3100, Government Code.
(c) On written request from a student's parent or guardian,
a school district shall excuse the student from reciting a pledge of
allegiance under Subsection (b)."
Sure, there's an out, but until (and unless) the written
request from student's parent or guardian is
received and acted upon, presumably a student
no matter what her or his nationality will be required
to pledge allegiance to the USA and TX in
TX schools.
I didn't check other states - I live in TX - but
while googling I've seen references to other
states that have requirements similar to TX.
Gail
Well, thanks for the info, but my request for was geared more for
foreigners
that weren't school age and in the US. I read the original poster's
comment
to mean that he was claiming that the US was requiring foreigners
*outside*
the US to pledge allegiance to the flag. I would expect that foreign
nationals attending a school in a state where they require the pledge to
be
spoken would be encouraged to play along.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
"Like a quarrelling group of monkeys on a leaky boat, armed with sticks of
dynamite, we are now embarked on an uncertain journey."
I'm confused. Are you saying if you're working
temporarily in a foreign country, and your
kids are attending public school in that country,
and they're required to pledge allegiance to,
say, Japan, or Germany, or Saudi Arabia, that
you wouldn't have a problem with that?
Or perhaps I'm misinterpreting what you mean
when you say "encouraged to play along".
That's kind of like lying, isn't it?
Gail
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Katt" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
16 Aug 2005 10:59:18 PM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
You mean the *manipulative and politically motivated late insertion* of the
words 'under God' into the Pledge of Allegiance...?
Katt.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
16 Aug 2005 11:04:08 PM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
--
rb #2187
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Chesterton" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 12:16:47 AM |
|
|
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 12:40:46 AM |
|
|
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 07:05:04 AM |
|
|
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote in message
news:y5AMe.1885$Q82.834@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
HOw about under satan?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 09:24:28 AM |
|
|
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:ddv95g$pen$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote in message
news:y5AMe.1885$Q82.834@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
HOw about under satan?
I'd like to be under Brad Pitt ;)
Um, what? Were we talking about something else ;)
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "kathryn" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
18 Aug 2005 04:16:21 AM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:3mgvndF12ug1hU1@individual.net...
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:ddv95g$pen$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote in message
news:y5AMe.1885$Q82.834@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
HOw about under satan?
I'd like to be under Brad Pitt ;)
Wouldn't we all?
.
|
|
|
| User: "LisaKay" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
18 Aug 2005 05:54:31 PM |
|
|
kathryn wrote:
"Robibnikoff" <witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:3mgvndF12ug1hU1@individual.net...
"kathryn" <nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:ddv95g$pen$1@nwrdmz01.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote in message
news:y5AMe.1885$Q82.834@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
HOw about under satan?
I'd like to be under Brad Pitt ;)
Wouldn't we all?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 08:10:00 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:05:04 +0000 (UTC), "kathryn" <nospam@here.com>
wrote:
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@bellsouth.net.pa> wrote in message
news:y5AMe.1885$Q82.834@tornado.socal.rr.com...
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
HOw about under satan?
"over Satan"?
How about the IPU(PBUH), or F.S.M.
--
zamboni #2139
BAAWA Assistant to the Vice-Administrator of Malevolence
EAC Tertiary Adjunct to the Dispenser of Obfuscation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory Gadow" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 08:16:02 AM |
|
|
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
Make sure that both Wiccans (under the Great Mother of All and the Horned Lord)
and Satanists (over Hell) are respected, too ;-D
--
Gregory Gadow
techbear@serv.net
http://www.serv.net/~techbear
"It is necessary to the happiness of man that he be
mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not
consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists
in professing to believe what one does not believe. It
is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may
so express it, that mental lying has produced in society.
When man has so far corrupted and prostituted the
chastity of his mind, as to subscribe his professional
belief to things he does not believe, he has prepared
himself for the commission of every other crime."
- Thomas Paine, "The Age of Reason"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Apostate" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 10:45:50 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 06:16:02 -0700, Gregory Gadow <techbear@serv.net> wrote:
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
Make sure that both Wiccans (under the Great Mother of All and the Horned Lord)
and Satanists (over Hell) are respected, too ;-D
I'd already begun to suspect that there were only two Wiccans.
--
/Apostate
alt.atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer
EAC Supernumerary Deputy Director, Department of Redundancy Department
plonked by Lani_girl, first post; Billions Served!
I doubt, therefore I might be.
e-mail to lower-case only
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Chesterton" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 01:09:58 AM |
|
|
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
Your chances of ever getting this idea put into practice are about as
good as they are for President Bush to resign tomorrow.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phÿltêr" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
20 Aug 2005 02:25:18 AM |
|
|
[posted and mailed]
Ian Chesterton <ichesterton@spfd.com> astounded us with:
news:4302D4FE.722F@spfd.com:
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
Your chances of ever getting this idea put into practice are about as
good as they are for President Bush to resign tomorrow.
It is my fond hope that Bush is assassinated tomorrow. Resignation doesn't
cut it.
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
Remove "s" to respond
http://www.jesusneverexisted.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
20 Aug 2005 02:29:42 AM |
|
|
Ph=FFlt=EAr wrote:
[posted and mailed]
=20
Ian Chesterton <ichesterton@spfd.com> astounded us with:
news:4302D4FE.722F@spfd.com:=20
=20
=20
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302C87E.537C@spfd.com...
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Ian Chesterton" <ichesterton@spfd.com> wrote in message
news:4302B56D.752D@spfd.com...
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in
the Pledge of Allegience?
No more so than you would be if it said "under Vishnu".
And if "under Vishnu" was inserted into the pledge in place of "under=
God," I suspect that most of those defending the pledge now would be
attacking it later.
Seems fair. ;)
I've got a simple solution. We rotate which deity is cited in the
pledge based on the respective numbers of their adherents among
the citizenry. So mostly it would be "under God". But say one
tenth of the time it would be "under Allah" and say another
tenth "under Vishnu". I would of course insist that it occasionally
be "under No god". I wonder how many Raelians there are.
I look forward to us pledging allegiance to "one nation, under Rael".
Seems fair. ;)
--
rb #2187
Your chances of ever getting this idea put into practice are about as
good as they are for President Bush to resign tomorrow.
=20
=20
It is my fond hope that Bush is assassinated tomorrow. Resignation does=
n't=20
cut it.
=20
Not I. I may dislike President Bush, but I don't want to see him=20
assassinated. Death is too good for him. ;-)
--=20
****************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*--------------------------------------------------*
* "No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, *
* the non-existence of Zeus or Thor - but they *
* have few followers now." Arthur C. Clarke *
****************************************************
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Darrell Stec" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 12:00:47 AM |
|
|
After serious contemplation, on or about Tuesday 16 August 2005 11:55 pm
ichesterton@spfd.com wrote:
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
Perhaps more confused than offended. Did you mean The most high god, El,
his son Yahweh, Yahweh's son Jesus, or Yahweh's brother and Jesus' uncle
Satan? Or perhaps you were referring to one of the incarnations of Vishnu?
I wouldn't be offended if you meant Satan or Vishnu as they were more
honest and benign than Jesus, Yahweh or El. I'm undecided about Azazel.
--
Later,
Darrell Stec
Webpage Sorcery
http://webpagesorcery.com
We Put the Magic in Your Webpages
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim07D5" |
|
| Title: Re: "under God" |
17 Aug 2005 09:52:35 AM |
|
|
Ian Chesterton <ichesterton@spfd.com> said:
Are atheists offended by the inclusion of the words "under God" in the
Pledge of Allegience?
After getting a few replies, what's your conclusion (if any)?
--- Jim07D5
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|