| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"dapra" |
| Date: |
08 Aug 2007 11:46:37 AM |
| Object: |
U.S.: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the
population. They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis had
to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in mass
graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it achieves
the same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
.
|
|
| User: "Jack Granade" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 12:06:03 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the population.
They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis had
to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in mass
graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it achieves the
same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 12:25:55 PM |
|
|
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the population.
They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis had
to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in mass
graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it achieves the
same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jack Granade" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 06:29:10 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2padnd1jsMRIYSTbnZ2dnUVZ_uGknZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the
population. They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis had
to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in mass
graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it achieves
the same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
When has International law prevented a war? You must be the dumbest liberal
on the block or a terrorist in disguise.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 07:20:43 PM |
|
|
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2padnd1jsMRIYSTbnZ2dnUVZ_uGknZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the
population. They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis had
to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in mass
graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it achieves
the same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
When has International law prevented a war? You must be the dumbest liberal
on the block or a terrorist in disguise.
It did prevent wars. But it doesn't make the headlines. Imagine; NEWS
FLASH; NO WAR STARTED YET BY THE DERANGED LEADER OF THE SUPER POWER!!!
It's unlikely to see that, but if Bush can be restrained not to start
WWIII, it will make the headlines, when, if he decides to go.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jack Granade" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 07:53:27 PM |
|
|
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3d6dndpQTsuRwyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2padnd1jsMRIYSTbnZ2dnUVZ_uGknZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling
networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the
population. They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis
had to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in
mass graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it
achieves the same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
When has International law prevented a war? You must be the dumbest
liberal on the block or a terrorist in disguise.
It did prevent wars. But it doesn't make the headlines. Imagine; NEWS
FLASH; NO WAR STARTED YET BY THE DERANGED LEADER OF THE SUPER POWER!!!
It's unlikely to see that, but if Bush can be restrained not to start
WWIII, it will make the headlines, when, if he decides to go.
I have to agree with you on Bush.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dapra" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 08:38:03 PM |
|
|
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3d6dndpQTsuRwyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2padnd1jsMRIYSTbnZ2dnUVZ_uGknZ2d@comcast.com...
Jack Granade wrote:
"dapra" <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VZSdnWoYApIDbiTbnZ2dnUVZ_h6vnZ2d@comcast.com...
BAGHDAD - U.S.-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of
Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12
others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling
networks
from Iran.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070808/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AtIIOScwO3PWmQgWNoJUAQ.s0NUE
Air strikes are a very efficient, 'clean' way to terrorize the
population. They are like video games. Push the bottom. Puff!
What a tremendous advancement from the old days of W.W.II. The Nazis
had to kill the partisans face to face, throw some dirt over them in
mass graves. No such an inconvenience for our brave pilots. And it
achieves the same results.
It is to be seen if the final judgment will be the same or not.
I do not understand your complaint. This was a successful mission and I
guess it was your side that took the casualties.
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
When has International law prevented a war? You must be the dumbest
liberal on the block or a terrorist in disguise.
It did prevent wars. But it doesn't make the headlines. Imagine; NEWS
FLASH; NO WAR STARTED YET BY THE DERANGED LEADER OF THE SUPER POWER!!!
It's unlikely to see that, but if Bush can be restrained not to start
WWIII, it will make the headlines, when, if he decides to go.
I have to agree with you on Bush.
Peace and prosperity be with you!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 09:24:53 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:25:55 -0400, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
Neocons don't care. After all, they're just Iraqis. It's not like
when those Godless terrorists kill one of OURS. (Last count, months
ago, was over 600,000. Anyone have an update?)
.
|
|
|
| User: "FACE" |
|
| Title: Re: Raids kills 32 in Baghdad |
08 Aug 2007 09:32:32 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:24:53 -0400, in alt.politics.republicans Al Klein
<rukbat@pern.invalid>, wrote
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 13:25:55 -0400, dapra <dapra1@comcast.net> wrote:
My side took casualties? No. All humanity takes the casualties, when an
occupier bombs its occupied people. International law takes the
casualties. It is probably a fatal one for international law for a long
time to come.
Neocons don't care. After all, they're just Iraqis. It's not like
when those Godless terrorists kill one of OURS. (Last count, months
ago, was over 600,000. Anyone have an update?)
At least a billion or so by now.............
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/001161.html
FACE
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
