Religions > Atheism > =?utf-8?q?What_is_the_difference_between_unit:_h_and_unit_:_=C4=A7_=3Dh/_2pi=3F?=
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"socratus" |
| Date: |
21 Jul 2006 05:27:04 AM |
| Object: |
=?utf-8?q?What_is_the_difference_between_unit:_h_and_unit_:_=C4=A7_=3Dh/_2pi=3F?= |
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : =C4=A7 =3Dh/ 2=EF=81=B0?
1=2E
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=3D1 falls
in area of absolutely black body and does not
radiate back, then =E2=80=9C terminal dead =E2=80=9C comes.
In 1900 Planck decided:
to save the quantum of light from death is possible
that quantum of light will radiate with unit h=3DEt.
Physicists say, that Planck,s unit is one: h=3D1.
Having this unit h=3D1 quantum of light flies
with speed c=3D1.
2=2E
In 1925 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck decided that
Electron has its own unit : =C4=A7 =3Dh /2pi.
Unit : =C4=A7 =3D h/ 2pi shows that electron has own
angular momentum ( own inner impulse).
Thanks to its own inner impulse electron
rotates around its diameter.
3=2E
These units do not come from any
formulas or equation.
Planck, Goudsmit , Uhlenbeck and Bohr introduced
These units in the physics intuitively.
4=2E
These units work, so they are recognized.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Now religious man can say, that an initial push ( unit)
to the particle was given by God.
And atheist can say that
the initial push ( unit) is only own internal impulse of a particle.
Probably they will argue each other.
I shall not argue with them.
.
|
|
| User: "Josef Balluch" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the difference between unit: h and unit : h =h/ 2pi? |
23 Jul 2006 12:59:03 PM |
|
|
"socratus" <israelsad@bezeqint.net> wrote in message
news:1153477624.663546.187680@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : h =h/ 2??
The ration of h to h-bar is 2pi, which simply reflects the fact that there
are 2pi radians in a full circle. Planck's Constant, h, is an expression of
angular momentum, with h being the value for a full turn, and h-bar the
value per radian.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
in area of absolutely black body and does not
radiate back, then “ terminal dead “ comes.
This is not the problem that concerned Planck. A black body does radiate.
The problem is that the classical model predicts that the energy of
radiation increases without limit as the frequency of the radiation
increases. This was called the Ultraviolet Catastrophe. This prediction is
also contrary to observation.
....
These units do not come from any
formulas or equation.
Yes. Planck's Constant is thought to be fundamental, ie: it cannot be
reduced to any simpler components.
....
Now religious man can say, that an initial push ( unit)
to the particle was given by God.
But the theist cannot demonstrate a need for this explanation.
Regards,
Josef
To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of lunacy.
-- David Brooks
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: What is the difference between unit: h and unit : ? =h/ 2pi? |
21 Jul 2006 06:03:12 AM |
|
|
On 21 Jul 2006 03:27:04 -0700, "socratus" <israelsad@bezeqint.net>
wrote:
- Refer: <1153477624.663546.187680@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : ? =h/ 2??
1.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
in area of absolutely black body and does not
radiate back, then “ terminal dead “ comes.
In 1900 Planck decided:
to save the quantum of light from death is possible
that quantum of light will radiate with unit h=Et.
Physicists say, that Planck,s unit is one: h=1.
Having this unit h=1 quantum of light flies
with speed c=1.
2.
In 1925 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck decided that
Electron has its own unit : ? =h /2pi.
Unit : ? = h/ 2pi shows that electron has own
angular momentum ( own inner impulse).
Thanks to its own inner impulse electron
rotates around its diameter.
3.
These units do not come from any
formulas or equation.
Planck, Goudsmit , Uhlenbeck and Bohr introduced
These units in the physics intuitively.
4.
These units work, so they are recognized.
================ ======================
Now religious man can say, that an initial push ( unit)
to the particle was given by God.
And atheist can say that
the initial push ( unit) is only own internal impulse of a particle.
Probably they will argue each other.
I shall not argue with them.
Please take your medication.
--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris H. Fleming" |
|
| Title: =?utf-8?q?Re:_What_is_the_difference_between_unit:_h_and_unit_:_=C4=A7_=3Dh/_2pi=3F?= |
21 Jul 2006 08:52:35 AM |
|
|
socratus wrote:
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : =C4=A7 =3Dh/ 2=EF=81=B0?
1.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=3D1 falls
in area of absolutely black body and does not
radiate back, then =E2=80=9C terminal dead =E2=80=9C comes.
In 1900 Planck decided:
to save the quantum of light from death is possible
that quantum of light will radiate with unit h=3DEt.
Physicists say, that Planck,s unit is one: h=3D1.
Having this unit h=3D1 quantum of light flies
with speed c=3D1.
2.
In 1925 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck decided that
Electron has its own unit : =C4=A7 =3Dh /2pi.
Unit : =C4=A7 =3D h/ 2pi shows that electron has own
angular momentum ( own inner impulse).
Thanks to its own inner impulse electron
rotates around its diameter.
3.
These units do not come from any
formulas or equation.
Planck, Goudsmit , Uhlenbeck and Bohr introduced
These units in the physics intuitively.
4.
These units work, so they are recognized.
The factor of 2 pi comes from a Fourier Transform.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
