Religions > Atheism > Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
10 May 2007 09:12:52 PM |
| Object: |
Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3383 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
| User: "John Mayson" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
15 May 2007 06:57:28 PM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
I don't think anyone wants anyone's daughter to die.
What is at issue here is who will pay for it and will girls have to have
this vaccination.
Having the state pick up the bill is corporate welfare at its finest.
The big pharmaceutical companies are pressuring states to pay for this
because they'll make billions. It's no mystery who wrote Texas Governor
Rick Perry a check before he announced all girls in Texas must receive
this vaccination. Perry, BTW, is one of those GOP Christians you criticize.
Generally vaccinations are required when the disease is a nuisance to
public health. The HPV virus isn't casually spread like other diseases.
The state has no reason to mandate this vaccination. If the state
decides it needs to prevent cancer then perhaps it should outlaw
tobacco? How much power should the government have in this matter?
Personally I think all girls should have this vaccination. I just don't
think the taxpayer should fund it nor should the government mandate it.
My question is, is there a medical reason to give it to sixth graders?
I think the idea is to catch all girls before they become sexually
active. If a girl didn't become active until she was in college, would
it still work if she were to receive it before college?
- --
John Mayson <john@mayson.us>
Austin, Texas, USA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGSkjo2kz4fWh3iuERAqfqAKCbuKU/l4wKjzo9BR54QU0SRUBTXQCeLxnz
+D9ans3SS8HnRoj/zs2a2nY=
=dooT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
15 May 2007 10:14:46 PM |
|
|
John Mayson <john@mayson.us> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
I don't think anyone wants anyone's daughter to die.
I think that you do not realize just how irrational and hate-filled
these religious fanatics are.
What is at issue here is who will pay for it and will girls have to have
this vaccination.
"Giving the HPV vaccine to young women could be potentially
harmful, because they may see it as a licence to engage in
premarital sex"
Bridget Maher, Family Research Council
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Mayson" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
16 May 2007 05:17:27 PM |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ray Fischer wrote:
John Mayson <john@mayson.us> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
I don't think anyone wants anyone's daughter to die.
I think that you do not realize just how irrational and hate-filled
these religious fanatics are.
I think you label anyone who disagrees with you a "religious fanatic".
I used to live in the Bible Belt. I know how these people act. But
being against tax-payer supported vaccinations doesn't make one a
"religious fanatic".
What is at issue here is who will pay for it and will girls have to have
this vaccination.
"Giving the HPV vaccine to young women could be potentially
harmful, because they may see it as a licence to engage in
premarital sex"
Bridget Maher, Family Research Council
"I support girls receiving the vaccination, but I don't believe taxpayer
money should be used to do it and the state should not force any girl to
have it."
John Mayson, USENET poster.
- --
John Mayson <john@mayson.us>
Austin, Texas, USA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGS4L32kz4fWh3iuERAohJAJ9YaWOOo5s0hgLLi85Lr/OV1gVutQCfcZZG
ST9CJDWDvTbfk4cX3AwT3Fc=
=ESep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
16 May 2007 09:12:59 PM |
|
|
John Mayson <john@mayson.us> wrote:
Ray Fischer wrote:
John Mayson <john@mayson.us> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
I don't think anyone wants anyone's daughter to die.
I think that you do not realize just how irrational and hate-filled
these religious fanatics are.
I think you label anyone who disagrees with you a "religious fanatic".
I think you're whining.
I used to live in the Bible Belt. I know how these people act. But
being against tax-payer supported vaccinations doesn't make one a
"religious fanatic".
I didn't say that it did. In fact, I wasn't even referring to you.
What is at issue here is who will pay for it and will girls have to have
this vaccination.
"Giving the HPV vaccine to young women could be potentially
harmful, because they may see it as a licence to engage in
premarital sex"
Bridget Maher, Family Research Council
"I support girls receiving the vaccination, but I don't believe taxpayer
money should be used to do it and the state should not force any girl to
have it."
John Mayson, USENET poster.
What an excellent way to completely miss the point.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
11 May 2007 05:56:19 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
11 May 2007 10:38:45 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 01:04:55 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:38:45 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 01:17:49 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:04:55 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <lb0c439jtao1hd7so9d918s5r3pivdet5c@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:38:45 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex, it just increases the
chance that they will get a STD and/or pregnant. But you may well be
right, that atheist parents are more concerned for the kid's welfare.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 11:38:32 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:04:55 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <lb0c439jtao1hd7so9d918s5r3pivdet5c@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:38:45 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
The vaccine is still available, just not required, by law. All the
atheist parents I know do teach their children that abstinence is the
best way to avoid STDS including a unwanted pregnancy. Then the kids
get the rest of the story.
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex, it just increases the
chance that they will get a STD and/or pregnant. But you may well be
right, that atheist parents are more concerned for the kid's welfare.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jaguar" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, ButChristians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 10:24:29 AM |
|
|
Robert wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:04:55 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <lb0c439jtao1hd7so9d918s5r3pivdet5c@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:38:45 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
The vaccine is still available, just not required, by law. All the
atheist parents I know do teach their children that abstinence is the
best way to avoid STDS including a unwanted pregnancy. Then the kids
get the rest of the story.
If girls do not get the vaccine young, then they are at the mercy of the sexual
history of their husbands to be even if they practice abstinence.
If this were a disease that primarily caused a lethal cancer in men, there would
be no question of a national mandatory vaccination programme.
You leave young women vulnerable to their future partner
--
Felice Schragenheim
"Jaguar"
One of the Lesbian Immortals
"I'd be satisfied with one single moment, so perfect, it would last a lifetime.
For example, this one. This one here is great. I don't want forever. I want now.
Now! Now! Now! I want loads of 'nows' and I want them til I turn old and grey"-
"Jaguar"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N12JU6-mGDs
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
14 May 2007 01:12:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 13 May 2007 15:24:29 GMT, Jaguar
<FeliceS@LesbianResistance.de> wrote:
Robert wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 13:04:55 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <lb0c439jtao1hd7so9d918s5r3pivdet5c@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 03:38:45 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:19 -0500, in alt.atheism , duke
<duckgumbo32@cox.net> in <p3t9431017mjrdgm6qdftljfh3hkdnqj0s@4ax.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007 02:12:52 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
The vaccine is still available, just not required, by law. All the
atheist parents I know do teach their children that abstinence is the
best way to avoid STDS including a unwanted pregnancy. Then the kids
get the rest of the story.
If girls do not get the vaccine young, then they are at the mercy of the sexual
history of their husbands to be even if they practice abstinence.
If this were a disease that primarily caused a lethal cancer in men, there would
be no question of a national mandatory vaccination programme.
You leave young women vulnerable to their future partner
True but those sensible parents that have their children vaccinated,
actually protect to some degree the children of those religious nuts.
By reducing the pool of those infected. If 90% of parents have their
daughters vaccinated, the incidence of cancer of the ovaries will
become a Christian woman's disease. Religious nut girls are usually
seduced by religious nut men. So the cancer will disappear in all but
RRR circles.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 05:52:31 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
it just increases the
chance that they will get a STD and/or pregnant. But you may well be
right, that atheist parents are more concerned for the kid's welfare.
Atheist kids are in trouble.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 06:20:24 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 09:04:14 AM |
|
|
On 12 May 2007 23:20:24 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
I'd put that at 100%.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 12:50:53 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
I'd put that at 100%.
I'm pretty sure than not 100% of priests are having sex with kids, but
you probably know better than do I.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 03:36:07 PM |
|
|
On 13 May 2007 17:50:53 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
I'd put that at 100%.
I'm pretty sure than not 100% of priests are having sex with kids, but
you probably know better than do I.
That answer is little to none. Improper touching was a recent problem mostly
cleared up and was centered on priests ordained in the '60's and '70's.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 06:16:46 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
rfischer@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that
abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
I'd put that at 100%.
I'm pretty sure than not 100% of priests are having sex with kids, but
you probably know better than do I.
That answer is little to none.
Now you're lying again.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
14 May 2007 05:29:07 PM |
|
|
On 13 May 2007 23:16:46 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
I'm pretty sure than not 100% of priests are having sex with kids, but
you probably know better than do I.
That answer is little to none.
Now you're lying again.
Nope - there were some US priests ordained in the 60's and 70's that formed the
majority of the problem. They are and have been weeded out and now the cream is
rising to the top.
Better luck next time, fish boy.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "bob&carole." |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 12:52:49 PM |
|
|
On May 13, 1:50=EF=BF=BDpm, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
duke =A0<duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
(Ray Fischer) wrote:
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
I'd put that at 100%.
I'm pretty sure than not 100% of priests are having sex with kids, but
you probably know better than do I.
You and your friends get what the priests miss, ray-ray......
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 09:36:29 PM |
|
|
On 12 May 2007 23:20:24 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 12 May 2007 18:17:49 GMT, Matt Silberstein
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The Texas legislature just over turned the governor's order to
inoculate school children.
Good grief - that will be forcing atheist mothers to school their kids about
abstinence.
Nice troll. But by now even your persona would know that abstinence
education does not stop kids from having sex,
Belief in God does.
Just look at all the priests who believe in God.
Belief in God stopped Earl from having sex, though. Well, SOMETHING
stopped him.
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Where and why, yang - Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
13 May 2007 09:05:02 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 May 2007 22:36:29 -0400, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote:
Belief in God stopped Earl from having sex, though. Well, SOMETHING
stopped him.
Hey, twice dead, you hitting the bottle already.
duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Schwartz" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
10 May 2007 11:52:14 PM |
|
|
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
I suppose if I'm not onboard with forcing people to put children into
car seats until the age of 25, I want children to die.
DS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
11 May 2007 12:34:16 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
I suppose if I'm not onboard with forcing people to put children into
car seats until the age of 25, I want children to die.
The correct analogy, David, is that you are preventing others from
putting seatbelts on their own children.
Now where do you stand on that?
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3383 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
11 May 2007 12:29:39 AM |
|
|
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3383 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoelKatz" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
12 May 2007 02:12:34 AM |
|
|
On May 10, 10:29 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
Next you'll decide that we should pass a law prohibiting children from
skiing. After all, it's risky and has no real measurable benefit for
the vast majority of children. You will claim that those who oppose
your ban "want our daughters to die".
You know what? I think most parents love their children, have their
best interests at heart, and are in a much better position than you to
decide what medical care they should receive.
That said, the argument that HPV vaccinations will encourage young
women to be more sexually active is about as bizarre and twisted as
the argument that because the vaccine is good it should be forced on
everyone. So I give both sides a "you're out of your mind" and "keep
your filthy hands away from my kids".
DS
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TheLetterK" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
11 May 2007 09:49:42 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
I'd oppose it on the grounds that it's mandating medical treatment
without the consent of parents.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
15 May 2007 09:50:55 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:49:42 -0400, TheLetterK <none@none.net> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
I'd oppose it on the grounds that it's mandating medical treatment
without the consent of parents.
So you think Jehovah Witness' should be allowed to be bled to death?
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3400 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cactus" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
11 May 2007 10:44:47 AM |
|
|
TheLetterK wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
I'd oppose it on the grounds that it's mandating medical treatment
without the consent of parents.
Just like polio vaccines and the other childhood immunizations.
This is sick. Unfortunately there is no vaccine against libertarian or
fundamentalist-inspired stupidity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughters to Die |
11 May 2007 12:36:02 PM |
|
|
"cactus" <bm1@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:Pb01i.930$y_7.89@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
TheLetterK wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
I'd oppose it on the grounds that it's mandating medical treatment
without the consent of parents.
Just like polio vaccines and the other childhood immunizations.
Wrong.
HPV isn't an airborne virus.
This is sick. Unfortunately there is no vaccine against libertarian or
fundamentalist-inspired stupidity.
Your agenda to screw underage females and your agenda to steal from the
taxpayers to provide you with medical care are what I see.
Have you anything other than insults and statements of error to present?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TheLetterK" |
|
| Title: Re: Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Christians Want Our Daughtersto Die |
11 May 2007 03:28:24 PM |
|
|
cactus wrote:
TheLetterK wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c) wrote:
On 10 May 2007 21:52:14 -0700, David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
wrote:
On May 10, 7:12 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
Yep, that vaunted GOP Christian morality
http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-05-10-voa61.cfm
Two studies appearing this week in the New England Journal of Medicine
confirm that a new vaccine is effective in preventing cervical cancer,
a disease that kills almost 300,000 women around the world each year.
The argument and "evidence" you posted could equally well support the
titled. "Vaccine Prevents Cervical Cancer, But Jews Want Our Daughters
to Die". You seem to have forgotten to defend or even argue for your
entire premise.
Seeing as how you been living under a neocon cave for the past few
years, I guess I'll just have to spell it out for you.
http://www.now.org/issues/health/122205hpvvaccine.html
A new vaccine that protects women against cancer-causing strains of
the human papilloma virus (HPV) is at the center of yet another
controversy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although it is
generally accepted that the vaccine is effective against the most
dangerous strains of HPV, which are responsible for about 70 percent
of all cases of cervical cancer, vaccine opponents claim that making
it a regular part of childrens' vaccine protocol would encourage young
women to be more sexually active. Women's health advocates are urging
that it become part of the regimen of pre-puberty vaccines, since HPV
is spread primarily through sexual contact. The FDA will be meeting in
early 2006 to make final determination on the vaccine's availability.
National Organization for Women President Kim Gandy condemned
religious and political extremists for opposing a vaccine that will
eliminate most cases of cervical cancer. "I lost my grandmother to
cervical cancer, and have two daughters who might be spared that fate
with this vaccine. Opposing an effective vaccine that would save
hundreds of thousands of women's lives with the vacuous assertion that
it would lead to promiscuity is inexcusable," Gandy said.
I'd oppose it on the grounds that it's mandating medical treatment
without the consent of parents.
Just like polio vaccines and the other childhood immunizations.
This is sick. Unfortunately there is no vaccine against libertarian or
fundamentalist-inspired stupidity.
Right, it's "stupid" to give people a choice on the matter. It's not
like I'm advocating that people prevent this treatment--merely that it
should not be mandatory. If it's so great and carries few risks, why
wouldn't people take you up on the offer?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
