"jw

x-no-archive: yes
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:26:27 -0400, "Doc: The
absent-minded-professor!" <Doc@Watson.yup> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:46 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> sez the following funny stuff:

jw started going for the no archive option after he got caught trolling for
incest porno.
--

True again......he was using the pathetic excuse 'he's a published
author and has to protect his copyright'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL!
But I hear now the old boy claims to be 'a trained investigative
reporter'!!! BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

By the way, psycho, suppose you prove I am NOT a trained investigative
reporter.

jw

Stupid,
Every post from you is proof to most.

This absurd ranting is called insane jealousy. Pure, unmitigated,
insane jealousy.
And I'll match the paychecks I have been paid for my writing to
Elaine's ANY day.
Did Elaine ever earn $250 grand in a year for her writing?
I did!

I have the credentials. All you have is a big mouth!
jw

x-no-archive: yes
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:46 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

<yumikodoe@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113747592.093373.38040@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

An Idiot Wrote:

The fact that I don't want my posts archived might lead some to
believe I have things to hide. OTOH, the very obvious copyright might
indicate other reasons to those not caught up in a myriad of
conspiracy theories.

You are an idiot. That's why you are so paranoid that you don't want
your posts archived. You are an idiot. Have you been one all your
life or just recently? Were you an idiot before you began posting porn
or just after?

jw started going for the no archive option after he got caught trolling for
incest porno.

Prove it, you lying sack of fecal matter!

I can prove I didn't.

jw

x-no-archive: yes
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:46 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

<yumikodoe@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1113747592.093373.38040@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

An Idiot Wrote:

The fact that I don't want my posts archived might lead
some to believe I have things to hide. OTOH, the very
obvious copyright might indicate other reasons to those
not caught up in a myriad of conspiracy theories.

You are an idiot. That's why you are so paranoid that you
don't want your posts archived. You are an idiot. Have you
been one all your life or just recently? Were you an idiot
before you began posting porn or just after?

jw started going for the no archive option after he got caught
trolling for incest porno.

Prove it, you lying sack of fecal matter!

I can prove I didn't.

jw

x-no-archive: yes
On 17 Apr 2005 07:19:52 -0700,

An Idiot Wrote:

The fact that I don't want my posts archived might lead some to
believe I have things to hide. OTOH, the very obvious copyright might
indicate other reasons to those not caught up in a myriad of
conspiracy theories.

You are an idiot. That's why you are so paranoid that you don't want
your posts archived. You are an idiot. Have you been one all your
life or just recently? Were you an idiot before you began posting porn
or just after?

Some immature folk call erotic literature "porn". Adults call it
"erotic literature", the kind Shakespeare was known for. The kind Gore
Vidal wrote. And did you forget Lolita?

My, my, if you pulled your head out long enough to count the erotic
scenes in literature today, including a recent "Best Film" at the
Oscars, "Snow Falling on Cedars."

Even the Bible has its own internal book of erotica, called "Songs" or
"Song of Solomon."

Only the most immature of children object to good erotic fiction.
Whether mine is/ was good is left to its audience.

You are likely one of those drones who picketed the theaters that
showed "Last Tango In Paris".

Remember the 70s MAJOR European hit,"I am Curious Yellow?"

Likely you are merely jealous that you are not a writer, that YOU have
never made a small fortune documenting computers and the like..

That's called "sour grapes" by the way.

jw

Color me cynical. I was a cop.

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:19:05 -0700, jw wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 10:30:27 -0700, Carson West
<carson.west@coxspambox.net> wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 05:08:33 -0700, jw wrote:

x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:08:46 -0500,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

[Snip]

And then of course, we have the FACT that you are
such a coward that you use a pseudonym, and a re mailer.

Does the one necessarily lead to the other? It might,
just as the idea that one doesn't want his posts archived
might lead one to believe the "FACT" that the writer might
not want some of his posts to be found.

The fact that I don't want my posts archived might lead some
to believe I have things to hide.

Color me cynical.

quite nicely,

standards are not necessarily binding or objective.

OTOH, the very obvious copyright might indicate other
reasons to those not caught up in a myriad of conspiracy
theories.

Do you know what a "conspiracy theory" is?

But go ahead, John, tell me your "other reasons."

Me? I have a lot of things that indicate that one
might be a coward. I tend to think that someone who throws
out empty challenges and claims to have an Abrams (as
an illustration, of course) to an Uzi but still disappears
after his posts are refuted, after which he returns a week
or two later and pretends that none of those discussions
ever happened, might also be a coward.

Accuse away. I have also explained the above behavior...

When and where?

...which might seem "bizarre" to the unenlightened...

Explain my lack of enlightenment.

...but which fits very well with my particular mental
impairment (I won't bore you with all that. You CLEARLY
prefer your conjecture and fantasies to real facts, or
you'd ask for facts).

It seems that asking for facts is precisely what I'm doing.

certainly invited to rebut what I'm writing here--nothing is stopping you.

Then he pretty much carries himself in the same fashion
as before he retreated from the group(s). It's a sad
commentary on the any number of points, not the least of
which are the psychological states and the intellectual
wherewithall of the person who does things like that.

And then there are the ignorant who accuse, who don't bother
to ask for any clarification on issues which might appear
confusing on the surface, but which might have reasonable,
satisfactory explanations.

Then provide them.

(I might bother to explain, but AGAIN, you show no interest
in anything other than your conjecture)

Prove it.

vitriol and I slapped you down.

expect that I'm certainly not going to feel sorry for you.

discussion is another matter.

x-no-archive: yes
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:08:46 -0500,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.dirt.cheap.llc wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the group)

In <1113555182.933bd2f7c038b628c89a70513f115212@teranews>, on 04/15/05
at 04:52 AM, ujb <ujb@bigfoot.com> said:


I do beleive your list is incomplete ujb.

"jw

x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:10:03 -0400, mike@POSTTOGROUP.invalid (Mike
Rosenberg) wrote:
copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the
group)

snip

Nor have I ever had any issue with posting under my real name.

You should have, you're an embarrassment.

If you think so, try not reading my posts for ... let's say.. the next 20
years.

I don't embarrass myself, and I'm the only one I'm concerned with. Kindly

don't attempt to impose your obvious feelings of inferiority on others.

jw

I have
never been and am not now ashamed of my posts.

That's why he flys the yellow ensign.

Liar.

Then why this list of handles?

If I wanted you to know, if there was any reason to tell you, you'd know.

Motivate me to explain myself to you, you drooling imbecile.

Thus far, you have only earned my back when I break wind.

jw

jaywest@hotmail.com
john_seeks@hotmail.com
j-d5@worldnet.att.net
jon_wetly@yohoo.com
johnthebeloved3@yahoo.com
angrydad@hotmail.com
prophet_jon@hotmail.com
bobwite@oo.com
jo@yohoo.com
john_47@yahoo.com

My my, you ARE obsessed! Did you miss ANY ???

You even listed a few that aren't me!

LOL!!!

jw

Luke
Doctor Luke
Baton rouge

Seems as he loves hotmail though, did he ever post his porn through yahoo?

walksalone who has used the same moniker other than one time, & posting
names, other than the spam trap, always contain his name. Since 95.

I don't embarrass myself,

and I'm the only one I'm concerned with.