"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:te6q62h68nv31cogl4agdjinjs6std6jil@4ax.com...

On Thu, 18 May 2006 16:17:05 -0500, "Reasoned Insanity"
<mintclovers@@yahoo.com> wrote:

"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:btko62pcnf69s800q9v8uh50890m20t05e@4ax.com...

Morons like "Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" can cry about not having a
job, but the simple fact is that the immigranst work harder.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0501.laufer.html

And even when native workers are interested in the jobs he's offering,
Elliott simply prefers to hire Mexicans instead of the available
locals. "We had whiteys that could tell you every basketball game in
the last ten years: who won, who played, scores. But they couldn't
count six 'baccer plants in one pile at any one time. They was 30
workers out of Owensboro here and there wasn't any of 'em could drive
a stick shift. Grown men."

Even if this is true, just because they were mexican doesn't mean they
were
illegal. Though it would be nice to force a 2 year military term on anyone
wanting to be part of this great country so long as they meet the age
requirements. If they want to live in this country, they should be willing
to die for it as I am. If even half the illegals here met those
requirements,

So why aren't you in Iraq? Instead of leeching off unemployment
checks, and posting during working hours, why aren't you signing up
for the Army?

Unless you have anything of substance besides ad hominems to contribute you
should shut up. It would be cool if you knocked off the unfounded
accusations as well.

imagine the look on terrorists faces when they all of a sudden have 6
million more soldiers coming after them.

Except they actually have jobs already, unlike you.

Terrorists have jobs? Oh yeah, I forgot, you are the kind of guy to hire
them. Why not get out of America traitor.

Yang, you are gonna give yourself a stroke at the rate you are going.

Discuss, not rave and rant------------remember?

Lighten up, big fella.

Now, before you call me a racist-------it's true in that
I would not want my daughter to cross-marry.

Nonetheless, am cordial to everyone--regardless
of race, ethnicity, etc.

Yang, you are gonna give yourself a stroke at the rate you are going.

Discuss, not rave and rant------------remember?

Lighten up, big fella.

Now, before you call me a racist-------it's true in that
I would not want my daughter to cross-marry.

Nonetheless, am cordial to everyone--regardless
of race, ethnicity, etc.

stoney wrote:

On 18 May 2006 10:52:22 -0700, "Kate"
<Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in alt.atheism

(shrug) It sounds like yet another employer that doesn't have
high
enough salaries to hire competant workers and wants to be able
to break
the law, so he doesn't have to.

Pay for brains, get brains. Pay crap - get crap. Or you have
to
import low cost brains from over the border. Once they get
their
papers with the amnesty program, you really think they will
settle for
crap pay any more?

It's not rocket science.

Eh? According to the article, Mr. Elliot is complying with
the law.

Oh there you go confounding the bigots with *FACTS* again!

--
L'Chaim

Miriam

In the beginning
the Word already was.

stoney wrote:

On 18 May 2006 10:52:22 -0700, "Kate" <Kate@twoangryliberals.com> wrote
in alt.atheism

(shrug) It sounds like yet another employer that doesn't have high
enough salaries to hire competant workers and wants to be able to break
the law, so he doesn't have to.

Pay for brains, get brains. Pay crap - get crap. Or you have to
import low cost brains from over the border. Once they get their
papers with the amnesty program, you really think they will settle for
crap pay any more?

It's not rocket science.

Eh? According to the article, Mr. Elliot is complying with the law.

Oh there you go confounding the bigots with *FACTS* again!

In article <pb6q625dnirnjq9g66g6i0nk9hbha68q77@4ax.com>, h.c
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:

On Thu, 18 May 2006 17:34:12 -0400, Sean C
<redhawk@burnspammersalive.com> wrote:

Am I the only one who has a problem with an employer openly refusing to
hire "whitey?"

The guy is a 4th generation Kentucky farmer, I doubt he's doing it out
of racial dsicrimination against his own ethnicity.

It is quite possible for someone to engage in racial discrimination
against his own ethnicity without actually being a racist. It is the
behavior, not the attitude behind it, that counts. This guy has openly
announced his intention not to hire whites. Regardless of his reasons,
he is in violation of the law.

Something about workers that demand better pay and
better working conditions or they walk seems to bother guys like this.

If he needs Mexicans to do his work, let him move his "baccer" farm to
Mexico. Let him sell his crop there, too.

So it's better to offshore a business than to have it here?

Yes, so long as we also include the provision that whatever he makes
offshore can't be sold here, which is what we should do with all
offshore operations.

The farm he leaves behind can be sold to an
American who is willing to hire Americans or legal immigrants at living
wages under proper working conditions. There is simply no way the
American worker can compete with Mexicans on their own turf or
illegally imported into this country to work as virtual slaves under
oppressive conditions. We don't have enough jobs or housing for
Americans, who have to come first before we can solve Mexico's
problems.