WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING



 Religions > Atheism > WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Matt"
Date: 15 Jan 2008 07:43:29 AM
Object: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING
Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be considerned
"NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year old little girl?
David Moss seems to believe that because "cave men did it" (yet he sights
no proof that cave men had sex with 6 year old little girls), that it MUST
be natural and OK to do!
Here is what David Moss is defending:
"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is
still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having
intercourse with a girl younger than nine, while other sexual acts such as
foreplay, rubbing, and kissing are allowed. A man having intercourse with a
girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an
infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however,
is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this
girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is
not permitted to marry the girl's sister."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_children
Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom
An English translation of this wonderful work can be purchased on
Amazon.com:
Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political, Philosophic, Social and Religious
with a special introduction by Clive Irving, ISBN number 0-553-14032-9
http://www.amazon.com/Sayings-Ayatollah-Khomeini-Political-
Philosophical/dp/0553140329
.

User: "regn.pickford"

Title: Re: WARNING!subject headers are not facts 15 Jan 2008 11:03:48 PM
"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be considerned
"NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have, Baylor.
It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you binned
into killfiles.
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: WARNING!subject headers are not facts 16 Jan 2008 12:19:11 AM
"regn.pickford" <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote in
news:478d9033@news.comindico.com.au:


"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have,
Baylor.

It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you
binned into killfiles.

To each his own. This person claims to work with abused children, and at
the same time defends pedophilia. I hope his superiors read these threads
on child molestation.
.
User: "regn.pickford"

Title: Re: WARNING!subject headers are not facts 16 Jan 2008 02:06:16 AM
"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26ED4F88A7mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

"regn.pickford" <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote in
news:478d9033@news.comindico.com.au:


"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have,
Baylor.

It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you
binned into killfiles.


To each his own. This person claims to work with abused children, and at
the same time defends pedophilia. I hope his superiors read these threads
on child molestation.

If you read what he wrote you will find you have misunderstood.
google "age of consent"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
[quote start]
The age of consent varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.[1] The
median
seems to range from 16 to 18 years, but laws stating ages ranging from 12
to 21
do exist. In many jurisdictions, age of consent is interpreted to mean
mental or
functional age
[quote fin]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_monarchy_records#Youngest
[selected quotes start]
The youngest monarch to marry was Henry IV who married Mary de Bohun when
he was 13 years old. The youngest queen at the time of her marriage was Mary
II
who was 15 years 188 days old when she married William III in 1677
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The youngest Queen Consort was Isabella of Valois, second wife of Richard
II, aged
6 years 11 months when she became queen in 1396.
[selected quotes fin]
b.t.w. Queen Consort = wife of a ruling King.
http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm
http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm
then check historical marriage before Christianity in this area
of Asian Pacific (40 years ago in some places) and you'll
find plenty of 9 years and younger.
.
User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: Age of consent 16 Jan 2008 03:41:05 AM
In article <478dbaf8@news.comindico.com.au>,

writes...


"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26ED4F88A7mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

"regn.pickford" <

> wrote in
news:478d9033@news.comindico.com.au:


"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have,
Baylor.

It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you
binned into killfiles.


To each his own. This person claims to work with abused children, and at
the same time defends pedophilia. I hope his superiors read these threads
on child molestation.


If you read what he wrote you will find you have misunderstood.

google "age of consent"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

[quote start]
The age of consent varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.[1] The
median
seems to range from 16 to 18 years, but laws stating ages ranging from 12
to 21
do exist. In many jurisdictions, age of consent is interpreted to mean
mental or
functional age
[quote fin]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_monarchy_records#Youngest

[selected quotes start]
The youngest monarch to marry was Henry IV who married Mary de Bohun when
he was 13 years old. The youngest queen at the time of her marriage was Mary
II
who was 15 years 188 days old when she married William III in 1677

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The youngest Queen Consort was Isabella of Valois, second wife of Richard
II, aged

6 years 11 months when she became queen in 1396.

[selected quotes fin]

b.t.w. Queen Consort = wife of a ruling King.



http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm


then check historical marriage before Christianity in this area
of Asian Pacific (40 years ago in some places) and you'll
find plenty of 9 years and younger.

This is true.
Matt finds it difficult to distinguish between the history lesson I
delivered and my own views on the age of consent. I have not actually
expressed my own views on the topic until now.
My belief is that the age of consent for sexual intercourse should be 16
years and one day for both males and females. I also believe the
tradition of consummating a marriage in order to render it valid is
outdated and should be discarded. This means that, although the court
should be able to grant an application for marriage involving a person
below the age of 18 for cultural reasons, there ought to be no excuse
for anyone to have sex with a person under the age of 16.
Why 16 years and one day?
Stops some people getting carried away at birthday parties.
Why 16 and not 15?
To give school leavers one year of legal protection while they gain
wisdom about how the adult workplace works and the pressures that can be
brought to bear through power relationships.
Does anyone have any better suggestions?
--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.


User: "B J Foster"

Title: Re: WARNING!subject headers are not facts 16 Jan 2008 06:47:48 AM
Matt wrote:

"regn.pickford" <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote in
news:478d9033@news.comindico.com.au:

"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have,
Baylor.

It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you
binned into killfiles.


To each his own. This person claims to work with abused children, and at
the same time defends pedophilia. I hope his superiors read these threads
on child molestation.

Where did he defend paedophilia?
If he sues the ***** out of you, which you richly deserve, intellectual
disability is a credible defence
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 16 Jan 2008 09:12:20 AM
B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:478dfd19$0$31016$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:

Matt wrote:

"regn.pickford" <regn@mysoul.cop.au> wrote in
news:478d9033@news.comindico.com.au:

"Matt" <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6
year old little girl?

It is a reckless and crude distortion to make the claims you have,
Baylor.

It's silly bugger crap like this abusive post of yours that gets you
binned into killfiles.


To each his own. This person claims to work with abused children, and
at the same time defends pedophilia. I hope his superiors read these
threads on child molestation.


Where did he defend paedophilia?

I posted a thread in alt.religion.islam "quoting" both The Prophet
Mohammed and then the Supreme Spiritual Leader of Iran - the same
passage as in the original post of this thread - and he goes off calling
me a neo-nazi and goes into some lame attempt at apologetics insinuating
that pedophelia is somehow "normal" and that Christianity condones
pedophelia.
His absurd logic seems to dictate that if a Christian commits a crime,
the crime itself must be condoned by Chrsitianity. I challenged him to
show me where Jesus (the founder of Christianity), or any of his
Apostles had written condoning marriage to 6-year-olds, or as in the
case of Khomeini, condoning sexual molestation of infants.

If he sues the ***** out of you, which you richly deserve, intellectual
disability is a credible defence

I think he'd have to prove that his calling me a neo-nazi was more
reasonable than me calling him a pedohile; under the circumstances, odds
are, the jury would agree with me.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 16 Jan 2008 04:58:04 PM
Matt ....:

I posted a thread in alt.religion.islam "quoting" both The Prophet
Mohammed and then the Supreme Spiritual Leader of Iran - the same
passage as in the original post of this thread -

You did post your verbal garbage with the full intent on stirring *****
in alt.religion.islam, uk.politics.misc, can.politics,
aus.religion.islam, aus.politics, alt.atheism, alt.talk.royalty,
nz.politics.
This makes you an arrogant spammer and troll. You are obviously not
interested in discussion, only in trading insults and annoying
everyone.

and he goes off calling
me a neo-nazi ......

Which you probably are, if not in well formulated intent than in
content and methodology for sure.

and goes into some lame attempt at apologetics insinuating
that pedophelia is somehow "normal" and that Christianity condones
pedophelia.

No he does not. He states fact about human history. If you don't like
this, it is your problem.

His absurd logic seems to dictate that if a Christian commits a crime,
the crime itself must be condoned by Chrsitianity.

Interestingly you apply similar constructs to support your pointed
drivel about the Muslims.

I challenged him to
show me where Jesus (the founder of Christianity), or any of his
Apostles had written condoning marriage to 6-year-olds, or as in the
case of Khomeini, condoning sexual molestation of infants.

The Bible (new and old Testament) stays silent on moralizing about
"pedophilia", which is no surprise since this whole concept is a
fairly recent taboo in human history.

If he sues the ***** out of you, which you richly deserve, intellectual
disability is a credible defence


I think he'd have to prove that his calling me a neo-nazi was more
reasonable than me calling him a pedohile; under the circumstances, odds
are, the jury would agree with me.

Tough cookie. You are wrong again.
In any case your Usenet credibility is in tatters now. In alt.atheism
they'll pick your feathers one by one if you don't desist.
Do yourself and us a favor and ***** permanently.
Ta.
O.
.

User: "B J Foster"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 16 Jan 2008 04:04:57 PM
Matt wrote:

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:478dfd19$0$31016$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au:

....


If he sues the ***** out of you, which you richly deserve, intellectual
disability is a credible defence


I think he'd have to prove that his calling me a neo-nazi was more
reasonable than me calling him a pedohile; under the circumstances, odds
are, the jury would agree with me.

No he won't
.





User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: WARNING! Matthew Baylor Is A Liar! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 08:25:51 AM
In article <Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be considerned
"NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year old little girl?

Can you imagine that it was ever acceptable to post unfounded lies about
someone in the title of an article Mr Baylor?
Just because I made you feel inferior by posting a few facts about
sexual mores down the ages is no reason to start making things up.
If you find anything inaccurate within the material I posted, lets hear
about it.
Until then, jam it.
--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.
User: "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss, muslim apologist, Is A Liar! WARNING 17 Jan 2008 10:11:55 AM
"Arthur Brain" <arthur_brain1@yahoo.co.uk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:f209e176-0b15-4606-933e-a318850cd271@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...


You posted lies in defence of a culture of paedophilia.

Contrary to your dishonest statement, in our 2,300-year-old romano-
christian culture, the age of 12 has been considered a bare minimum
for legal consent.

The ayatollah Khomeini recommended sex with infants, and this
disgusting teaching springs straight from the acts of the muslim
prophet, mohammed, who was a paedophile - and you are defending the
culture that spawned Khomeini's revolting rulings.

You may have realized that I basically stopped talking to him a longer time
ago.
Not that I weren't able to decompose his nonsense. >.)
I find it simply too tiring, boring etc pp (you name it) and below my
dignity to keep on playing along his ever-the-same mendacious rhetorics
cabal game.
Have you read the chapter of Mein Kampf where the author describes the
eternal acting patterns of the jews, as he experienced them? He might as
well have described David Mos(e)s. >.)
But you're right, that doesn't mean that you and others - and me
occasionally, too - shouldn't kick his arse, when there is a good occasion
for it.
--
Proudly introducing the free speech concept to german/european politicians &
jurists. >.)
'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.'
.

User: "Michael Laudahn eOpposition"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 03:52:07 PM
"David Moss" <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:MPG.21f75f60423bb07e98afa9@news.bigpond.com...


Can you imagine that it was ever acceptable to post unfounded lies about
someone in the title of an article Mr Baylor?

Just because I made you feel inferior by posting a few facts about
sexual mores down the ages is no reason to start making things up.

If you find anything inaccurate within the material I posted, lets hear
about it.

Until then, jam it.


How does it taste to swallow one's own medicine?
--
Proudly introducing the free speech concept to german/european politicians &
jurists. >.)
'Freedom of speech - use it or lose it.'
.
User: "B J Foster"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 03:57:33 PM
Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote:



How does it taste to swallow one's own medicine?

You been wanking again, Nazi boy?
.


User: "Matt"

Title: Re: WARNING! Matthew Baylor Is A Liar! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 09:58:23 AM
David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f75f60423bb07e98afa9@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?


Can you imagine that it was ever acceptable to post unfounded lies
about someone in the title of an article Mr Baylor?

First off, you called me a "neo-nazi" for a post that merely QUOTED a
Bukhari Hadith and a passage from a book by Ayatollah Khomeini. I
believe "normal" person who read that Hadith or the quote from Khomeini
regarding child molestation would be apalled, yet you, in defense of
such pratices, not only tried to justify the behavior, you accused me of
being a "neo-nazi" for merely posting the quotes!
I believe any reasonable person can clearly see that my accusation
against you was very well founded, and that in fact it is you posting
unfounded lies.

Just because I made you feel inferior by posting a few facts about
sexual mores down the ages is no reason to start making things up.

My posts were direct quotes from the Hadith, and direct quotes from
Khomeini with links to Wikipedia and Amazon.com where his book could be
purchased.
Your so-called "facts" are without reference:
"when the Koran was written girls even younger than nine were fair game
for Christians"
Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was written
hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles advocate
52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children? Jesus said "It is
better for a man to tie a millstone around his neck and cast it into the
sea than to harm one of these little ones".
You are truly a sick man.
My point in posting the Hadith along side the quote from Ayatollah
Khomeini was to illustrate that modern Islam seeks to impose the beliefs
of a sick pedophile barbarian warlord from the 7th century.

If you find anything inaccurate within the material I posted, lets
hear about it.

Aside from you attempts to justify sex with children, your information
regarding Iran is incorrect and misleading, you seem to think that
before the "new law" was passed, 9 year olds often got married WIHTOUT
thier parents consent! (you are a TARD!)
To this day in Iran, a man can marry a BABY with the parents consent -
there is no legal age for marriage (see the above ruling by Khomeni),
the new law only deals with when girls can get married WITHOUT CONSENT
of the parents here are the facts:
Tehran - Iranian authorities have approved a law to raise the age at
which girls can get married without their parents' consent to 13 from
nine and for boys to 15 from 14, newspapers said on Sunday.
The decision by Iran's Expediency Council arbitration body watered down
a bill passed by the reformist-dominated parliament in 2000 which tried
to raise the age of consent to 15 for girls and 18 for boys to cut
teenage marriages and ease criticism of Iran's human rights record.
That bill was vetoed by the Guardian Council, a 12-man body dominated by
conservative clerics whose job it is to ensure legislation conforms to
Islamic Sharia law.
Iran's clerical establishment has promoted marriage as a means to combat
what it calls immorality amongst youth.
The Expediency Council is charged with arbitrating in disputes between
parliament and the Guardian Council.
The arbitration body ruling does not change the age at which children
can get married - nine for girls and 14 for boys - but says girls below
the age of 13 and boys younger than 15 need their parents' permission
and the approval of a "righteous court".
Reformists said the new law did not protect children since most of those
who married at a young age did so under pressure from their parents.
European Union countries have pointed to the low legal age of marriage
in Iran as an example of its poor human rights.
http://www.iol.co.za/?click_id=3&art_id=qw1024837201529B265&set_id=1
ie Irans "new law' does nothing at all.
.
User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: WARNING! Matthew Baylor Is A Liar! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 12:29:03 PM
In article <Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was written
hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles advocate
52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children?

The law in the Bible is proscriptive, it presumes that any activity,
which is not expressly forbidden, is presumed to be legal. The
antithesis of this is prescriptive law, which presumes that any thing
not specifically authorized or exempted, is illegal.
As such it is up to you to show where in the Bible it states that it is
illegal to have sex with children younger than nine, or indeed
proscribes any lower age limit on sexual intercourse.
You may also consider the fact most Christian scholars believe Mary was
around 13 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus. She was married
off to Joseph, a considerably older man, before she gave birth.
According to Hebrew scripts the normal age of betrothal for girls at
that time was 12 and a half.
Now it must be realised that once a girl was betrothed in that time, she
was considered to be owned by her husband. Therefore it was not unusual
for the husband to have sex with his betrothed wife. Mary's pregnancy
was not considered unusual or unexpected by anyone but Joseph.
So now we have set a conventional lower limit for consent at 12 years
and 6 months. It gets worse however:
Numbers 31:17-18
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,
18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
Basically kill all the women over 12 years of age and save the rest for
the after-invasion orgy.
How young would they take them however?
You won't see that in the Bible, but a peep into the Torah will make
your stomach turn if the story of Mohammed and his nine year old wife
makes you queasy:
M.5:4 A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse.
And if a levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her.
....
If she is younger than that [age], [intercourse with her] is like
putting a finger in an eye.
(The Halakhah: An Encyclopaedia of the Law of Judaism, Jacob Neusner, p.
313)
So, Moses urged his army to rape the entire female population between
the ages of zero and 12, and priests were allowed to pork three year old
girls.
I bet you didn't know that about Christianity and Judaism before you
started mouthing off about Muslims.
--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss is a Pedophle AND a Neo-Nazi! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 01:17:18 PM
David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f79837efb1ad5098afae@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was
written hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles
advocate 52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children?


First off I wonder if your "neo-nazi" reference was really a reference
to yourself, since you are now the one attacking Jews. Since you seem to
insist on comparing modern day pratices of Muslims to cave men who lived
3500 years ago - ok lets compare:

The law in the Bible is proscriptive, it presumes that any activity,
which is not expressly forbidden, is presumed to be legal. The
antithesis of this is prescriptive law, which presumes that any thing
not specifically authorized or exempted, is illegal.

Since you are citing the Old Testament, specificlly the Torah as your
authority, let us first recognize that this covers a period of time
before Israel existed, 3500 years ago, when the tribe of the Hebrews
were living in the wilderness in caves due to a judgment against them by
God. It is written that generation was cursed by God and had to live in
the wilderness for 40 years, until the entire generation had died. The
average life expectancy at that time was about 35 years, since every one
of them died in the 40 years.

As such it is up to you to show where in the Bible it states that it
is illegal to have sex with children younger than nine, or indeed
proscribes any lower age limit on sexual intercourse.

Christians are not Jews, and do not follow the law of Moses and I am no
expert on Jewish customs and laws. Those that are experts that I have
read tell me there is an interpretation of the Torah called the Talmud
in which it states that girls cannot be married until puberty. I tend to
believe them over you (considering your record thus far).

You may also consider the fact most Christian scholars believe Mary
was around 13 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus. She was
married off to Joseph, a considerably older man, before she gave
birth. According to Hebrew scripts the normal age of betrothal for
girls at that time was 12 and a half.

Again, at that time, with life expectancies what they were, and even by
todays standards, 13 is one hell of a long ways from 6 - or as Khomeini
described, molesting babys that are still being breast fed!

Now it must be realised that once a girl was betrothed in that time,
she was considered to be owned by her husband. Therefore it was not
unusual for the husband to have sex with his betrothed wife. Mary's
pregnancy was not considered unusual or unexpected by anyone but
Joseph.

So now we have set a conventional lower limit for consent at 12 years
and 6 months. It gets worse however:

Numbers 31:17-18
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a
man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a
man.

Basically kill all the women over 12 years of age and save the rest
for the after-invasion orgy.

You really are a sick ***** arent you? "After invasion orgy?" Is that
what you picture in your demented mind? Again, we are talking about a
time when people lived in tribes and in caves, and a time when these
tribes were in continual blood fueds with one another, a time when
survival of your tribe depended on the fear of your tribe by other
tribes... and you want to use examples of cave men - from a time that is
nearly pre-historic to justify modern day pedophelia?

How young would they take them however?
You won't see that in the Bible, but a peep into the Torah will make
your stomach turn if the story of Mohammed and his nine year old wife
makes you queasy:

WHO SOUNDS LIKE A NEO-NAZI NOW - LOL!!
What does what cave men did 3500 years ago have to do with didling babys
in the modern era?

M.5:4 A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse.
And if a levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her.
...
If she is younger than that [age], [intercourse with her] is like
putting a finger in an eye.
(The Halakhah: An Encyclopaedia of the Law of Judaism, Jacob Neusner,
p. 313)

So, Moses urged his army to rape the entire female population between
the ages of zero and 12, and priests were allowed to pork three year
old girls.

I bet you didn't know that about Christianity and Judaism before you
started mouthing off about Muslims.


I was going to clip the above, but I think it should be saved for
posterity, - you obviously ARE a neo-nazi!
The above has NOTHING to do with Christianity and sounds like it was
pasted from a neo-nazi website! I did a word-search and all I got for
the above quote, and all I get are neo-nazi websites!
For the record, again, Jesus said of children: "Better that a man tie a
millstone around his neck and cast it into the sea than to harm one of
these little ones"
Jesus is the founder of Christianity, not Moses, not Mohammed or Buddah.
David Moss is a pedophile and a neo-nazi!
Your true colors show through David, as any intelligent reader can see
from this exchange!
.
User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss is a Pedophle AND a Neo-Nazi! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 07:49:30 PM
In article <Xns9A267D150EAAAmattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f79837efb1ad5098afae@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was
written hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles
advocate 52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children?



First off I wonder if your "neo-nazi" reference was really a reference
to yourself, since you are now the one attacking Jews.

Thats OK Matt. In psychology, psychological projection (or projection
bias) is a defense mechanism in which one attributes to others one=3Fs own
unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions. It is not really
surprising you should try to project your own undesirable
characteristics onto me. If it makes you feel better, keep doing it.
Don't confuse your own personal dissonance reducing strategies with the
truth however.

Since you seem to
insist on comparing modern day pratices of Muslims to cave men who lived
3500 years ago - ok lets compare:

You seem to be backpedaling from your previous position about ancient
social mores being attributable to modern societies. Good boy. You can
learn!

The law in the Bible is proscriptive, it presumes that any activity,
which is not expressly forbidden, is presumed to be legal. The
antithesis of this is prescriptive law, which presumes that any thing
not specifically authorized or exempted, is illegal.


Since you are citing the Old Testament, specificlly the Torah as your
authority, let us first recognize that this covers a period of time
before Israel existed, 3500 years ago, when the tribe of the Hebrews
were living in the wilderness in caves due to a judgment against them by
God. It is written that generation was cursed by God and had to live in
the wilderness for 40 years, until the entire generation had died. The
average life expectancy at that time was about 35 years, since every one
of them died in the 40 years.

And you think the society at the time the Koran was written down was not
just as tribal, violent and with similar life expectancy?

As such it is up to you to show where in the Bible it states that it
is illegal to have sex with children younger than nine, or indeed
proscribes any lower age limit on sexual intercourse.


Christians are not Jews, and do not follow the law of Moses and I am no
expert on Jewish customs and laws.

You are clearly not an expert on Christian customs and laws either.
Did you know Jesus was a Jew? WASP clergymen often gloss over this
embarrassing fact, and neo-Nazis pretend it just isn't so. But it is.

Those that are experts that I have
read tell me there is an interpretation of the Torah called the Talmud
in which it states that girls cannot be married until puberty. I tend to
believe them over you (considering your record thus far).

There are all sorts of interpretations concerning puberty in the Torah,
many of them concerning when 2 or more pubic hairs appear on a girl, or
when breasts develop. These are called the upper and lower marks. The
first of these to appear means a Jewish girl can be married.
There are other parts of the Torah concerning when it is acceptable to
have sex with any girl, and the consequences of having done so. The one
I cited below is particularly disturbing.

You may also consider the fact most Christian scholars believe Mary
was around 13 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus. She was
married off to Joseph, a considerably older man, before she gave
birth. According to Hebrew scripts the normal age of betrothal for
girls at that time was 12 and a half.


Again, at that time, with life expectancies what they were, and even by
todays standards, 13 is one hell of a long ways from 6 - or as Khomeini
described, molesting babys that are still being breast fed!

Propagandists always find it convenient to draw an arbitrary line, just
before the events they want to use, and say everything else is ancient
history. In your case its OK to go back as far as Mohammed, but not
quite as far as Jesus.

Now it must be realised that once a girl was betrothed in that time,
she was considered to be owned by her husband. Therefore it was not
unusual for the husband to have sex with his betrothed wife. Mary's
pregnancy was not considered unusual or unexpected by anyone but
Joseph.

So now we have set a conventional lower limit for consent at 12 years
and 6 months. It gets worse however:

Numbers 31:17-18
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a
man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a
man.

Basically kill all the women over 12 years of age and save the rest
for the after-invasion orgy.


You really are a sick ***** arent you? "After invasion orgy?" Is that
what you picture in your demented mind?

Well Moses was pretty specific about it:
31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill
every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying
with him, keep alive for yourselves.
....
31:35 And thirty and two thousand persons in all, of women that had not
known man by lying with him.
....
31:48 And the officers which were over thousands of the host, the
captains of thousands, and captains of hundreds, came near unto Moses:
31:49 And they said unto Moses, Thy servants have taken the sum of the
men of war which are under our charge, and there lacketh not one man of
us.
So Moses shared 16,000 virginal young girls out among the victorious
troops right after the battle.
What do YOU think happened to those girls?

Again, we are talking about a
time when people lived in tribes and in caves, and a time when these
tribes were in continual blood fueds with one another, a time when
survival of your tribe depended on the fear of your tribe by other
tribes... and you want to use examples of cave men - from a time that is
nearly pre-historic to justify modern day pedophelia?

That line you've drawn between irrelevant pre-history and Mohammed is
pretty convenient, isn't it?
Bringing things forward into the present day we find that even the
Islamic Republic of Iran, the most fundamentalist Muslim regime on the
planet, has laws preventing sex with girls under the age of 13 without
the approval of both the parents and a properly constituted court.
This is effectively the situation in Australia, where couples may marry
at 18, but a properly constituted court can permit a marriage if one
member of the couple is over the age of 16.
The difference is that in Iran it is illegal to have sex outside of
marriage. Here in Australia it is not.

How young would they take them however?
You won't see that in the Bible, but a peep into the Torah will make
your stomach turn if the story of Mohammed and his nine year old wife
makes you queasy:



WHO SOUNDS LIKE A NEO-NAZI NOW - LOL!!

For pointing out historical facts about human social evolution?
I make no statements about the Jews, Christians or Muslims of today,
other than that all have evolved their cultural mores and provide
greater protection for children than they did in ancient times.

What does what cave men did 3500 years ago have to do with didling babys
in the modern era?

When you consider fundamentalists in all the Abrahamic religions, quite
a lot. You are aware that all fundamentalists read scripture literally
and make no allowances for changes in society over the years? A Jewish
or Christian fundamentalist would take as much justification of
paedophilia from the Bible and the Law as a Muslim paedophile would form
the cultural practices of 400AD. The best a Muslim paedophile could hope
for was a nine year old, following the example of Mohammed. A Christian
or a Jewish paedophile can find justification for porking a newborn
baby. Fortunately society has moved forward in child protection since
these things were written and all but the fundamentalist nutters realise
its unacceptable to have sex with very young children. Where each
society draws the line changes over time however.

M.5:4 A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse.
And if a levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her.
...
If she is younger than that [age], [intercourse with her] is like
putting a finger in an eye.
(The Halakhah: An Encyclopaedia of the Law of Judaism, Jacob Neusner,
p. 313)

So, Moses urged his army to rape the entire female population between
the ages of zero and 12, and priests were allowed to pork three year
old girls.

I bet you didn't know that about Christianity and Judaism before you
started mouthing off about Muslims.



I was going to clip the above, but I think it should be saved for
posterity, - you obviously ARE a neo-nazi!

There is no need to save the clip, I provided a hard reference.
If you are unfamiliar with a hard reference, its the words inside the
brackets immediately following the quote.

The above has NOTHING to do with Christianity and sounds like it was
pasted from a neo-nazi website! I did a word-search and all I got for
the above quote, and all I get are neo-nazi websites!

You can try putting the title of the book into Google Books and
scrolling to the page mentioned in the reference. Unless you are going
to claim Google Books is run by neo-Nazis your assertion fails.
(see http://books.google.com)

For the record, again, Jesus said of children: "Better that a man tie a
millstone around his neck and cast it into the sea than to harm one of
these little ones"

Jesus is the founder of Christianity, not Moses, not Mohammed or Buddah.

You are quite correct, but Jesus also said:
"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I
have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the
truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not
the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law
until everything is accomplished."
(Matthew 5:17)
I'm pretty sure Jesus would have known the Law pretty well. Even the
bits about porking little girls and Moses' instructions to his soldiers
concerning the under 12s.

David Moss is a pedophile and a neo-nazi!

Actually David Moss is a liberal who works diligently in the field of
child protection. I doubt you could be more wrong if you tried.

Your true colors show through David, as any intelligent reader can see
from this exchange!

We can only hope that is correct.
--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss is a Pedophle AND a Neo-Nazi! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 10:54:04 PM
David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f7ffa1456db1f098afb3@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A267D150EAAAmattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f79837efb1ad5098afae@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was
written hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his
Apostles advocate 52 year old men having sex with 6 year old
children?



First off I wonder if your "neo-nazi" reference was really a
reference to yourself, since you are now the one attacking Jews.


Thats OK Matt. In psychology, psychological projection (or projection
bias) is a defense mechanism in which one attributes to others one=3Fs
own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions. It is not
really surprising you should try to project your own undesirable
characteristics onto me. If it makes you feel better, keep doing it.
Don't confuse your own personal dissonance reducing strategies with
the truth however.

I do not and have no reason to accuse modern day Jews of pedophelia, and
all anyone has to do is click your profile on Google groups to see all
your posts and all you trash talk about Jews.

Since you seem to
insist on comparing modern day pratices of Muslims to cave men who
lived 3500 years ago - ok lets compare:


You seem to be backpedaling from your previous position about ancient
social mores being attributable to modern societies. Good boy. You can
learn!

Its funny how you continue to "pretend" to STILL not get it, as I have
stated over and over again, my issue is with modern day Islam as it
relates to continuing to imitate the dispicable pratices of Mohammed as
relates to infants and toddlers.
Jews did many things in the Old Testament, including animal sacrifices -
many many things were in the Law of Moses from 3500 years ago, that Jews
today do not practice - the see them for what they are, pratices of
primative cave men who happen to be thier ancestors. I relatively
certain that our own cave man ancestors had similar practices.
My issue is with Islam and Muslims who continue in this modern era to
treat children like sexual playthings.

The law in the Bible is proscriptive, it presumes that any
activity, which is not expressly forbidden, is presumed to be
legal. The antithesis of this is prescriptive law, which presumes
that any thing not specifically authorized or exempted, is illegal.


Since you are citing the Old Testament, specificlly the Torah as your
authority, let us first recognize that this covers a period of time
before Israel existed, 3500 years ago, when the tribe of the Hebrews
were living in the wilderness in caves due to a judgment against them
by God. It is written that generation was cursed by God and had to
live in the wilderness for 40 years, until the entire generation had
died. The average life expectancy at that time was about 35 years,
since every one of them died in the 40 years.


And you think the society at the time the Koran was written down was
not just as tribal, violent and with similar life expectancy?

Why do you continue to PRETEND to be stupid? My post quoted the modern
day supreme leader of Islam in Iran - the quote did not come from the
Koran...

As such it is up to you to show where in the Bible it states that
it is illegal to have sex with children younger than nine, or
indeed proscribes any lower age limit on sexual intercourse.


Christians are not Jews, and do not follow the law of Moses and I am
no expert on Jewish customs and laws.


You are clearly not an expert on Christian customs and laws either.
Did you know Jesus was a Jew? WASP clergymen often gloss over this
embarrassing fact, and neo-Nazis pretend it just isn't so. But it is.

I've never heard any clergymen "gloss over" the Jewishness of Jesus -
were Jesus not a Jew, He could not have been the Messiah. Who do you
think supports Israel financially? "WASP"'s as you call them, are
Israels #1 supporters. I am proud that a good portion of my taxes goes
to Israel, and I encourage giving donations to the IDF.
All good Christians support Israel :)

Those that are experts that I have
read tell me there is an interpretation of the Torah called the
Talmud in which it states that girls cannot be married until puberty.
I tend to believe them over you (considering your record thus far).


There are all sorts of interpretations concerning puberty in the
Torah, many of them concerning when 2 or more pubic hairs appear on a
girl, or when breasts develop. These are called the upper and lower
marks. The first of these to appear means a Jewish girl can be
married.

There are other parts of the Torah concerning when it is acceptable to
have sex with any girl, and the consequences of having done so. The
one I cited below is particularly disturbing.

Your citations do not refer to sex, they refer to sparing of virgins in
war. I suppose you'd favor slaughtering them too?

You may also consider the fact most Christian scholars believe Mary
was around 13 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus. She
was married off to Joseph, a considerably older man, before she
gave birth. According to Hebrew scripts the normal age of betrothal
for girls at that time was 12 and a half.


Again, at that time, with life expectancies what they were, and even
by todays standards, 13 is one hell of a long ways from 6 - or as
Khomeini described, molesting babys that are still being breast fed!


Propagandists always find it convenient to draw an arbitrary line,
just before the events they want to use, and say everything else is
ancient history. In your case its OK to go back as far as Mohammed,
but not quite as far as Jesus.

I happen to believe that restrictions on the age at which people can
engate in sex are necessary, and not arbitrary. You seem to be of the
opinion that there should be no restrictions what-so-ever, as you
continue to defend the Islamic practice of pedophelia.

Now it must be realised that once a girl was betrothed in that
time, she was considered to be owned by her husband. Therefore it
was not unusual for the husband to have sex with his betrothed
wife. Mary's pregnancy was not considered unusual or unexpected by
anyone but Joseph.

So now we have set a conventional lower limit for consent at 12
years and 6 months. It gets worse however:

Numbers 31:17-18
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a
man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with
a man.

Basically kill all the women over 12 years of age and save the rest
for the after-invasion orgy.


You really are a sick ***** arent you? "After invasion orgy?" Is that
what you picture in your demented mind?


Well Moses was pretty specific about it:

31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill
every woman that hath known man by lying with him.

31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying
with him, keep alive for yourselves.
...
31:35 And thirty and two thousand persons in all, of women that had
not known man by lying with him.
...
31:48 And the officers which were over thousands of the host, the
captains of thousands, and captains of hundreds, came near unto Moses:

31:49 And they said unto Moses, Thy servants have taken the sum of the
men of war which are under our charge, and there lacketh not one man
of us.

So Moses shared 16,000 virginal young girls out among the victorious
troops right after the battle.

What do YOU think happened to those girls?

Would you have prefered that they be slaughterd? Again, we're talking
about cave men who lived 3500 years ago, what kind of things did your
cavemen ancestors do? Any idea?
Agian, as you continue to pretend to be stupid, (why I dont know), I am
concerned about modern day pratices of Muslims and the modern day
teachings of Islam, not what cave men did thosuands of years ago - why
you keep trying to justify pedophelia by what cave men did is beyond me.

Again, we are talking about a
time when people lived in tribes and in caves, and a time when these
tribes were in continual blood fueds with one another, a time when
survival of your tribe depended on the fear of your tribe by other
tribes... and you want to use examples of cave men - from a time that
is nearly pre-historic to justify modern day pedophelia?


That line you've drawn between irrelevant pre-history and Mohammed is
pretty convenient, isn't it?

Bringing things forward into the present day we find that even the
Islamic Republic of Iran, the most fundamentalist Muslim regime on the
planet, has laws preventing sex with girls under the age of 13 without
the approval of both the parents and a properly constituted court.

LOL - now your dreaming - and parental consent does not mean BOTH
parents, only the father must consent - the woman has no say in the
matter.
Exactly how many pre-13 (12 year olds and less) do you think are eager
to run off and get married without thier parents consent? LOL
The law in Iran says that 70 year old man can marry a infant, and diddle
her till she's 9 and then have sex with her. Those are the facts.
Human rights groups have criticized the law, as I have already shown you
in previous threads, as doing nothing but maintaining the status quo,
which is that many, especially poor parents, can collect a higher "bride
price" the younger the girl is.
Women in Islam are treated as little more than animals, the property of
men.
But then again, that's probably fine with you too.

This is effectively the situation in Australia, where couples may
marry at 18, but a properly constituted court can permit a marriage if
one member of the couple is over the age of 16.

Again, for the umteenth time, we're talking about sex with girls under
the age of puberty in Iran, as thier Supreme Leader, said, even infants
that are still suckling from their mothers breasts, not 16 and 18 year
olds.

The difference is that in Iran it is illegal to have sex outside of
marriage. Here in Australia it is not.

In Iran they have "temporary marriage" - a father can legally marry off
his 9 year old to a different man eveyr hour!

How young would they take them however?
You won't see that in the Bible, but a peep into the Torah will
make your stomach turn if the story of Mohammed and his nine year
old wife makes you queasy:



WHO SOUNDS LIKE A NEO-NAZI NOW - LOL!!


For pointing out historical facts about human social evolution?
I make no statements about the Jews, Christians or Muslims of today,
other than that all have evolved their cultural mores and provide
greater protection for children than they did in ancient times.

*****! You can't read or what? My original post quotes the Supreme
Leader of Iran saying that didling infants and toddlers is OK? Are you
blind or what?
Still pretending to not be able to understand?

What does what cave men did 3500 years ago have to do with didling
babys in the modern era?


When you consider fundamentalists in all the Abrahamic religions,
quite a lot. You are aware that all fundamentalists read scripture
literally and make no allowances for changes in society over the
years? A Jewish or Christian fundamentalist would take as much
justification of paedophilia from the Bible and the Law as a Muslim
paedophile would form the cultural practices of 400AD. The best a
Muslim paedophile could hope for was a nine year old, following the
example of Mohammed. A Christian or a Jewish paedophile can find
justification for porking a newborn baby. Fortunately society has
moved forward in child protection since these things were written and
all but the fundamentalist nutters realise its unacceptable to have
sex with very young children. Where each society draws the line
changes over time however.

Hey! WAKE UP! Iran is run by fundamentalist nutters!

M.5:4 A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by
intercourse. And if a levir has had intercourse with her, he has
acquired her. ...
If she is younger than that [age], [intercourse with her] is like
putting a finger in an eye.
(The Halakhah: An Encyclopaedia of the Law of Judaism, Jacob
Neusner, p. 313)

So, Moses urged his army to rape the entire female population
between the ages of zero and 12, and priests were allowed to pork
three year old girls.

I bet you didn't know that about Christianity and Judaism before
you started mouthing off about Muslims.



I was going to clip the above, but I think it should be saved for
posterity, - you obviously ARE a neo-nazi!



There is no need to save the clip, I provided a hard reference.
If you are unfamiliar with a hard reference, its the words inside the
brackets immediately following the quote.

The above has NOTHING to do with Christianity and sounds like it was
pasted from a neo-nazi website! I did a word-search and all I got for
the above quote, and all I get are neo-nazi websites!


You can try putting the title of the book into Google Books and
scrolling to the page mentioned in the reference. Unless you are going
to claim Google Books is run by neo-Nazis your assertion fails.
(see http://books.google.com)

For the record, again, Jesus said of children: "Better that a man tie
a millstone around his neck and cast it into the sea than to harm one
of these little ones"

Jesus is the founder of Christianity, not Moses, not Mohammed or
Buddah.


You are quite correct, but Jesus also said:

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I
have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18I tell you the
truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not
the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law
until everything is accomplished."
(Matthew 5:17)

I'm pretty sure Jesus would have known the Law pretty well. Even the
bits about porking little girls and Moses' instructions to his
soldiers concerning the under 12s.

Fulfull means to "complete" to "finish" - "to bring an end to" - and his
last words on the cross were "I IS FINISHED!"
You clearly don't know much about Christianity. The Old Covenant (Old
Testament) was not abolished, it was fulfilled, to make way for The New
Covenant (New Testament).
Thus, Christians do not live by the law of Moses, dont sacrifice goats,
etc etc etc.

David Moss is a pedophile and a neo-nazi!


Actually David Moss is a liberal who works diligently in the field of
child protection. I doubt you could be more wrong if you tried.

Um, your "concern" for children is quite obvious. Its a well known fact
that pedophiles like to work in fields that bring them into contact with
vulnerable children, especially children who have been abused.
I hope someone reading this will forward it to your superiors.

Your true colors show through David, as any intelligent reader can
see from this exchange!


We can only hope that is correct.

.


User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss is a Pedophle AND a Neo-Nazi! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 05:52:49 PM
In article <Xns9A267D150EAAAmattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f79837efb1ad5098afae@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was
written hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles
advocate 52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children?



First off I wonder if your "neo-nazi" reference was really a reference
to yourself, since you are now the one attacking Jews. Since you seem to
insist on comparing modern day pratices of Muslims to cave men who lived
3500 years ago - ok lets compare:

The law in the Bible is proscriptive, it presumes that any activity,
which is not expressly forbidden, is presumed to be legal. The
antithesis of this is prescriptive law, which presumes that any thing
not specifically authorized or exempted, is illegal.


Since you are citing the Old Testament, specificlly the Torah as your
authority, let us first recognize that this covers a period of time
before Israel existed, 3500 years ago, when the tribe of the Hebrews
were living in the wilderness in caves due to a judgment against them by
God. It is written that generation was cursed by God and had to live in
the wilderness for 40 years, until the entire generation had died. The
average life expectancy at that time was about 35 years, since every one
of them died in the 40 years.

As such it is up to you to show where in the Bible it states that it
is illegal to have sex with children younger than nine, or indeed
proscribes any lower age limit on sexual intercourse.


Christians are not Jews, and do not follow the law of Moses and I am no
expert on Jewish customs and laws. Those that are experts that I have
read tell me there is an interpretation of the Torah called the Talmud
in which it states that girls cannot be married until puberty. I tend to
believe them over you (considering your record thus far).

You may also consider the fact most Christian scholars believe Mary
was around 13 years old when she became pregnant with Jesus. She was
married off to Joseph, a considerably older man, before she gave
birth. According to Hebrew scripts the normal age of betrothal for
girls at that time was 12 and a half.


Again, at that time, with life expectancies what they were, and even by
todays standards, 13 is one hell of a long ways from 6 - or as Khomeini
described, molesting babys that are still being breast fed!

Now it must be realised that once a girl was betrothed in that time,
she was considered to be owned by her husband. Therefore it was not
unusual for the husband to have sex with his betrothed wife. Mary's
pregnancy was not considered unusual or unexpected by anyone but
Joseph.

So now we have set a conventional lower limit for consent at 12 years
and 6 months. It gets worse however:

Numbers 31:17-18
17 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a
man, 18 but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a
man.

Basically kill all the women over 12 years of age and save the rest
for the after-invasion orgy.


You really are a sick ***** arent you? "After invasion orgy?" Is that
what you picture in your demented mind? Again, we are talking about a
time when people lived in tribes and in caves, and a time when these
tribes were in continual blood fueds with one another, a time when
survival of your tribe depended on the fear of your tribe by other
tribes... and you want to use examples of cave men - from a time that is
nearly pre-historic to justify modern day pedophelia?

How young would they take them however?
You won't see that in the Bible, but a peep into the Torah will make
your stomach turn if the story of Mohammed and his nine year old wife
makes you queasy:



WHO SOUNDS LIKE A NEO-NAZI NOW - LOL!!

What does what cave men did 3500 years ago have to do with didling babys
in the modern era?

M.5:4 A girl three years and one day old is betrothed by intercourse.
And if a levir has had intercourse with her, he has acquired her.
...
If she is younger than that [age], [intercourse with her] is like
putting a finger in an eye.
(The Halakhah: An Encyclopaedia of the Law of Judaism, Jacob Neusner,
p. 313)

So, Moses urged his army to rape the entire female population between
the ages of zero and 12, and priests were allowed to pork three year
old girls.

I bet you didn't know that about Christianity and Judaism before you
started mouthing off about Muslims.



I was going to clip the above, but I think it should be saved for
posterity, - you obviously ARE a neo-nazi!

The above has NOTHING to do with Christianity and sounds like it was
pasted from a neo-nazi website! I did a word-search and all I got for
the above quote, and all I get are neo-nazi websites!

For the record, again, Jesus said of children: "Better that a man tie a
millstone around his neck and cast it into the sea than to harm one of
these little ones"

Jesus is the founder of Christianity, not Moses, not Mohammed or Buddah.

David Moss is a pedophile and a neo-nazi!

Your true colors show through David, as any intelligent reader can see
from this exchange!

--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.



User: "Christians Follow Jesus"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 12:43:02 PM
Matt <mattbaylor@gmail.com> wrote in
news:Xns9A265B5ACF753mattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131:

David Moss <q0320811@mail.connect.usq.edu.au> wrote in
news:MPG.21f75f60423bb07e98afa9@news.bigpond.com:

In article <Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be
considerned "NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year
old little girl?


Can you imagine that it was ever acceptable to post unfounded lies
about someone in the title of an article Mr Baylor?


First off, you called me a "neo-nazi" for a post that merely QUOTED a
Bukhari Hadith and a passage from a book by Ayatollah Khomeini. I
believe "normal" person who read that Hadith or the quote from
Khomeini regarding child molestation would be apalled, yet you, in
defense of such pratices, not only tried to justify the behavior, you
accused me of being a "neo-nazi" for merely posting the quotes!

I believe any reasonable person can clearly see that my accusation
against you was very well founded, and that in fact it is you posting
unfounded lies.

Just because I made you feel inferior by posting a few facts about
sexual mores down the ages is no reason to start making things up.


My posts were direct quotes from the Hadith, and direct quotes from
Khomeini with links to Wikipedia and Amazon.com where his book could
be purchased.

Your so-called "facts" are without reference:

"when the Koran was written girls even younger than nine were fair
game for Christians"

Do you have a reference? Where, in the New Testament, (wich was
written hundreds of years before the Quran), do Jesus or his Apostles
advocate 52 year old men having sex with 6 year old children? Jesus
said "It is better for a man to tie a millstone around his neck and
cast it into the sea than to harm one of these little ones".

You are truly a sick man.

My point in posting the Hadith along side the quote from Ayatollah
Khomeini was to illustrate that modern Islam seeks to impose the
beliefs of a sick pedophile barbarian warlord from the 7th century.


If you find anything inaccurate within the material I posted, lets
hear about it.


Aside from you attempts to justify sex with children, your information
regarding Iran is incorrect and misleading, you seem to think that
before the "new law" was passed, 9 year olds often got married WIHTOUT
thier parents consent! (you are a TARD!)

To this day in Iran, a man can marry a BABY with the parents consent -
there is no legal age for marriage (see the above ruling by Khomeni),
the new law only deals with when girls can get married WITHOUT CONSENT
of the parents here are the facts:

Tehran - Iranian authorities have approved a law to raise the age at
which girls can get married without their parents' consent to 13 from
nine and for boys to 15 from 14, newspapers said on Sunday.

The decision by Iran's Expediency Council arbitration body watered
down a bill passed by the reformist-dominated parliament in 2000 which
tried to raise the age of consent to 15 for girls and 18 for boys to
cut teenage marriages and ease criticism of Iran's human rights
record.

That bill was vetoed by the Guardian Council, a 12-man body dominated
by conservative clerics whose job it is to ensure legislation conforms
to Islamic Sharia law.

Iran's clerical establishment has promoted marriage as a means to
combat what it calls immorality amongst youth.

The Expediency Council is charged with arbitrating in disputes between
parliament and the Guardian Council.

The arbitration body ruling does not change the age at which children
can get married - nine for girls and 14 for boys - but says girls
below the age of 13 and boys younger than 15 need their parents'
permission and the approval of a "righteous court".

Reformists said the new law did not protect children since most of
those who married at a young age did so under pressure from their
parents.

European Union countries have pointed to the low legal age of marriage
in Iran as an example of its poor human rights.

http://www.iol.co.za/?click_id=3&art_id=qw1024837201529B265&set_id=1

ie Irans "new law' does nothing at all.

Muslim wedding photos from npr.org, msnbc and others:
http://www.npr.org/templates/common/image_enlargement.php?imageResId=5541107
http://www.npr.org/templates/common/image_enlargement.php?imageResId=5541073
http://www.npr.org/templates/common/image_enlargement.php?imageResId=5541071
http://msnbcmedia3.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/071013/071013_childBride_vmed_11a.widec.jpg
http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e257/allahnogood/Politically%20Incorrect%20Guide%20to%20Beslam/inform-islam-pic3-src.jpg
A short video on child marriage in Islam:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxairDPD-GM
.


User: "David Moss"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss, muslim apologist, Is A Liar! WARNING 17 Jan 2008 03:56:29 AM
In article <f209e176-0b15-4606-933e-a318850cd271
@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
writes...

David Moss wrote:

In article <Xns9A26447A8BA0Emattbaylorgmailcom@216.196.97.131>,
mattbaylor@gmail.com writes...

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be considerned
"NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year old little girl?


Can you imagine that it was ever acceptable to post unfounded lies about
someone in the title of an article Mr Baylor?

Just because I made you feel inferior by posting a few facts about
sexual mores down the ages is no reason to start making things up.


You posted lies in defence of a culture of paedophilia.

Contrary to your dishonest statement, in our 2,300-year-old romano-
christian culture, the age of 12 has been considered a bare minimum
for legal consent.

The ayatollah Khomeini recommended sex with infants, and this
disgusting teaching springs straight from the acts of the muslim
prophet, mohammed, who was a paedophile - and you are defending the
culture that spawned Khomeini's revolting rulings.

Sorry Arthur, but you are wrong. I'll leave it to you to search the
recent threads on this topic for my *fully referenced* contributions
concerning the age of consent.
Or, you could close your eyes, stick you fingers in your ears and hum
like usual.
--
DM
personal opinion only
The Australian Politics Resource
http://politics.sunnybar.dynip.com
.


User: "Orthus"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 16 Jan 2008 07:49:42 PM
Little sockpuppet......

NO F'ING WAY!

So you haven't read the story of Little Red Riding Hood, and you have
no clue who Sigmund Freud was.
Don't sock puppets learn how to read these days?

David Moss .......

Its because he's into it.

Yeah, he is into child protection, all right! If he'll catch you on
official business you might have something real to worry about.

Its no surprise that a dhimmi like Moses would defend this.

Interesting assertion. It is illogical even in view of such an idiot
as you are.
Apart from that, I recommend public school, year one. This might teach
you your alphabet so in the future you won't mistake Moss for Moses.
Exterminate yourself!
O.
.

User: "B J Foster"

Title: The usual response when someone loses a debate---> Re: WARNING! DavidMoss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 03:00:13 PM
Looks like Matt got his arse well & truly kicked
Matt wrote:

Can you imagine, that in ANY time in history, that it would be considerned
"NORMAL" for a 53 year old man to have sex with a 6 year old little girl?

David Moss seems to believe that because "cave men did it" (yet he sights
no proof that cave men had sex with 6 year old little girls), that it MUST
be natural and OK to do!

Here is what David Moss is defending:

"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is
still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having
intercourse with a girl younger than nine, while other sexual acts such as
foreplay, rubbing, and kissing are allowed. A man having intercourse with a
girl younger than nine years of age has not committed a crime, but only an
infraction, if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl, however,
is permanently damaged, the man must provide for her all her life. But this
girl will not count as one of the man's four permanent wives. He also is
not permitted to marry the girl's sister."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_children

Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom

An English translation of this wonderful work can be purchased on
Amazon.com:

Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political, Philosophic, Social and Religious
with a special introduction by Clive Irving, ISBN number 0-553-14032-9

http://www.amazon.com/Sayings-Ayatollah-Khomeini-Political-
Philosophical/dp/0553140329

.
User: "Matt"

Title: Re: WARNING! David Moss Is A Pedophile! WARNING 15 Jan 2008 04:19:38 PM
mugz <tjordan555@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:033bf029-b04b-4594-a03b-596a72d0519a@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com:

On Jan 15, 2:00 pm, B J Foster <bjfos...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Looks like Matt got his arse well & truly kicked

Looks more like you're David Moss's sock pupit. How many morons can
there be that are from Austrailia, that go around bashing Jews while
at the same time calling anyone who disagrees with them "Nazi's" -
There cant be very many - lol

Check this guys profile and compare it to David Moss's, either one is
a sock puppet or they are butt-buddies!

heh!

--snip--
You took the words out of my mouth! Look at this Jew-basher's reply to
Michale above! Calls him 'naziboy' LOL
You've been outed (one way or the other ROFL) - "B J BOY" ROFLMAO!
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles