| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Budikka" |
| Date: |
19 Nov 2004 05:00:09 AM |
| Object: |
Was Darwin Wrong? |
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
.
|
|
| User: "Soxy Puppit ., =.8~ ...." |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
19 Nov 2004 01:04:48 PM |
|
|
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
========================
Uh, oh,... you're going to have Jabbers foaming at the mouth and
cross-posting like crazy on this one.
--
Soxy........
"The test of every religious (like the Watchtower Society), political, or
educational system is the man (like Jabriol) that it forms." -
~ Henri Amiel ~
All trees (like the WTS) can be judged by the fruit (Jabriols) they produce.
===================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
20 Nov 2004 08:06:46 AM |
|
|
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberhole's ***** so many times on evolution he daren't
address it with me any more - he just snips my messages!
B.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
21 Nov 2004 06:03:21 PM |
|
|
(Budikka) wrote in message news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" < > wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
.
|
|
|
| User: "~ Wind-A-Go ~" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
21 Nov 2004 09:54:37 PM |
|
|
"Jabriol" <jabriol1@excite.com> wrote in message
news:9e9431eb.0411211603.6342fea9@posting.google.com...
budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote in message
news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message
news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
==============================
He got you by the short hairs again, eh Jabbers? You've lost to him so many
times before I don't know why you bother to infest the NGs Budikka is in.
He shuts you up every time! He's chewed you up and spit you out a gibbering
idiot,... and yet you never learn :-D
BTW, did your lawyer take off with all your money? I notice you still don't
own my ISP.
--
Rusty.
Jabriol wants to be loved; failing this, to be admired; failing this, to be
feared; failing even this, to be hated and despised. Jabriol wants to
arouse
some sort of feeling in people. The soul shrinks from the void and wants
contact at any price." ~ Hjalmar Soderberg ~
==========================================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
21 Nov 2004 06:16:54 PM |
|
|
(Jabriol) wrote in
news:9e9431eb.0411211603.6342fea9@posting.google.com:
budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote in message
news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message
news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a
resounding "No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPP
PPPP
While you're at it, snip alt.atheism out of your future posts. Killfile
us all at once and be done with it.
--
Enkidu
"Yee-Ha" is not a foreign policy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bling Away ~" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
22 Nov 2004 11:23:50 AM |
|
|
"Enkidu" <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message
news:Xns95A8A5AE67AC7enkiduleaddogsorg@68.6.19.6...
jabriol1@excite.com (Jabriol) wrote in
news:9e9431eb.0411211603.6342fea9@posting.google.com:
budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote in message
news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message
news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a
resounding "No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPP
PPPP
While you're at it, snip alt.atheism out of your future posts. Killfile
us all at once and be done with it.
Enkidu
=========================
You're the ONLY NG left where Jabbers knows he'll get someone to weaken and
reply to his never ending decade old "evolution-creation" blather. He
usually ends up drifting off into sex and rape. Oh, wait,... there's a BOT
that replies to him from alt.kooks.
--
Blingo........
Yep, the sleazebags at the WTS added another 120 years to 1914. What a
hoot! :-D The poor misled JWs who were waiting for 1975 got the shaft,
then 2000, shafted again... now this. What happened to all their promised
and underlined scripture proving the generation who saw 1914 would not pass
away before "the end of this system of things?" And they claim a clear
direct line to Jehovah!!!
How can any rational person be so gullible as to swallow this obvious male
bovine excreta? This GB vomit....
=======================================
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
22 Nov 2004 07:56:01 AM |
|
|
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<Xns95A8A5AE67AC7enkiduleaddogsorg@68.6.19.6>...
jabriol1@excite.com (Jabriol) wrote in
news:9e9431eb.0411211603.6342fea9@posting.google.com:
budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote in message
news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message
news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a
resounding "No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPP
PPPP
While you're at it, snip alt.atheism out of your future posts. Killfile
us all at once and be done with it.
give me a second to think about your request...
uh.. request denied...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
22 Nov 2004 05:27:32 PM |
|
|
On 22 Nov 2004 05:56:01 -0800, (Jabriol) wrote:
Enkidu <enkidu@leaddogs.org> wrote in message news:<Xns95A8A5AE67AC7enkiduleaddogsorg@68.6.19.6>...
(Jabriol) wrote in
news:9e9431eb.0411211603.6342fea9@posting.google.com:
budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote in message
news:<e1e30450.0411200606.2a9c667a@posting.google.com>...
"Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....> wrote in message
news:<gNSdnf9t2LBN3gPcRVn-pA@heartoftn.net>...
"Budikka" <budikka1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:e1e30450.0411190300.3af59636@posting.google.com...
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a
resounding "No"!
You can read an excerpt of the article here:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Budikka
I've kicked Jabberho
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPPPPPPPPPPPP
PPPP
While you're at it, snip alt.atheism out of your future posts. Killfile
us all at once and be done with it.
give me a second to think about your request...
uh.. request denied...
The fucking useless wank stain is out of my kill file again.
This is too much.
Re-PLONK.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amphetamine Gobbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
22 Nov 2004 11:55:10 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:27:32 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
wrote:
uh.. request denied...
The fucking useless wank stain is out of my kill file again.
This is too much.
Jabberwocky won't believe in evolution until someone, pardon the
cliche, fucks him in the ear to give him some brains.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
23 Nov 2004 06:59:23 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 00:55:10 -0500, Amphetamine Gobbler <ITC@aol.com> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:27:32 GMT, Dubh Ghall <puck@pooks.hill.fey>
wrote:
uh.. request denied...
The fucking useless wank stain is out of my kill file again.
This is too much.
Jabberwocky won't believe in evolution until someone, pardon the
cliche, fucks him in the ear to give him some brains.
Mmm. Now there is a thought: A quick snicker snack, from a vorpal blade.
Anybody got a vorpal blade, handy?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
21 Nov 2004 08:34:30 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:04:48 -0600, "Soxy Puppit" <., ~8..*@*.. =.8~ ....>
wrote:
Uh, oh,... you're going to have Jabbers foaming at the mouth and
cross-posting like crazy on this one.
So no change there, then.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
24 Nov 2004 05:17:40 AM |
|
|
On 19 Nov 2004 03:00:09 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
Wow, so NG has taken over for God!!!!!!!!
I guess that means you can go unrepentant for your sins, right?
duke
*****
Matthew 22
14"For many are invited, but few are chosen."
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Fritzinger" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
24 Nov 2004 12:32:28 PM |
|
|
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message news:<dcr8q056o1reei17tuebu1rsdjrs2fo3cf@4ax.com>...
On 19 Nov 2004 03:00:09 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on its
front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a resounding
"No"!
Wow, so NG has taken over for God!!!!!!!!
No, not at all. It means that the evidence overwhelmingly supports
evolution. And, the fact of evolution does in no way comment on the
existence or non-existence of God in any way.
I guess that means you can go unrepentant for your sins, right?
I would like to learn something about your thought processes, because
it is clear from the above that logic is not important to them.
--
Dave Fritzinger
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Was Darwin Wrong? |
24 Nov 2004 01:25:10 PM |
|
|
David Fritzinger wrote:
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:<dcr8q056o1reei17tuebu1rsdjrs2fo3cf@4ax.com>...
On 19 Nov 2004 03:00:09 -0800, (Budikka) wrote:
That's the question the November 2004 National geographic asks on
its front cover, and inside, on page 4, comes the answer: a
resounding "No"!
Wow, so NG has taken over for God!!!!!!!!
No, not at all. It means that the evidence overwhelmingly supports
evolution. And, the fact of evolution does in no way comment on the
existence or non-existence of God in any way.
I guess that means you can go unrepentant for your sins, right?
I would like to learn something about your thought processes, because
it is clear from the above that logic is not important to them.
Usually this type of response from him occurs later in the week and booze is
as good an explanation as any other.
He may still have to work so it could be age, fatigue and reduced mental
capacity.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
