how petty and stupid

how petty and stupid are such remarks. First we need to establish some
basic facts, about the "American Indian" and his "ownership of this
land".


The American Indian is neither American, nor Indian, he is of the
mongoloid race, a people who migrated to this continent; archaeology,
and genetics prove these facts. It is believed early mongoloid people
crossed over from Asia on an isthmus that extended through what today
is a chain of islands called the Aleutian Islands. They are therefore
not indigenous to North America; their claim to this continent is based
on the fallacy that they owned it. These people not only did not own
the land, they did not want to! Their religion declared that the people
were part of the land, they could not own it, the very idea of land
ownership was more than repugnant it was sacrilegious. This is why they
often fought to stay off reservations; they were hunter-gatherers, a
largely nomadic people. The concept of land ownership was forced upon
them.


Let us be absolutely clear on this, we respect the "native" tribes
people, they more than any other have held to their own race, language,
and culture. They have given way to the white mans government and
custom only grudgingly, and for this we salute their courage and
independence. We must point out however, they are a people who are not
American, even today. They live under Indian law, which gives them by
treaty with the U.S. Government special rights, and privileges. The
American Government does not make or keep treaty with its citizens.


The War for Southern Independence was fought because the south
determined to be free of the then existing government, not unlike the
"Indian" yet no treaty exist between the parties involved in that
conflict, all parties resolved to re-join the union of states, and live
under its laws. Our government made treaty with these "native" people,
we respect and honor those treaties, and we agree these people have the
right to exist, the right to their lands, laws, and religion as
proscribed by existing treaty. We have recognized their government, and
people, their history, and heritage, we ask no less in return

how petty and stupid are such remarks. First we need to establish some
basic facts, about the "American Indian" and his "ownership of this
land".

The American Indian is neither American, nor Indian, he is of the
mongoloid race, a people who migrated to this continent; archaeology,
and genetics prove these facts. It is believed early mongoloid people
crossed over from Asia on an isthmus that extended through what today
is a chain of islands called the Aleutian Islands. They are therefore
not indigenous to North America; their claim to this continent is based
on the fallacy that they owned it. These people not only did not own
the land, they did not want to! Their religion declared that the people
were part of the land, they could not own it, the very idea of land
ownership was more than repugnant it was sacrilegious. This is why they
often fought to stay off reservations; they were hunter-gatherers, a
largely nomadic people. The concept of land ownership was forced upon
them.


Let us be absolutely clear on this, we respect the "native" tribes
people, they more than any other have held to their own race, language,
and culture. They have given way to the white mans government and
custom only grudgingly, and for this we salute their courage and
independence. We must point out however, they are a people who are not
American, even today. They live under Indian law, which gives them by
treaty with the U.S. Government special rights, and privileges. The
American Government does not make or keep treaty with its citizens.


The War for Southern Independence was fought because the south
determined to be free of the then existing government, not unlike the
"Indian" yet no treaty exist between the parties involved in that
conflict, all parties resolved to re-join the union of states, and live
under its laws. Our government made treaty with these "native" people,
we respect and honor those treaties, and we agree these people have the
right to exist, the right to their lands, laws, and religion as
proscribed by existing treaty. We have recognized their government, and
people, their history, and heritage, we ask no less in return

how petty and stupid are such remarks. First we need to establish some
basic facts, about the "American Indian" and his "ownership of this
land".


The American Indian is neither American, nor Indian, he is of the
mongoloid race, a people who migrated to this continent; archaeology,
and genetics prove these facts. It is believed early mongoloid people
crossed over from Asia on an isthmus that extended through what today
is a chain of islands called the Aleutian Islands. They are therefore
not indigenous to North America; their claim to this continent is based
on the fallacy that they owned it. These people not only did not own
the land, they did not want to! Their religion declared that the people
were part of the land, they could not own it, the very idea of land
ownership was more than repugnant it was sacrilegious. This is why they
often fought to stay off reservations; they were hunter-gatherers, a
largely nomadic people. The concept of land ownership was forced upon
them.


Let us be absolutely clear on this, we respect the "native" tribes
people, they more than any other have held to their own race, language,
and culture. They have given way to the white mans government and
custom only grudgingly, and for this we salute their courage and
independence. We must point out however, they are a people who are not
American, even today. They live under Indian law, which gives them by
treaty with the U.S. Government special rights, and privileges. The
American Government does not make or keep treaty with its citizens.


The War for Southern Independence was fought because the south
determined to be free of the then existing government, not unlike the
"Indian" yet no treaty exist between the parties involved in that
conflict, all parties resolved to re-join the union of states, and live
under its laws. Our government made treaty with these "native" people,
we respect and honor those treaties, and we agree these people have the
right to exist, the right to their lands, laws, and religion as
proscribed by existing treaty. We have recognized their government, and
people, their history, and heritage, we ask no less in return

The War for Southern Independence was fought because the south
determined to be free of the then existing government

how petty and stupid are such remarks. First we need to establish some
basic facts, about the "American Indian" and his "ownership of this
land".