What Creationists Cannot Handle #1: Microbes



 Religions > Atheism > What Creationists Cannot Handle #1: Microbes

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Budikka666"
Date: 31 Oct 2007 05:47:50 PM
Object: What Creationists Cannot Handle #1: Microbes
From
http://www.harvardmagazine.com/2007/11/the-undiscovered-planet.html
"...there is 'far less genetic difference between [a human being] and
a potato' than there is between, say, 'the bacterium that causes
tuberculosis and the one that causes cholera'"
"The world of animals-from elephants to ants-is divided into 13 phyla
(vertebrates are one phylum, insects another). In the microbial world,
their equivalents are called, for the time being, "deep-rooting
branches." In 1987, 13 of these big divisions were known in the
bacterial domain...by 2004 we had found 80 such divisions from which
we couldn't cultivate even a single representative"
"The human cells in your body number 10 trillion, but that pales by
comparison to the estimated 100 trillion microbial cells that live in
and on you."
"After looking at human gut microflora, they learned that each
individual has his or her own characteristic set of a thousand
species. "These represent three million genes that you carry," points
out Kolter, "as compared to the estimated 18,000 genes of the human
genome."
And the moronic creationist and so-called intelligent so-called design
scum think they can overturn evolution by whining about vertebrates?
Budikka
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
---We cannot be GOD.
Why I cannot believe.
OT: A Job area where openings cannot be filled
Corrected! TQOTM Nomination "Re: The Soul That Cannot Be"
OT: Democracy cannot be good in parts
OT: We cannot vote Labour
Proof: Bible Cannot Save People *and* Jesus Lied!
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
Re: Why Naturalism Cannot Have The Final Say
think we all know who was responsible for that, the Godless liberals who cannot stand having their immorality shoved back in their ugly face!! The defenders of free thought, the Big Bang theory and evolution, are not only striking out at me, but at a
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER