| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Nerd Gerl" |
| Date: |
25 Feb 2004 01:43:14 PM |
| Object: |
What's Wrong With Them? |
Robibnikoff wrote in message <6p6%b.4414$_4.312@www.newsranger.com>...
Nice dishonest snipping of the remainder of my post.
What was dishonest about it? I snipped in in plain sight!
You claim your god exists - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it.
G'head.
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
Or was this too hard for you to understand? Shall I type slower next
time?
Perhaps you're too lazy to support your claims. Shall I type in caps
next time?
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 02:29:58 PM |
|
|
In article <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd Gerl says...
Robibnikoff wrote in message <6p6%b.4414$_4.312@www.newsranger.com>...
Nice dishonest snipping of the remainder of my post.
What was dishonest about it? I snipped in in plain sight!
Nice grammar. You snipped my part about you proving your god exists.
You claim your god exists - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it.
G'head.
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
I have never claimed that your god doesn't exist, consequently I don't have to
prove anything.
So, does your god exist or not? And if you claim it does, then prove it.
Or was this too hard for you to understand? Shall I type slower next
time?
Perhaps you're too lazy to support your claims. Shall I type in caps
next time?
See above, oh dishonest child. I have never made the claim that your god
doesn't exist.
Try again, baby. You're good for a chuckle if nothing else.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Xaonon" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 01:44:58 PM |
|
|
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive claimant---in
this case, you.
--
Xaonon, EAC Chief of Mad Scientists and informal BAAWA, aa #1821, Kibo #: 1
http://xaonon.dyndns.org/ Guaranteed content-free since 1999. No refunds.
"On one end of the spectrum you have `funny' and `enjoyable to be around'
and on the other end you have `really religious'." -- SomethingAwful.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimmyz" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 07:18:07 PM |
|
|
Xaonon <xaonon@hotpop.com> wrote in message news:<slrnc3pum0.dvk.xaonon@xaonon.local>...
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive claimant---in
this case, you.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
Carl Sagan
Link to the real world:
http://www.utahchronicle.com/news/2003/10/27/Opinion/Letter.To.The.Editor.Burden.Of.Proof.About.God.Lies.With.Theists-539663.shtml
Recommended reading: "The Book your church doesn't want you to
read"...Edited by Tim C. Leedom.
I brought this book to work today to read at lunchtime. A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading, got a look
of terror on her face and left the staff room. This is a woman with a
graduate degree in science and 20 years of teaching experience. Why
did this little book of paper strike such terror into her heart?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baruch." |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 07:47:44 PM |
|
|
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402251718.2f19e76c@posting.google.com...
Xaonon <xaonon@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:<slrnc3pum0.dvk.xaonon@xaonon.local>...
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive
claimant---in
this case, you.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
Carl Sagan
"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source
of spirituality." - Carl Sagan
Recommended reading: "The Book your church doesn't want you to
read"...Edited by Tim C. Leedom.
I brought this book to work today to read at lunchtime. A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading, got a look
of terror on her face and left the staff room. This is a woman with a
graduate degree in science and 20 years of teaching experience. Why
did this little book of paper strike such terror into her heart?
Maybe you were leering at her? Speaking for myself, when babies see my
face, they often cry. Perhaps you're just a scary kind of person?
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimmyz" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
26 Feb 2004 06:24:00 PM |
|
|
"Baruch." <baruch@N0blessedb.org$PAM> wrote in message news:<4fc%b.94267$hR.1875375@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402251718.2f19e76c@posting.google.com...
Xaonon <xaonon@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:<slrnc3pum0.dvk.xaonon@xaonon.local>...
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive
claimant---in
this case, you.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
Carl Sagan
"Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source
of spirituality." - Carl Sagan
Recommended reading: "The Book your church doesn't want you to
read"...Edited by Tim C. Leedom.
I brought this book to work today to read at lunchtime. A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading, got a look
of terror on her face and left the staff room. This is a woman with a
graduate degree in science and 20 years of teaching experience. Why
did this little book of paper strike such terror into her heart?
Maybe you were leering at her? Speaking for myself, when babies see my
face, they often cry. Perhaps you're just a scary kind of person?
As my post stated, "A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading,".
Why did you ignore what I said and choose to make it into a personal
attack?
Why did you have to make up something about something you didn't see
just because you can't stand having your beliefs questioned?
Oh, right.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baruch." |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
26 Feb 2004 07:57:12 PM |
|
|
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402261624.1bdbaf@posting.google.com...
"Baruch." <baruch@N0blessedb.org$PAM> wrote in message
news:<4fc%b.94267$hR.1875375@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402251718.2f19e76c@posting.google.com...
Xaonon <xaonon@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:<slrnc3pum0.dvk.xaonon@xaonon.local>...
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd
Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove
it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive
claimant---in
I brought this book to work today to read at lunchtime. A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading, got a look
of terror on her face and left the staff room. This is a woman with a
graduate degree in science and 20 years of teaching experience. Why
did this little book of paper strike such terror into her heart?
Maybe you were leering at her? Speaking for myself, when babies see my
face, they often cry. Perhaps you're just a scary kind of person?
As my post stated, "A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading,".
Why did you ignore what I said and choose to make it into a personal
attack?
I apologize if you felt I was attacking you. I was trying to be humorous.
I regret offending you.
Why did you have to make up something about something you didn't see
just because you can't stand having your beliefs questioned?
Ah, *what* beliefs? What do I believe in, anyway? And who's questioning
them (hint: I am)?
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimmyz" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
01 Mar 2004 09:06:47 AM |
|
|
"Baruch." <baruch@N0blessedb.org$PAM> wrote in message news:<Ytx%b.101228$hR.1986496@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402261624.1bdbaf@posting.google.com...
"Baruch." <baruch@N0blessedb.org$PAM> wrote in message
news:<4fc%b.94267$hR.1875375@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"jimmyz" <jimmyzed@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:71396465.0402251718.2f19e76c@posting.google.com...
Xaonon <xaonon@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:<slrnc3pum0.dvk.xaonon@xaonon.local>...
Ned i bach <c45b61ca.0402251143.16ffb871@posting.google.com>, Nerd
Gerl
<nerdgerl@rcip.com> teithant i thiw hin:
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove
it
doesn't. G'head.
No, it isn't. The burden of proof is always on the positive
claimant---in
I brought this book to work today to read at lunchtime. A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading, got a look
of terror on her face and left the staff room. This is a woman with a
graduate degree in science and 20 years of teaching experience. Why
did this little book of paper strike such terror into her heart?
Maybe you were leering at her? Speaking for myself, when babies see my
face, they often cry. Perhaps you're just a scary kind of person?
As my post stated, "A co-worker
sitting next to me leaned over to see what I was reading,".
Why did you ignore what I said and choose to make it into a personal
attack?
I apologize if you felt I was attacking you. I was trying to be humorous.
I regret offending you.
Why did you have to make up something about something you didn't see
just because you can't stand having your beliefs questioned?
Ah, *what* beliefs? What do I believe in, anyway? And who's questioning
them (hint: I am)?
I told about a true incident. You pretended to see something you did
not see. I don't know your beliefs, I just wonder why you need to
contradict. Maybe God needs you to defend Him.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog old*wet*dog@netscapeD0Tnet" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 07:57:52 PM |
|
|
P;ease do not cross post
.
|
|
|
| User: "Baruch." |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 08:00:14 PM |
|
|
"oldwetdog" <old*wet*dog@netscapeD0Tnet> wrote in message
news:103qkkvg2nt2v49@corp.supernews.com...
P;ease do not cross post
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vic Sagerquist" |
|
| Title: Re: What's Wrong With Them? |
25 Feb 2004 03:52:22 PM |
|
|
One day in alt.atheism, Also Sprach Nerd Gerl:
Robibnikoff wrote in message <6p6%b.4414$_4.312@www.newsranger.com>...
Nice dishonest snipping of the remainder of my post.
What was dishonest about it? I snipped in in plain sight!
You claim your god exists - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it.
G'head.
You claim God doesn't exist - therefore, it is up to YOU to prove it
doesn't. G'head.
Or was this too hard for you to understand? Shall I type slower next
time?
Perhaps you're too lazy to support your claims. Shall I type in caps
next time?
Do you claim the Invisible Pink Unicorn doesn't exist? Or are you a
believer?
No?
Can you prove the IPU doesn't exist?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Plonked by Angelicusrex 2/24/04
______________
The fool says in his heart, "There is no God".
The wise man announces it to the world.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
