You're still the one who cannot support his hypocritical addiction to
anti-abortion rants whilst ignoring the plight of SIX MILLION CHILDREN
WHO DIE FROM HUINGER-RELATED CAUSES.

Attila wrote:

The core meaning of abortion is the termination of any process prior
to it's ultimate completion. Whether it is a space mission or a
pregnancy. You were the one who set the goalposts for your own
convenience.

Sorry, I didn't realise you're god almighty and the sole authority for
definitions in this universe. My bad. I apologize. I'll immediately
notify Houghton Mifflin (publisher's of Webster's), MICRA, Inc.,
Princeton University, and the other sites that www.dictioanry.com pulls
from that their definition is utterly wrong and they should substitute
yours instead.

And for goodness sakes let's get rid of all those messy alternate
definitions that are so confusing to you because they require that you
understand "context". Clearly there can only be one true definition
(TM), and that's yours, and any context and clarification that were in
the original message are completely irrelevant.

But it's not my definition. Which
part of "www.dictiomary.com" was it you missed?

The part that matched http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm

You mean item #3 : arrest of development (as of a part or process)
resulting in imperfection; also : a result of such arrest

Which is clearly the definition I'm using since I specifically defined
the issue in my first message as "post-partum abortion" - or were you
so addictively jerking yourself off that you missed that?

And since this thread
is focused on starving children,

Not according to the subject line.

Oh, another pedant who thinks the headline is the news! Oh, do please
forgive me. As I informed a similar pedant recently, from now on, I'll
leave the opening message - you know the one that explains what the
thread is about and clarifies the title - completely blank and put the
entire 240 words in the thread title and we'll conduct the entire
thread in the title.

clearly not " any death" is being
addressed, only "Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or
other body part, prior to full development or maturation." and
"Something malformed or incompletely developed; a monstrosity." and "An
aborted organism" (due to malnutrition in this context).

It really is tedious to have to keep correcting you,

Strange - I recall no such prior conversations. But I admit I often
pay little attention to those who come in for a while and then leave.

Then maybe you should engage your brain before you flap your fingers?
But since you evidently didn't read the opening message, or don't have
the wherewithal to comprehend it, and since you're making up your own
definitions in the face of the ones I've specified *in my opening
message* and since you're moving the goalposts ("the title should be
the message, not the opening message" and "despite the deifnition
Budikka gave for abortion by specifically using the words
'post-partum', *my definition is right and Budikka's is wrong").

I guess that's why they hired women for the space program and for the
military because there's obviously no way they can abort a mission
where no women are involved....

but please don't
let that get in the way of your support for the anti-abortionists.

Having been pro-choice for longer than it's been legal there is no
danger of any such support.

And once again you misunderstand. How predictable givne your track
record so far. There are more ways of supporting the inane ranting of
anti-abortionists than being "pro-life".

Budikka

Attila wrote:

The core meaning of abortion is the termination of any process prior
to it's ultimate completion. Whether it is a space mission or a
pregnancy. You were the one who set the goalposts for your own
convenience.

Sorry, I didn't realise you're god almighty

and the sole authority for
definitions in this universe. My bad. I apologize. I'll immediately
notify Houghton Mifflin (publisher's of Webster's), MICRA, Inc.,
Princeton University, and the other sites that www.dictioanry.com pulls
from that their definition is utterly wrong and they should substitute
yours instead.

And for goodness sakes let's get rid of all those messy alternate
definitions that are so confusing to you because they require that you
understand "context". Clearly there can only be one true definition
(TM), and that's yours, and any context and clarification that were in
the original message are completely irrelevant.

But it's not my definition. Which
part of "www.dictiomary.com" was it you missed?

The part that matched http://www.m-w.com/netdict.htm

You mean item #3 : arrest of development (as of a part or process)
resulting in imperfection; also : a result of such arrest

Which is clearly the definition I'm using since I specifically defined
the issue in my first message as "post-partum abortion" - or were you
so addictively jerking yourself off that you missed that?

And since this thread
is focused on starving children,

Not according to the subject line.

Oh, another pedant who thinks the headline is the news! Oh, do please
forgive me. As I informed a similar pedant recently, from now on, I'll
leave the opening message - you know the one that explains what the
thread is about and clarifies the title - completely blank and put the
entire 240 words in the thread title and we'll conduct the entire
thread in the title.

clearly not " any death" is being
addressed, only "Cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or
other body part, prior to full development or maturation." and
"Something malformed or incompletely developed; a monstrosity." and "An
aborted organism" (due to malnutrition in this context).

It really is tedious to have to keep correcting you,

Strange - I recall no such prior conversations. But I admit I often
pay little attention to those who come in for a while and then leave.

Then maybe you should engage your brain before you flap your fingers?
But since you evidently didn't read the opening message, or don't have
the wherewithal to comprehend it, and since you're making up your own
definitions in the face of the ones I've specified *in my opening
message*

and since you're moving the goalposts ("the title should be
the message, not the opening message" and "despite the deifnition
Budikka gave for abortion by specifically using the words
'post-partum', *my definition is right and Budikka's is wrong").

I guess that's why they hired women for the space program and for the
military because there's obviously no way they can abort a mission
where no women are involved....

but please don't
let that get in the way of your support for the anti-abortionists.

Having been pro-choice for longer than it's been legal there is no
danger of any such support.

And once again you misunderstand. How predictable givne your track
record so far. There are more ways of supporting the inane ranting of
anti-abortionists than being "pro-life".

Budikka