| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
16 Nov 2005 12:14:07 PM |
| Object: |
White phosphorus used in Iraq |
And the problem is ....?
http://ansa.it/main/notizie/awnplus/english/news/2005-11-16_1976236.html
White phosphorus used in Iraq
ANSA) - Washington, November 16 - The Pentagon has admitted using white
phosphorus in Iraq but denies claims made by an Italian documentary that the
spontaneously flammable chemical was used against civilians .
Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Barry Venable said on Tuesday that white
phosphorus was used as an incendiary weapon against insurgent strongholds
during the US military's siege of the Iraqi city of Falluja last year .
"It was not used against civilians," he said .
Washington had earlier denied the use of white phosphorus at all in Falluja,
a city just to the west of Baghdad which suffered widespread destruction
during the November 2004 offensive .
White phosphorus is a lethal chemical which is capable of burning and
melting human skin. The smoke it produces is capable of causing external and
internal chemical burns .
.
|
|
| User: "Bear" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
19 Nov 2005 08:52:45 PM |
|
|
"No One" wrote
: "Bear" writes:
:
: > : > : We do have objective evidence that Cheney will lie shamelessly
when
: > : > : it suits his political agenda.
: > : >
: > : > Do you?
: > :
: > : Yes, and you do to, at least if you bother to read any mainstream
: > : newspapers.
: >
: > I don't bother. Besides, what does this have to do with how the CWC
: > classifies white phosphorus?
:
: Read what I said.
I read what you said and I told you that I don't bother to read the
mainstram newspapers. Are you having trouble understanding that?
--
Bear
There but for circumstances go I.
Being an atheist isn't a choice or act of will - like theism; it's a
consequence of what one knows and how one reasons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
19 Nov 2005 09:03:40 PM |
|
|
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: "Bear" writes:
:
: > : > : We do have objective evidence that Cheney will lie shamelessly
when
: > : > : it suits his political agenda.
: > : >
: > : > Do you?
: > :
: > : Yes, and you do to, at least if you bother to read any mainstream
: > : newspapers.
: >
: > I don't bother. Besides, what does this have to do with how the CWC
: > classifies white phosphorus?
:
: Read what I said.
I read what you said and I told you that I don't bother to read the
mainstram newspapers. Are you having trouble understanding that?
Since you don't read newspapers, perhaps you shouldn't whine when
someone points out what is in them. It just makes you look like a
fool. And if you read what I had posted, then why couldn't you
figure out that the statement was about Cheney's honesty, not
white phosphorus?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bear" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
19 Nov 2005 09:18:44 PM |
|
|
"No One" wrote
: Since you don't read newspapers, perhaps you shouldn't whine when
: someone points out what is in them.
Shows how much attention you have paid to this thread! Maybe you should
start at the beginning!
: It just makes you look like a fool.
No, the ones that look like fools are the ones who cant report accurately!
: And if you read what I had posted, then why couldn't you
: figure out that the statement was about Cheney's honesty, not
: white phosphorus?
I knew that moron, but the thread is about white phosphorus! Pay attention!
Apparently, you can't read very well!
--
Bear
There but for circumstances go I.
Being an atheist isn't a choice or act of will - like theism; it's a
consequence of what one knows and how one reasons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 12:00:14 AM |
|
|
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: Since you don't read newspapers, perhaps you shouldn't whine when
: someone points out what is in them.
Shows how much attention you have paid to this thread! Maybe you should
start at the beginning!
In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
with the subject line.
: It just makes you look like a fool.
No, the ones that look like fools are the ones who cant report accurately!
You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
: And if you read what I had posted, then why couldn't you
: figure out that the statement was about Cheney's honesty, not
: white phosphorus?
I knew that moron, but the thread is about white phosphorus! Pay attention!
Apparently, you can't read very well!
You really are a complete and utter idiot, aren't you!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bear" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 12:04:57 AM |
|
|
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a "chemical
weapon".
: You really are a complete and utter idiot, aren't you!
No, but you are! And you don't comprehend very well either!
--
Bear
There but for circumstances go I.
Being an atheist isn't a choice or act of will - like theism; it's a
consequence of what one knows and how one reasons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 12:17:57 AM |
|
|
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a "chemical
weapon".
We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
might want to learn to spell it too.
: You really are a complete and utter idiot, aren't you!
No, but you are! And you don't comprehend very well either!
Trying to cover up the fact that you (a) could not comprehend two
sentences, both under 20 words long and (b) that you made a complete
fool of yourself?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bear" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 12:30:47 AM |
|
|
"No One" wrote
: We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
: part of the thread was already beaten to death.
No, "we" weren't talking about that> You were talking about that. Anything I
have said in this thread is connected to my first post in this thread.
: Oh, and BTW, you might want to learn to spell it too.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=phosphorus
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Phosphorus
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/Phosphorus
MORON!!!
Let me know if you wish to discuss what I said in my first post to this
thread.
--
Bear
There but for circumstances go I.
Being an atheist isn't a choice or act of will - like theism; it's a
consequence of what one knows and how one reasons.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 01:34:59 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a "chemical
weapon".
We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
might want to learn to spell it too.
*sigh*
Phosphorus.
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bear" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 02:05:02 AM |
|
|
"Tim McGaughy" wrote
: No One wrote:
: > "Bear" writes:
: >>"No One" wrote
: >>: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: >>: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: >>: with the subject line.
: >>
: >>That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: >>
: >>: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about
your
: >>: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
: >>
: >>No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a
"chemical
: >>weapon".
: >
: >
: > We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
: > part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
: > might want to learn to spell it too.
:
: *sigh*
:
: Phosphorus.
:
: Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
LOL!!!
--
Bear
There but for circumstances go I.
Being an atheist isn't a choice or act of will - like theism; it's a
consequence of what one knows and how one reasons.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jenn" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 08:49:21 AM |
|
|
In article <dlrtb70214t@enews3.newsguy.com>,
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote:
No One wrote:
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a "chemical
weapon".
We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
might want to learn to spell it too.
*sigh*
Phosphorus.
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
LOL It almost never fails, does it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 10:03:38 PM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a
"chemical weapon".
We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
might want to learn to spell it too.
*sigh*
Phosphorus.
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly different.
Don't be surprised to see a typo after a long day, although that doesn't
make the idiot I was replying to any less of an idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Machque" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 06:04:31 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Don't be surprised to see a typo after a long day, although that doesn't
make the idiot I was replying to any less of an idiot.
Replying to your own posts again?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
21 Nov 2005 11:31:20 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
"Bear" <bigbear1wh@nativeweb.net> writes:
"No One" wrote
: In case you've never noticed, the topic under discussion in a thread
: that has gone on for some time usually has little or nothing to do
: with the subject line.
That's when it is time to change the subject line!
: You mean people who don't read the newspapers (as you claimed about your
: reading habits) and then argue about what is in them anyway?
No, I mean people who make false claims like white phosporus is a
"chemical weapon".
We were talking about ***** Cheney's honesty - the white phosphorous
part of the thread was already beaten to death. Oh, and BTW, you
might want to learn to spell it too.
*sigh*
Phosphorus.
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly different.
Noun... adjective... What's the difference?
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
22 Nov 2005 12:37:43 AM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly
different.
Noun... adjective... What's the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to think that a spelling checker (i.e,
a simple software module) knows the difference?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
22 Nov 2005 06:29:23 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly
different.
Noun... adjective... What's the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to think that a spelling checker (i.e,
a simple software module) knows the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to need a spellchecker to tell you the
difference?
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
22 Nov 2005 08:40:27 PM |
|
|
"Tim McGaughy" <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote
Are you perchance so daft
"Daft," huh?
Like someone who hasn't a clue as to how pathetic his
spelling flames look to the rest of the universe?
Get over it already. Pretend you're an adult & move on.
Thanks in advance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
24 Nov 2005 12:11:19 PM |
|
|
JTEM wrote:
"Tim McGaughy" <teekem@ispwest.com> wrote
Are you perchance so daft
"Daft," huh?
Like someone who hasn't a clue as to how pathetic his
spelling flames look to the rest of the universe?
Exactly.
Maybe you could follow the thread a bit more closely.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
22 Nov 2005 08:45:29 PM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly
different.
Noun... adjective... What's the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to think that a spelling checker (i.e,
a simple software module) knows the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to need a spellchecker to tell you the
difference?
Are you so incredibly stupid as to think that at the end of a long
day, when deigning to reply to some bozo, I have time to type more
than M-$ to get a quick check for typos? (In case you don't know,
'M-' is the usual notation for using the meta key), and it is
sometimes faster to use that than to back up and actually replace the
text by hand.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
24 Nov 2005 12:13:41 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Spelling flames are more effective if you spell it correctly yourself.
My spell checker accepts both, although the meaning is slightly
different.
Noun... adjective... What's the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to think that a spelling checker (i.e,
a simple software module) knows the difference?
Are you perchance so daft as to need a spellchecker to tell you the
difference?
Are you so incredibly stupid as to think that at the end of a long
day, when deigning to reply to some bozo, I have time to type more
than M-$ to get a quick check for typos?
Yer an idiot if you can't figure out what 'ous' at the end of ANY word
means. Yer also an idiot if you flame a spelling error while making one
yerself.
End of discussion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
24 Nov 2005 01:01:38 PM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Are you so incredibly stupid as to think that at the end of a long
day, when deigning to reply to some bozo, I have time to type more
than M-$ to get a quick check for typos?
Yer an idiot if you can't figure out what 'ous' at the end of ANY word
means. Yer also an idiot if you flame a spelling error while making
one yerself.
End of discussion.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot for
(a) not knowing that spell checkers simply check that words are
spelled correctly, not whether you picked the correct one, (b) not
knowing the difference between a gramatical error and a spelling
error, and (c) thinking anyone would waste much time in a response to
a bozo by carefully proofreading a post to catch the "brain/finger
disconnect problem" some of us have when typing quickly - we just
use spellcheckers (sometimes) to catch most of them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
24 Nov 2005 08:23:49 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Are you so incredibly stupid as to think that at the end of a long
day, when deigning to reply to some bozo, I have time to type more
than M-$ to get a quick check for typos?
Yer an idiot if you can't figure out what 'ous' at the end of ANY word
means. Yer also an idiot if you flame a spelling error while making
one yerself.
End of discussion.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 02:21:18 AM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
End of discussion.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I'll note that you (a) did not end the discussion as you claimed,
and (b) snipped the rest of a very short post that said
for (a) not knowing that spell checkers simply check that
words are spelled correctly, not whether you picked the
correct one, (b) not knowing the difference between a
gramatical error and a spelling error, and (c) thinking anyone
would waste much time in a response to a bozo by carefully
proofreading a post to catch the "brain/finger disconnect
problem" some of us have when typing quickly - we just use
spellcheckers (sometimes) to catch most of them.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 08:56:16 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
End of discussion.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 11:23:58 AM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim McGaughy is intellectually dishonest - the sentence of mine that
he just quoted (starting with "I think it is pretty clear") referred
to the following:
:: I'll note that you (a) did not end the discussion as you claimed,
:: and (b) snipped the rest of a very short post that said
:: for (a) not knowing that spell checkers simply check that
:: words are spelled correctly, not whether you picked the
:: correct one, (b) not knowing the difference between a
:: gramatical error and a spelling error, and (c) thinking anyone
:: would waste much time in a response to a bozo by carefully
:: proofreading a post to catch the "brain/finger disconnect
:: problem" some of us have when typing quickly - we just use
:: spellcheckers (sometimes) to catch most of them.
Pretending otherwise as Tim McGaughy just did proves him to be a liar,
particularly since he's played games snipping text two times in a row,
so it wasn't an accident.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 02:28:51 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim McGaughy is intellectually dishonest
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 04:14:30 PM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim McGaughy is intellectually dishonest
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim is declaring defeat - he acted like a jerk, objected when it
was relatively politely pointed out, and now is whining repeatedly
to save face.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
25 Nov 2005 08:09:36 PM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is truly a complete and utter idiot
for
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
I think it is pretty clear who is acting like a child and his
name starts with "Tim".
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim McGaughy is intellectually dishonest
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Tim is declaring defeat - he acted like a jerk, objected when it
was relatively politely pointed out, and now is whining repeatedly
to save face.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
26 Nov 2005 01:12:23 AM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
<snip - Tim isn't replying to anything I posted>
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is in fact a little child who, like
many 3 year olds, repeats himself incessantly. What a moron he is!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim McGaughy" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
26 Nov 2005 03:21:28 AM |
|
|
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
<snip - Tim isn't replying to anything I posted>
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is in fact a little child who, like
many 3 year olds, repeats himself incessantly. What a moron he is!
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: White phosphorus used in Iraq |
26 Nov 2005 01:33:16 PM |
|
|
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
No One wrote:
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
[reordered]
Tim McGaughy <teekem@ispwest.com> writes:
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Yes, yes, little child. You win.
Thus proving that Tim McGaughy is in fact a little child who, like
many 3 year olds, repeats himself incessantly. What a moron he is!
And also proving that Tim McGaughy is a human incarnation of a
misbehaving device on a computer network that is colloquially known as
a "babbling node".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
