Religions > Atheism > Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
08 Jan 2005 03:41:58 PM |
| Object: |
Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
I report, you decide.
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 09:08:46 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:41:58 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
Yep, google is not exactly an accurate source.
duke
*****
Matthew 7
21"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,'
will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 11:51:33 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:08:46 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:41:58 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
Yep, google is not exactly an accurate source.
Of course not. If I have access to Lexus-Nexus, I would be able to
find a lot more of your pedophile priests being booked., makeing your
Christian conservative even more immoral to professors.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "sgolac" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 05:35:46 PM |
|
|
I suggest that unless anyone is really interested in the opinions and the
squawkings of this Yang cretin, that he be simply ignored. Clearly he has
been hurt by something or other in his life and feels the need to verbally
ejaculate all the shallow generalizations to whomever would hear him so that
he can feel proud of himself since probably few others are. For him to
elevate himself to judge of Star Wars newsgroup and speak of morality is
utterly meaningless and only affects his own sad life or those who allow
themselves to be affected by the words a childish little menace. Such a
person cannot be reasoned with much less can he come up with some kind of
moral obligation for others from his own "conservative" view. (as opposed to
his self-flattering designation of neo-con).
Sage
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:7mr2u05gjkiufgrt9g54fvpa0gm72onbcj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:08:46 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:41:58 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
Yep, google is not exactly an accurate source.
Of course not. If I have access to Lexus-Nexus, I would be able to
find a lot more of your pedophile priests being booked., makeing your
Christian conservative even more immoral to professors.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 07:39:28 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:35:46 -0400, "sgolac" <sgolac@rogers.com> wrote:
I suggest that unless anyone is really interested in the opinions and the
squawkings of this Yang cretin, that he be simply ignored.
Yes, everyone, do as sgolac says, not as sgolac does.
Moron.
For him to
elevate himself to judge of Star Wars newsgroup and speak of morality is
utterly meaningless
BWAHAHA, you're trying to exonerate pedophile priests, I'm trying to
hold them to the standard of human decency. Who's the cretin again?
and only affects his own sad life or those who allow
themselves to be affected by the words a childish little menace. Such a
person cannot be reasoned with much less can he come up with some kind of
moral obligation for others from his own "conservative" view. (as opposed to
his self-flattering designation of neo-con).
Sage
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:7mr2u05gjkiufgrt9g54fvpa0gm72onbcj@4ax.com...
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:08:46 -0600, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:41:58 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine
Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
Yep, google is not exactly an accurate source.
Of course not. If I have access to Lexus-Nexus, I would be able to
find a lot more of your pedophile priests being booked., makeing your
Christian conservative even more immoral to professors.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1352 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
10 Jan 2005 10:44:42 AM |
|
|
What I see is that there is a real Satan who would love for your soul to be
eternally destroyed (since he is doomed, he plans to take as many humans as
possible with him)
What better more cunning way to do this than to infiltrate churches and get
weak people to commit such crimes. That way, people like yourself can post
topics like this and discredit the legitamecy of all of Christianity and
portray all Christians as immoral fools.
Yes, there is much wrong with the so-called leaders of Christianity and many
so called Christians - but that is only because it is a plot by the ruler of
this world (Who is Satan) to get people to scoff at the very generous offer
of eternal life through Jesus Christ.
You've been warned.
-Joe
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:haj0u01nasrh1h1nsr1cal8f4lpot2omf6@4ax.com...
I report, you decide.
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
10 Jan 2005 10:01:03 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:44:42 GMT, "Joe" <res04854@gte.net> wrote:
What I see is that there is a real Satan who would love for your soul to be
eternally destroyed (since he is doomed, he plans to take as many humans as
possible with him)
What better more cunning way to do this than to infiltrate churches and get
weak people to commit such crimes. That way, people like yourself can post
topics like this and discredit the legitamecy of all of Christianity and
portray all Christians as immoral fools.
Yes, there is much wrong with the so-called leaders of Christianity and many
so called Christians - but that is only because it is a plot by the ruler of
this world (Who is Satan) to get people to scoff at the very generous offer
of eternal life through Jesus Christ.
You've been warned.
And what is your qualification for making this warning? What have you
done against pedophile priests, GW Bush, and other CEOs of Satan, by
your own reckoning?
-Joe
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:haj0u01nasrh1h1nsr1cal8f4lpot2omf6@4ax.com...
I report, you decide.
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
[1] using news.google,com
[2] Census Bureau
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka
Yang's poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and
counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1355 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 03:49:36 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
I report, you decide.
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
You are operating under a false assumption: that everyone who is or has
been a professor or graduate student is a "liberal athiest".
Most aren't.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 04:20:21 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:49:36 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
I report, you decide.
========================================================
Number of professors/graduate students convicted of something during
the past 60 days in the US:
5 (2 involving sexual assualt of some sort) [1]
Number of priests/pastors/reverends/ministers convicted of something
during the past 30 days in the US:
23 (20 involving sexual assault of some sort) [1]
Number of post-secondary-schools teachers in the US:
524,000 [2]
Number of clergy in the US:
350,000 [2]
=========================================================
See a pattern here?
You are operating under a false assumption: that everyone who is or has
been a professor or graduate student is a "liberal athiest".
Most aren't.
Vastly more so than the population at large. A recent poll shows that
professors, being more intelligent and informed than the general
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP. A
Scientific American survey of National Acamedy of Science members
showed that 95% do not believe in a Biblical-type God. A majority of
whom can be described as atheists.
You can find anecdotal exceptions for eveything, but you need to ask
yourself, is the 6.88* felony incidence likelihood ratio between the
most conservative, religious profession and the most liberal,
nonreligious profession merely a statistcial blip, or is something
really rotten in Denmark?
*ie. a randomly selected memeber of the clergy is 6.88 times mroe
likely to be convicted of a serious felony than a randomly selected
professor/graduate student.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gerald Meazell" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 11:41:11 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
A recent poll shows that
professors, being more intelligent and informed than the general
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP.
You see, here's a common misconception. Academicians do not vote
liberal because they are more educated, intelligent, or informed. They
vote that way because they do not live in the real world. They all have
tenured positions and therefore do not have to hit the pavement every
day to bust ***** making a living. They sit up there in their halls
reading books by Thoreau and have no concept of what real life is all
about. Theirs is a world of theory, not practice.
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
Your point being?
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The number of jobs lost during Bush's first term didn't even approach
that number in Kerry's wet dreams.
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
...and 25 million people liberated; a tryant and mass murderer toppled;
a force of instability extinguished.
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
Yeah, much better we should have someone like Clinton who got blowjobs
in the Oval Office while turning down opportunities to capture or kill
bin Laden.
--
Gerald
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Johnston" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
10 Jan 2005 12:31:36 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:41:11 GMT, Gerald Meazell <gmeazell@swbell.net>
wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
A recent poll shows that
professors, being more intelligent and informed than the general
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP.
You see, here's a common misconception. Academicians do not vote
liberal because they are more educated, intelligent, or informed. They
vote that way because they do not live in the real world. They all have
tenured positions
Someone who is ignorant enough to believe that all academicians have
tenure has nothing relevant to say.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
10 Jan 2005 01:34:54 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:41:11 GMT, Gerald Meazell <gmeazell@swbell.net>
wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
A recent poll shows that
professors, being more intelligent and informed than the general
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP.
You see, here's a common misconception. Academicians do not vote
liberal because they are more educated, intelligent, or informed. They
vote that way because they do not live in the real world. They all have
tenured positions and therefore do not have to hit the pavement every
day to bust ***** making a living. They sit up there in their halls
reading books by Thoreau and have no concept of what real life is all
about. Theirs is a world of theory, not practice.
Oh, yeah, maybe they should take on "real world" risks like Ken Lay's
golden parachute or AWOL's Texas Ranger's scam he pawned off on
Austin. Where can we sign up for your "world of practice"?
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
Your point being?
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The number of jobs lost during Bush's first term didn't even approach
that number in Kerry's wet dreams.
Of course not, unlike AWOL, Kerry would have actually done something
about the economy.
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
..and 25 million people liberated; a tryant and mass murderer toppled;
a force of instability extinguished.
That must be why there are more insurgenst today than 2 tyears agao,
according to the Pentagon. Oh yeah, where's that WMD again, *****?
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
Yeah, much better we should have someone like Clinton who got blowjobs
in the Oval Office while turning down opportunities to capture or kill
bin Laden.
Yeah, like how AWOL's current practiec: "Osama Who?"
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1352 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 04:41:34 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:49:36 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
You are operating under a false assumption: that everyone who is or has
been a professor or graduate student is a "liberal athiest".
Most aren't.
Vastly more so than the population at large. A recent poll shows that
A poll run by who? Scientific American? They have their own agenda.
A bit like you.
professors, being more intelligent and informed than the general
"Intelligent and informed"... You've never met any, have you?
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP. A
Being well informed in a field like biology doesn't translate into being
particularly well informed in other fields - or in politics. Frankly,
anyone who understands the issues and still votes for people like Kerry
needs professional help. Oh, wait. It's not and never has been about
the *issues*, but about POWER. The DNC and the Left thinks it is the
ruling class and it is somehow against the natural order for them to not
be in power.
Just what has Bush done that Clinton didn't?
Scientific American survey of National Acamedy of Science members
showed that 95% do not believe in a Biblical-type God. A majority of
NAS members are also a small subset of "professors".
whom can be described as atheists.
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative - and the one DNC-voter is a
lawyer... Almost 100% of people in my field with an advanced degree are
conservatives.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:26:11 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative
Obviously you didn't get your "advanced degree" in common sense.
Surveys consistently show that professors are more liberal than the
general population, but facts be damned! They're no match for my
anecdotes!
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:31:31 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Obviously you didn't get your "advanced degree" in common sense.
Yours is in, what, exactly?
Surveys consistently show that professors are more liberal than the
general population, but facts be damned! They're no match for my
What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly field
doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid.
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "ClabberHead 5.0" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 09:55:24 AM |
|
|
"JCS" <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Just to lighten up this conversation a little bit...
From the comedy of Ron White:
"If I knew the difference in anecdote and antidote my friend would still be
alive today. He's got a snake bite, and I'm reading him funny stories out
of Reader's Digest."
--
ClabberHead 5.0 (aka Iron Chef Atkins)
248.5/195.0/185.0 Livin' La Vida Low-Carb since 5/1/03
Al-Team #"e" to 27 decimal places (2.71828182845904523536028747...)
MSTie # 93058
"Think about how stupid the average person is, then remember half of them
are stupider than that!" - George Carlin
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:42:15 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:31:31 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Surveys consistently show that professors are more liberal than the
general population, but facts be damned! They're no match for my
What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly field
doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid.
Non sequitur. What does the "validity" of their political preference
have anything to do with the distribution of their political
preferences?
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
handful anecdotes. What did you get your "advanced degree" on,
equivocation?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:45:06 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:31:31 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Surveys consistently show that professors are more liberal than the
general population, but facts be damned! They're no match for my
What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly field
doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid.
Non sequitur. What does the "validity" of their political preference
have anything to do with the distribution of their political
preferences?
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
What was the sample size? What fields were sampled? What was the
error rate? Do you even know?
handful anecdotes. What did you get your "advanced degree" on,
equivocation?
I'm willing to bet you don't have a degree of any type in any field.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 06:39:38 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:45:06 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Since you appeared to have the office "debate" handbook, why don;t you
show me where it seyas I have to post only one reply?
Surveys consistently show that professors are more liberal than the
general population, but facts be damned! They're no match for my
What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly field
doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid.
Non sequitur. What does the "validity" of their political preference
have anything to do with the distribution of their political
preferences?
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
What, that liberal, non-religious professors for some reasons are
somehow less likely to molest little kids than conservative, religious
people of the cloth?
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
What was the sample size? What fields were sampled? What was the
error rate? Do you even know?
You really are ill-informed aren't you. What you can't google? Can't
get your head out of your ***** and read headlines from time to time?
http://www.nas.org/aa/klein_launch.htm
http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110004806
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 07:02:41 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:45:06 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Since you appeared to have the office "debate" handbook, why don;t you
show me where it seyas I have to post only one reply?
It's the way things are generally done on Usenet. It's the same with
top-posting. It makes the argument harder for people to follow.
<snip>
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
What, that liberal, non-religious professors for some reasons are
somehow less likely to molest little kids than conservative, religious
people of the cloth?
Your evidence doesn't indicate that.
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
What was the sample size? What fields were sampled? What was the
error rate? Do you even know?
You really are ill-informed aren't you. What you can't google? Can't
get your head out of your ***** and read headlines from time to time?
http://www.nas.org/aa/klein_launch.htm
Finally you post a link. Regardless, this doesn't prove what you are
trying to prove.
I do notice that the most heavily democratic-leaning people are in the
softer sciences. What's more, this isn't a valid study of people with
*advanced degrees* (which you are implying to mean "better educated"),
since most of them are NOT in academia.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 10:24:41 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:02:41 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:45:06 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Since you appeared to have the office "debate" handbook, why don;t you
show me where it seyas I have to post only one reply?
It's the way things are generally done on Usenet. It's the same with
top-posting. It makes the argument harder for people to follow.
Sounds like a personal problem to me.
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
What, that liberal, non-religious professors for some reasons are
somehow less likely to molest little kids than conservative, religious
people of the cloth?
Your evidence doesn't indicate that.
Actually, it does.
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
What was the sample size? What fields were sampled? What was the
error rate? Do you even know?
You really are ill-informed aren't you. What you can't google? Can't
get your head out of your ***** and read headlines from time to time?
http://www.nas.org/aa/klein_launch.htm
Finally you post a link. Regardless, this doesn't prove what you are
trying to prove.
I do notice that the most heavily democratic-leaning people are in the
softer sciences.
I do notice that you snip the other link. Let me guess, you think
there are no biologists in Stanford.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 09:48:49 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:02:41 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:45:06 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Since you appeared to have the office "debate" handbook, why don;t you
show me where it seyas I have to post only one reply?
It's the way things are generally done on Usenet. It's the same with
top-posting. It makes the argument harder for people to follow.
Sounds like a personal problem to me.
If that's what you consider the normal method of accepted posting on
Usenet....
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
What, that liberal, non-religious professors for some reasons are
somehow less likely to molest little kids than conservative, religious
people of the cloth?
Your evidence doesn't indicate that.
Actually, it does.
No, it doesn't. The SciAm survey was limited to the "soft sciences"
only. That not only doesn't speak to the leanings of ALL faculty
everywhere, but doesn't address what their grad students think nor does
it cover all those people NOT in academia with said advanced degrees.
anecdotes!
My anecdotes are very much a match for your anecdotes. I'm not sure you
understand what the word means.
Oh, I see, a large sample survey is the numerically the same as your
What was the sample size? What fields were sampled? What was the
error rate? Do you even know?
You really are ill-informed aren't you. What you can't google? Can't
get your head out of your ***** and read headlines from time to time?
http://www.nas.org/aa/klein_launch.htm
Finally you post a link. Regardless, this doesn't prove what you are
trying to prove.
I do notice that the most heavily democratic-leaning people are in the
softer sciences.
I do notice that you snip the other link. Let me guess, you think
there are no biologists in Stanford.
Why should I care?
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
10 Jan 2005 01:37:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 21:48:49 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:02:41 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:45:06 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can't just limit yourself to ONE reply per response, I see.
Since when do I have to play by your rules?
Your new to this whole "debate" thing. Either that, your the only
reason you are here is that you admire your own words too much.
Since you appeared to have the office "debate" handbook, why don;t you
show me where it seyas I have to post only one reply?
It's the way things are generally done on Usenet. It's the same with
top-posting. It makes the argument harder for people to follow.
Sounds like a personal problem to me.
If that's what you consider the normal method of accepted posting on
Usenet....
Hmm, let me put that away in the JCS hypocrisy file...
It's a meaningless point you're trying to make. That's why.
What, that liberal, non-religious professors for some reasons are
somehow less likely to molest little kids than conservative, religious
people of the cloth?
Your evidence doesn't indicate that.
Actually, it does.
No, it doesn't. The SciAm survey was limited to the "soft sciences"
only. That not only doesn't speak to the leanings of ALL faculty
everywhere, but doesn't address what their grad students think nor does
it cover all those people NOT in academia with said advanced degrees.
Actually, you're full of *****. SciAm polls the NAS members, the
rightwing NAS survey social science faculties, the WSJ poll all of
Stanford professors.
Oops, turns out you're full of *****. Again.
I do notice that you snip the other link. Let me guess, you think
there are no biologists in Stanford.
Why should I care?
Hmm, let me pull this out of the JCS hypocrisy file....
"If that's what you consider the normal method of accepted posting on
Usenet...."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1352 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:16:25 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:49:36 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
You are operating under a false assumption: that everyone who is or has
been a professor or graduate student is a "liberal athiest".
Most aren't.
Vastly more so than the population at large. A recent poll shows that
A poll run by who? Scientific American? They have their own agenda.
Sort of like how your ad hominen attack reflects your own misinformed
agenda? The SciAm survey is consitent with prior surveys.
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP. A
Just what has Bush done that Clinton didn't?
Lie about a war, run up a massive deficit. Oh, yeah, where's that WMD
again, *****?
Scientific American survey of National Acamedy of Science members
showed that 95% do not believe in a Biblical-type God. A majority of
NAS members are also a small subset of "professors".
True. but any other surveys of professors will show that they are far
less religious than the general population at large.
whom can be described as atheists.
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative - and the one DNC-voter is a
lawyer... Almost 100% of people in my field with an advanced degree are
conservatives.
Let me guess, your "advance degree" is not a PhD. Try again. But then
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 05:28:16 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:41:34 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:49:36 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
You are operating under a false assumption: that everyone who is or has
been a professor or graduate student is a "liberal athiest".
Most aren't.
Vastly more so than the population at large. A recent poll shows that
A poll run by who? Scientific American? They have their own agenda.
Sort of like how your ad hominen attack reflects your own misinformed
agenda? The SciAm survey is consitent with prior surveys.
What "ad-hom" in the above? Frankly, judging by the name you post
under, an "ad-hom" would have to be pretty serious to compete.
An "ad-hom" attack would be me saying "you're wrong because you're a moron".
population, are 8-to-1 more likely to vote Democrat relative to GOP. A
Just what has Bush done that Clinton didn't?
Lie about a war, run up a massive deficit. Oh, yeah, where's that WMD
again, *****?
What lie? Clinton said the EXACT SAME THINGS ABOUT IRAQ and signed the
Iraq Liberation Act into *law* - that made it the policy of this
government to depose Saddam. It isn't a lie if not only YOU think it's
the truth, but Iraq CLAIMED it was. So did pretty much everyone else at
the time.
Need I point out all the deficit spending the Dems have run up over the
years?
Scientific American survey of National Acamedy of Science members
showed that 95% do not believe in a Biblical-type God. A majority of
NAS members are also a small subset of "professors".
True. but any other surveys of professors will show that they are far
less religious than the general population at large.
Which surveys would those be?
whom can be described as atheists.
Let's see: I have an advanced degree and I'm not an athiest. All but
one of my professors wasn't, either. Almost everyone I know currently
with an advanced degree votes conservative - and the one DNC-voter is a
lawyer... Almost 100% of people in my field with an advanced degree are
conservatives.
Let me guess, your "advance degree" is not a PhD. Try again. But then
Not yet. What's yours in? Have you even BEEN to a university?
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
You think this garbage somehow makes people think YOU'RE intelligent and
informed? You think THIS counts as reasoned and educated debate?
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 06:26:05 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:28:16 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lie about a war, run up a massive deficit. Oh, yeah, where's that WMD
again, *****?
What lie? Clinton said the EXACT SAME THINGS ABOUT IRAQ and signed the
Iraq Liberation Act into *law* - that made it the policy of this
government to depose Saddam. It isn't a lie if not only YOU think it's
the truth, but Iraq CLAIMED it was. So did pretty much everyone else at
the time.
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
So, where's that WMD again, *****?
True. but any other surveys of professors will show that they are far
less religious than the general population at large.
Which surveys would those be?
If you're in school, as you claim you are, you can look it up on Lexus
Nexus.
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
Oh wait, let me pull this out from the JCS hypocrisy file:
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 06:27:30 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:28:16 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Lie about a war, run up a massive deficit. Oh, yeah, where's that WMD
again, *****?
What lie? Clinton said the EXACT SAME THINGS ABOUT IRAQ and signed the
Iraq Liberation Act into *law* - that made it the policy of this
government to depose Saddam. It isn't a lie if not only YOU think it's
the truth, but Iraq CLAIMED it was. So did pretty much everyone else at
the time.
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
Actually, no the UN didn't *disagree*. They'd said the same things that
Bush did in the past, but the French were bought off.
So, where's that WMD again, *****?
Ask the world's intel services.
True. but any other surveys of professors will show that they are far
less religious than the general population at large.
Which surveys would those be?
If you're in school, as you claim you are, you can look it up on Lexus
Nexus.
I'm not in school. I'm long out of school.
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
Oh wait, let me pull this out from the JCS hypocrisy file:
I'm not the one claiming that holding an advanced degree is some
evidence of intelligent choices in voting. You are.
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
So, what's YOUR field again? I've asked several times.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 06:50:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:27:30 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
Actually, no the UN didn't *disagree*. They'd said the same things that
Bush did in the past, but the French were bought off.
Actually, the UN rightly called AWOL's WMD claims *****.
I'm not in school. I'm long out of school.
Oh, I get it. So the fact that you "not yet" have a PhD might perhaps
have something to do with the fact that you're, hmm, let me guess,
"long out of school"?
What were you expecting? That you "not yet" have a PhD but one day the
magic PhD fairy might one day show up, sprinkle some magic
dissertation dust, and you would miraculously have a PhD even though
you're "long out of school"?
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
Oh wait, let me pull this out from the JCS hypocrisy file:
I'm not the one claiming that holding an advanced degree is some
evidence of intelligent choices in voting. You are.
I am, and you apparently agree with me, given the fact that you think
your pedigree as "an educated engineer with an MS" makes you
"intelligent and informed".
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
So, what's YOUR field again? I've asked several times.
Let me pull this outof the JCS idiocy file:
"I'm willing to bet you don't have a degree of any type in any field."
Well, how much are you willing to bet? Put up or shut up.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 06:58:16 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:27:30 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
Actually, no the UN didn't *disagree*. They'd said the same things that
Bush did in the past, but the French were bought off.
Actually, the UN rightly called AWOL's WMD claims *****.
You really ought to read up a bit more on current events - especially
concerning the reasons for the sanctions, who imposed them, and just
what that last UN sanction against Saddam was over.
I'm not in school. I'm long out of school.
Oh, I get it. So the fact that you "not yet" have a PhD might perhaps
have something to do with the fact that you're, hmm, let me guess,
"long out of school"?
No. It means I might go back.
What were you expecting? That you "not yet" have a PhD but one day the
magic PhD fairy might one day show up, sprinkle some magic
dissertation dust, and you would miraculously have a PhD even though
you're "long out of school"?
Do you somehow think an education is something you have to get all at once?
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
Oh wait, let me pull this out from the JCS hypocrisy file:
I'm not the one claiming that holding an advanced degree is some
evidence of intelligent choices in voting. You are.
I am, and you apparently agree with me, given the fact that you think
your pedigree as "an educated engineer with an MS" makes you
"intelligent and informed".
Compared to you, certainly. At least based on your behaviour so far.
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
So, what's YOUR field again? I've asked several times.
Let me pull this outof the JCS idiocy file:
"I'm willing to bet you don't have a degree of any type in any field."
Well, how much are you willing to bet? Put up or shut up.
It's a phrase. Geez.
I'm willing to bet exactly what "Yang"'s opinion is worth to the world.
JCS
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists? (Part II) |
08 Jan 2005 10:22:45 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:58:16 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:27:30 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
Actually, no the UN didn't *disagree*. They'd said the same things that
Bush did in the past, but the French were bought off.
Actually, the UN rightly called AWOL's WMD claims *****.
You really ought to read up a bit more on current events - especially
concerning the reasons for the sanctions, who imposed them, and just
what that last UN sanction against Saddam was over.
You really need to get your head out of your *****. The sanctioned
worked. That was the UN's position. Oops, that turned out to be
Duelfer's position as well.
Where's that WMD again, *****?
I'm not in school. I'm long out of school.
Oh, I get it. So the fact that you "not yet" have a PhD might perhaps
have something to do with the fact that you're, hmm, let me guess,
"long out of school"?
No. It means I might go back.
Riiiiight. Just like I'm "no yet" drafted by the NFL.
I can't really expect you to be "intelligent and informed" being what
you are.
What, an educated engineer with an MS?
Oh wait, let me pull this out from the JCS hypocrisy file:
I'm not the one claiming that holding an advanced degree is some
evidence of intelligent choices in voting. You are.
I am, and you apparently agree with me, given the fact that you think
your pedigree as "an educated engineer with an MS" makes you
"intelligent and informed".
Compared to you, certainly. At least based on your behaviour so far.
Ah, so even when your puny brain tries to disagree with me. You end up
agreeing with me.
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
So, what's YOUR field again? I've asked several times.
Let me pull this outof the JCS idiocy file:
"I'm willing to bet you don't have a degree of any type in any field."
Well, how much are you willing to bet? Put up or shut up.
It's a phrase. Geez.
Sort of like "Mission Accomplished" right?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1351 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "JCS" |
|
| Title: Re: Who's More Moral, Conservative Christians or Liberal Atheists?(Part II) |
09 Jan 2005 09:46:36 PM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:58:16 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:27:30 -0600, JCS <mjcs_750@hotmail.com> wrote:
*****. the UN, the IAEA BOTH disagreed with AWOL in 2003. And,
surprise! unlike AWOL's cheery-picked info, they turned out to be
correct.
Actually, no the UN didn't *disagree*. They'd said the same things that
Bush did in the past, but the French were bought off.
Actually, the UN rightly called AWOL's WMD claims *****.
You really ought to read up a bit more on current events - especially
concerning the reasons for the sanctions, who imposed them, and just
what that last UN sanction against Saddam was over.
You really need to get your head out of your *****. The sanctioned
worked. That was the UN's position. Oops, that turned out to be
Duelfer's position as well.
The sanctions didn't work: re: The Oil For Food Scandal and the fact
that Iraq NEVER complied with the ceasefire and NEVER proved they'd
destroyed the weapons they'd ADMITTED they had.
The sanctions were intended to force Iraq to comply, not to keep them
from building more.
Where's that WMD again, *****?
Where's your brain? Iraq STATED they HAD WMDs. Of course, you're
ignorant of history.
I'm not in school. I'm long out of school.
Oh, I get it. So the fact that you "not yet" have a PhD might perhaps
have something to do with the fact that you're, hmm, let me guess,
"long out of school"?
No. It means I might go back.
Riiiiight. Just like I'm "no yet" drafted by the NFL.
The two aren't comparable. You'll nevrer be drafted by the NFL, but I
can apply to any PhD program in my field of study I desire - when I
desire to do so.
<snip>
Compared to you, certainly. At least based on your behaviour so far.
Ah, so even when your puny brain tries to disagree with me. You end up
agreeing with me.
Hardly.
"What YOU don't understand is that being trained in a particularly
field doesn't make your opinions in any other field more valid."
So, what's YOUR field again? I've asked several times.
Let me pull this outof the JCS idiocy file:
"I'm willing to bet you don't have a degree of any type in any field."
Well, how much are you willing to bet? Put up or shut up.
It's a phrase. Geez.
Sort of like "Mission Accomplished" right?
"Mission Accomplished" as in the full-scale ground campaign was over and
the Iraqi government had fallen.
JCS
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
