Religions > Atheism > Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"satyr" |
| Date: |
29 May 2004 01:14:56 AM |
| Object: |
Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
| User: "Earle Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 01:14:15 PM |
|
|
In article <m89gb0hpbv4a7kih3mvm14e5r6hdt2tgn1@4ax.com>,
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
*
Satyr: Don't you know that it's impolite to mention 'Bishops' and
'buttocks' in the same posting?
earle
*
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
30 May 2004 02:24:41 AM |
|
|
In article <earle.jones-E8B1B2.11141429052004@netnews.comcast.net>,
Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> wrote:
In article <m89gb0hpbv4a7kih3mvm14e5r6hdt2tgn1@4ax.com>,
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
*
Satyr: Don't you know that it's impolite to mention 'Bishops' and
'buttocks' in the same posting?
earle
*
Besides, it's redundant.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
03 Jun 2004 12:51:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 18:14:15 GMT, Earle Jones
<earle.jones@comcast.net> wrote:
In article <m89gb0hpbv4a7kih3mvm14e5r6hdt2tgn1@4ax.com>,
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
*
Satyr: Don't you know that it's impolite to mention 'Bishops' and
'buttocks' in the same posting?
earle
*
I thought it was practically unavoidable.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
30 May 2004 02:32:35 AM |
|
|
In article <m89gb0hpbv4a7kih3mvm14e5r6hdt2tgn1@4ax.com>,
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
If I remember my old catechism from a half century ago, Cathoics who are
in a state of mortal sin may not receive communion. The church teaches
that the use of 'artificial' contraception is a mortal sin, so if you
use condoms or the pill or somesuch and don't confess it to a priest,
you commit another sin if you receive the sacrament. It's obvious that
many Catholics don't care.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "D. Stephen Heersink" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
30 May 2004 03:47:53 AM |
|
|
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
_____________________
D. Stephen Heersink
San Francisco
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 12:56:58 AM |
|
|
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
(D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
---
Wishful Thinking
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
There is no way to deny the fact that the Church's ordinary magisterium
(cf. Vatican II's document Lumen Gentium 25) has always and everywhere
condemned artificial contraception. The matter has already been
infallibly decided. The so-called "individual conscience" argument
amounts to "individual disobedience."
---
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 01:28:54 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-0AE466.22565830052004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
dshsfca@ixpres.com (D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
---
Wishful Thinking
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
There is no way to deny the fact that the Church's ordinary magisterium
(cf. Vatican II's document Lumen Gentium 25) has always and everywhere
condemned artificial contraception. The matter has already been
infallibly decided. The so-called "individual conscience" argument
amounts to "individual disobedience."
The church does not proclaim infallibility, only the pope can do that (after
1871, before that the magnistarium did the deed.)
No pope has made such a declaration and it is unlikely that even a most
conservative pope would do so.
Like marriage of priests (done in some countries) it is to political and
they need breathing room.
I doubt any pope will ever speak "ex-cathedra" on anything except issues
such as the ascension of Mary and other such meaningless things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
02 Jun 2004 12:55:36 AM |
|
|
In article <GgAuc.99988$hH.1775384@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-0AE466.22565830052004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
dshsfca@ixpres.com (D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
---
Wishful Thinking
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
There is no way to deny the fact that the Church's ordinary magisterium
(cf. Vatican II's document Lumen Gentium 25) has always and everywhere
condemned artificial contraception. The matter has already been
infallibly decided. The so-called "individual conscience" argument
amounts to "individual disobedience."
The church does not proclaim infallibility, only the pope can do that (after
1871, before that the magnistarium did the deed.)
No pope has made such a declaration and it is unlikely that even a most
conservative pope would do so.
Like marriage of priests (done in some countries) it is to political and
they need breathing room.
I doubt any pope will ever speak "ex-cathedra" on anything except issues
such as the ascension of Mary and other such meaningless things.
I don't think that the Pope has to declare something to be a mortal sin
to make it a mortal sin. Tradition counts a lot too. The Catholic
catechism declares contraception to be "intrinsically evil" which sounds
like a mortal sin to me:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#IV
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based
on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity
with the objective criteria of morality.157 These methods respect the
bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the
education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which,
whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment,
or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as
an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically
evil:158
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal
self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by
an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving
oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal
to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of
conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality.
.. . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between
contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in
the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and
of human sexuality.
---
Then again, I'm not a Catholic theologian and have no intention to be
one.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
02 Jun 2004 10:48:11 AM |
|
|
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-4A60E1.22553601062004@news-60.giganews.com...
.
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could
be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control
are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching
is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
I don't think that the Pope has to declare something to be a mortal sin
to make it a mortal sin. Tradition counts a lot too. The Catholic
catechism declares contraception to be "intrinsically evil" which sounds
like a mortal sin to me:
The argument was that " It cannot be changed and has been proclaimed by
the Church infallibly."
It has not been stated in this manner. Certainly the church can talk about
mortal sins. Whne I was growing up in the church it was a mortal sin to eat
meat on Friday. Not any more.
The church used to make a really big deal about touching the host afterr it
had been consecrated. Only the priest could do it with the magic thumb and
forefinger of his right hand. I vaguely rememebr a story about how some
priest lost those and the wonderful church let him use another hand.
Of course you could eat it and later ***** part of it.
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#IV
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based
on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity
with the objective criteria of morality.157 These methods respect the
bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the
education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which,
whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment,
or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as
an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically
evil:158
The technical tern for this is method is "parent"
My first wife and one of her first boy friends were serious catholics with
catholic sex education.
It was always a painful experience for her with him.
They decided to use the rhythm method. Safe with all they had learned about
sex from the parish priest and the nuns they decided that the week or so
*between* periods was the safest time...
She had an abortion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
03 Jun 2004 12:32:29 AM |
|
|
In article <%Emvc.77823$r36.31354@newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>,
"Mike Painter" <mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-4A60E1.22553601062004@news-60.giganews.com...
.
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could
be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control
are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching
is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
I don't think that the Pope has to declare something to be a mortal sin
to make it a mortal sin. Tradition counts a lot too. The Catholic
catechism declares contraception to be "intrinsically evil" which sounds
like a mortal sin to me:
The argument was that " It cannot be changed and has been proclaimed by
the Church infallibly."
That wasn't my statement though. I was quoting from RCC literature. The
Catholic church can and does change. They even let Galileo off the hook.
It has not been stated in this manner. Certainly the church can talk about
mortal sins. Whne I was growing up in the church it was a mortal sin to eat
meat on Friday. Not any more.
Nonetheless, when I was growing up as a Catholic, I believed, as other
Catholics, that if I ate meat on a Friday and died without confessing, I
would go to Hell just as surely as If I had killed somebody. I'm sure
that many Catholics believe that contraception is a mortal sin in the
same way. It is possible that the church may change its mind here too.
At times the church can also be practical when it feels that it is its
own interest.
The church used to make a really big deal about touching the host afterr it
had been consecrated. Only the priest could do it with the magic thumb and
forefinger of his right hand. I vaguely rememebr a story about how some
priest lost those and the wonderful church let him use another hand.
Of course you could eat it and later ***** part of it.
In my church one kid puked after receiving. They had to get the priest
to clean it up. Hah!
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#IV
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based
on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity
with the objective criteria of morality.157 These methods respect the
bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the
education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which,
whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment,
or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as
an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically
evil:158
The technical tern for this is method is "parent"
My first wife and one of her first boy friends were serious catholics with
catholic sex education.
It was always a painful experience for her with him.
They decided to use the rhythm method. Safe with all they had learned about
sex from the parish priest and the nuns they decided that the week or so
*between* periods was the safest time...
She had an abortion.
The rhythm method, aka Vatican Roulette.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Men become civilized not in their willingness to believe, but in
proportion to their readiness to doubt." - H. L. Mencken
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 12:35:03 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:48:11 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
The church used to make a really big deal about touching the host afterr it
had been consecrated. Only the priest could do it with the magic thumb and
forefinger of his right hand. I vaguely rememebr a story about how some
priest lost those and the wonderful church let him use another hand.
Of course you could eat it and later ***** part of it.
That's not the part that's Jesus.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 12:33:16 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 22:55:36 -0700, johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com>
wrote:
In article <GgAuc.99988$hH.1775384@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net> wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-0AE466.22565830052004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
dshsfca@ixpres.com (D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
---
Wishful Thinking
Ignoring the mountain of evidence, some maintain that the Church
considers the use of contraception a matter for each married couple to
decide according to their "individual conscience." Yet, nothing could be
further from the truth. The Church has always maintained the historic
Christian teaching that deliberate acts of artificial birth control are
always gravely sinful, which means that it is mortally sinful if done
with full knowledge and deliberate consent (CCC 1857). This teaching is
definitive and irreformable. It cannot be changed and has been
proclaimed by the Church infallibly.
There is no way to deny the fact that the Church's ordinary magisterium
(cf. Vatican II's document Lumen Gentium 25) has always and everywhere
condemned artificial contraception. The matter has already been
infallibly decided. The so-called "individual conscience" argument
amounts to "individual disobedience."
The church does not proclaim infallibility, only the pope can do that (after
1871, before that the magnistarium did the deed.)
No pope has made such a declaration and it is unlikely that even a most
conservative pope would do so.
Like marriage of priests (done in some countries) it is to political and
they need breathing room.
I doubt any pope will ever speak "ex-cathedra" on anything except issues
such as the ascension of Mary and other such meaningless things.
I don't think that the Pope has to declare something to be a mortal sin
to make it a mortal sin. Tradition counts a lot too. The Catholic
catechism declares contraception to be "intrinsically evil" which sounds
like a mortal sin to me:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s2c2a6.htm#IV
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based
on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity
with the objective criteria of morality.157 These methods respect the
bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the
education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which,
whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment,
or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as
an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically
evil:158
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal
self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by
an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving
oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal
to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of
conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality.
. . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between
contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in
the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and
of human sexuality.
---
Then again, I'm not a Catholic theologian and have no intention to be
one.
From The Catholic Marriage Manual by Rev. George A. Kelly, 1958:
Sometimes the question of "rights" arises to plague a marriage. From a
technical point of view, theologians tell us, the husband has the
right to engage in intercourse with his wife except when she has a
serious reason to refuse. St. Paul teaches that "the wife has not
authority over her body, but the husband; the husband likewise has not
authority over his body, but the wife." (1 Corinthians, vii, 4:1) For
a wife to refuse her husband's request without a serious reason could
be a mortal sin. When is a reason serious? Theologians say that she
may reasonably refuse when her husband is drunk, when either has a
venereal disease which may be transmitted to the other, when her own
health could be seriously endangered as a result, when there is a
clear indication that artificial birth control is to be practiced, or
when the other party has committed adultery. A husband may refuse his
wife on the same grounds.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 12:39:42 AM |
|
|
"satyr" <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in message
news:phm2c0to0el9kmq7bmd8tfpojru8ma7950@4ax.com...
From The Catholic Marriage Manual by Rev. George A. Kelly, 1958:
Sometimes the question of "rights" arises to plague a marriage. From a
technical point of view, theologians tell us, the husband has the
right to engage in intercourse with his wife except when she has a
serious reason to refuse. St. Paul teaches that "the wife has not
authority over her body, but the husband; the husband likewise has not
authority over his body, but the wife." (1 Corinthians, vii, 4:1) For
a wife to refuse her husband's request without a serious reason could
be a mortal sin. When is a reason serious? Theologians say that she
may reasonably refuse when her husband is drunk, when either has a
venereal disease which may be transmitted to the other, when her own
health could be seriously endangered as a result, when there is a
clear indication that artificial birth control is to be practiced, or
when the other party has committed adultery. A husband may refuse his
wife on the same grounds.
Roman Catholic Foreplay takes two forms.
"Are you awake?" and
"Brace yourself Bridget!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 03:43:31 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 05:39:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Roman Catholic Foreplay takes two forms.
"Are you awake?" and
"Brace yourself Bridget!"
Australian foreplay:
"G'day Sheila"
"G'day Bruce"
"Fancy a screw?"
"Go on, you smooth talking *****, you talked me into it."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 11:11:11 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:vq13c0h06k9qabo7b92fkorr0q86d84ogm@4ax.com...
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 05:39:42 GMT, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Roman Catholic Foreplay takes two forms.
"Are you awake?" and
"Brace yourself Bridget!"
Australian foreplay:
"G'day Sheila"
"G'day Bruce"
"Fancy a screw?"
"Go on, you smooth talking *****, you talked me into it."
Alternatively
"If all you're going to do is talk, I'm going home."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
05 Jun 2004 04:40:57 PM |
|
|
From The Catholic Marriage Manual by Rev. George A. Kelly, 1958:
Sometimes the question of "rights" arises to plague a marriage.
Leave it to religion to consider rights a "plague."
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Department of Applied Rattan Use
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking, which
leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy." - Robert Anton
Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earl Camembert" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 04:04:26 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 06:28:54 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net>
wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-0AE466.22565830052004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
dshsfca@ixpres.com (D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
Wow, even the official catholic site is blowing smoke up people's *****.
I quote from the site.
"Deuteronomy 23:1 condemns birth control by sterilization: "He whose
testicles are crushed or whose male member is cut off shall not enter
the assembly of the Lord." These were the methods of male
sterilization available in those days."
What is the next verse?
2 A ***** shall not enter into the assembly of Yahweh; even to the
tenth generation shall none of his enter into the assembly of Yahweh.
That has nothing to do with sterilization, it has to do with Yahweh
wanting only PERFECT people in his prescience.
Leviticus 21:17 “Say to Aaron, ‘None of your seed throughout their
generations who has a blemish, may approach to offer the bread of his
God.
18 For whatever man he is that has a blemish, he shall not draw near:
a blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity,
19 or a man who has an injured foot, or an injured hand,
20 or hunchbacked, or a dwarf, or one who has a defect in his eye, or
an itching disease, or scabs, or who has damaged testicles;
21 no man of the seed of Aaron the priest, who has a blemish, shall
come near to offer the offerings of Yahweh made by fire. Since has a
blemish, he shall not come near to offer the bread of his God.
Did you ever wonder why the RCC doesn't want you the read the Bible?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mike Painter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 05:04:23 PM |
|
|
"Earl Camembert" <nospam@forme.org> wrote in message
news:seslb0te5ssv6e0okbmm4772d06mq1erkf@4ax.com...
On Mon, 31 May 2004 06:28:54 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net>
wrote:
"johac" <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in message
news:jhachm-0AE466.22565830052004@news-60.giganews.com...
In article <40c29e56.70252735@news.ixpres.com>,
dshsfca@ixpres.com (D. Stephen Heersink) wrote:
Humanae Vitae, the papal document that condemns artificial birth
control, was merely an encyclical -- that is a pastoral letter. While
it may have contained dogmatic issues circumlocutious to birth
control, the encyclical is not a dogmatic statement of faith.
Catholics are required to read and learn the arguments contained in
that letter, and are urged to follow its recommendations. Whether or
not the use of contraceptive devices is a 'sin' is a matter of
personal conscience. If one does not believe in good faith that
contraception is wrong and is not convinced through one's conscience,
then the practice may still be sinful objectively, but only venially.
Venial sins don't preclude anyone from receiving communion.
Kind regards,
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but
I
haven't heard so.
From a Catholic website:
http://www.catholic.com/library/birth_control.asp
Wow, even the official catholic site is blowing smoke up people's *****.
I quote from the site.
"Deuteronomy 23:1 condemns birth control by sterilization: "He whose
testicles are crushed or whose male member is cut off shall not enter
the assembly of the Lord." These were the methods of male
sterilization available in those days."
They use Gen 38: 9-10 to show why contreception is wrong.
I suspect if there was a god it would still be doing this.
What is the next verse?
2 A ***** shall not enter into the assembly of Yahweh; even to the
tenth generation shall none of his enter into the assembly of Yahweh.
That has nothing to do with sterilization, it has to do with Yahweh
wanting only PERFECT people in his prescience.
Leviticus 21:17 "Say to Aaron, 'None of your seed throughout their
generations who has a blemish, may approach to offer the bread of his
God.
18 For whatever man he is that has a blemish, he shall not draw near:
a blind man, or a lame, or he who has a flat nose, or any deformity,
19 or a man who has an injured foot, or an injured hand,
20 or hunchbacked, or a dwarf, or one who has a defect in his eye, or
an itching disease, or scabs, or who has damaged testicles;
21 no man of the seed of Aaron the priest, who has a blemish, shall
come near to offer the offerings of Yahweh made by fire. Since has a
blemish, he shall not come near to offer the bread of his God.
Did you ever wonder why the RCC doesn't want you the read the Bible?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Luree" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 08:30:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 22:04:23 GMT, "Mike Painter" <mdotpainter@att.net>
wrote:
Back when I was in Catholic high school in the '50s, we were told that
it was definitely a mortal sin. Things may have changed since then but
I
The Catholic Church is hypocritical. If you get a chance to read "In
God's Name" by Yallop (available in most libraries) you will see how
he researched the birth control issue. Apparently, the Vatican has
invested funds in a pharmaceutical company that manufactures birth
control pills.
*
Nice chatting with you! Luree
*********************************
Drop by for a visit http://www.islandnet.com/~luree
Save a critter http://www.duncanspca.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 05:41:47 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 09:04:26 GMT, Earl Camembert <nospam@forme.org> wrote:
That has nothing to do with sterilization, it has to do with Yahweh
wanting only PERFECT people in his prescience.
No man is perfect without purification.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Earle Jones" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 11:29:57 AM |
|
|
In article <7t2mb0ti5d0e8ua1a4hla7tfm7f1g4i9e8@4ax.com>,
duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2004 09:04:26 GMT, Earl Camembert <nospam@forme.org> wrote:
That has nothing to do with sterilization, it has to do with Yahweh
wanting only PERFECT people in his prescience.
No man is perfect without purification.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
*
I do wish that you would stop posting this cannibalism crap --
"eating my flesh" and "drinking my blood".
Yuck!
Don't you know that children read these newsgroups?
earle
*
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
.
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 05:32:02 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:29:57 GMT, Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> wrote:
I do wish that you would stop posting this cannibalism crap --
"eating my flesh" and "drinking my blood".
Yuck!
Don't you know that children read these newsgroups?
Pity the rotten parent that lets their kids do that.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earl Camembert" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
31 May 2004 06:08:16 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 31 May 2004 05:41:47 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On Mon, 31 May 2004 09:04:26 GMT, Earl Camembert <nospam@forme.org> wrote:
That has nothing to do with sterilization, it has to do with Yahweh
wanting only PERFECT people in his prescience.
No man is perfect without purification.
Mark 16:17 And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name
shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;
18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing,
it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they
shall recover.
OK all of you followers ***** or get off the pot; you SHALL take up
serpents.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Earl Camembert" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 01:22:45 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
Are you referring to politicians that don't vote to repeal abortion
laws? They can't take cracker in public only.
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
03 Jun 2004 12:51:21 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:22:45 GMT, Earl Camembert <nospam@forme.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
Are you referring to politicians that don't vote to repeal abortion
laws? They can't take cracker in public only.
Which makes no sense of course.
I was actually thinking of the Colorado Bishop who said that Catholics
who vote for Pro-Chooice candidates shouldn't take the Sacrament. Now
you can add to them the rainbow sash people.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jos Flachs" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 10:20:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
My closest family members are practically living in the (RCC) church.
By Dutch standards you can consider them right wing RCC fundies. Yet,
she considers herself a perfect member of the church, whilst taking
the pill, and her hubby turned of his tap after two kids. Also
something strictly and explicitly forbidden by the church. And yet,
they consider themselves exemplary members of the church...
I'm pretty sure their priest knows fully well about this, but what the
heck... he himself is openly gay! But, admitted, he claims his oath of
celibacy works very well for gays himself.
Now, tell me: a priest who openly tells he is gay. Is he, according to
RCC regulations a valid priest? Probably yes, given the scarcity of
priests in Holland.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Dollar Bill" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
30 May 2004 05:54:11 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Sun, 30 May 2004 10:20:26 +0700, Jos Flachs
<'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org>
wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker, why aren't the most flagrant violators of God's Holy Plan
even mentioned? Namely, those who would spill (or induce spillage of)
the sacred sperm in any manner not conducive to reproduction. Why
aren't the Bishops denying the Sacrament to those sinners?
Could it be that those sinners comprise the majority of the
ever-shrinking number of buttocks in the pews? The Catholic Church
seems hell bent on becoming totally irrelevant in the developed world,
but even they must realize that they can ill-afford to alienate that
contingent. The Church may find itself being denied the $acrament.
My closest family members are practically living in the (RCC) church.
By Dutch standards you can consider them right wing RCC fundies. Yet,
she considers herself a perfect member of the church, whilst taking
the pill, and her hubby turned of his tap after two kids. Also
something strictly and explicitly forbidden by the church. And yet,
they consider themselves exemplary members of the church...
I'm pretty sure their priest knows fully well about this, but what the
heck... he himself is openly gay! But, admitted, he claims his oath of
celibacy works very well for gays himself.
Now, tell me: a priest who openly tells he is gay. Is he, according to
RCC regulations a valid priest? Probably yes, given the scarcity of
priests in Holland.
I think most churches are willing to accept gay pastors as long as
they aren't <quote> "practicing" </quote> homosexuals. The vow of
celibacy thing would sort of take care of that matter.
--
L8r,
Uncle Dollar Bill
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 06:50:20 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker,
Well, no sign of intelligent life here.
duke
*****
John 6
53Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, unless
you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his
blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my
flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I
will raise him up at the last day.
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 07:02:33 AM |
|
|
In article <57ugb0lugjj5k7j4od3lpmip529s7rhteh@4ax.com>, duke says...
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker,
Well, no sign of intelligent life here
says puke as he looks in the mirror.
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why are Catholics who use contraceptives allowed to take communion? |
29 May 2004 07:25:52 AM |
|
|
"Robibnikoff" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:tZ_tc.4613$H4.91@www.newsranger.com...
In article <57ugb0lugjj5k7j4od3lpmip529s7rhteh@4ax.com>, duke says...
On Sat, 29 May 2004 06:14:56 GMT, satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote:
With all the groups of Catholics no longer eligible for salvation via
cracker,
Well, no sign of intelligent life here
says puke as he looks in the mirror.
Hehehe !
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|