| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
18 Jan 2005 07:52:42 AM |
| Object: |
Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
"When the chemical weapons and other WMD are revealed, it will be
interesting to see the double talk by liberals"
Osprey, 3/29/2003
"We must make sure the regime is totally eliminated and all WMD are
found and destroyed."
-Osprey, 4/8/2003
"It is going to take time."
-Osprey, 5/20/2003
"Like I said, if they find the WMD, you would be better off taking a
few months vacation from this NG"
-Osprey, 8/6/2003
"Now about the questions of WMD, I believe Saddam either destroyed
them before the war, sold them, or hid them in another country."
-Osprey, 2/11/2004
"many believed he possessed WMD ... We don't know."
-Osprey, 3/19/2004
"It is a WMD"
-Osprey, 5/8/2004, trying to call something a "WMD" that even
AWOL didn't bother classifying as such.
"WMD have been located and found, most likely more will be found."
-Osprey, 5/18/2004, making up stories yet again.
"Duelfer Report: no WMD Found"
http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/duelfer.html
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=iraq+WMD+osprey++author:noneedtokno...
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1367 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Somewriter" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
21 Jan 2005 01:17:43 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:52:42 -0800, "Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's
Cocaine Snorting *****" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Up his arse.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 08:36:08 AM |
|
|
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
You on the other hand, can not act like an adult. I realize that you
have some childish need to act the way you do, for what ever reason. I
can take pride though, that unlike you, I don't use American soldiers
for propaganda. You lie when you say you care about their lives, you
lie in general about everything.
So you can repost my quotes everyday for all I care, you are the child.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 07:30:47 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1106037368.776966.118650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
You on the other hand, can not act like an adult. I realize that you
have some childish need to act the way you do, for what ever reason. I
can take pride though, that unlike you, I don't use American soldiers
for propaganda. You lie when you say you care about their lives, you
lie in general about everything.
So you can repost my quotes everyday for all I care, you are the child.
Awwww. Baby got caught fibbing. Now baby cannot fully own up to his fibbing,
his gullibility, and lashes out at adults who "punish" him.
Larry
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 10:14:19 PM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in
news:csjo07$bvnc$1@news3.infoave.net:
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1106037368.776966.118650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many
Republicans and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the
WMD. If he did not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as
that, we are human...well in your case..I don't know.
You on the other hand, can not act like an adult. I realize that you
have some childish need to act the way you do, for what ever reason.
I can take pride though, that unlike you, I don't use American
soldiers for propaganda. You lie when you say you care about their
lives, you lie in general about everything.
So you can repost my quotes everyday for all I care, you are the
child.
Awwww. Baby got caught fibbing. Now baby cannot fully own up to his
fibbing, his gullibility, and lashes out at adults who "punish" him.
coward bobby has *never* admitted to a single lie in the abortion
newsgroups. i think he could have admitted to undres of them, if not more.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 03:14:49 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1106037368.776966.118650@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
No, you are a liar. The WMD news has been about a year ahead of your
whining, and that of the usenet republicans and the administration, as the
quotes show.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 07:03:31 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in news:1106037368.776966.118650
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
Unlike you, I can act like an adult.
"Liar. Having NO credibility.
.....
IMMATURE liar."
-xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) to ospery
Message-ID: <3e003cb4.45015725@netnews.mchsi.com>
"All you do is demonstrate that you are
a coward that can't support his position.
You toss this ***** around and
when people call you on it you claim
you won't discuss it. Cowardly.
....
And, again, don't expect to be treated with
any respect on this newsgroup if you continue
to avoid the difficult issues and only want
to talk about the easy ones. It is cowardly."
-David Barnes <dbarnes@barnsco.com> to ospery
Message-ID: <110320031640052091%dbarnes@barnsco.com>
"You're a chickenshit coward who hides behind
bars on the prison system. They know that
you have the entire state legal system to
protect your chickenshit little *****.
....
You don't respect anybody, chickenhawk.
That's why you keep running away every time
you're proven to be a dishonest coward."
(Ray Fischer) to ospery
Message-ID: <b4gb16$j03$1@bolt.sonic.net>
"Apparently, you feel that if someone doesn't believe your lies,
that you should continue to screech them over and over in an
attempt to convince someone that what you're saying has any
value. This isn't kindergarten Asspry, and no matter how many
times you screech your lies, they will continue to BE lies."
(pr0r3p) writing to coward osprey (bobby
heishman) in <1686c3b8.0401271759.27fa1e9e@posting.google.com>
"You're like the child who has cake all over his face, yet denies
having eaten the cake." (pr0r3p) writing to
coward osprey (bobby heishman)
in <1686c3b8.0401290731.17ace3b1@posting.google.com>
"You start with your scummy lies every time somebody
dares to tell the truth about you. You have so little understanding
of morals that you have used every despicable lie and then tried
to justify it by whining "they did it first""
(Ray Fischer) writing to coward bobby
heishman in <c71c0u$2ml$1@bolt.sonic.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 05:51:36 PM |
|
|
In article <1106037368.776966.118650
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, osprey said...
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong.
Why do you not admit that you really were gravely mistaken and
absurdly credulous about the WMDs, instead of qualifying your
response with an "if"? Once a coward, always a coward,
apparently.
Simple as that, we are human...
No, it's not "simple as that," you moral cripple.
Your stupidity and credulity, in tandem with the gullibility of
millions of others like you, have cost more than 100,000 people
their lives. You bear a certain responsibility for those deaths,
and for the war, and for the millions of lives ruined by that
war.
Now you shrug and say that maybe you were "mistaken." Wrong, you
miserable wretch. Forgetting to carry the one is a mistake. What
you did was grossly immoral. What's more, you will do nothing to
redress the destruction and misery you helped to bring about.
You haven't the guts or the wits to take a realistic view of
your government and your president; you haven't the integrity to
admit you fell for a lie; and you haven't the moral fiber to
accept responsibility for the consequences of your earlier
decisions. Just what the hell are you good for, Osprey?
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Baker" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 07:14:09 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:51:36 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1106037368.776966.118650
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, osprey said...
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong.
Why do you not admit that you really were gravely mistaken and
absurdly credulous about the WMDs, instead of qualifying your
response with an "if"? Once a coward, always a coward,
apparently.
Simple as that, we are human...
No, it's not "simple as that," you moral cripple.
Your stupidity and credulity, in tandem with the gullibility of
millions of others like you, have cost more than 100,000 people
their lives. You bear a certain responsibility for those deaths,
and for the war, and for the millions of lives ruined by that
war.
Now you shrug and say that maybe you were "mistaken." Wrong, you
miserable wretch. Forgetting to carry the one is a mistake. What
you did was grossly immoral. What's more, you will do nothing to
redress the destruction and misery you helped to bring about.
You haven't the guts or the wits to take a realistic view of
your government and your president; you haven't the integrity to
admit you fell for a lie; and you haven't the moral fiber to
accept responsibility for the consequences of your earlier
decisions. Just what the hell are you good for, Osprey?
If nothing else, he serves as a prime example of everything that's
wrong with modern conservatism. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 11:32:53 PM |
|
|
"John Baker" <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:b3oqu0d2t610gsp45m9stn8qghok5puj9t@4ax.com...
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:51:36 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1106037368.776966.118650
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, osprey said...
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong.
Why do you not admit that you really were gravely mistaken and
absurdly credulous about the WMDs, instead of qualifying your
response with an "if"? Once a coward, always a coward,
apparently.
Simple as that, we are human...
No, it's not "simple as that," you moral cripple.
Your stupidity and credulity, in tandem with the gullibility of
millions of others like you, have cost more than 100,000 people
their lives. You bear a certain responsibility for those deaths,
and for the war, and for the millions of lives ruined by that
war.
Now you shrug and say that maybe you were "mistaken." Wrong, you
miserable wretch. Forgetting to carry the one is a mistake. What
you did was grossly immoral. What's more, you will do nothing to
redress the destruction and misery you helped to bring about.
You haven't the guts or the wits to take a realistic view of
your government and your president; you haven't the integrity to
admit you fell for a lie; and you haven't the moral fiber to
accept responsibility for the consequences of your earlier
decisions. Just what the hell are you good for, Osprey?
If nothing else, he serves as a prime example of everything that's
wrong with modern conservatism. :-)
Actually, there's nothing 'conservative' about "modern conservatism." It's
all about 'spend, lie, meddle, and spend some more.'
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
19 Jan 2005 01:29:49 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:53 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> said in alt.atheism:
Actually, there's nothing 'conservative' about "modern conservatism." It's
all about 'spend, lie, meddle, and spend some more.'
You left out "and lie about spending".
--
"They laughed at Newton, they laughed at Einstein, but they also laughed at
Bozo the Clown."
- Carl Sagan
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
19 Jan 2005 04:56:28 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:7vdru0hom6179m4l8raikb21ac6ar447k2@4ax.com...
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:53 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> said in alt.atheism:
Actually, there's nothing 'conservative' about "modern conservatism."
It's
all about 'spend, lie, meddle, and spend some more.'
You left out "and lie about spending".
D'OH!!
--
-DMc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 04:23:51 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:53 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> said in alt.atheism:
Actually, there's nothing 'conservative' about "modern conservatism." It's
all about 'spend, lie, meddle, and spend some more.'
You left out "and lie about spending".
Like leaving the cost or the Iraq Occupation out of this year's budget?
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
21 Jan 2005 01:12:56 PM |
|
|
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:32:53 GMT, "The other Donald"
<the_donald_13@yeehaw2.com> said in alt.atheism:
Actually, there's nothing 'conservative' about "modern conservatism."
It's
all about 'spend, lie, meddle, and spend some more.'
You left out "and lie about spending".
Like leaving the cost or the Iraq Occupation out of this year's budget?
Which didn't happen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
21 Jan 2005 02:25:39 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in news:sd7Id.1187$id1.710
@news02.roc.ny:
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Like leaving the cost or the Iraq Occupation out of this year's budget?
Which didn't happen.
tell that to the parents, spouses and children of the americans and iraquis
bush's illegal occupation cost, forger.
]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
21 Jan 2005 08:12:34 PM |
|
|
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in news:sd7Id.1187$id1.710
@news02.roc.ny:
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Like leaving the cost or the Iraq Occupation out of this year's budget?
Which didn't happen.
tell that to the parents, spouses and children of the americans and iraquis <sic>
bush's occupation cost
Don't need to, stupid. Unlike you, they're smart enough to figure it out
for themselves - if they even care about the federal budget.
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
21 Jan 2005 10:04:09 PM |
|
|
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in
news:SmdId.1264$Lt1.1048@news02.roc.ny:
james g. keegan jr. wrote:
Frank Dwyer <fdwyer@XcitlinkX.net> wrote in news:sd7Id.1187$id1.710
@news02.roc.ny:
Tukla Ratte wrote:
Like leaving the cost or the Iraq Occupation out of this year's
budget?
Which didn't happen.
tell that to the parents, spouses and children of the americans and
iraquis <sic> bush's occupation cost
Don't need to, stupid.
you're a coward as well as a forger, i see.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 10:11:46 PM |
|
|
John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote in
news:b3oqu0d2t610gsp45m9stn8qghok5puj9t@4ax.com:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:51:36 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <1106037368.776966.118650
@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, osprey said...
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many
Republicans and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the
WMD. If he did not have them, then many of us were wrong.
Why do you not admit that you really were gravely mistaken and
absurdly credulous about the WMDs, instead of qualifying your
response with an "if"? Once a coward, always a coward,
apparently.
Simple as that, we are human...
No, it's not "simple as that," you moral cripple.
Your stupidity and credulity, in tandem with the gullibility of
millions of others like you, have cost more than 100,000 people
their lives. You bear a certain responsibility for those deaths,
and for the war, and for the millions of lives ruined by that
war.
Now you shrug and say that maybe you were "mistaken." Wrong, you
miserable wretch. Forgetting to carry the one is a mistake. What
you did was grossly immoral. What's more, you will do nothing to
redress the destruction and misery you helped to bring about.
You haven't the guts or the wits to take a realistic view of
your government and your president; you haven't the integrity to
admit you fell for a lie; and you haven't the moral fiber to
accept responsibility for the consequences of your earlier
decisions. Just what the hell are you good for, Osprey?
If nothing else, he serves as a prime example of everything that's
wrong with modern conservatism. :-)
very true.
i think even most conservatives disavow coward bobby
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 06:50:09 PM |
|
|
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
Sorry, but we were told that we *knew* that Iraq possed weapons of
Mass destruction, and an active nuclear weapons program. Not
"suspected" but "knew." Some quotes:
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons
of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use
against our friends, against our allies, and against us." - Vice
President ***** Cheney, Aug. 26, 2002.
"The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about
how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the
smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." - National security adviser
Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002.
"After 11 years during which we have tried containment, sanctions,
inspections, even selected military action, the end result is that
Saddam Hussein still has chemical and biological weapons and is
increasing his capabilities to make more." - President Bush, Oct. 7,
2002.
"Saddam Hussein is a man who told the world he wouldn't have weapons
of mass destruction, but he's got them." - Bush, Nov. 3, 2002.
"The gravity of this moment is matched by the gravity of the threat
that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction pose to the world." -
Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5, 2003.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 06:59:11 PM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8fmqu0d8m0ham4lfllrss2anctmahiae5p@4ax.com...
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
Sorry, but we were told that we *knew* that Iraq possed weapons of
Mass destruction, and an active nuclear weapons program. Not
"suspected" but "knew." Some quotes:
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons
of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use
against our friends, against our allies, and against us." - Vice
President ***** Cheney, Aug. 26, 2002.
"The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about
how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the
smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." - National security adviser
Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002.
"After 11 years during which we have tried containment, sanctions,
inspections, even selected military action, the end result is that
Saddam Hussein still has chemical and biological weapons and is
increasing his capabilities to make more." - President Bush, Oct. 7,
2002.
"Saddam Hussein is a man who told the world he wouldn't have weapons
of mass destruction, but he's got them." - Bush, Nov. 3, 2002.
"The gravity of this moment is matched by the gravity of the threat
that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction pose to the world." -
Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5, 2003.
You ignore many other quotes..on purpose of course. Your true motive is
shown above...
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security
of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998
| Source
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 | Source
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 | Source
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 | Source
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 | Source
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 | Source
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 | Source
The last thing I will ever accept is yours or any other left wing liberal's
phoney concern for innocent people who die in a war. Why?
Because of the fact that you nor any other liberals ever cared about the
people...hundreds of thousands...killed prior to the war and put into mass
graves.
Because people like you and other liberals use military soldiers for
propaganda. You will count their bodies, and use it for propaganda. You
never cared about the thousands of soldiers that died prior to the war
during peace time operations. You never cared about the soldiers that were
killed from terrorist attacks prior to the war. So you will have to just
understand, I don't accept your phoney concern for people. You, like other
liberals, just use people for political propaganda.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
19 Jan 2005 04:25:29 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8fmqu0d8m0ham4lfllrss2anctmahiae5p@4ax.com...
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism beanbag and drunkenly
proclaimed the following
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
Sorry, but we were told that we *knew* that Iraq possed weapons of
Mass destruction, and an active nuclear weapons program. Not
"suspected" but "knew." Some quotes:
"Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons
of mass destruction. There is no doubt he is amassing them to use
against our friends, against our allies, and against us." - Vice
President ***** Cheney, Aug. 26, 2002.
"The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about
how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the
smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." - National security adviser
Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002.
"After 11 years during which we have tried containment, sanctions,
inspections, even selected military action, the end result is that
Saddam Hussein still has chemical and biological weapons and is
increasing his capabilities to make more." - President Bush, Oct. 7,
2002.
"Saddam Hussein is a man who told the world he wouldn't have weapons
of mass destruction, but he's got them." - Bush, Nov. 3, 2002.
"The gravity of this moment is matched by the gravity of the threat
that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction pose to the world." -
Secretary of State Colin Powell, Feb. 5, 2003.
You ignore many other quotes..on purpose of course. Your true motive is
shown above...
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein.
[...]
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source
"Disarm". Not invade, destroy, kill, murder.
And, as the UN weapons inspecters determined before the invasion, Iraq
had been disarmed.
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 | Source
And as we see, force was not necessary.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source
And the US succeeded, which is why Bush's needless invasion is so
immoral.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 06:38:45 PM |
|
|
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> said
in alt.atheism:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
So killing tens of thousands and just writing it off as "we were
wrong" is acting like an adult? Only for insane values of "adult".
--
"Creationists are the best evidence we have that there is no intelligent design."
-Josef Balluch
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
18 Jan 2005 06:54:50 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vrlqu0drblehtapofku6rp1sm1u7a511pk@4ax.com...
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> said
in alt.atheism:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
So killing tens of thousands and just writing it off as "we were
wrong" is acting like an adult? Only for insane values of "adult".
The last thing I will ever accept is yours or any other left wing liberal's
phoney concern for innocent people who die in a war. Why?
Because of the fact that you nor any other liberals ever cared about the
people...hundreds of thousands...killed prior to the war and put into mass
graves.
Because people like you and other liberals use military soldiers for
propaganda. You will count their bodies, and use it for propaganda. You
never cared about the thousands of soldiers that died prior to the war
during peace time operations. You never cared about the soldiers that were
killed from terrorist attacks prior to the war. So you will have to just
understand, I don't accept your phoney concern for people. You, like other
liberals, just use people for political propaganda.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
19 Jan 2005 12:28:11 PM |
|
|
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Osprey wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:vrlqu0drblehtapofku6rp1sm1u7a511pk@4ax.com...
On 18 Jan 2005 00:36:08 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said
in alt.atheism:
Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting ***** wrote:
So... Where's that WMD again, *****?
Unlike you, I can act like an adult. I believed, like many
Republicans
and Democrats alike, that Saddam Hussein did have the WMD. If he
did
not have them, then many of us were wrong. Simple as that, we are
human...well in your case..I don't know.
So killing tens of thousands and just writing it off as "we were
wrong" is acting like an adult? Only for insane values of "adult".
The last thing I will ever accept is yours or any other left wing
liberal's
phoney concern for innocent people who die in a war.
Subject change alert!
No, just stating the truth.
Why?
Because of the fact that you nor any other liberals ever cared about
the
people...hundreds of thousands...killed prior to the war and put into
mass
graves.
Considering that you have no eidence that could
begin to support your claim here it looks like you
say it only to divert attention away from your
embarrassig position.
My claim is my opinion, deal with it.
There is nothing for me to be embarrassed over. Considering that you nor
any other liberal has been able to show me where my opinion is wrong, it
looks like you don't have a leg to stand on.
Because people like you and other liberals use military soldiers for
propaganda. You will count their bodies, and use it for propaganda.
You
never cared about the thousands of soldiers that died prior to the
war
during peace time operations. You never cared about the soldiers
that were
killed from terrorist attacks prior to the war. So you will have to
just
understand, I don't accept your phoney concern for people. You, like
other
liberals, just use people for political propaganda.
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Have a good day.
And no, I do not think in the grand scheme of things, and using a
utilitarian style of thought...we did the wrong thing. Do you need help in
understanding utilitarian?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
19 Jan 2005 07:49:46 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon. "My decision cost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it. You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
If gunpowder were free you wouldn't be worth the amount it would take
to blow you to hell.
--
"The United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion"
- Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, ratified by Congress
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "The other Donald" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 12:29:39 AM |
|
|
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon. "My decision cost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it. You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
If gunpowder were free you wouldn't be worth the amount it would take
to blow you to hell.
....and if brains were gunpowder, Osprey couldn't blow his nose.
--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
.....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 12:56:25 AM |
|
|
The other Donald wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon. "My decision cost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it.
You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
If gunpowder were free you wouldn't be worth the amount it would
take
to blow you to hell.
...and if brains were gunpowder, Osprey couldn't blow his nose.
Well Al? Do you need any more proof on what I said about liberals?
Donald is an excellent example of what I was talking about.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 08:03:15 PM |
|
|
osprey wrote:
The other Donald wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon. "My decision c ost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it.
You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
If gunpowder were free you wouldn't be worth the amount it would
take
to blow you to hell.
...and if brains were gunpowder, Osprey couldn't blow his nose.
Well Al? Do you need any more proof on what I said about liberals?
Donald is an excellent example of what I was talking about.
An even better example is the following where
you didn't wish to address this question:
"So killing tens of thousands and just writing it
off as 'we were wrong' is acting like an adult?"
And so responded with this totally irrelevant and
unsubstantiated jewel of bigotry:
"The last thing I will ever accept is yours or any other left wing
liberal's phoney concern for innocent people who die in a war. Why?
Because of the fact that you nor any other liberals ever cared about
the people...hundreds of thousands...killed prior to the war and put
into mass graves. Because people like you and other liberals use
military soldiers for propaganda. You will count their bodies, and use
it for propaganda. You never cared about the thousands of soldiers
that died prior to the war during peace time operations. You never
cared about the soldiers that were killed from terrorist attacks prior
to the war. So you will have to just understand, I don't accept your
phoney concern for people. You, like other liberals, just use people
for political propaganda."
So much for your phony concern for sticking to
the issues.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 08:15:34 PM |
|
|
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106251395.616879.288740@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
osprey wrote:
The other Donald wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon. "My decision c ost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it.
You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
If gunpowder were free you wouldn't be worth the amount it would
take
to blow you to hell.
...and if brains were gunpowder, Osprey couldn't blow his nose.
Well Al? Do you need any more proof on what I said about liberals?
Donald is an excellent example of what I was talking about.
An even better example is the following where
you didn't wish to address this question:
"So killing tens of thousands and just writing it
off as 'we were wrong' is acting like an adult?"
And so responded with this totally irrelevant and
unsubstantiated jewel of bigotry:
"The last thing I will ever accept is yours or any other left wing
liberal's phoney concern for innocent people who die in a war. Why?
Because of the fact that you nor any other liberals ever cared about
the people...hundreds of thousands...killed prior to the war and put
into mass graves. Because people like you and other liberals use
military soldiers for propaganda. You will count their bodies, and use
it for propaganda. You never cared about the thousands of soldiers
that died prior to the war during peace time operations. You never
cared about the soldiers that were killed from terrorist attacks prior
to the war. So you will have to just understand, I don't accept your
phoney concern for people. You, like other liberals, just use people
for political propaganda."
So much for your phony concern for sticking to
the issues.
And that is about enough of you....blip!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 02:19:02 AM |
|
|
Osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon.
neocon? oh puh-lease, the new phrase of 2004...
Tell us what neocon means.
http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html
"My decision cost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it. You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
I tend to view this in a utilitarian manner.
They're dead so what do you care?
Do you know what that means?
It means that you don't care about anybody but yourself.
No, I do not think George Bush lied either.
Because you're stupid.
I do think mistakes were made,
from our intelligence and our leaders were lead to believe something that
lead us to war.
Scapegoat.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is NeoCon "Osprey" Such a Moron? |
20 Jan 2005 07:47:09 PM |
|
|
Osprey wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message
news:kbetu09co93pj8ppkoks63gk67028orvnk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:28:11 -0500, "Osprey"
<noneedtoknow@mail.com>
said in alt.atheism:
<jfacts@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:1106126101.518063.268130@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Now that everyone knows you are a bigot and that
you have an arms-length relationship with the truth
why don't you go back and address the point you evaded
about writing off the killing tens of thousands with
a "we were wrong"
Tell you what, tomorrow, ask me how much sleep I lost.
Typical neocon.
neocon? oh puh-lease, the new phrase of 2004...
Tell us what neocon means.
I am as far from being a neocon as you are being a reasonable person.
This from the guy who calls anyone who disagrees
with him a "liberal." Don't you know it is
hypocritical to whine about things being done to
you that you find great utility in doing yourself?
Or maybe having sufficiently low standards means
you don't care.
"My decision cost tens of thousands of innocent
lives, due to a total lie that I knew was a lie when I told it.
You
expect me to lose sleep over that?"
I t end to view this in a utilitarian manner. Do you know what that
means?
" I t end to view this in a utilitarian manner"? No,
what does it mean?
No, I do not think George Bush lied either. I do think mistakes were
made,
Notice the switch from the active to the passive
voice ("...do not think George Bush lied..." to
"...do think mistakes were made.")
from our intelligence and our leaders were lead to believe something
that
lead us to war.
I also be lieve that we still did the right thing.
I frankly don't care for your propaganda and you would rather attack,
name
call, and accuse than actually discuss this in an intelligent manner.
More irony! As previously noted, you ducked an
inconvenient question by going off on an irrelevant
name-calling tangent about liberals not caring about
casualities. So why do you whine about people doing things
that are standard operating procedure for you?
The evidence of that is in this post.
LOL! How true. And amusingly ironic. You continue
to do here exactly what you complain about: "you would
rather attack, name call, and accuse than actually discuss
this in an intelligent manner." See for yourself:
This is why I hold the opinion of
liberals, that liberals do not care, they will use anything and
anybody to
attack opposing political parties and anyone who is in that political
party.
If George Bush was a liberal democrat, you and other liberals would
be
singing a different tune..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|