| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Maaxx" |
| Date: |
10 Mar 2005 08:35:59 AM |
| Object: |
Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
.
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 10:34:26 AM |
|
|
"Maaxx" <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:3cz46vanl3or$.dlg@oc12-nlogax.pepsi.com...
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Go ahead, ignore Hezbollah, see what happens. That kind of thing worked
so well for Bush in the spring of 2001. rofl
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liberals.HATE America!;" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 12:11:15 PM |
|
|
"Maaxx" <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote in message
news:3cz46vanl3or$.dlg@oc12-nlogax.pepsi.com...
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
Annan is a liberal, a communist and staunchly anti-American. He will never
lose his job with these credentials.
--
"Liberals hate America, they hate 'flag-wavers', they hate abortion
opponents, they hate all religions except Islam (post 9/11). Even
terrorists don't hate America like liberals do." - Ann Coulter
www.liberalscum.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 01:21:07 PM |
|
|
Liberals.HATE America!; wrote:
Annan is a liberal, a communist and staunchly anti-American. He will never
lose his job with these credentials.
Then Bush it's a fucking fascist dictator. I can say
nonsenses too...
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 09:04:46 PM |
|
|
Neocons.HATE America!; <libZZsuck1t@toavstj.com> wrote:
"Maaxx" <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote in message
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
Annan is a liberal, a communist and staunchly anti-American.
You're a right-wing kook.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Maaxx" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 02:29:39 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1se$mde$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Neocons.HATE America!; <libZZsuck1t@toavstj.com> wrote:
"Maaxx" <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote in message
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
Annan is a liberal, a communist and staunchly anti-American.
You're a right-wing kook.
To you, everybody is a "right-wing kook".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 01:30:24 AM |
|
|
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1se$mde$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Neocons.HATE America!; <libZZsuck1t@toavstj.com> wrote:
"Maaxx" <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote in message
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
Annan is a liberal, a communist and staunchly anti-American.
You're a right-wing kook.
To you, everybody is a "right-wing kook".
All you can do is lie about people.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 09:03:25 PM |
|
|
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Maaxx" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 02:31:57 PM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe
if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 01:31:53 AM |
|
|
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe
if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India?
This episode of non sequitur theater was brought to you by: Maaxx.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 02:53:00 PM |
|
|
Maaxx wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe
if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
Ejem.. *indiatimes* Ejem...
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Maaxx" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 05:20:53 PM |
|
|
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39een1F623a1aU2@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
Ejem.. *indiatimes* Ejem...
Your point?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 05:02:27 AM |
|
|
Maaxx wrote:
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39een1F623a1aU2@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
Ejem.. *indiatimes* Ejem...
Your point?
That that don't seem to be a very "Indian" newspaper, that's all.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Maaxx" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 08:08:00 AM |
|
|
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39g26gF5u8t42U13@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39een1F623a1aU2@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
Ejem.. *indiatimes* Ejem...
Your point?
That that don't seem to be a very "Indian" newspaper, that's all.
Since when is a newspaper from India not an Indian newspaper?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 10:21:29 AM |
|
|
Maaxx wrote:
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39g26gF5u8t42U13@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote in
news:39een1F623a1aU2@individual.net:
Maaxx wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:d0r1pt$mau$1@bolt.sonic.net:
Maaxx <maaxx@xrs.net> wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted?
Maybe if he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Your problems is that you blindly accept US propaganda without
bothering to think for yourself. You hate whoever Bush tells you
to hate.
So now George Bush controls newspapers in India? That's quite an
influential president.
Those damn neocon, red state, Republican Indians!
Ejem.. *indiatimes* Ejem...
Your point?
That that don't seem to be a very "Indian" newspaper, that's all.
Since when is a newspaper from India not an Indian newspaper?
Depends on what you call an Indian newspaper, for example:
Look at this:
http://www.dowjones.com/Pressroom/PressReleases/Other/US/2004/0122_US_TheWallStreetJournal_8522.htm
NEW YORK & NEW DELHI, INDIA (Jan. 22, 2004) — Dow Jones & Company,
publisher of The Wall Street Journal, and Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd.,
publisher of the Times of India and The Economic Times, announced today
an agreement on a joint venture to publish The Wall Street Journal for
India. The venture would publish the Journal five-days-a-week, edited
for global Indian business readers and international business travelers,
drawing on the newspaper's global content.
Or look at this other:
http://www.mediauk.com/article/16599
BBC arm buys half of Bennett Coleman unit
Our Corporate Bureau / New Delhi November 20, 2004
Worldwide Channel Investments Ltd is picking up a 50 per cent stake in
Worldwide Media Ltd (WWML), a fully owned subsidiary of Bennett, Coleman
& Co, the publisher of Times of India and The Economic Times newspapers,
for Rs 38.95 crore.
As per the investment proposal, which has been cleared by the government
today, WWML will issue fresh shares up to 50 per cent of its equity
shares to Worldwide Channel Investments at a premium.
Worldwide Channel Investments is a fully owned company of BBC Worldwide,
a fully owned subsidiary of British Broadcasting Corporation.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 09:58:51 AM |
|
|
Maaxx wrote:
Is there anything Kofi Annan could say that would get him booted? Maybe if
he voiced support for George W. Bush?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1046733.cms
Where's those WMD's again ?
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/screenshots/Screenshots%20Funstuff/404-WeaponsOfMassDestruction.gif
--
Jez
'Realism is seductive because once you have accepted the reasonable
notion that you should base your actions on reality, you are too often
led to accept, without much questioning, someone else's version of what
that reality is. It is a crucial act of independent thinking to be
skeptical of someone else's description of reality.'-
Howard Zinn
NFS Underground2, Americas Army And MOH-PA
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
10 Mar 2005 02:33:04 PM |
|
|
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
Mike Syvanen
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tukla Ratte" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 11:34:04 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
--
Tukla, Eater of Theists, Squeaker of Chew Toys
Official Mascot of Alt.Atheism, aa 1347
.
|
|
|
| User: "JEDIDIAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 02:30:17 PM |
|
|
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
--
The best OS in the world is ultimately useless |||
if it is controlled by a Tramiel, Jobs or Gates. / | \
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 05:27:41 PM |
|
|
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
news:4231ffd9$1_1@127.0.0.1...
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
Still no proof of any wrongdoing by Kofi or his son, last I heard.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 02:51:27 PM |
|
|
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
| User: "JEDIDIAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 03:28:58 PM |
|
|
On 2005-03-11, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
Still reading the Basque Communist daily I see...
Regards.
--
The best OS in the world is ultimately useless |||
if it is controlled by a Tramiel, Jobs or Gates. / | \
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 05:29:05 PM |
|
|
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
news:42320d9a$1_1@127.0.0.1...
On 2005-03-11, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In
Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi
Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
Still reading the Basque Communist daily I see...
Did you miss that we have lost 8 billion dollars of Iraqi oil money?
That's pretty comparable to an oil-for-food take.
.
|
|
|
| User: "JEDIDIAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 04:31:49 PM |
|
|
On 2005-03-11, c-bee1 <c-bee1@insightbb.com> wrote:
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
news:42320d9a$1_1@127.0.0.1...
On 2005-03-11, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez <jkerouac@bgsec.com> wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In
Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi
Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
Still reading the Basque Communist daily I see...
Did you miss that we have lost 8 billion dollars of Iraqi oil money?
That's pretty comparable to an oil-for-food take.
No, that's just gross incompetence. It's also not possible to make
any sound conclusions regarding where the money went.
--
The best OS in the world is ultimately useless |||
if it is controlled by a Tramiel, Jobs or Gates. / | \
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 04:38:13 PM |
|
|
JEDIDIAH wrote:
Still reading the Basque Communist daily I see...
I'm not Basque nor Communist. But none of them are insults,
if that was your intention. I could be Basque and Communist.
What's the matter with that?
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Liam Slider" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 04:02:48 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:27 +0100, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
We are? Funny, I was sure that the Iraqis were getting paid in Euros and
that the oil was going to Europe....when it wasn't being burned in Iraq
for power, or turned into local gas....or being blown up by insurrgents.
Are you sure it's the US stealing Iraqi oil?
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 05:29:47 PM |
|
|
"Liam Slider" <liam@NOSPAM.liamslider.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.03.11.22.02.47.35272@NOSPAM.liamslider.com...
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:51:27 +0100, Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In
Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi
Oil-for-food
program.
It's funny to hear that when the US it's *stealing* all the Iraq oil.
We are? Funny, I was sure that the Iraqis were getting paid in Euros and
that the oil was going to Europe....when it wasn't being burned in Iraq
for power, or turned into local gas....or being blown up by insurrgents.
Are you sure it's the US stealing Iraqi oil?
Just lost 8 billion of their oil money is all.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
12 Mar 2005 05:01:17 AM |
|
|
Liam Slider wrote:
We are? Funny, I was sure that the Iraqis were getting paid in Euros and
that the oil was going to Europe....when it wasn't being burned in Iraq
for power, or turned into local gas....or being blown up by insurrgents.
Are you sure it's the US stealing Iraqi oil?
What companies are extracting the Iraqi oil?
Regards.
--
Jose Maria Lopez Hernandez
Director Tecnico de bgSEC
jkerouac@bgsec.com
bgSEC Seguridad y Consultoria de Sistemas Informaticos
http://www.bgsec.com
ESPAÑA
The only people for me are the mad ones -- the ones who are mad to live,
mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time,
the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn
like fabulous yellow Roman candles.
-- Jack Kerouac, "On the Road"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "wcb" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 03:17:35 PM |
|
|
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
Uhmmm, no. The accusation was against his son.
But about the time the far right hate campaign against
Kofi was beingginned up a report came out that fingered the
big american oil companies as being the cuplrits who were
illegally pouring money into Saddam's hands. the right winger
***** monkies were demanding Kofi quit for what his son had done,
but with companies doing far worse that had poured vast wealth into
the GOP, the ***** monkey chatter dies down.
--
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "JEDIDIAH" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 03:31:18 PM |
|
|
On 2005-03-11, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi Oil-for-food
program.
Uhmmm, no. The accusation was against his son.
...which puts Kofi in it up to his eyeballs.
This is like the Haliburton shenanigans.
But about the time the far right hate campaign against
Kofi was beingginned up a report came out that fingered the
Conflicts of interest and cronyism remain that.
The political motivations of those that bring such shenanigans
to light are entirely irrelevant.
[deletia]
You will impress no American by screaming that the GOP is corrupt.
--
The best OS in the world is ultimately useless |||
if it is controlled by a Tramiel, Jobs or Gates. / | \
.
|
|
|
| User: "c-bee1" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Is This Guy Still In Charge Of The UN? |
11 Mar 2005 05:31:59 PM |
|
|
"JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
news:42320e26$1_1@127.0.0.1...
On 2005-03-11, wcb <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote:
JEDIDIAH wrote:
On 2005-03-11, Tukla Ratte <tukla_ratte@tukla.net> wrote:
syvanen@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Oh you silly billy maaxx, even Bush is getting ready to recognize the
obvious
http://nytimes.com/2005/03/10/politics/10diplo.html
I guess we should change the subject to "Why Is This Guy Still In
Charge
Of The US?" I'm sure Maaxx would agree.
Well, Kofi doesn't exactly have clean hands either appparently. He
seems to be in up to his eyeballs in the abuse of the Iraqi
Oil-for-food
program.
Uhmmm, no. The accusation was against his son.
...which puts Kofi in it up to his eyeballs.
On what planet?
This is like the Haliburton shenanigans.
They're paying off Cheney?
But about the time the far right hate campaign against
Kofi was beingginned up a report came out that fingered the
Conflicts of interest and cronyism remain that.
The political motivations of those that bring such shenanigans
to light are entirely irrelevant.
Still no proof of any wrongdoing by Kofi or his son.
[deletia]
You will impress no American by screaming that the GOP is corrupt.
..Or surprise them.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
