| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"words of truth" |
| Date: |
25 Sep 2005 06:30:50 PM |
| Object: |
Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
Ben Shapiro
June 1, 2005
Paris Hilton is at it again. The 24-year-old hotel heiress is the
feature attraction in Carl's Jr.'s new Spicy Burger ad campaign, aimed
at the horny male TV-watching population. Scantily clad in a one-piece
leather outfit plunging down to below her navel, Hilton struts into an
empty warehouse, licks her finger, then suds up herself and a Bentley
automobile, as a stripper-styled "I Love Paris" rendition slowly plays
in the background. At the end of the spot, Hilton bites the burger and
sucks her finger clean. The commercial closes with Hilton's tagline
flashing across the screen: "That's Hot."
The spot is pure, soft-core pornography, beginning to end. The website
for the commercial, spicyparis.com, touts the "too-hot-for-TV spot."
And while Carl's Jr. CEO Andy Puzder defends the ad as "a beautiful
model in a swimsuit washing a car," it is clearly designed to
capitalize on Hilton's target audience -- porn watchers.
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation
is that Paris Hilton would be a relative nobody today were she not
incredibly rich and profligate with her favors. Hilton made perhaps the
most infamous porn video outside of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee. That
hard-core work, starring then-boyfriend Rick Solomon, brought her
international fame. At least nine other sex tapes are said to be
floating around somewhere, including a lesbian sex tape with Playboy
playmate Nicole Lenz. The sexually uninhibited Hilton became a target
for Larry Flynt of Hustler fame, who released pictures of Hilton
sharing some lesbian tongue at a nightclub. As Conan O'Brien observed,
"Hustler magazine announced that it will feature photos of Paris Hilton
making out with another woman, while the woman fondles Paris' breasts.
So the search continues for a photo of Paris Hilton not having sex."
Because of her pornographic involvement, Hilton has grabbed an
endorsement deal as the Guess? Jeans girl (the New York Observer
reported that "her bad-girl image jibes with the clothing company's
porn-lite ad campaigns"), endless tabloid headlines, and now, this deal
with Carl's Jr. As Brad Haley, marketing chief for Carl's Jr., stated,
"Paris was chosen to star in the ad because she is an intriguing
cultural icon and the 'it girl' of the moment."
Here's the big question: How, as a society, did we allow Paris Hilton
to become a cultural icon? Clearly, no one likes her very much.
Liberals and conservatives alike agree that she is vacuous and silly.
Media commentators all over the map label her "spoiled" and "stupid."
Maureen Dowd, hardly a cultural right-winger, lumps Hilton together
with "vacuous, slutty girls on TV sitcoms."
No, Hilton is today's "it girl" for one reason and one reason alone:
Individual scorn, though that opinion may be shared by a vast majority,
does not control the river of a culture. It is those who push the
envelope who do. Over the past few decades, we have implemented a "live
and let live" culture whereby abhorrence for immorality is seen as
illegitimate if promoted through governmental means. Instead, we are
supposed to let our culture be poisoned slowly -- and if we protest, we
are told that as long as we turn off our own TV's, all will be well.
That's why it should come as no surprise that Hilton's spicy ad has
ardent defenders, who proclaim that just because you don't like
pornography doesn't mean that it can't make someone else very happy.
One man's pornography is another man's means to happiness. And so Keith
Olbermann of MSNBC ripped the ad's detractors: "I'm reminded tonight of
H.L. Mencken's definition of Puritanism: the haunting fear someone
somewhere may be happy. Is that at the bottom line here, I mean, that
the people who have to protest crap like this ad -- and it's crap --
but are they afraid it will corrupt somebody, or are they afraid
somebody will enjoy it?" Paul Begala labeled the offended "the
sanctimonious Republican right." And Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles
Times simultaneously condemned the commercial as "a new high (or low)
in television crassness" and slammed the ad's opponents as members of
the "manufactured outrage industry."
This is the new pattern: individual condemnation and societal
acceptance. The moral among us have been forced into tolerance of
immorality. Paris Hilton is a cultural icon because of it. As long as
the moral majority is impotent, the lowest common denominator will
continue to define us.
BEN SHAPIRO
Benjamin Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed into
a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
He entered UCLA at the age of 16. Never afraid to antagonize his
political opposition, he was the only counter-protester at an
Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people on UCLA's campus,
and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
As a staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus,
Shapiro faces the political liberals head-on. From exposing the leftist
tilt of the professoriate on college campuses to addressing the
conflict in the Middle East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always
draws a hailstorm of response.
Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally
syndicated columnist in the U.S. His columns are printed nationwide in
major newspapers and websites, including Townhall.com,
WorldNetDaily.com, Frontpagemag.com, the Riverside Press-Enterprise and
the Conservative Chronicle. His columns have also appeared in the
Orlando Sentinel, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, RealClearPolitics.com,
Jewish World Review, and he has been quoted on the O'Reilly Factor, in
the Wall Street Journal and the New York Press, and in The American
Conservative magazine, among many others.
Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United
States and Canada. He is also the author of the national bestseller,
Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth (May 2004,
Thomas Nelson Inc./WND Books).
An Orthodox Jew, virtuosic violinist, and hack golfer, Shapiro
graduated UCLA in June 2004 with a B.A. in Political Science. He is
currently a student at Harvard Law School.
.
|
|
| User: "ci+" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 02:36:20 AM |
|
|
"words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> in news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
Ben Shapiro
June 1, 2005
Paris Hilton is at it again. The 24-year-old hotel heiress is the
feature attraction in Carl's Jr.'s new Spicy Burger ad campaign, aimed
at the horny male TV-watching population.
horniness is a biological state, not a matter of 'morality'
....
model in a swimsuit washing a car," it is clearly designed to
capitalize on Hilton's target audience -- porn watchers.
As I explain in my upcoming book, "
[pr deleted]
" the plain truth of the situation
is that Paris Hilton would be a
....
Hilton made perhaps the
most infamous porn video outside of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.
oh?
where there's money to be made, count on avid attention from conservative pundits.
That
hard-core work, starring then-boyfriend Rick Solomon, brought her
international fame. At least nine other sex tapes are said to be
floating around somewhere, including a lesbian sex tape with Playboy
playmate Nicole Lenz.
...
yadda. this columnist seems obsessed with PH. maybe he's a stalker.
....
Here's the big question: How, as a society, did we allow Paris Hilton
to become a cultural icon? Clearly, no one likes her very much.
Liberals and conservatives alike agree that she is vacuous and silly.
....
That's why it should come as no surprise that Hilton's spicy ad has
ardent defenders, who proclaim that just because you don't like
pornography doesn't mean that it can't make someone else very happy.
One man's pornography is another man's means to happiness.
right. .. i see you've seen the 700 club too...
And so Keith
Olbermann of MSNBC ripped the ad's detractors: "I'm reminded tonight of
H.L. Mencken's definition of Puritanism:
.... And Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles
Times simultaneously condemned the commercial as "a new high (or low)
in television crassness" and slammed the ad's opponents as members of
the "manufactured outrage industry."
This is the new pattern: individual condemnation and societal
acceptance.
it was the reagan society trendies who tried to encourage a culture of "shaming"
The moral among us have been forced into tolerance of
immorality. Paris Hilton is a cultural icon because of it. As long as
the moral majority is impotent, the lowest common denominator will
continue to define us.
speak for yourself. republicans *DO NOT* represent me;
BEN SHAPIRO
Benjamin Shapiro was born
..... Shapiro quickly developed into
a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
badly needs more work.
He entered UCLA at the age of 16.
...tedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
As a staunch
...hapiro's confrontational approach always
draws a hailstorm of response.
looks like a preponderance of this "article" is nauseatingly self promoting "porn bs"...
Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally
syndicated columnist in the U.S.
if money grubbers hire 6 years old as drug runners, i guess money grubbers can hire 17 year old propagandists.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Goodness Godless" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 08:50:18 PM |
|
|
"words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
Ben Shapiro
Is that an Hotel in France?
No you an Shapiro could not possibly make that mistake
with your totally academic interest in all things sexy!
.
|
|
|
| User: "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 09:16:27 PM |
|
|
You can actually tell Ben that at:
ben@benjaminshapiro.com
"Goodness Godless" <cla@cwcom.net> wrote in message
news:dh7k54$jhv$1@usenet.otenet.gr...
:
: "words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote in message
: news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
: >
: >
: > What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
: >
: >
: > Ben Shapiro
: >
: Is that an Hotel in France?
:
: No you an Shapiro could not possibly make that mistake
: with your totally academic interest in all things sexy!
:
:
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 03:06:04 PM |
|
|
*What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
I don't know. I'm a liberal, I am what you would you would describe as
an atheist and I don't give a flying ***** about Paris Hilton.
What's your point again?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vivapadrepios personal Cthulhu" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 01:17:26 AM |
|
|
Cometh the hour, cometh "words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave us this:
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
One that takes the Christian/Larry Flynt worldview that women are
there merely to please men?
------------------------------------------------
"The real dichotomy in today's world is between reason and religion.
The future of civilisation rests upon how many people realise that and do something about it."
D Silverman FLAHN, SMLAHN
AA #2208
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 12:04:55 PM |
|
|
Vivapadrepio's personal Cthulhu wrote:
Cometh the hour, cometh "words of truth"
<wordsoftruth21@lycos.com>
who, with imperceptibly subtle footwork in alt.atheism, gave
us this:
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
One that takes the Christian/Larry Flynt worldview that women
are there merely to please men?
No, the view that men are simply a source of quick
bucks if you have a nice body.
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ollie Sandcastle" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
17 Nov 2005 04:44:36 PM |
|
|
Damn, at least one might hope the quality of the vid's better than that
other crap she was at one point infamous for?
OTS
"words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
Ben Shapiro
June 1, 2005
Paris Hilton is at it again. The 24-year-old hotel heiress is the
feature attraction in Carl's Jr.'s new Spicy Burger ad campaign, aimed
at the horny male TV-watching population. Scantily clad in a one-piece
leather outfit plunging down to below her navel, Hilton struts into an
empty warehouse, licks her finger, then suds up herself and a Bentley
automobile, as a stripper-styled "I Love Paris" rendition slowly plays
in the background. At the end of the spot, Hilton bites the burger and
sucks her finger clean. The commercial closes with Hilton's tagline
flashing across the screen: "That's Hot."
The spot is pure, soft-core pornography, beginning to end. The website
for the commercial, spicyparis.com, touts the "too-hot-for-TV spot."
And while Carl's Jr. CEO Andy Puzder defends the ad as "a beautiful
model in a swimsuit washing a car," it is clearly designed to
capitalize on Hilton's target audience -- porn watchers.
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation
is that Paris Hilton would be a relative nobody today were she not
incredibly rich and profligate with her favors. Hilton made perhaps the
most infamous porn video outside of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee. That
hard-core work, starring then-boyfriend Rick Solomon, brought her
international fame. At least nine other sex tapes are said to be
floating around somewhere, including a lesbian sex tape with Playboy
playmate Nicole Lenz. The sexually uninhibited Hilton became a target
for Larry Flynt of Hustler fame, who released pictures of Hilton
sharing some lesbian tongue at a nightclub. As Conan O'Brien observed,
"Hustler magazine announced that it will feature photos of Paris Hilton
making out with another woman, while the woman fondles Paris' breasts.
So the search continues for a photo of Paris Hilton not having sex."
Because of her pornographic involvement, Hilton has grabbed an
endorsement deal as the Guess? Jeans girl (the New York Observer
reported that "her bad-girl image jibes with the clothing company's
porn-lite ad campaigns"), endless tabloid headlines, and now, this deal
with Carl's Jr. As Brad Haley, marketing chief for Carl's Jr., stated,
"Paris was chosen to star in the ad because she is an intriguing
cultural icon and the 'it girl' of the moment."
Here's the big question: How, as a society, did we allow Paris Hilton
to become a cultural icon? Clearly, no one likes her very much.
Liberals and conservatives alike agree that she is vacuous and silly.
Media commentators all over the map label her "spoiled" and "stupid."
Maureen Dowd, hardly a cultural right-winger, lumps Hilton together
with "vacuous, slutty girls on TV sitcoms."
No, Hilton is today's "it girl" for one reason and one reason alone:
Individual scorn, though that opinion may be shared by a vast majority,
does not control the river of a culture. It is those who push the
envelope who do. Over the past few decades, we have implemented a "live
and let live" culture whereby abhorrence for immorality is seen as
illegitimate if promoted through governmental means. Instead, we are
supposed to let our culture be poisoned slowly -- and if we protest, we
are told that as long as we turn off our own TV's, all will be well.
That's why it should come as no surprise that Hilton's spicy ad has
ardent defenders, who proclaim that just because you don't like
pornography doesn't mean that it can't make someone else very happy.
One man's pornography is another man's means to happiness. And so Keith
Olbermann of MSNBC ripped the ad's detractors: "I'm reminded tonight of
H.L. Mencken's definition of Puritanism: the haunting fear someone
somewhere may be happy. Is that at the bottom line here, I mean, that
the people who have to protest crap like this ad -- and it's crap --
but are they afraid it will corrupt somebody, or are they afraid
somebody will enjoy it?" Paul Begala labeled the offended "the
sanctimonious Republican right." And Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles
Times simultaneously condemned the commercial as "a new high (or low)
in television crassness" and slammed the ad's opponents as members of
the "manufactured outrage industry."
This is the new pattern: individual condemnation and societal
acceptance. The moral among us have been forced into tolerance of
immorality. Paris Hilton is a cultural icon because of it. As long as
the moral majority is impotent, the lowest common denominator will
continue to define us.
BEN SHAPIRO
Benjamin Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed into
a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
He entered UCLA at the age of 16. Never afraid to antagonize his
political opposition, he was the only counter-protester at an
Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people on UCLA's campus,
and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
As a staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus,
Shapiro faces the political liberals head-on. From exposing the leftist
tilt of the professoriate on college campuses to addressing the
conflict in the Middle East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always
draws a hailstorm of response.
Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally
syndicated columnist in the U.S. His columns are printed nationwide in
major newspapers and websites, including Townhall.com,
WorldNetDaily.com, Frontpagemag.com, the Riverside Press-Enterprise and
the Conservative Chronicle. His columns have also appeared in the
Orlando Sentinel, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, RealClearPolitics.com,
Jewish World Review, and he has been quoted on the O'Reilly Factor, in
the Wall Street Journal and the New York Press, and in The American
Conservative magazine, among many others.
Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United
States and Canada. He is also the author of the national bestseller,
Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth (May 2004,
Thomas Nelson Inc./WND Books).
An Orthodox Jew, virtuosic violinist, and hack golfer, Shapiro
graduated UCLA in June 2004 with a B.A. in Political Science. He is
currently a student at Harvard Law School.
.
|
|
|
| User: "2080 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
17 Nov 2005 07:27:00 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:44:36 GMT, "Ollie Sandcastle"
<nothing@omegapoint.com> wrote:
Damn, at least one might hope the quality of the vid's better than that
other crap she was at one point infamous for?
Is that the overprivileged ***** that Fox (owned, like most right
wingers, by Kangarupe Murdoch) promotes endlessly?
OTS
"words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
Ben Shapiro
June 1, 2005
Paris Hilton is at it again. The 24-year-old hotel heiress is the
feature attraction in Carl's Jr.'s new Spicy Burger ad campaign, aimed
at the horny male TV-watching population. Scantily clad in a one-piece
leather outfit plunging down to below her navel, Hilton struts into an
empty warehouse, licks her finger, then suds up herself and a Bentley
automobile, as a stripper-styled "I Love Paris" rendition slowly plays
in the background. At the end of the spot, Hilton bites the burger and
sucks her finger clean. The commercial closes with Hilton's tagline
flashing across the screen: "That's Hot."
The spot is pure, soft-core pornography, beginning to end. The website
for the commercial, spicyparis.com, touts the "too-hot-for-TV spot."
And while Carl's Jr. CEO Andy Puzder defends the ad as "a beautiful
model in a swimsuit washing a car," it is clearly designed to
capitalize on Hilton's target audience -- porn watchers.
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation
is that Paris Hilton would be a relative nobody today were she not
incredibly rich and profligate with her favors. Hilton made perhaps the
most infamous porn video outside of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee. That
hard-core work, starring then-boyfriend Rick Solomon, brought her
international fame. At least nine other sex tapes are said to be
floating around somewhere, including a lesbian sex tape with Playboy
playmate Nicole Lenz. The sexually uninhibited Hilton became a target
for Larry Flynt of Hustler fame, who released pictures of Hilton
sharing some lesbian tongue at a nightclub. As Conan O'Brien observed,
"Hustler magazine announced that it will feature photos of Paris Hilton
making out with another woman, while the woman fondles Paris' breasts.
So the search continues for a photo of Paris Hilton not having sex."
Because of her pornographic involvement, Hilton has grabbed an
endorsement deal as the Guess? Jeans girl (the New York Observer
reported that "her bad-girl image jibes with the clothing company's
porn-lite ad campaigns"), endless tabloid headlines, and now, this deal
with Carl's Jr. As Brad Haley, marketing chief for Carl's Jr., stated,
"Paris was chosen to star in the ad because she is an intriguing
cultural icon and the 'it girl' of the moment."
Here's the big question: How, as a society, did we allow Paris Hilton
to become a cultural icon? Clearly, no one likes her very much.
Liberals and conservatives alike agree that she is vacuous and silly.
Media commentators all over the map label her "spoiled" and "stupid."
Maureen Dowd, hardly a cultural right-winger, lumps Hilton together
with "vacuous, slutty girls on TV sitcoms."
No, Hilton is today's "it girl" for one reason and one reason alone:
Individual scorn, though that opinion may be shared by a vast majority,
does not control the river of a culture. It is those who push the
envelope who do. Over the past few decades, we have implemented a "live
and let live" culture whereby abhorrence for immorality is seen as
illegitimate if promoted through governmental means. Instead, we are
supposed to let our culture be poisoned slowly -- and if we protest, we
are told that as long as we turn off our own TV's, all will be well.
That's why it should come as no surprise that Hilton's spicy ad has
ardent defenders, who proclaim that just because you don't like
pornography doesn't mean that it can't make someone else very happy.
One man's pornography is another man's means to happiness. And so Keith
Olbermann of MSNBC ripped the ad's detractors: "I'm reminded tonight of
H.L. Mencken's definition of Puritanism: the haunting fear someone
somewhere may be happy. Is that at the bottom line here, I mean, that
the people who have to protest crap like this ad -- and it's crap --
but are they afraid it will corrupt somebody, or are they afraid
somebody will enjoy it?" Paul Begala labeled the offended "the
sanctimonious Republican right." And Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles
Times simultaneously condemned the commercial as "a new high (or low)
in television crassness" and slammed the ad's opponents as members of
the "manufactured outrage industry."
This is the new pattern: individual condemnation and societal
acceptance. The moral among us have been forced into tolerance of
immorality. Paris Hilton is a cultural icon because of it. As long as
the moral majority is impotent, the lowest common denominator will
continue to define us.
BEN SHAPIRO
Benjamin Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed into
a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
He entered UCLA at the age of 16. Never afraid to antagonize his
political opposition, he was the only counter-protester at an
Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people on UCLA's campus,
and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
As a staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus,
Shapiro faces the political liberals head-on. From exposing the leftist
tilt of the professoriate on college campuses to addressing the
conflict in the Middle East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always
draws a hailstorm of response.
Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally
syndicated columnist in the U.S. His columns are printed nationwide in
major newspapers and websites, including Townhall.com,
WorldNetDaily.com, Frontpagemag.com, the Riverside Press-Enterprise and
the Conservative Chronicle. His columns have also appeared in the
Orlando Sentinel, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, RealClearPolitics.com,
Jewish World Review, and he has been quoted on the O'Reilly Factor, in
the Wall Street Journal and the New York Press, and in The American
Conservative magazine, among many others.
Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United
States and Canada. He is also the author of the national bestseller,
Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth (May 2004,
Thomas Nelson Inc./WND Books).
An Orthodox Jew, virtuosic violinist, and hack golfer, Shapiro
graduated UCLA in June 2004 with a B.A. in Political Science. He is
currently a student at Harvard Law School.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MooJoo" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 07:01:51 PM |
|
|
I really don't know but I bet she won't have to be death taxes on her
daddy's money when she inherits.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 07:26:41 PM |
|
|
In <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "words of
truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote:
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation is
that Paris Hilton...
....is enormously popular in "red states."
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
|
| User: "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 07:33:49 PM |
|
|
His book is popular with people who cannot think for themselves.
"Mark K. Bilbo" <alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote in message
news:qNednVjv85TZ3areRVn-jA@megapath.net...
: In <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "words of
: truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote:
:
: > As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
: > Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the
situation is
: > that Paris Hilton...
:
: ...is enormously popular in "red states."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "1913 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 09:57:27 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:26:41 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "words of
truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote:
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation is
that Paris Hilton...
...is enormously popular in "red states."
Isn't it FAUX that carries her TV shows?
"'I’m not meeting with that goddamned *****,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I’m concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 09:02:46 AM |
|
|
In <4soej11mnmo6o3seqri8use1lr6fuu1gh3@4ax.com>, 1913 Dead
<zepp1913#2211finestplanet.com@> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:26:41 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<alt-atheism@org.webmaster> wrote:
In <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "words of
truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote:
As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation
is that Paris Hilton...
...is enormously popular in "red states."
Isn't it FAUX that carries her TV shows?
Of course.
You gotta hand it to them. They know how to capitalize on the hypocrisy...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
"We're angry, Mr. President, and we'll be angry long
after our beloved city and surrounding parishes have
been pumped dry. Our people deserved rescuing.
Many who could have been were not. That's to the
government's shame."
http://makeashorterlink.com/?F2D511CBB
.
|
|
|
| User: "helen" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 04:11:20 PM |
|
|
Isn't it FAUX that carries her TV shows?
her mentor, from what i understand, is rupert murdoch.
yeah...real "liberal"...sure.
h
.
|
|
|
| User: "bou bou" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
27 Sep 2005 02:42:40 AM |
|
|
On 26 Sep 2005 14:11:20 -0700, "helen" <helens_piano@yahoo.com> wrote:
Isn't it FAUX that carries her TV shows?
her mentor, from what i understand, is rupert murdoch.
yeah...real "liberal"...sure.
h
Ever notice how either Murdoch and Turner holdings play antagonist
when either left or right begin taking too much of a lead? If the
nation swings too far right in opinion polls, both come close to
undermining the left, the opposite is also true... With these boys
playing God there is no democracy.
Only purpose I can find, is to give a major lobby a deciding
outcome....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 10:19:43 AM |
|
|
In article <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> "words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> writes:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
{...}
No, Hilton is today's "it girl" for one reason and one reason alone:
Individual scorn, though that opinion may be shared by a vast majority,
does not control the river of a culture. It is those who push the
envelope who do. Over the past few decades, we have implemented a "live
and let live" culture whereby abhorrence for immorality is seen as
illegitimate if promoted through governmental means. Instead, we are
supposed to let our culture be poisoned slowly -- and if we protest, we
are told that as long as we turn off our own TV's, all will be well.
Heh. If "our culture" is so fragile that it can be "poisoned"
by the likes of this bibmo, than it much deserves it.
But of course it isn't, and it won't be.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sean C" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 01:56:46 PM |
|
|
In article <1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
words of truth <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
The kind that wants to make sure spoiled, vapid skanks like Paris
Hilton never have to pay a dime of tax in their lifetimes. The kind
that watch her brainless shows on Fox. The kind that would elect an
ignorant, spoiled ***** like Bush as president. The kind that think the
rich are better than the rest of us because they have money. The kind
that thinks "freedom" means being slaves to people like this.
Sean C
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Watch Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 08:39:09 PM |
|
|
Liberals? You think only liberals like that commercial? You think that
only liberals look at porn? Think again. Talk to some NASCAR dads.
Check on hamburger consumption in the Red States.
The commercial exists for exactly one reason, a reason that is neither
liberal nor conservative: it sells burgers. If it only sold burgers to
liberals, it would be a failure and they would pull it.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "bou bou" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 11:22:39 PM |
|
|
Money
She represents the legally blond niche that is heavily consumer
driven, apathetic and believes that it is taken seriously.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the Professor" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
26 Sep 2005 11:35:16 PM |
|
|
"bou bou" <horton@bruce.biz.ca> wrote in message
news:r2ihj1tsd377j0nus1a5tba12fp2hh6hme@4ax.com...
Money
She represents the legally blond niche that is heavily consumer
driven, apathetic and believes that it is taken seriously.
A good looking blond who makes a sex tape not for money, is apt to be very
popular.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
27 Sep 2005 02:27:27 PM |
|
|
bou bou wrote:
Money
She represents the legally blond niche that is heavily consumer
driven, apathetic and believes that it is taken seriously.
I don't know of any liberal cuktures here.
We have a nation that is obviously far right.
These far right freaks gave us a GOP president,
House and Senate. Most governors are Republicans.
More people believe in Adam and Eve than Creationism
almost 3 to 1.
Its these far right mouth breathers that have made
trash like Hilton a star.
--
The official spokesman of the Foxes said
today that investigation into what happened
to the henhouse may be needed.
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
27 Sep 2005 07:23:27 PM |
|
|
51% of a population does not make for a HUGE MAJORITY!
"wbarwell" <wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message
news:11jj6amj1seci39@corp.supernews.com...
:
: I don't know of any liberal cuktures here.
: We have a nation that is obviously far right.
: These far right freaks gave us a GOP president,
: House and Senate. Most governors are Republicans.
: More people believe in Adam and Eve than Creationism
: almost 3 to 1.
: Its these far right mouth breathers that have made
: trash like Hilton a star.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andre Lieven" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
27 Sep 2005 03:32:42 PM |
|
|
wbarwell (wbarwell@mylinuxisp.com) writes:
bou bou wrote:
Money
She represents the legally blond niche that is heavily consumer
driven, apathetic and believes that it is taken seriously.
I don't know of any liberal cuktures here.
We are happy to stipulate any degree of your ignorance as you wish
to claim...
We have a nation that is obviously far right.
" obviously "... Hmm... Are Brown shirts in the streets ? No.
" far right " is clearly, thus, a fluid term. In amny nations,
just having a monitored election is leftish.
These far right freaks gave us a GOP president,
That was actually, you know, the voters. Who decided on whom
they preferred. Thats, like... democracy. It still counts as
democracy, if your guy loses.
House and Senate. Most governors are Republicans.
Indeed. Because, unfortunately, the US Democrats have simply become
ineffective, and have chosen issues that the majority of US voters
oppose.
Case in point" 2004 election. 11 states had gay marriage on their
ballot initiatives. All 11 were defeated, in most by 2-1 or higher
margins.
If you have a two party system, and one party *chooses* to back issues
that are opposed by the population 2-1, that party will... lose, and
lose, and LOSE. Period. In a 2 party deal, if you are behind 2-1, thats
all you'll get.
The Democrats need to do one thing, for starters... LISTEN to what the
voters are saying, what their issues are, and then, start to address
those issues.
More people believe in Adam and Eve than Creationism
almost 3 to 1.
It would be good if you stopped taking crack while typing.
As you just claimed that " more people believe in Creationism
than believe in *CReationism*... ".
A non retard would have written: " More people believe in Adam and
Eve than *Evolution*... ".
And, its not a typo, evolution doesn't even start with a " c "...
Its these far right mouth breathers that have made
trash like Hilton a star.
No proof offered ? Claim fails.
Andre
--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
.
|
|
|
| User: "towelie" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 12:25:39 AM |
|
|
TV's Andre Lieven wrote:
We have a nation that is obviously far right.
" obviously "... Hmm... Are Brown shirts in the streets ? No.
" far right " is clearly, thus, a fluid term. In amny nations,
just having a monitored election is leftish.
The 2004 election wasn't monitored. Remember? The neo-cons wouldn't allow
it.
These far right freaks gave us a GOP president,
That was actually, you know, the voters. Who decided on whom
they preferred. Thats, like... democracy. It still counts as
democracy, if your guy loses.
Utterly unnecessary, when you have Diebold to deliver the votes to you.
House and Senate. Most governors are Republicans.
Indeed. Because, unfortunately, the US Democrats have simply become
ineffective, and have chosen issues that the majority of US voters
oppose.
Case in point" 2004 election. 11 states had gay marriage on their
ballot initiatives. All 11 were defeated, in most by 2-1 or higher
margins.
All that proves is the country is full of bigots.
More people believe in Adam and Eve than Creationism
almost 3 to 1.
It would be good if you stopped taking crack while typing.
As you just claimed that " more people believe in Creationism
than believe in *CReationism*... ".
I knew what he meant.
A non retard would have written: " More people believe in Adam and
Eve than *Evolution*... ".
And, its not a typo, evolution doesn't even start with a " c "...
Oh, come on. You've never been thinking of one word and typed it instead of
the one you meant?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 01:12:00 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 00:25:39 -0500, "towelie" <bugoNOSPAM@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Oh, come on. You've never been thinking of one word and typed it instead of
the one you meant?
I have. For example, I intended to type "I think towelie is in
error", when instead I typed, "This fucking idiot, towelie, has got to
be the afterbirth of a Mongolian gang *****."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Watch Dog" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 01:06:10 AM |
|
|
So here's the National Council of Women's Organizations - "liberal
feminists" all - protesting an upcoming ad using a scantily clad woman
to sell the NHL:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050928/ap_on_sp_ho_ne/hkn_nbc_hockey_ad
No doubt when the ad runs, Words of Truth and his cohort will be
asking, "Why do liberals support ads like this?!!?"
He wouldn't know truth if it bit him on his scantily clad butt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "bou bou" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 01:55:51 AM |
|
|
On 27 Sep 2005 23:06:10 -0700, "The Watch Dog" <tirhuan@aol.com>
wrote:
So here's the National Council of Women's Organizations - "liberal
feminists" all - protesting an upcoming ad using a scantily clad woman
to sell the NHL:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050928/ap_on_sp_ho_ne/hkn_nbc_hockey_ad
No doubt when the ad runs, Words of Truth and his cohort will be
asking, "Why do liberals support ads like this?!!?"
He wouldn't know truth if it bit him on his scantily clad butt.
I saw that scantily clad commercial today. She looked to be in her
40's and he looked like he just came out of puberty.
The game scratches the hockey itch well enough...Good graphics and
gameplay.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 01:26:45 AM |
|
|
So why aren't we seeing scantily clad Hockey Players (male) selling the
NHL?
*grin*
"The Watch Dog" <tirhuan@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1127887570.775966.8300@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
: So here's the National Council of Women's Organizations - "liberal
: feminists" all - protesting an upcoming ad using a scantily clad woman
: to sell the NHL:
:
:
: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050928/ap_on_sp_ho_ne/hkn_nbc_hockey_ad
:
: No doubt when the ad runs, Words of Truth and his cohort will be
: asking, "Why do liberals support ads like this?!!?"
:
: He wouldn't know truth if it bit him on his scantily clad butt.
:
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
28 Sep 2005 03:24:05 AM |
|
|
On 28-Sep-2005, "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" <riain@zion.org.il> wrote:
So why aren't we seeing scantily clad Hockey Players (male) selling the
NHL?
*grin*
You'd think that any group that has the advantage of supposedly superior
specimens would use that advantage to try to bring in new "buyers."
No, it wouldn't make it any more correct - well, maybe *slightly* less
incorrect -
after all, there are NO WOMEN in the NHL, why should they be used to try
to sell it?
Susan
"The Watch Dog" <tirhuan@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1127887570.775966.8300@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
: So here's the National Council of Women's Organizations - "liberal
: feminists" all - protesting an upcoming ad using a scantily clad woman
: to sell the NHL:
:
:
: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050928/ap_on_sp_ho_ne/hkn_nbc_hockey_ad
:
: No doubt when the ad runs, Words of Truth and his cohort will be
: asking, "Why do liberals support ads like this?!!?"
:
: He wouldn't know truth if it bit him on his scantily clad butt.
:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: Why Liberal Culture Embraces Paris Hilton? |
25 Sep 2005 06:56:35 PM |
|
|
Oh look, what a surprise, NOT -- Ben Shapiro is a Republican brainwashed
fascist Orthodox Jew, all of 21-years-old -- who is only about one
thing making money by bashing others! So unlike"words of truth" to post
messages from Jews!
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/BIOS/cbshapiro.html
BEN SHAPIRO
Benjamin Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed into a
reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
He entered UCLA at the age of 16. Never afraid to antagonize his
political opposition, he was the only counter-protester at an
Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people on UCLA's campus,
and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
As a staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus,
Shapiro faces the political liberals head-on. From exposing the leftist
tilt of the professoriate on college campuses to addressing the conflict
in the Middle East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always draws a
hailstorm of response.
Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally syndicated
columnist in the U.S. His columns are printed nationwide in major
newspapers and websites, including Townhall.com, WorldNetDaily.com,
Frontpagemag.com, the Riverside Press-Enterprise and the Conservative
Chronicle. His columns have also appeared in the Orlando Sentinel,
Honolulu Star-Advertiser, RealClearPolitics.com, Jewish World Review,
and he has been quoted on the O'Reilly Factor, in the Wall Street
Journal and the New York Press, and in The American Conservative
magazine, among many others.
Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United
States and Canada. He is also the author of the national bestseller,
Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth (May 2004,
Thomas Nelson Inc./WND Books).
An Orthodox Jew, virtuosic violinist, and hack golfer, Shapiro graduated
UCLA in June 2004 with a B.A. in Political Science. He is currently a
student at Harvard Law School
You can contact the little fascist hypocrite at:
http://cf.townhall.com/contact/columnists.cfm?ID=54&Post=16263
"words of truth" <wordsoftruth21@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1127691050.851118.21710@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/bs20050601.shtml
:
:
: What kind of culture would embrace Paris Hilton?
:
:
: Ben Shapiro
:
:
:
: June 1, 2005
:
:
: Paris Hilton is at it again. The 24-year-old hotel heiress is the
: feature attraction in Carl's Jr.'s new Spicy Burger ad campaign, aimed
: at the horny male TV-watching population. Scantily clad in a one-piece
: leather outfit plunging down to below her navel, Hilton struts into an
: empty warehouse, licks her finger, then suds up herself and a Bentley
: automobile, as a stripper-styled "I Love Paris" rendition slowly plays
: in the background. At the end of the spot, Hilton bites the burger and
: sucks her finger clean. The commercial closes with Hilton's tagline
: flashing across the screen: "That's Hot."
:
: The spot is pure, soft-core pornography, beginning to end. The website
: for the commercial, spicyparis.com, touts the "too-hot-for-TV spot."
: And while Carl's Jr. CEO Andy Puzder defends the ad as "a beautiful
: model in a swimsuit washing a car," it is clearly designed to
: capitalize on Hilton's target audience -- porn watchers.
:
: As I explain in my upcoming book, "Porn Generation: How Social
: Liberalism Is Corrupting Our Future," the plain truth of the situation
: is that Paris Hilton would be a relative nobody today were she not
: incredibly rich and profligate with her favors. Hilton made perhaps
the
: most infamous porn video outside of Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee.
That
: hard-core work, starring then-boyfriend Rick Solomon, brought her
: international fame. At least nine other sex tapes are said to be
: floating around somewhere, including a lesbian sex tape with Playboy
: playmate Nicole Lenz. The sexually uninhibited Hilton became a target
: for Larry Flynt of Hustler fame, who released pictures of Hilton
: sharing some lesbian tongue at a nightclub. As Conan O'Brien observed,
: "Hustler magazine announced that it will feature photos of Paris
Hilton
: making out with another woman, while the woman fondles Paris' breasts.
: So the search continues for a photo of Paris Hilton not having sex."
:
: Because of her pornographic involvement, Hilton has grabbed an
: endorsement deal as the Guess? Jeans girl (the New York Observer
: reported that "her bad-girl image jibes with the clothing company's
: porn-lite ad campaigns"), endless tabloid headlines, and now, this
deal
: with Carl's Jr. As Brad Haley, marketing chief for Carl's Jr., stated,
: "Paris was chosen to star in the ad because she is an intriguing
: cultural icon and the 'it girl' of the moment."
:
: Here's the big question: How, as a society, did we allow Paris Hilton
: to become a cultural icon? Clearly, no one likes her very much.
: Liberals and conservatives alike agree that she is vacuous and silly.
: Media commentators all over the map label her "spoiled" and "stupid."
: Maureen Dowd, hardly a cultural right-winger, lumps Hilton together
: with "vacuous, slutty girls on TV sitcoms."
:
: No, Hilton is today's "it girl" for one reason and one reason alone:
: Individual scorn, though that opinion may be shared by a vast
majority,
: does not control the river of a culture. It is those who push the
: envelope who do. Over the past few decades, we have implemented a
"live
: and let live" culture whereby abhorrence for immorality is seen as
: illegitimate if promoted through governmental means. Instead, we are
: supposed to let our culture be poisoned slowly -- and if we protest,
we
: are told that as long as we turn off our own TV's, all will be well.
:
: That's why it should come as no surprise that Hilton's spicy ad has
: ardent defenders, who proclaim that just because you don't like
: pornography doesn't mean that it can't make someone else very happy.
: One man's pornography is another man's means to happiness. And so
Keith
: Olbermann of MSNBC ripped the ad's detractors: "I'm reminded tonight
of
: H.L. Mencken's definition of Puritanism: the haunting fear someone
: somewhere may be happy. Is that at the bottom line here, I mean, that
: the people who have to protest crap like this ad -- and it's crap --
: but are they afraid it will corrupt somebody, or are they afraid
: somebody will enjoy it?" Paul Begala labeled the offended "the
: sanctimonious Republican right." And Michael Hiltzik of the Los
Angeles
: Times simultaneously condemned the commercial as "a new high (or low)
: in television crassness" and slammed the ad's opponents as members of
: the "manufactured outrage industry."
:
: This is the new pattern: individual condemnation and societal
: acceptance. The moral among us have been forced into tolerance of
: immorality. Paris Hilton is a cultural icon because of it. As long as
: the moral majority is impotent, the lowest common denominator will
: continue to define us.
:
:
:
:
: BEN SHAPIRO
:
:
: Benjamin Shapiro was born in 1984 in Burbank, Calif. Brought up in the
: home of two Reagan Republicans, where intelligent conversation about
: politics and philosophy was encouraged, Shapiro quickly developed into
: a reasoned political thinker and a powerful writer.
:
: He entered UCLA at the age of 16. Never afraid to antagonize his
: political opposition, he was the only counter-protester at an
: Affirmative Action Rally that drew over 1,500 people on UCLA's campus,
: and he has repeatedly challenged liberal professors and faculty.
:
: As a staunch conservative on the modern politically correct campus,
: Shapiro faces the political liberals head-on. From exposing the
leftist
: tilt of the professoriate on college campuses to addressing the
: conflict in the Middle East, Shapiro's confrontational approach always
: draws a hailstorm of response.
:
: Shapiro was hired at age 17 to become the youngest nationally
: syndicated columnist in the U.S. His columns are printed nationwide in
: major newspapers and websites, including Townhall.com,
: WorldNetDaily.com, Frontpagemag.com, the Riverside Press-Enterprise
and
: the Conservative Chronicle. His columns have also appeared in the
: Orlando Sentinel, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, RealClearPolitics.com,
: Jewish World Review, and he has been quoted on the O'Reilly Factor, in
: the Wall Street Journal and the New York Press, and in The American
: Conservative magazine, among many others.
:
: Shapiro is a regular guest on dozens of radio shows around the United
: States and Canada. He is also the author of the national bestseller,
: Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth (May 2004,
: Thomas Nelson Inc./WND Books).
:
: An Orthodox Jew, virtuosic violinist, and hack golfer, Shapiro
: graduated UCLA in June 2004 with a B.A. in Political Science. He is
: currently a student at Harvard Law School.
:
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|