Why Science Is Wrong



 Religions > Atheism > Why Science Is Wrong

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "adman"
Date: 01 Feb 2008 10:20:11 AM
Object: Why Science Is Wrong
Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves in
recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself into
materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We believe
nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of value unless
it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and its spending. While
science has not taught this directly, the belief results from the prevailing
beliefs and structures of science and their pervasive influence on our
lives.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong
how true
.

User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 11:42:01 AM
<JM20000000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e31119fd-ad06-424d-abbe-79e2d73ec41b@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Adman making strawmen again.

JM

this was a topic for discussion, try to keep up
.
User: "Mike Johannson"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 12:12:18 PM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:dRIoj.88079$L%6.86768@bignews3.bellsouth.net...


<JM20000000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e31119fd-ad06-424d-abbe-79e2d73ec41b@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Adman making strawmen again.

JM


this was a topic for discussion, try to keep up

Why do you keep using the same old line and expressions even when it's not
appropriate?



.

User: "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 02:36:51 PM
adman <72545@hottmail.et> wrote:


<JM20000000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e31119fd-ad06-424d-abbe-79e2d73ec41b@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

Adman making strawmen again.

JM


this was a topic for discussion, try to keep up


KOOK FIGHT! KOOK FIGHT!
--
There are none more ignorant and useless,
than they that seek answers on their knees,
with their eyes closed.
____________________________________________________________________
Rev. Karl E. Taylor

A.A #1143 PLONKED by Bob
Apostle of Dr. Lao EAC: Virgin Conversion Unit Director
____________________________________________________________________
.


User: "Killiam"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 12:33:58 PM
"Wexford" <wryan77@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8e563ec6-4dfe-49b5-bda2-389d92938e07@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
I don't have to bow to
a mythical creature to find fulfillment and happiness. A cold beer and
a warm woman are enough. You should try it some time.
He probably believes beer is the nectar of the demons and sex is for
procreation only.
.

User: "Ips-Switch"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 12:08:24 PM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves in
recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors.

And churches with pedophile priests who rape and sexually abuse children.
We believe

nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of value unless
it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and its spending.

That sounds like the churches today... always passing the plate and looking
for pledges. Ever hear the electronic preachers begging for money?
While

science has not taught this directly, the belief results from the
prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their pervasive influence
on our lives.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong

How about something other than the same old pro-creation sites?




how true








.

User: "Robert Weldon"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 11:25:30 AM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves in
recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We
believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of
value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and its
spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief results
from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their pervasive
influence on our lives.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong



how true

Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.
.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 11:36:44 AM
"Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...


"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves in
recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We
believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of
value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and its
spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief results
from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their pervasive
influence on our lives.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong



how true


Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.

Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?
.
User: "Ips-Switch"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 12:23:02 PM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:fMIoj.88074$L%6.80331@bignews3.bellsouth.net...


Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?

Where is your evidence and why is your English and spelling so poor, and
expressions so juvenile when you claim to be an adult? Do you feel lying
for god as you do is justifiable?
.

User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 01:38:00 PM
adman wrote:

"Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...

"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...

Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves in
recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We
believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of
value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and its
spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief results
from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their pervasive
influence on our lives.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong



how true

Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.


Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?


Some write about the beauty inherent in the workings of our universe.
There are many deep and elegant truths embedded in something as simple
as planetary motion or even the weak force. People who are hung up on
their religion do not understand that everything in the universe
declares G-d's glory. You miss the beauty for some damn theology. Why
do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly? Are you
not comfortable with your world?
.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 03:03:42 PM
"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:wyKoj.3984$nK5.1225@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
| adman wrote:
| > "Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
| > news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...
| >> "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| >> news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
| >>> Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
| >>> humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves
in
| >>> recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
| >>> into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We
| >>> believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of
| >>> value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and
its
| >>> spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief
results
| >>> from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their
pervasive
| >>> influence on our lives.
| >>>
| >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>> how true
| >>>
| >> Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.
| >
| > Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?
| >
| >
| Some write about the beauty inherent in the workings of our universe.
Yes, but i am not talking about them,
| There are many deep and elegant truths embedded in something as simple
| as planetary motion or even the weak force.
I agree 100%
| People who are hung up on
| their religion do not understand that everything in the universe
| declares G-d's glory.
Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| You miss the beauty for some damn theology.
I do not believe in theology
| Why
| do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?
I do not worship science
| Are you
| not comfortable with your world?
I love my world, and my life
.
User: "Killiam"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 04:22:02 PM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:vOLoj.88185$L%6.12960@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

I love my world, and my life

Then why do you need a magic sky daddy?
.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 07:30:45 AM
"Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:47a39b8d$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
|
| "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| news:vOLoj.88185$L%6.12960@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
| > I love my world, and my life
| >
|
| Then why do you need a magic sky daddy?
Because he created this world and my life.
Sky daddy? lol, that was funny.
|
.
User: "Killiam"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 11:27:52 AM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:Pf_oj.16528$1f.11453@bignews9.bellsouth.net...


"Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:47a39b8d$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
|
| "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| news:vOLoj.88185$L%6.12960@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
| > I love my world, and my life
| >
|
| Then why do you need a magic sky daddy?

Because he created this world and my life.

What kind of reply is that? Millions realize gods don't exist and live full
and happy lives. Why can't you? What makes you so unhappy or dissatisfied
that you must have a "god?"

Sky daddy? lol, that was funny.

There's no other way to describe it. Adults don't need their daddy any
more - why do you?
.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 01:52:16 PM
"Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:47a4a81c$0$1341$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
|
| "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| news:Pf_oj.16528$1f.11453@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
| >
| > "Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
| > news:47a39b8d$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
..
|
| There's no other way to describe it. Adults don't need their daddy any
| more - why do you?
|
This is exactly how some 15 to 16 years old feel when they feel all grown up
.
User: "Killiam"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 08:13:15 PM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:uR3pj.55962$k27.21049@bignews2.bellsouth.net...


"Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:47a4a81c$0$1341$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
|
| "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| news:Pf_oj.16528$1f.11453@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
| >
| > "Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
| > news:47a39b8d$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
.
|
| There's no other way to describe it. Adults don't need their daddy any
| more - why do you?
|

This is exactly how some 15 to 16 years old feel when they feel all grown
up

So you are only 15 or 16. I thought so. You post like a youngster. Most
people over age 18 no longer need daddy and mommy like children do.



.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 09:38:10 PM
"Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:47a523d1$0$1341$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
|
| "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| news:uR3pj.55962$k27.21049@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
| >
| > "Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
| > news:47a4a81c$0$1341$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
| > |
| > | "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| > | news:Pf_oj.16528$1f.11453@bignews9.bellsouth.net...
| > | >
| > | > "Killiam" <killiam@invalid.net> wrote in message
| > | > news:47a39b8d$0$1349$834e42db@reader.greatnowhere.com...
| > .
| > |
| > | There's no other way to describe it. Adults don't need their daddy
any
| > | more - why do you?
| > |
| >
| > This is exactly how some 15 to 16 years old feel when they feel all
grown
| > up
|
| So you are only 15 or 16. I thought so. You post like a youngster. Most
| people over age 18 no longer need daddy and mommy like children do.
young man go clean up that room!
|
| >
| >
|
.






User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 01 Feb 2008 03:18:53 PM
adman wrote:

"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:wyKoj.3984$nK5.1225@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
| adman wrote:
| > "Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
| > news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...
| >> "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| >> news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
| >>> Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
| >>> humanistic religion than most religions have done selling themselves
in
| >>> recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed itself
| >>> into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and acquisitors. We
| >>> believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is of
| >>> value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition and
its
| >>> spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief
results
| >>> from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their
pervasive
| >>> influence on our lives.
| >>>
| >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>> how true
| >>>
| >> Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.
| >
| > Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?
| >
| >
| Some write about the beauty inherent in the workings of our universe.

Yes, but i am not talking about them,

Of course not, it damages your argument.


| There are many deep and elegant truths embedded in something as simple
| as planetary motion or even the weak force.

I agree 100%


| People who are hung up on
| their religion do not understand that everything in the universe
| declares G-d's glory.

Of course, he made everything for his pleasure

I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
deity I would like.


| You miss the beauty for some damn theology.

I do not believe in theology

Of course you do. You worship it, and sacrifice your intellect to it.
Your metaphor for this belief is "God."


| Why
| do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?

I do not worship science

Nor should you. You should take it for what it is - a realm of human
endeavor.


| Are you
| not comfortable with your world?

I love my world, and my life

It's easy when you have all of your truths spelled out for you.



.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 07:29:25 AM
"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:wyKoj.3984$nK5.1225@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
| > | > news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...
| > | >> "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| > | >> news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
| > | >>> Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
| > | >>> humanistic religion than most religions have done selling
themselves
| > in
| > | >>> recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed
itself
| > | >>> into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and
acquisitors. We
| > | >>> believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is
of
| > | >>> value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition
and
| > its
| > | >>> spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief
| > results
| > | >>> from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their
| > pervasive
| > | >>> influence on our lives.
| > | >>>
| > | >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong
| > | >>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>> how true
| > | >>>
| > | >> Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.
| > | >
| > | > Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?
| > | >
| > | >
| > | Some write about the beauty inherent in the workings of our universe.
| >
| > Yes, but i am not talking about them,
|
| Of course not, it damages your argument.
Ni it does not
|
| >
| > | There are many deep and elegant truths embedded in something as simple
| > | as planetary motion or even the weak force.
| >
| > I agree 100%
| >
| >
| > | People who are hung up on
| > | their religion do not understand that everything in the universe
| > | declares G-d's glory.
| >
| > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
|
| I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
| AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
| deity I would like.
I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God would
allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many sources
and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by physical
laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one. In a
physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without a
bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also see and
understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to exist and
have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to accept
the have bad.
<shrug>
Plus, i do not think the system of things we have here on earth now was
exactly what God intended for us. The physical realm was corrupted in
another eon, was destroyed (partially) by flood, and rebuilt into this mess
we have today.
|
| >
| > | You miss the beauty for some damn theology.
| >
| > I do not believe in theology
|
| Of course you do. You worship it, and sacrifice your intellect to it.
| Your metaphor for this belief is "God."
I believe what i have discovered for myself.
|
| >
| > | Why
| > | do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?
| >
| > I do not worship science
|
| Nor should you. You should take it for what it is - a realm of human
| endeavor.
I do take it for what it is. The physical world (or realm), and everything
that governs this physical world (or realm) like the laws of physics, how
plants grow, how the earth spins, how the universe expands all had a
creator. This physical realm did not create itself imho.
|
| >
| > | Are you
| > | not comfortable with your world?
| >
| > I love my world, and my life
|
| It's easy when you have all of your truths spelled out for you.
|
| >
| >
.
User: "M.M. Martinson"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 11:25:39 AM
"adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
news:Ae_oj.16527$1f.8451@bignews9.bellsouth.net...


"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
| AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
| deity I would like.

I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God would
allow such things to exist.

A wouldn't allow them to exist if it had any power at all, no more than you
would allow your child near someone with the black plague. There is no god
but you can't accept that.
Then as i read more and more from many sources

and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by physical
laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one. In a
physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without a
bottom.

But we can have a world without disease. All he had to do was NOTE CREATE
diseases and that which cause them. Is it so hard you couldn't figure this
out on your own?
We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also see and

understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to exist and
have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to accept
the have bad.

HAHAHAHAHA....... you can't be serious! You're trying to cover for your
mass murdering serial killing demonic god for creating deadly viruses,
bacteria etc.
.

User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 07:14:56 PM
adman wrote:

"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:wyKoj.3984$nK5.1225@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "Robert Weldon" <rweldon.spamblock@jrpspamblock.ca> wrote in message
| > | > news:eCIoj.35599$ow.29966@pd7urf1no...
| > | >> "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> wrote in message
| > | >> news:sEHoj.89179$K27.22634@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
| > | >>> Science has done arguably a better job selling itself as a kind of
| > | >>> humanistic religion than most religions have done selling
themselves
| > in
| > | >>> recent decades. In the process, western society has transformed
itself
| > | >>> into materialistic cultures of doubters, naysayers and
acquisitors. We
| > | >>> believe nothing is credible unless it can be proven and nothing is
of
| > | >>> value unless it can be related somehow to money, its acquisition
and
| > its
| > | >>> spending. While science has not taught this directly, the belief
| > results
| > | >>> from the prevailing beliefs and structures of science and their
| > pervasive
| > | >>> influence on our lives.
| > | >>>
| > | >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/951118/Why-Science-Is-Wrong
| > | >>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>>
| > | >>> how true
| > | >>>
| > | >> Except for the inconvenient fact that science is not a religion.
| > | >
| > | > Sure it is. Have you read some of the stuff science freeks write?
| > | >
| > | >
| > | Some write about the beauty inherent in the workings of our universe.
| >
| > Yes, but i am not talking about them,
|
| Of course not, it damages your argument.

Ni it does not
|
| >
| > | There are many deep and elegant truths embedded in something as simple
| > | as planetary motion or even the weak force.
| >
| > I agree 100%
| >
| >
| > | People who are hung up on
| > | their religion do not understand that everything in the universe
| > | declares G-d's glory.
| >
| > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
|
| I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
| AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
| deity I would like.

I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God would
allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many sources
and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by physical
laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one. In a
physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without a
bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also see and
understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to exist and
have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to accept
the have bad.

Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
everything. That means your god was responsible for things we regard as
evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a "good"
god, doesn't it?


<shrug>

Plus, i do not think the system of things we have here on earth now was
exactly what God intended for us. The physical realm was corrupted in
another eon, was destroyed (partially) by flood, and rebuilt into this mess
we have today.

How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows everything?
Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.

|
| >
| > | You miss the beauty for some damn theology.
| >
| > I do not believe in theology
|
| Of course you do. You worship it, and sacrifice your intellect to it.
| Your metaphor for this belief is "God."

I believe what i have discovered for myself.

Join the crowd.



|
| >
| > | Why
| > | do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?
| >
| > I do not worship science
|
| Nor should you. You should take it for what it is - a realm of human
| endeavor.


I do take it for what it is. The physical world (or realm), and everything
that governs this physical world (or realm) like the laws of physics, how
plants grow, how the earth spins, how the universe expands all had a
creator. This physical realm did not create itself imho.

We'll just have to disagree on that one.





|
| >
| > | Are you
| > | not comfortable with your world?
| >
| > I love my world, and my life
|
| It's easy when you have all of your truths spelled out for you.
|
| >
| >


.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 02 Feb 2008 08:31:43 PM
"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
|snip>
| > | >
| > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > |
| > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
| > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
| > | deity I would like.
| >
| > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God would
| > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many
sources
| > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by
physical
| > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one. In a
| > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without a
| > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also see
and
| > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to exist
and
| > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to
accept
| > the have bad.
|
| Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| everything. That means your god was responsible for things we regard as
| evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a "good"
| god, doesn't it?
God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.
|
| >
| > <shrug>
| >
| > Plus, i do not think the system of things we have here on earth now was
| > exactly what God intended for us. The physical realm was corrupted in
| > another eon, was destroyed (partially) by flood, and rebuilt into this
mess
| > we have today.
|
| How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows everything?
| Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.
I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set things in
motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is fucked up.
You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the dinner still
nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor, no it
waas not a nice dinner.
It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.
| > |
| > | >
| > | > | You miss the beauty for some damn theology.
| > | >
| > | > I do not believe in theology
| > |
| > | Of course you do. You worship it, and sacrifice your intellect to it.
| > | Your metaphor for this belief is "God."
| >
| > I believe what i have discovered for myself.
|
| Join the crowd.
| >
| >
| > |
| > | >
| > | > | Why
| > | > | do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?
| > | >
| > | > I do not worship science
| > |
| > | Nor should you. You should take it for what it is - a realm of human
| > | endeavor.
| >
| >
| > I do take it for what it is. The physical world (or realm), and
everything
| > that governs this physical world (or realm) like the laws of physics,
how
| > plants grow, how the earth spins, how the universe expands all had a
| > creator. This physical realm did not create itself imho.
|
| We'll just have to disagree on that one.
You think something came from nothing?
.
User: "Douglas Berry"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 11:46:50 AM
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:31:43 -0600 "adman" <72545@hottmail.et> carved
the following into the hard stone of alt.atheism

God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.

The Bible disagrees
Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and
create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.

User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 12:18:16 AM
adman wrote:

"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
|snip>

| > | >
| > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > |
| > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of the
| > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of a
| > | deity I would like.
| >
| > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God would
| > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many
sources
| > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by
physical
| > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one. In a
| > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without a
| > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also see
and
| > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to exist
and
| > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to
accept
| > the have bad.
|
| Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| everything. That means your god was responsible for things we regard as
| evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a "good"
| god, doesn't it?

God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.

If God created everything, God created evil. If God did not create evil,
God did not create everything, which means someone or something else
did. That idea limits God, which from the Jewish perspective is pagan.


|
| >
| > <shrug>
| >
| > Plus, i do not think the system of things we have here on earth now was
| > exactly what God intended for us. The physical realm was corrupted in
| > another eon, was destroyed (partially) by flood, and rebuilt into this
mess
| > we have today.
|
| How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows everything?
| Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.

I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set things in
motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is fucked up.
You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the dinner still
nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor, no it
waas not a nice dinner.

It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.

So if God made the physical world and set things in motion, God created
viruses and the mechanism for them to evolve to infect other organisms.
If God did not make parasites, God made it possible for parasites to
exist. God made it possible for diseases to spread, God made it
possible for humans to murder humans in ghastly ways, even gave them the
theology to do it.
It's like you didn't make the guy trip over your foot, you just made it
available for him to do so. That's your deity.


| > |
| > | >
| > | > | You miss the beauty for some damn theology.
| > | >
| > | > I do not believe in theology
| > |
| > | Of course you do. You worship it, and sacrifice your intellect to it.
| > | Your metaphor for this belief is "God."
| >
| > I believe what i have discovered for myself.
|
| Join the crowd.
| >
| >
| > |
| > | >
| > | > | Why
| > | > | do you accept the mental shackles and blinders so willingly?
| > | >
| > | > I do not worship science
| > |
| > | Nor should you. You should take it for what it is - a realm of human
| > | endeavor.
| >
| >
| > I do take it for what it is. The physical world (or realm), and
everything
| > that governs this physical world (or realm) like the laws of physics,
how
| > plants grow, how the earth spins, how the universe expands all had a
| > creator. This physical realm did not create itself imho.
|
| We'll just have to disagree on that one.

You think something came from nothing?

I think that things came from other things. Some things, such as the
ylem, are imponderable. But you Christians always have to have an
answer, even if its wrong. You cannot accept not knowing something or
uncertain knowledge. It gets in the way of your spiritual path. You
made your own stumbling block.
And you might benefit from learning about the Kabbalistic idea of tzimtzum.




.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 09:59:01 AM
"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:I0dpj.9142$Ej5.5449@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > |snip>
| >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > | > |
| > | > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of
the
| > | > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of
a
| > | > | deity I would like.
| > | >
| > | > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God
would
| > | > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many
| > sources
| > | > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by
| > physical
| > | > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one.
In a
| > | > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without
a
| > | > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also
see
| > and
| > | > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to
exist
| > and
| > | > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to
| > accept
| > | > the have bad.
| > |
| > | Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| > | everything. That means your god was responsible for things we regard
as
| > | evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a
"good"
| > | god, doesn't it?
| >
| > God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.
|
| If God created everything, God created evil. If God did not create evil,
| God did not create everything, which means someone or something else
| did. That idea limits God, which from the Jewish perspective is pagan.
That kind of logic will have your mind running in circles looking for
anything to stop it or point a finger to; which in this case you point to
God.
Man created transportation, therefore man created car wrecks.If man did not
create car wrecks, then man did not create cars or transportation, which
means someone else created cars and transportation.That idea limits man.
As far as the jewish perspective:they have always been a bit extreme in
their views imho
The world as God created it is no more. This system of the world is
corrupted. The virsus, the germs, all the bad stuff and all the evil was NOT
part of the original design.
| > |
| > | How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows everything?
| > | Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.
| >
| > I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set things in
| > motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is fucked
up.
| > You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the dinner
still
| > nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor, no it
| > waas not a nice dinner.
| >
| > It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.
|
| So if God made the physical world and set things in motion, God created
| viruses and the mechanism for them to evolve to infect other organisms.
| If God did not make parasites, God made it possible for parasites to
| exist. God made it possible for diseases to spread, God made it
| possible for humans to murder humans in ghastly ways, even gave them the
| theology to do it.
|
| It's like you didn't make the guy trip over your foot, you just made it
| available for him to do so. That's your deity.
"Then Michael, Gabriel, Suriel, and Uriel looked down from heaven, and saw
the wickedness which ´Azâz´êl had done in the world"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bct/bct05.htm
| > | We'll just have to disagree on that one.
| >
| > You think something came from nothing?
|
| I think that things came from other things. Some things, such as the
| ylem, are imponderable. But you Christians always have to have an
| answer, even if its wrong. You cannot accept not knowing something or
| uncertain knowledge. It gets in the way of your spiritual path. You
| made your own stumbling block.
Sure i am uncertain, and i would like to have some physical proof that God
exists beyond my personal experiences which are spirtual in nature. But i
accept my uncertain knowledge that God exists on the way of down my
spiritual path.There are times when i am 100% sure God exists, and there are
times i want to throw my hands up and say no way. Especially when i hear all
the terrible stories in the news, or when i have personal tradegy in my
life.
And i know there are others like me.
During the conversation with Jesus the father makes a tearful, plea to
Jesus: "Lord, Help My Unbelief!" (Mk. 9:24)
Just like the father of the little boy wanted help with his unbelief when
his son was dying --because unbelief and doubt affects everyone. That is
part of the plan in the destruction of Gods works. To cause us pain and
doubt, to lie and murder the children of God.

| And you might benefit from learning about the Kabbalistic idea of
tzimtzum.

I read some of it.
I perfer to argue in favor of the existance of God, and that there is some
truth to the Torah.
Because while primitave, I believe in the Torah for the great information in
it, eventhough it may have some errors. But lets face it, nothing is
perefect.
The Torah has some uncanny and insightful information like healthy foods,
clean sexual practices, removing mold in a building, social skills, how to
deal with criminals, how to raise a family and on and on and on.
Many laws that man has made has origins from the Torah. Science has just
this century admitted that eating pork is bad for you. The Torah is chocked
full of useful information when you filter out the primitive explanations
and get to the real meaning.
.
User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 12:17:05 PM
adman wrote:

"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:I0dpj.9142$Ej5.5449@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > |snip>
| >
| > | > | >
| > | > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > | > |
| > | > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the depredations of
the
| > | > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea of
a
| > | > | deity I would like.
| > | >
| > | > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why God
would
| > | > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from many
| > sources
| > | > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed by
| > physical
| > | > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual one.
In a
| > | > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top without
a
| > | > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can also
see
| > and
| > | > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to
exist
| > and
| > | > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have to
| > accept
| > | > the have bad.
| > |
| > | Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| > | everything. That means your god was responsible for things we regard
as
| > | evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a
"good"
| > | god, doesn't it?
| >
| > God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.
|
| If God created everything, God created evil. If God did not create evil,
| God did not create everything, which means someone or something else
| did. That idea limits God, which from the Jewish perspective is pagan.

That kind of logic will have your mind running in circles looking for
anything to stop it or point a finger to; which in this case you point to
God.
Man created transportation, therefore man created car wrecks.If man did not
create car wrecks, then man did not create cars or transportation, which
means someone else created cars and transportation.That idea limits man.

As far as the jewish perspective:they have always been a bit extreme in
their views imho

The world as God created it is no more. This system of the world is
corrupted. The virsus, the germs, all the bad stuff and all the evil was NOT
part of the original design.


| > |
| > | How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows everything?
| > | Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.
| >
| > I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set things in
| > motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is fucked
up.
| > You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the dinner
still
| > nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor, no it
| > waas not a nice dinner.
| >
| > It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.
|
| So if God made the physical world and set things in motion, God created
| viruses and the mechanism for them to evolve to infect other organisms.
| If God did not make parasites, God made it possible for parasites to
| exist. God made it possible for diseases to spread, God made it
| possible for humans to murder humans in ghastly ways, even gave them the
| theology to do it.
|
| It's like you didn't make the guy trip over your foot, you just made it
| available for him to do so. That's your deity.


"Then Michael, Gabriel, Suriel, and Uriel looked down from heaven, and saw
the wickedness which ´Azâz´êl had done in the world"
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bct/bct05.htm



| > | We'll just have to disagree on that one.
| >
| > You think something came from nothing?
|
| I think that things came from other things. Some things, such as the
| ylem, are imponderable. But you Christians always have to have an
| answer, even if its wrong. You cannot accept not knowing something or
| uncertain knowledge. It gets in the way of your spiritual path. You
| made your own stumbling block.


Sure i am uncertain, and i would like to have some physical proof that God
exists beyond my personal experiences which are spirtual in nature. But i
accept my uncertain knowledge that God exists on the way of down my
spiritual path.There are times when i am 100% sure God exists, and there are
times i want to throw my hands up and say no way. Especially when i hear all
the terrible stories in the news, or when i have personal tradegy in my
life.

That's because your faith is weak. If if weren't you wouldn't have to
say those things.


And i know there are others like me.

Indeed. Many of them become fanatics to compensate.


During the conversation with Jesus the father makes a tearful, plea to
Jesus: "Lord, Help My Unbelief!" (Mk. 9:24)

Just like the father of the little boy wanted help with his unbelief when
his son was dying --because unbelief and doubt affects everyone. That is
part of the plan in the destruction of Gods works. To cause us pain and
doubt, to lie and murder the children of God.

Your god does that? That's sick.


| And you might benefit from learning about the Kabbalistic idea of
tzimtzum.


I read some of it.

I perfer to argue in favor of the existance of God, and that there is some
truth to the Torah.
Because while primitave, I believe in the Torah for the great information in
it, eventhough it may have some errors. But lets face it, nothing is
perefect.

The Torah has some uncanny and insightful information like healthy foods,
clean sexual practices, removing mold in a building, social skills, how to
deal with criminals, how to raise a family and on and on and on.

And like virtually all non-Jews you ignore the ethical teachings.


Many laws that man has made has origins from the Torah. Science has just
this century admitted that eating pork is bad for you. The Torah is chocked
full of useful information when you filter out the primitive explanations
and get to the real meaning.

Pork is like coffee - sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad. Ditto
wine. Shrimp OTOH is always good by Christianity and Islam, but not
Judaism.
And the JWs misinterpret the prohibition against "drinking blood,"
forbidding transfusions. That's primitive IMO.
.
User: "adman"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 04:44:05 PM
"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:Iwnpj.54143$Pv2.49589@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:I0dpj.9142$Ej5.5449@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > |snip>
| > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the
depredations of
| > the
| > | > | > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea
of
| > a
| > | > | > | deity I would like.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why
God
| > would
| > | > | > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from
many
| > | > sources
| > | > | > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed
by
| > | > physical
| > | > | > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual
one.
| > In a
| > | > | > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top
without
| > a
| > | > | > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can
also
| > see
| > | > and
| > | > | > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to
| > exist
| > | > and
| > | > | > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have
to
| > | > accept
| > | > | > the have bad.
| > | > |
| > | > | Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| > | > | everything. That means your god was responsible for things we
regard
| > as
| > | > | evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a
| > "good"
| > | > | god, doesn't it?
| > | >
| > | > God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.
| > |
| > | If God created everything, God created evil. If God did not create
evil,
| > | God did not create everything, which means someone or something else
| > | did. That idea limits God, which from the Jewish perspective is
pagan.
| >
| > That kind of logic will have your mind running in circles looking for
| > anything to stop it or point a finger to; which in this case you point
to
| > God.
| > Man created transportation, therefore man created car wrecks.If man did
not
| > create car wrecks, then man did not create cars or transportation, which
| > means someone else created cars and transportation.That idea limits man.
| >
| > As far as the jewish perspective:they have always been a bit extreme in
| > their views imho
| >
| > The world as God created it is no more. This system of the world is
| > corrupted. The virsus, the germs, all the bad stuff and all the evil was
NOT
| > part of the original design.
| >
| >
| > | > |
| > | > | How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows
everything?
| > | > | Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.
| > | >
| > | > I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set
things in
| > | > motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is
fucked
| > up.
| > | > You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the
dinner
| > still
| > | > nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor,
no it
| > | > waas not a nice dinner.
| > | >
| > | > It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.
| > |
| > | So if God made the physical world and set things in motion, God
created
| > | viruses and the mechanism for them to evolve to infect other
organisms.
| > | If God did not make parasites, God made it possible for parasites to
| > | exist. God made it possible for diseases to spread, God made it
| > | possible for humans to murder humans in ghastly ways, even gave them
the
| > | theology to do it.
| > |
| > | It's like you didn't make the guy trip over your foot, you just made
it
| > | available for him to do so. That's your deity.
| >
| >
| > "Then Michael, Gabriel, Suriel, and Uriel looked down from heaven, and
saw
| > the wickedness which ´Azâz´êl had done in the world"
| > http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bct/bct05.htm
| >
| >
| >
| > | > | We'll just have to disagree on that one.
| > | >
| > | > You think something came from nothing?
| > |
| > | I think that things came from other things. Some things, such as the
| > | ylem, are imponderable. But you Christians always have to have an
| > | answer, even if its wrong. You cannot accept not knowing something or
| > | uncertain knowledge. It gets in the way of your spiritual path. You
| > | made your own stumbling block.
| >
| >
| > Sure i am uncertain, and i would like to have some physical proof that
God
| > exists beyond my personal experiences which are spirtual in nature. But
i
| > accept my uncertain knowledge that God exists on the way of down my
| > spiritual path.There are times when i am 100% sure God exists, and there
are
| > times i want to throw my hands up and say no way. Especially when i hear
all
| > the terrible stories in the news, or when i have personal tradegy in my
| > life.
|
| That's because your faith is weak. If if weren't you wouldn't have to
| say those things.
No at all. I am simply human, and as a human, i will have doubts from time
to time
| >
| > And i know there are others like me.
|
| Indeed. Many of them become fanatics to compensate.
I agree. And this sad fact has turned so many off to God.
The bible old testiment warns these types of zealots that if they teach the
people wrong that there judgement is going to be quite harsh.
|
| >
| > During the conversation with Jesus the father makes a tearful, plea to
| > Jesus: "Lord, Help My Unbelief!" (Mk. 9:24)
| >
| > Just like the father of the little boy wanted help with his unbelief
when
| > his son was dying --because unbelief and doubt affects everyone. That is
| > part of the plan in the destruction of Gods works. To cause us pain and
| > doubt, to lie and murder the children of God.
|
| Your god does that? That's sick.
No,of course not, that is Azâz´êl plan against God's creation.
| >
| >> | And you might benefit from learning about the Kabbalistic idea of
| >> tzimtzum.
| >
| > I read some of it.
| >
| > I perfer to argue in favor of the existance of God, and that there is
some
| > truth to the Torah.
| > Because while primitave, I believe in the Torah for the great
information in
| > it, eventhough it may have some errors. But lets face it, nothing is
| > perefect.
| >
| > The Torah has some uncanny and insightful information like healthy
foods,
| > clean sexual practices, removing mold in a building, social skills, how
to
| > deal with criminals, how to raise a family and on and on and on.
|
| And like virtually all non-Jews you ignore the ethical teachings.
Nope. I simply did not mention in the other post. The ethical teachings are
just as good as the laws. The moral teachings are just as important as the
laws. The book itself has some of the best information for living life with
value.
| > Many laws that man has made has origins from the Torah. Science has just
| > this century admitted that eating pork is bad for you. The Torah is
chocked
| > full of useful information when you filter out the primitive
explanations
| > and get to the real meaning.
|
| Pork is like coffee - sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad. Ditto
| wine. Shrimp OTOH is always good by Christianity and Islam, but not
| Judaism.
Anykind of shellfish is bad:
Leviticus 11:9-12 states that all salt- and fresh-water fish may be eaten as
long as they have "fins and scales." However, all shellfish, squid, frogs,
octopi, etc. are identified as unclean for human consumption.I guess because
they are bottom feeders. Swine are trash eaters also, and they do not have
sweat glands to remove toxins from the body.
Now, ---There is a passage in the new testiment that man has twisted into
making all foods acceptable.But its original meaning regarding food was a
metaphor imho. So perhaps that is why some christians allow shrimp, etc.
| And the JWs misinterpret the prohibition against "drinking blood,"
| forbidding transfusions. That's primitive IMO.
Perhaps. I am not an JW, so i cannot say. What does jewish faith say about
consuming blood?
I have read "Life is in the blood" and we should not eat it or meat where
the animal has been strangled in the bible. When a hunter cleans an animal
it is usually hung upside down and they "bleed" it before cooking.
.
User: "cactus"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 03 Feb 2008 10:54:44 PM
adman wrote:

"cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
news:Iwnpj.54143$Pv2.49589@newssvr23.news.prodigy.net...
| adman wrote:
| > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > news:I0dpj.9142$Ej5.5449@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
| > | adman wrote:
| > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:kA8pj.5534$Ch6.2849@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:11Moj.5158$J41.2322@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
| > | > | > | adman wrote:
| > | > | > | > "cactus" <cactus@nonespam.com> wrote in message
| > | > |snip>
| > | >
| > | > | > | >
| > | > | > | > Of course, he made everything for his pleasure
| > | > | > |
| > | > | > | I have no idea. A deity that takes pleasure in the
depredations of
| > the
| > | > | > | AIDS virus or the way Alzheimer's wrecks humans is not my idea
of
| > a
| > | > | > | deity I would like.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > I struggle with these issues also. I could not understand why
God
| > would
| > | > | > allow such things to exist. Then as i read more and more from
many
| > | > sources
| > | > | > and cultures, i realized that everything around us is governed
by
| > | > physical
| > | > | > laws. God made (imho) a physical world for us, not a spirtual
one.
| > In a
| > | > | > physical world we cannot have a left with out a right, a top
without
| > a
| > | > | > bottom. We can not understand what darkness is unless we can
also
| > see
| > | > and
| > | > | > understand light. So while it may seem cruel, inorder for us to
| > exist
| > | > and
| > | > | > have a life at all, we got to accept the good, and we also have
to
| > | > accept
| > | > | > the have bad.
| > | > |
| > | > | Fine as far as it goes, but you believe that your god created
| > | > | everything. That means your god was responsible for things we
regard
| > as
| > | > | evil, or just plain bad. Sort of conflicts with the notion of a
| > "good"
| > | > | god, doesn't it?
| > | >
| > | > God did not create evil. Man OTOH has plenty of evil.
| > |
| > | If God created everything, God created evil. If God did not create
evil,
| > | God did not create everything, which means someone or something else
| > | did. That idea limits God, which from the Jewish perspective is
pagan.
| >
| > That kind of logic will have your mind running in circles looking for
| > anything to stop it or point a finger to; which in this case you point
to
| > God.
| > Man created transportation, therefore man created car wrecks.If man did
not
| > create car wrecks, then man did not create cars or transportation, which
| > means someone else created cars and transportation.That idea limits man.
| >
| > As far as the jewish perspective:they have always been a bit extreme in
| > their views imho
| >
| > The world as God created it is no more. This system of the world is
| > corrupted. The virsus, the germs, all the bad stuff and all the evil was
NOT
| > part of the original design.
| >
| >
| > | > |
| > | > | How can you say that, when your deity is perfect and knows
everything?
| > | > | Such a deity does not make mistakes. Everything is as intended.
| > | >
| > | > I do not think you get it. God made the physical realm and set
things in
| > | > motion. It was then corruped. Once something is fucked up, it is
fucked
| > up.
| > | > You make a nice dinner, someone throws it on the floor. Was the
dinner
| > still
| > | > nice? Before it hit the floor, yes it was. After it hit the floor,
no it
| > | > waas not a nice dinner.
| > | >
| > | > It is really not God's fault we fucked everything up.
| > |
| > | So if God made the physical world and set things in motion, God
created
| > | viruses and the mechanism for them to evolve to infect other
organisms.
| > | If God did not make parasites, God made it possible for parasites to
| > | exist. God made it possible for diseases to spread, God made it
| > | possible for humans to murder humans in ghastly ways, even gave them
the
| > | theology to do it.
| > |
| > | It's like you didn't make the guy trip over your foot, you just made
it
| > | available for him to do so. That's your deity.
| >
| >
| > "Then Michael, Gabriel, Suriel, and Uriel looked down from heaven, and
saw
| > the wickedness which ´Azâz´êl had done in the world"
| > http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/bct/bct05.htm
| >
| >
| >
| > | > | We'll just have to disagree on that one.
| > | >
| > | > You think something came from nothing?
| > |
| > | I think that things came from other things. Some things, such as the
| > | ylem, are imponderable. But you Christians always have to have an
| > | answer, even if its wrong. You cannot accept not knowing something or
| > | uncertain knowledge. It gets in the way of your spiritual path. You
| > | made your own stumbling block.
| >
| >
| > Sure i am uncertain, and i would like to have some physical proof that
God
| > exists beyond my personal experiences which are spirtual in nature. But
i
| > accept my uncertain knowledge that God exists on the way of down my
| > spiritual path.There are times when i am 100% sure God exists, and there
are
| > times i want to throw my hands up and say no way. Especially when i hear
all
| > the terrible stories in the news, or when i have personal tradegy in my
| > life.
|
| That's because your faith is weak. If if weren't you wouldn't have to
| say those things.

No at all. I am simply human, and as a human, i will have doubts from time
to time
| >
| > And i know there are others like me.
|
| Indeed. Many of them become fanatics to compensate.

I agree. And this sad fact has turned so many off to God.
The bible old testiment warns these types of zealots that if they teach the
people wrong that there judgement is going to be quite harsh.

|
| >
| > During the conversation with Jesus the father makes a tearful, plea to
| > Jesus: "Lord, Help My Unbelief!" (Mk. 9:24)
| >
| > Just like the father of the little boy wanted help with his unbelief
when
| > his son was dying --because unbelief and doubt affects everyone. That is
| > part of the plan in the destruction of Gods works. To cause us pain and
| > doubt, to lie and murder the children of God.
|
| Your god does that? That's sick.

No,of course not, that is Azâz´êl plan against God's creation.


| >
| >> | And you might benefit from learning about the Kabbalistic idea of
| >> tzimtzum.
| >
| > I read some of it.
| >
| > I perfer to argue in favor of the existance of God, and that there is
some
| > truth to the Torah.
| > Because while primitave, I believe in the Torah for the great
information in
| > it, eventhough it may have some errors. But lets face it, nothing is
| > perefect.
| >
| > The Torah has some uncanny and insightful information like healthy
foods,
| > clean sexual practices, removing mold in a building, social skills, how
to
| > deal with criminals, how to raise a family and on and on and on.
|
| And like virtually all non-Jews you ignore the ethical teachings.

Nope. I simply did not mention in the other post. The ethical teachings are
just as good as the laws. The moral teachings are just as important as the
laws. The book itself has some of the best information for living life with
value.

| > Many laws that man has made has origins from the Torah. Science has just
| > this century admitted that eating pork is bad for you. The Torah is
chocked
| > full of useful information when you filter out the primitive
explanations
| > and get to the real meaning.
|
| Pork is like coffee - sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad. Ditto
| wine. Shrimp OTOH is always good by Christianity and Islam, but not
| Judaism.

Anykind of shellfish is bad:
Leviticus 11:9-12 states that all salt- and fresh-water fish may be eaten as
long as they have "fins and scales." However, all shellfish, squid, frogs,
octopi, etc. are identified as unclean for human consumption.I guess because
they are bottom feeders. Swine are trash eaters also, and they do not have
sweat glands to remove toxins from the body.

Who knows why? All we can do is speculate.


Now, ---There is a passage in the new testiment that man has twisted into
making all foods acceptable.But its original meaning regarding food was a
metaphor imho. So perhaps that is why some christians allow shrimp, etc.

Christians abrogated the Covenant. They are therefore not subject to the
mitzvot. They can eat what they want, prepared in whatever way they
want. They can also engage in any sexual practices they choose. They
abrogated the Covenant, so they are not bound by it.

| And the JWs misinterpret the prohibition against "drinking blood,"
| forbidding transfusions. That's primitive IMO.

Perhaps. I am not an JW, so i cannot say. What does jewish faith say about
consuming blood?

It prohibits drinking blood. Judaism does not regard transfusions as
drinking blood.

I have read "Life is in the blood" and we should not eat it or meat where
the animal has been strangled in the bible. When a hunter cleans an animal
it is usually hung upside down and they "bleed" it before cooking.





.
</
User: "monkie"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 04 Feb 2008 04:55:26 PM
<snip>


| > Many laws that man has made has origins from the Torah. Science has just
| > this century admitted that eating pork is bad for you. The Torah is chocked
| > full of useful information when you filter out the primitive explanations
| > and get to the real meaning.
|
| Pork is like coffee - sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad. Ditto
| wine. Shrimp OTOH is always good by Christianity and Islam, but not
| Judaism.

Anykind of shellfish is bad:
Leviticus 11:9-12 states that all salt- and fresh-water fish may be eaten as
long as they have "fins and scales." However, all shellfish, squid, frogs,
octopi, etc. are identified as unclean for human consumption.I guess because
they are bottom feeders. Swine are trash eaters also, and they do not have
sweat glands to remove toxins from the body.

Trash eating swine is inconsistent. Goats are notorious trash eaters.
The liver is responsible for removing toxins from the body and I fail
to see what "trash" existed such that observable "toxins" existed in
levels sufficient to threaten "bible-man".


Who knows why? All we can do is speculate.


Now, ---There is a passage in the new testiment that man has twisted into
making all foods acceptable.But its original meaning regarding food was a
metaphor imho. So perhaps that is why some christians allow shrimp, etc.

There are many theories about pork taboo -- trichinosis, that pigs
were devine or totems, uncleanliness, similarity to human flesh,
social distinction and function, even "words from god about pork".
Such theories all create inconsistencies. Cattle, sheep, goats and
chicken were also domesticated, worshipped, diseased, unclean, but
most importantly these animals were "farmed" successfully.
Since both the Bible and Koran condem the pig, it is thought that pig
farming was a threat to the cultural and natural ecosystem of the
Middle East. In other words, raising pigs as a "way of life" was a
poor choice for survival, sort of like committing family suicide.
How is the claim of a threat established? Simple. Exposed to direct
sunlight and high temperature a pig dies quickly, at temperatures
below 100 degrees F. Thus temperatures below the average in the
Jordan Valley will kill a pig, easily and quickly. And there is lots
of sunlight in the region. If for some reason a family had to move
suddenly in nomadic lifestyle, the pigs would die where other animals
would survive.
Pigs compensate for their lack of sweat glands by dampening their skin
in external moisture. In it's natural environment a pig will wallow
in fresh and clean mud but removed from it's natural environment it
will be forced to wallow in it's own excrement in order to survive.
Pigs farms in moderate climates show pigs are clean and always
defecate away from where they sleep, never wallow in their own
excrement. Pig farms in hot climates show pigs become confused and
defecate all over the place, will wallow in their own excrement.
The trichinosis parasite is not related to climate. It is common in
colder climates where no pig taboo exists. All that is required is
proper cooking, as with any meat.
It is not that pigs are dirty or unclean, it is that the Middle East
made pigs sick and killed them too easily. Perhaps people feared
eating sick animals or animals that appeared to die inexplicably (from
exposure). Raising pigs in the Middle East was a sure path to poverty
and starvation. No wonder it became taboo wrapped up in tradition
and religious belief.
<snip>
.
User: "M.M. Martinson"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 04 Feb 2008 04:14:20 PM
"monkie" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:47a7632f.5924895@localhost...


Trash eating swine is inconsistent. Goats are notorious trash eaters.

<brevity snips>
We raised dairy goats for years. They are browsers like deer and do not eat
trash. They eat broad leafed plants such as the lower leaves on trees and
all kinds of bushes and brush. Only starving goats or one with mineral or
vitamin deficiency would eat trash.
.
User: "monkie"

Title: Re: Why Science Is Wrong 05 Feb 2008 10:38:08 AM
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:14:20 -0600, "M.M. Martinson"
<mmm954@invalid.com> wrote:


"monkie" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:47a7632f.5924895@localhost...


Trash eating swine is inconsistent. Goats are notorious trash eaters.


<brevity snips>

We raised dairy goats for years. They are browsers like deer and do not eat
trash. They eat broad leafed plants such as the lower leaves on trees and
all kinds of bushes and brush. Only starving goats or one with mineral or
vitamin deficiency would eat trash.

Then notorious is indeed a mischaracterization of their behavior.
Thanks for the correction.
.