Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life



 Religions > Atheism > Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Budikka666"
Date: 29 Aug 2007 04:59:28 PM
Object: Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life
www.sciencedaily.com/ posted this back in mid-August and it's already
been addressed in a thread on a.a., but it's so worthy of mention that
I'm including it in this series:
http://tinyurl.com/23v2c4
"Now, an international team has discovered that under the right
conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organised into
helical structures. These structures can then interact with each other
in ways that are usually associated with organic compounds and life
itself."
The article goes on to say: "Quite bizarrely, not only do these
helical strands interact in a counterintuitive way in which like can
attract like, but they also undergo changes that are normally
associated with biological molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say
the researchers. They can, for instance, divide, or bifurcate, to form
two copies of the original structure. These new structures can also
interact to induce changes in their neighbours and they can even
evolve into yet more structures as less stable ones break down,
leaving behind only the fittest structures in the plasma.
"So, could helical clusters formed from interstellar dust be
somehow alive? 'These complex, self-organized plasma structures
exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for
inorganic living matter,' says Tsytovich, 'they are autonomous, they
reproduce and they evolve.'"
If dust can do this all by itself, where's the basis for claiming that
organic chemistry cannot? Or does some god have his little fingers in
there, tweaking and herding these particles?
Nope, it's all undirected, unplanned, unintelligent. Just like
evolution.
Budikka
.

User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life 29 Aug 2007 06:06:53 PM
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:59:28 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:

www.sciencedaily.com/ posted this back in mid-August and it's already
been addressed in a thread on a.a., but it's so worthy of mention that
I'm including it in this series:
http://tinyurl.com/23v2c4
"Now, an international team has discovered that under the right
conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organised into
helical structures. These structures can then interact with each other
in ways that are usually associated with organic compounds and life
itself."
The article goes on to say: "Quite bizarrely, not only do these
helical strands interact in a counterintuitive way in which like can
attract like, but they also undergo changes that are normally
associated with biological molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say
the researchers. They can, for instance, divide, or bifurcate, to form
two copies of the original structure. These new structures can also
interact to induce changes in their neighbours and they can even
evolve into yet more structures as less stable ones break down,
leaving behind only the fittest structures in the plasma.
"So, could helical clusters formed from interstellar dust be
somehow alive? 'These complex, self-organized plasma structures
exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for
inorganic living matter,' says Tsytovich, 'they are autonomous, they
reproduce and they evolve.'"

If dust can do this all by itself, where's the basis for claiming that
organic chemistry cannot? Or does some god have his little fingers in
there, tweaking and herding these particles?

Nope, it's all undirected, unplanned, unintelligent. Just like
evolution.

Budikka

Except that this is only a laboratory hypothesis at the moment.
No such structures have been found 'out there', if you read the papers
carefully.
.
User: "Budikka666"

Title: Re: Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life 30 Aug 2007 05:45:39 PM
On Aug 29, 6:06 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:59:28 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:



www.sciencedaily.com/posted this back in mid-August and it's already
been addressed in a thread on a.a., but it's so worthy of mention that
I'm including it in this series:
http://tinyurl.com/23v2c4
"Now, an international team has discovered that under the right
conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organised into
helical structures. These structures can then interact with each other
in ways that are usually associated with organic compounds and life
itself."
The article goes on to say: "Quite bizarrely, not only do these
helical strands interact in a counterintuitive way in which like can
attract like, but they also undergo changes that are normally
associated with biological molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say
the researchers. They can, for instance, divide, or bifurcate, to form
two copies of the original structure. These new structures can also
interact to induce changes in their neighbours and they can even
evolve into yet more structures as less stable ones break down,
leaving behind only the fittest structures in the plasma.
"So, could helical clusters formed from interstellar dust be
somehow alive? 'These complex, self-organized plasma structures
exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for
inorganic living matter,' says Tsytovich, 'they are autonomous, they
reproduce and they evolve.'"


If dust can do this all by itself, where's the basis for claiming that
organic chemistry cannot? Or does some god have his little fingers in
there, tweaking and herding these particles?


Nope, it's all undirected, unplanned, unintelligent. Just like
evolution.


Budikka


Except that this is only a laboratory hypothesis at the moment.
No such structures have been found 'out there', if you read the papers
carefully.

I didn't say it had been found in nature, and I did read the
abstract. The point is that, aside from simply setting the initial
conditions (conditions which do exist in nature), no intelligence or
direction was involved, yet these structures did form.
Budikka
.
User: "Michael Gray"

Title: Re: Why There's No Design #159 - inorganic life 30 Aug 2007 07:54:52 PM
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:45:39 -0700, Budikka666 <budikka1@netscape.net>
wrote:

On Aug 29, 6:06 pm, Michael Gray <mikeg...@newsguy.com> wrote:

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:59:28 -0700, Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
wrote:



www.sciencedaily.com/posted this back in mid-August and it's already
been addressed in a thread on a.a., but it's so worthy of mention that
I'm including it in this series:
http://tinyurl.com/23v2c4
"Now, an international team has discovered that under the right
conditions, particles of inorganic dust can become organised into
helical structures. These structures can then interact with each other
in ways that are usually associated with organic compounds and life
itself."
The article goes on to say: "Quite bizarrely, not only do these
helical strands interact in a counterintuitive way in which like can
attract like, but they also undergo changes that are normally
associated with biological molecules, such as DNA and proteins, say
the researchers. They can, for instance, divide, or bifurcate, to form
two copies of the original structure. These new structures can also
interact to induce changes in their neighbours and they can even
evolve into yet more structures as less stable ones break down,
leaving behind only the fittest structures in the plasma.
"So, could helical clusters formed from interstellar dust be
somehow alive? 'These complex, self-organized plasma structures
exhibit all the necessary properties to qualify them as candidates for
inorganic living matter,' says Tsytovich, 'they are autonomous, they
reproduce and they evolve.'"


If dust can do this all by itself, where's the basis for claiming that
organic chemistry cannot? Or does some god have his little fingers in
there, tweaking and herding these particles?


Nope, it's all undirected, unplanned, unintelligent. Just like
evolution.


Budikka


Except that this is only a laboratory hypothesis at the moment.
No such structures have been found 'out there', if you read the papers
carefully.


I didn't say it had been found in nature, and I did read the

Apologies, I know that you did not say that, BUT:
My observation was directed toward the readers who may have gained the
mistaken impression, as seems to be very common after a cursory
reading.
Don't forget that we have many stupid creationists, and even more
ignorant Jehovah's Witlesses 'reading' these posts.
They need all the didactic assistance that they can get, and more.

abstract. The point is that, aside from simply setting the initial
conditions (conditions which do exist in nature), no intelligence or
direction was involved, yet these structures did form.

Quite.
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
PRETENDING THAT THERE IS A GOD WHO IS HELPING YOU WITH YOUR LIFE IS A WONDERFUL THING
In death there is life
IS PRETENDING THAT THERE IS A GOD A SYMPTOM OF A PROBLEM IN YOUR LIFE OR IS IT THE PROBLEM ITSELF?
Scientists make case that there could be life on Red Planet
THERE IS A BETTER LIFE!! MAKE $20 TO $50 THOUSAND DOLLARS IN LESS THAN 60 DAYS!!!
Was There Ever Any Atheist Leader Who Was Kind, Honest, Sober And Had A Stable Family Life?
-- Is there a teleological basis to cognition & phenomenon--life as we know it Jim?
Re: Hello is there intelligent life out there!!!!!
Are There Any Pro-Life Atheists?
Army Chief says, 'There is life after death'
There's life on the edge
Why There's No Design #110 - How Could Life Arise From Dead Chemicals?
Galileo's life shows there's always room for doubt
God explains how he put life into the waters and from there it would evolve. Science is baby steps, religion is baby speak
AA Estranged Senses - Ghosts of a Life Past
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER