Religions > Atheism > Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c, Kicking AWOLs Cocaine Snorting Ass" |
| Date: |
03 Oct 2005 09:37:01 PM |
| Object: |
Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec (aka aka Yang's little poltregeist *****)
The Bush 'balanced' budget: 1.6 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -1935 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:59:30 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:j9H0f.10263$q1.9595@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:CfudnfyPgt9koN7eRVn-sQ@comcast.com...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:a0H0f.10249$q1.1630@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:h7ydnUdPAMrPq97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:IYF0f.8636$QE1.2511@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:xZudneJF2bRvt97eRVn-jw@comcast.com...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:1VF0f.8633$QE1.2077@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:E82dnY7NP4Ght97enZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Mimi Cohen" <imnot@cox.net> wrote in message
news:OwF0f.2142$gj1.1706@fed1read05...
osprey wrote:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:c0F0f.8389$vw6.6302@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:YKGdncsmMaGTh97eRVn-rg@comcast.com...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:EfC0f.8219$vw6.201@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:2Dy0f.8035$vw6.2652@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:pdednVplTde9HN_eRVn-jw@comcast.com...
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in
message
news:5Km0f.8155$QE1.4924@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans
blocked far more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats
have blocked Bush's nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1,
but the Reps started crying bloody murder when it started
happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
I will, however, I would like you to review a question that I
asked you a couple or three weeks back concerning your claim
that your local population boomed while the membership of your
local BSA only grew 10%.
The question was, what would that mean to a reasonable person?
Once you have answered that question with intellectual
honesty, I will be happy to answer your question. Until then,
your question is as meaningless to me as had a two year old
asked it.
And we have a conspicuous silence from Osprey... Sounds of
crickets chirping..... LOL!
No, it's just that I am not going to entertain a child.
*****. You just are too childish to answer the question.
You're now a lying coward. Care to try again?
No, you can run along now. Other people did answer my question
so I have no need or use for you. If you want to argue like a
child, go to the nearest playground and argue with kids your own
age.
If you don't like my opinion in regards to the BSA, who cares?
You really ARE a loser!
Who asked you?
He's right though, you are a loser.
All because I don't support or agree with you...
Nope,t hat has nothing to do with it.
Yes it does,
Nope, you're wrong.
No, I am dead on.
Nope, you are dead off.
You are entitled to your opinion, it really doesn't matter to me one way or
the other.
It's because you can't debate on the
intellectual level of an adult.
Debate what?
Anything, apparently.
I am not going to get into petty or childish debates,
LOL! You can't even answer simple questions, much less expect to keep up
with adults in a debate. This is just your excuse for being a lying
coward.
Read above. As I told you before someone else answered the question I asked
of you.
and you call me the loser...
Yes, because it's quite true.
Says you
Truth is truth after all.
Try to learn it sometime.
I have. Shame that you never will.
It's a shame you think you have.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomInt3rn" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
05 Oct 2005 03:14:41 AM |
|
|
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Mimi Cohen" wrote...
osprey wrote:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"osprey" wrote...
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans
blocked far more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats
have blocked Bush's nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1,
but the Reps started crying bloody murder when it started
happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
I will, however, I would like you to review a question that I
asked you a couple or three weeks back concerning your claim
that your local population boomed while the membership of
your local BSA only grew 10%.
The question was, what would that mean to a reasonable
person? Once you have answered that question with
intellectual
honesty, I will be happy to answer your question. Until
then, your question is as meaningless to me as had a two year
old asked it.
And we have a conspicuous silence from Osprey... Sounds of
crickets chirping..... LOL!
No, it's just that I am not going to entertain a child.
*****. You just are too childish to answer the question.
You're now a lying coward. Care to try again?
No, you can run along now. Other people did answer my question
so I have no need or use for you. If you want to argue like a
child, go to the nearest playground and argue with kids your own
age.
If you don't like my opinion in regards to the BSA, who cares?
You really ARE a loser!
Who asked you?
He's right though, you are a loser.
All because I don't support or agree with you...
Nope,t hat has nothing to do with it.
Yes it does,
Nope, you're wrong.
No, I am dead on.
Nope, you are dead off.
You are entitled to your opinion, it really doesn't matter to me one way
or the other.
No, *you're* entitled to his opinion, and mine, and Barnes', and that of
everyone else inclined to take a swing at you. You aren't entitled to your
own, since you aren't informed enough to possess a valid opinion.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:20:52 PM |
|
|
In article <h7ydnUdPAMrPq97eRVn-oQ@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
And we have a conspicuous silence from Osprey... Sounds of
crickets chirping..... LOL!
No, it's just that I am not going to entertain a child.
*****. You just are too childish to answer the question. You're
now a lying coward. Care to try again?
No, you can run along now. Other people did answer my question so I
have no need or use for you. If you want to argue like a child, go
to the nearest playground and argue with kids your own age.
If you don't like my opinion in regards to the BSA, who cares?
You really ARE a loser!
Who asked you?
He's right though, you are a loser.
All because I don't support or agree with you...
Nope,t hat has nothing to do with it.
Yes it does,
Typical Osprey. He knows what you think. YOU don't know what you
think. What a world he must live in.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:17:05 PM |
|
|
In article <xZudneJF2bRvt97eRVn-jw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
No, you can run along now. Other people did answer my question so I
have no need or use for you. If you want to argue like a child, go to
the nearest playground and argue with kids your own age.
If you don't like my opinion in regards to the BSA, who cares?
You really ARE a loser!
Who asked you?
He's right though, you are a loser.
All because I don't support or agree with you...and you call me the loser...
People call you a loser because you are a loser.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joel" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 12:21:28 PM |
|
|
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
I will, however, I would like you to review a question that I asked you a
couple or three weeks back concerning your claim that your local population
boomed while the membership of your local BSA only grew 10%.
The question was, what would that mean to a reasonable person?
Roflmao.
--
Joel Crump
"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomIntern" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:33:04 AM |
|
|
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody
murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but it's
bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months ago, back
in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the GOP
senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his and his
staff's blunders.
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go abuse
a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 12:06:43 PM |
|
|
"The Secretary of HomIntern" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in message
news:Aow0f.91287$tl2.80701@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody
murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but
it's
bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months ago,
back
in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the
GOP
senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his and his
staff's blunders.
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go
abuse
a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Osprey has no right making any sort of demands on anyone, anywhere. He's a
mental child.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 10:03:34 AM |
|
|
"The Secretary of HomIntern" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in message
news:Aow0f.91287$tl2.80701@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody
murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but
it's
bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months ago,
back
in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the
GOP
senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his and his
staff's blunders.
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go
abuse
a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
Are you going to run again?
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joel" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 12:21:28 PM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
Are you going to run again?
You're as simple and dull as they come, aren't you? What a one trick
pony, deflecting any need to engage in actual discussion by presenting
these grandiose challenges to provide more (largely obvious or
extraneous) information. Keep jerking off about how you've somehow
won these freakin' Internet discussions by posing as some kind of
intellectual.
--
Joel Crump
"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomInt3rn" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 08:48:46 PM |
|
|
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"The Secretary of HomIntern" wrote...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but
it's bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months
ago, back in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the
GOP senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his and
his staff's blunders.
Nothing to say to this, eh?
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go
abuse a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
How should I know with what weapons prison guards are armed? I never got
specific, nor did I ever intend to. I'm *Canadian*, and not a prison guard.
My interest in all this is as an observer with close friends in the US.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:13:41 PM |
|
|
"The Secretary of HomInt3rn" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in message
news:2iG0f.98512$tl2.69690@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"The Secretary of HomIntern" wrote...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but
it's bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months
ago, back in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the
GOP senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his
and
his staff's blunders.
Nothing to say to this, eh?
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go
abuse a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional
officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
How should I know with what weapons prison guards are armed?
It was your claim, you said we are armed.
I never got
specific, nor did I ever intend to. I'm *Canadian*, and not a prison
guard.
My interest in all this is as an observer with close friends in the US.
So you are backing away from your claim...smart move.
You would have looked foolish because you don't know what you are talking
about.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:20:51 PM |
|
|
In article <FfidnWNSv_Hnq97eRVn-gA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The Secretary of HomInt3rn" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in message
news:2iG0f.98512$tl2.69690@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"The Secretary of HomIntern" wrote...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech), but
it's bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it months
ago, back in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think the
GOP senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his
and
his staff's blunders.
Nothing to say to this, eh?
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/. Go
abuse a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional
officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
How should I know with what weapons prison guards are armed?
It was your claim, you said we are armed.
They wouldn¹t dare arm you.
I never got
specific, nor did I ever intend to. I'm *Canadian*, and not a prison
guard.
My interest in all this is as an observer with close friends in the US.
So you are backing away from your claim...smart move.
You would have looked foolish because you don't know what you are talking
about.
He seems to know far more than you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:28:04 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051920514521%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <FfidnWNSv_Hnq97eRVn-gA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The Secretary of HomInt3rn" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in
message
news:2iG0f.98512$tl2.69690@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"The Secretary of HomIntern" wrote...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked
far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech),
but
it's bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it
months
ago, back in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a
GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think
the
GOP senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his
and
his staff's blunders.
Nothing to say to this, eh?
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up
your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/.
Go
abuse a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional
officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers
are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
How should I know with what weapons prison guards are armed?
It was your claim, you said we are armed.
They wouldn¹t dare arm you.
Really? Then why is it during court and trans, tower duty, or outside I am
armed?
Explain that.
I never got
specific, nor did I ever intend to. I'm *Canadian*, and not a prison
guard.
My interest in all this is as an observer with close friends in the US.
So you are backing away from your claim...smart move.
You would have looked foolish because you don't know what you are talking
about.
He seems to know far more than you.
No, not even close. Oh, and before you make a fool out of yourself, you
don't know yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 11:33:57 PM |
|
|
In article <M5OdnTW4YL5KpN7eRVn-tA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051920514521%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <FfidnWNSv_Hnq97eRVn-gA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"The Secretary of HomInt3rn" <ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote in
message
news:2iG0f.98512$tl2.69690@pd7tw3no...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"The Secretary of HomIntern" wrote...
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The
Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to osprey:
"Andrealphus" wrote...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****" wrote...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked
far
more of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's
nominees, on the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying
bloody murder when it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
There _is_ a page listing them somewhere (in the form of a speech),
but
it's bloody long, and I don't recall how to find it -- I saw it
months
ago, back in May or June...
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
However, that's not the funny bit. The funny bit is this time it's a
GOP
president nominating people the Republican Party doesn't like to the
Supreme Court of the US. That's just fucking hilarious. You'd think
the
GOP senators would realise their Fuehrer is trying to make up for his
and
his staff's blunders.
Nothing to say to this, eh?
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up
your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
Oh, *YOU*, Osprey, have _no_ call making such a demand on /anyone/.
Go
abuse a prisoner, whydon'tcha? I'm sure that's more your speed.
Oh yea, speaking of that..you made some claims about correctional
officers
being armed. When I asked you to tell me what Correctional Officers
are
armed with, you got silent and was unable to support your claim.
How should I know with what weapons prison guards are armed?
It was your claim, you said we are armed.
They wouldn¹t dare arm you.
Really?
Yeah - really.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Adam H." |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:08:39 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:20:32 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Andrealphus" <NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
news:5Km0f.8155$QE1.4924@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far more
of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's nominees, on
the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody murder when
it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
This is a game BOTH parties play, and Democrats cry just as loud as
Republicans so don't pretend like it doesn't happen.
Regardless, I would like for you to provide something to back up your
statement about Republicans blocking more than Clinton's nominees.
The Republican-controlled Senate blocked 60 of Clinton's nominees from
even receiving a hearing.
http://mediamatters.org/items/200502180004
As of the time of that article's writing, February 2005, Democrats had
blocked only 10 of Bush's nominees, out of 229. The Senate has also
changed the rules regarding 'blue slips' since Bush became president,
making it harder to a Democrat to block a Bush nomination than it used
to be for a Republican to block one of Clinton's.
More:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/25/opinion/main683182.shtml
http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=1262
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 12:27:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:20:32 -0400, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far more
of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's nominees, on
the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody murder when
it started happening to them.
Can you provide the names of those the Republicans blocked?
You could start with the first filibuster of a Supreme Court Justice -
the GOP filibuster of Abe Fortas.
----------------
"Should any political party attempt to abolish
social security, unemployment insurance, and
eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would
not hear of that party again in our political
history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course,
that believes you can do these things. Among them
are [a] few other Texas oil millionaires, and an
occasional politician or business man from other
areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
- President Dwight D. Eisenhower, 11/8/54
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
05 Oct 2005 08:06:44 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:33:21 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far more
of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's nominees, on
the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody murder when it
started happening to them.
BushCo-a bunch of pussies.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
05 Oct 2005 08:19:05 PM |
|
|
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:l4u8k156prds3eqi43m4mcg58eg23qhfeo@4ax.com...
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:33:21 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far more
of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's nominees, on
the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody murder when
it
started happening to them.
BushCo-a bunch of pussies.
Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
06 Oct 2005 07:53:49 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 01:19:05 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message
news:l4u8k156prds3eqi43m4mcg58eg23qhfeo@4ax.com...
On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 03:33:21 GMT, "Andrealphus"
<NOREALEMAIL2@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
That only applies to someone they like. The Republicans blocked far more
of Clinton's nominees, than the Democrats have blocked Bush's nominees, on
the order of like 5 to 1, but the Reps started crying bloody murder when
it
started happening to them.
BushCo-a bunch of pussies.
Sure seems that way, doesn't it?
No seems about it. The avoidance of active military service during a
time of draftee armies demonstrates that nicely.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president
represents, more and more closely, the inner soul
of the people. On some great and glorious day the
plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned
by a downright moron." --- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
Religion is the original war crime.
-Michelle Malkin (Feb 26, 2005)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robin" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
03 Oct 2005 10:36:53 PM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that Bush has
left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly towards an
energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom times does
not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear from the
drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of the
American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate someone for
to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al Gore in
1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking about
Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized Bush was
just stringing them along.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No One" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
03 Oct 2005 11:06:04 PM |
|
|
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> writes:
<snip>
Let him [Bush] bend over and take in the rear from the drug
industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of the
American tax payer; not a whimper from them [the far right].
<snip>
This is unfair to Bush. :-) He is not "taking it the rear" from any of
these groups. He's on the golf course while the American public is
"taking it in the rear" from all of the above and more. And even
worse, they are "taking it in the rear" figuratively rather than
literally (nobody enjoys the former, while people who try the latter
speak favorably of it, no matter what everyone else may think).
<Ducking for cover>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joel" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
03 Oct 2005 11:45:59 PM |
|
|
No One <noone@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote:
And even
worse, they are "taking it in the rear" figuratively rather than
literally (nobody enjoys the former, while people who try the latter
speak favorably of it, no matter what everyone else may think).
So, so very true.
--
Joel Crump
"Of course, it is ironic that a media company [Fox News Channel] that
should be seeking to protect the First Amendment is seeking to
undermine it by claiming a monopoly on the phrase 'fair and balanced.'"
- Judge Denny Chin, referring to Fox News accusing Al Franken of
trademark infringement.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
03 Oct 2005 10:55:24 PM |
|
|
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pNm0f.390329$x96.39474@attbi_s72...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom times
does not bother them one iota..
It shouldn't. They're making sure they're so rich that they never feel it.
Not like the rest of us.
--
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
http://www.ashenempires.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 08:21:20 AM |
|
|
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pNm0f.390329$x96.39474@attbi_s72...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peacenik" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 11:08:55 AM |
|
|
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:kuydndII1p7NHN_eRVn-3w@comcast.com...
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pNm0f.390329$x96.39474@attbi_s72...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom. If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 02:51:13 PM |
|
|
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dhu9em$f3j$1@news.seed.net.tw...
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:kuydndII1p7NHN_eRVn-3w@comcast.com...
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:pNm0f.390329$x96.39474@attbi_s72...
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that
Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in
his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear
from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom. If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
No thanks, I would rather vote for the person and not the party. If you
wish to vote blindly, that's your choice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:17:04 PM |
|
|
In article <Bs-dnbc_HqZUQd_eRVn-iw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that
Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in
his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear
from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom. If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
No thanks, I would rather vote for the person and not the party. If you
wish to vote blindly, that's your choice.
Osprey heard that comment once and thought is sounded "smart" so he
repeats it every chance he gets.
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 09:26:29 PM |
|
|
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051917040895%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <Bs-dnbc_HqZUQd_eRVn-iw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that
Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in
his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear
from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense
of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter
talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and
realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom.
If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
No thanks, I would rather vote for the person and not the party. If you
wish to vote blindly, that's your choice.
Osprey heard that comment once and thought is sounded "smart" so he
repeats it every chance he gets.
Because it's true, I will vote for the person I think is best no matter WHAT
party he or she belongs to. Unlike YOU, I don't let "party" decide my vote.
That truly bothers you, it should. Because you are part of the problem in
this country. It's almost as bad as not voting at all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David W. Barnes" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 11:33:57 PM |
|
|
In article <M5OdnTq4YL5LpN7eRVn-tA@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:041020051917040895%dbarnes@aol.com...
In article <Bs-dnbc_HqZUQd_eRVn-iw@comcast.com>, osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that
Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in
his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear
from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense
of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter
talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and
realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom.
If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
No thanks, I would rather vote for the person and not the party. If you
wish to vote blindly, that's your choice.
Osprey heard that comment once and thought is sounded "smart" so he
repeats it every chance he gets.
Because it's true,
No it isn't *****. But keep saying it. I love that your vote
doesn't impact anything.
I will vote for the person I think is best no matter WHAT
party he or she belongs to.
And as long as they are Republican.
Unlike YOU, I don't let "party" decide my vote.
Right - you'd rather vote in a haphazard way. Vote small. No use
voting for a platform when you can vote for some individual who you
like the looks of.
That truly bothers you, it should.
The ONLY thing that bother me about you is that you are an American.
Because you are part of the problem in
this country. It's almost as bad as not voting at all.
From the independent that does nothing but bash Democrats.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Wingnuts Threatens Filibuster Against Bush's Gay Friendly SCOTUS Nominee (GOP, The Party of Hypocrisy) |
04 Oct 2005 08:50:55 PM |
|
|
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
"Peacenik" <cnelsonpublic@hotmail.com> wrote in message
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
"Robin" <robinandtami@hotmail.nospam.com> wrote in message
"Yang, AthD (h.c), Kicking AWOL's Cocaine Snorting *****"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:6eq3k1pr7033beo2ko6eiadlg823l6672m@4ax.com...
What ever happened to a straight up-or-down vote?
You gotta love the complete idiocy of the far right. The fact that
Bush
has left us with the largest deficit in history as we head rapidly
towards
an energy recession that will make the 70's recession look like boom
times
does not bother them one iota.. Let him allow rampant corruption in
his
administration, no problem. Let him bend over and take in the rear
from
the drug industry, the oil industry, Halliburtion all at the expense of
the American tax payer; not a whimper from them. Let him nominate
someone
for to the Supreme Court that had the audacity to donate $1000 to Al
Gore
in 1988, and suddenly when they are more rabid than Ann Coulter talking
about Michael Moore. I guess it's about time they woke up and realized
Bush was just stringing them along.
Doom and gloom, is that all you liberals know how to talk about?
Get ready to say President Guilliani
When Republicans are in charge, the only possibility is gloom and doom. If
you want a better future, vote Democrat.
No thanks, I would rather vote for the person and not the party.
Which is why you voted for anti-abortion, pro-war, big government Bush.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
